• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Cheating- WWYD

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cheating- WWYD

    At a show this past weekend and was walking on foot near a warm up ring. A friend (an amateur who rides with a different trainer) was on her horse in the warmup ring waiting for trainer. Friend (or show acquaintance, more like) was on a jumper. One strap on horse's boot was coming undone and she asked me to stop and fix it. I did, and was about to take horse's entire boot off to reposition before fixing strap when she goes "NO! Don't take it off! There are plastic chips in there! Just fix the strap!". Clearly, this is not allowed. She whispered it to me and then laughed, and was clearly not expecting me to have a problem with it. I was pretty floored. Had never thought this woman a cheater before.
    Personally, I was disgusted and my opinion of this woman and her trainer fell exponentially. I did not know what to do though. Is it my place to get involved and say something to the steward? Have been in a similar situation to this last year- someone I know confessed at the ingate that her A/A hunter secretly had a studded noseband on. Both times this happened at an A rated show, but not a huge one like Devon, Wellington Indoors etc. Also not in the huge divisions- the boots on a Low AO jumper and the noseband on an A/A hunter. This cheating disgusts me, but these are also friends of mine. Is it my place to get involved? Is this kind of cheating commonplace and I just never knew about it? I would NEVER do this to my horses and am a little revolted.
    So, COTH, in these situations or similar ones- what would you do? What is the responsibility of the third party who finds out about it?
    Thought this would be an interesting discussion (is it really so prevalent?), and I'd appreciate the advice. TIA

  • #2
    I would have reported it to the stewards immediately.

    ANd yes it is "your place". If not yours, then whose? We all have a responsibility to the animals we ride, and this kind of crap happens because people don't speak up.
    "Perhaps the final test of anybody's love of dogs is their willingness to permit them to make a camping ground of the bed" -Henry T. Merwin

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by ConcernedAlter1 View Post
      Both times this happened at an A rated show, but not a huge one like Devon, Wellington Indoors etc. Also not in the huge divisions- the boots on a Low AO jumper and the noseband on an A/A hunter.
      Stop trying to justify it and report it. The division and rating doesn't matter. These "friends" clearly have questionable ethics and you could be the one who had helped their horse.

      Comment


      • #4
        This is going to sound really harsh, but hopefully, you will read it and consider it seriously:

        You basically just perpetuated animal abuse. Of COURSE it is your responsibility to go to the steward. By not doing so, you've just made it possible for this rider and her "trainer" to continue abusing this poor horse. That's really all there is to it.

        ETA- Tack nosebands are not illegal.
        Here today, gone tomorrow...

        Comment


        • #5
          Yes, you should have reported the boots. I'm not sure the noseband is illegal, though.

          Comment


          • #6
            The noseband is common among exhibitors and is not subject to examinination by judges as it could be under AQHA rules.
            The rule applies to what a judge can "see" as unconventional. That is why bridles are not dropped to inspect bits and nosebands at the back gate . Different disciplines have different rules , it is up to the exhibitor to learn and abide by them.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jaegermonster View Post
              I would have reported it to the stewards immediately.

              ANd yes it is "your place". If not yours, then whose? We all have a responsibility to the animals we ride, and this kind of crap happens because people don't speak up.
              Bravo... I agree 100%, if no one says anything, who speaks for the horses... who cannot speak for themselves?
              Last edited by Platinum Equestrian; Apr. 12, 2011, 10:22 PM.
              Platinum Equestrian - Florida, USA

              Comment


              • #8
                Did you see the chips? Could she have been joking, a joke that certainly fell flat but nonetheless meant as a joke? Maybe she was in a hurry and didn't want to take the time for you to take the boot off, and was trying to make a bad joke about the McLain Ward scandal from a few years back.

                I would have take the boot off just to see, honestly! But I don't have much patience for cheaters and you need proof to take it to a steward. Easier to prove if you have chip in hand. I'd be leading the horse to the steward with the other boot still on if I found a chip, if no chip I'd play dumb and say the boot was too crooked, and think she just had a bad sense of humor.

                Comment


                • #9
                  There is a similar thread over on the eventing forum. But there it was a competitor who was entered in a division she was overqualified for.

                  Consensus there was that the rules were made to create an equal playing field and it was the responsibility of each person who knew of clear, provable violations to bring it to the proper authorities, hopefully before the problem became a cause for elimination.

                  Had it been me, I would have looked the girl square in the eye (thinking, "you stupid twat -- don't you know what you just said? I'm nominating you for the Darwin Awards immediately.") and say (out loud), "You DO realize that it is highly illegal to have foreign substances in your horse's boots, right? I guess you do since you told me not to take them off. You also should realize that, if you walk into the ring with those boots on, I will have no choice but to talk to the Steward and you will be eliminated and written up and fined, and so will your trainer."

                  "Now, it's your choice which you will do."

                  THAT SAID, since you did not stop the infraction before it occurred, there is no point in saying anything to a steward now. But I would try to find a way to let the girl know that you have been in a moral quandry about how to handle the situation.

                  She needs to keep looking behind her, worrying when a steward will show up.

                  God, I hate cheaters!
                  "He lives in a cocoon of solipsism"

                  Charles Krauthammer speaking about Trump

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Not to be dumb, but does a plastic chip do?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Rel6 View Post
                      Stop trying to justify it and report it. The division and rating doesn't matter. These "friends" clearly have questionable ethics and you could be the one who had helped their horse.
                      Pardon me, I should have been clearer. I clarified what type of show it was to make sure that everyone was aware that it was a USEF rated show (where there would have been a steward), and not a schooling show or such where there would have been less regulation. Was not trying to justify it by saying "oh, it's not Wellington so it's OK". Simply trying to explain that it was not a backyard event where USEF rules did not apply and there was no one to enforce them. I am sorry, I should have been clearer in my original post.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 3 is the limit View Post
                        Not to be dumb, but does a plastic chip do?
                        Yep, I have the same question. I think I can figure out the reason behind the studded noseband, but can't figure out the chips.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by alspharmd View Post
                          Yep, I have the same question. I think I can figure out the reason behind the studded noseband, but can't figure out the chips.
                          I think the idea is that if the rubs a rail it digs into their legs...and makes them jump cleaner for fear of that pain.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Thanks COTH for the response. I am glad to see that my gut is right. I appreciate all of you who have jumped to the defense of the horse- that is very happy to see. I was under the impression that the studded noseband is illegal. Is that wrong? The noseband I saw last year and did not report it. I regret that very much.
                            I saw the boots with chips on Sunday at the show towards the end of the day. I did not know where the steward was, but I left a complaint form for the steward in the horse show office. I do not know what came of it, as I did not see the steward. I hope that she took the appropriate actions. I will be sad if this loses me my friend- but on second thought, maybe it does not make me that sad, because if she is the kind of person OK with doing that to her horse, I do not value her company so much.
                            To the person who suggested that maybe she had been joking, I do not think so. The tone was very serious, and she invited me to poke my finger in to feel.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Tack and chain nosebands are unconventional, but not illegal.
                              http://www.youtube.com/user/supershorty628
                              Proudly blogging for The Chronicle of the Horse!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by alspharmd View Post
                                Yep, I have the same question. I think I can figure out the reason behind the studded noseband, but can't figure out the chips.
                                If the horse hits a jump, the chips inside the boot are pressed into the leg. The pain makes the horse NOT want to hit jumps. Imagine putting glass/plastic chips in your shoe and taking a step.
                                .

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post

                                  Had it been me, I would have looked the girl square in the eye (thinking, "you stupid twat -- don't you know what you just said? I'm nominating you for the Darwin Awards immediately.") and say (out loud), "You DO realize that it is highly illegal to have foreign substances in your horse's boots, right? I guess you do since you told me not to take them off. You also should realize that, if you walk into the ring with those boots on, I will have no choice but to talk to the Steward and you will be eliminated and written up and fined, and so will your trainer."

                                  "Now, it's your choice which you will do."

                                  Honestly I was originally going to say that I would have said something to her and not the steward. But then even if she doesn't do it for that particular show, she will do it again. I saw go to the steward who might be able to inflict some sort of penalty or punishment.

                                  Originally posted by ConcernedAlter1 View Post
                                  Pardon me, I should have been clearer. I clarified what type of show it was to make sure that everyone was aware that it was a USEF rated show (where there would have been a steward), and not a schooling show or such where there would have been less regulation. Was not trying to justify it by saying "oh, it's not Wellington so it's OK". Simply trying to explain that it was not a backyard event where USEF rules did not apply and there was no one to enforce them. I am sorry, I should have been clearer in my original post.
                                  I understand, and maybe "justify" was the wrong word choice. But you also did make a point to say that it was not a huge show or a huge division. I don't think that you condoned it by any means, but it did seem in your wording that the fact that it was not a higher level of competition was significant. No harm done, I just took a different way than intended.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    One curious thing -- assuming she was telling the truth, what is she trying to do to herself to tell you? It doesn't sound as if she knew you well, she had no idea what you might do with that info.

                                    I can appreciate how on the spot you must have felt, not expecting that. The first thing I would have done was look her square in the eye and say in a serious tone "I wish you hadn't told me that." No humor at all. It might impress on her that breaking the rules matters, and she should not have assumed I would keep such a secret. And it would give me a few seconds to think how to get a steward over right away, before any chips vanished.

                                    Of course this person will know who ratted her out, but who cares what a cheater thinks of you. It's she who needs to be worried what others will think of her, not you worried what they will think of you. She finked on herself, anyway.

                                    If you did not report her this time, is it possible to informally give stewards at the next show a heads-up to be on the look-out? I know it's awkward - but it's about the horse, not the cheating rider.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by OverandOnward View Post
                                      If you did not report her this time, is it possible to informally give stewards at the next show a heads-up to be on the look-out? I know it's awkward - but it's about the horse, not the cheating rider.
                                      That's what I was thinking... maybe someone can do a "surprise check" on her at the next show? I have no idea if a steward would do that on a tip from someone.

                                      It's a shame one would even have to think about it, but maybe there should be random boot checks after jumper rounds throughout shows - kind of like bit checks at dressage shows. Not sure if that's something that has been suggested in the past, or if this is even a prevalent enough issue to warrant it though...

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Lord Helpus View Post
                                        Had it been me, I would have looked the girl square in the eye (thinking, "you stupid twat -- don't you know what you just said? I'm nominating you for the Darwin Awards immediately.") and say (out loud), "You DO realize that it is highly illegal to have foreign substances in your horse's boots, right? I guess you do since you told me not to take them off. You also should realize that, if you walk into the ring with those boots on, I will have no choice but to talk to the Steward and you will be eliminated and written up and fined, and so will your trainer."

                                        "Now, it's your choice which you will do."
                                        Exactly what I would have done, but I would have said the "stupid twat" part out loud.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X