• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Question about a Judging Card

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Question about a Judging Card

    HI! I am new here!

    I have been competing dressage and the way dressage is judged - it is broke down very clearly on points, priority and what is specifically being judged. I also rode jumpers for a long time but was forced to do dressage due to an injury (I love dressage though) - and have been cleared to go back to jumping - I was in Europe so I am new to the hunter thing. I got a new horse who is an ex-eventer and wanted to take him to some hunter shows - the low level work for now.

    I have heard about a 'judging card' and wondered if there is a breakdown on what is specifically being judged? Like are points awarded for soft hands or taken away for missed leads - etc - like what is more important? Is there an official breakdown?

    Is there like an official judging card I have heard people talk about?

  • #2
    For the hunters, you as an exhibitor don't get to see the judge's card. You might be able to if you make a request through the steward, but it's not really something you're supposed to do.
    It wouldn't be of much use to you anyway, since the structure of the card is specific to the judge and probably wouldn't make a lot of sense. Most judges use a personal system of marks and notations to indicate the quality of the jumps and make note of errors, together with a running placement tally of exhibitor numbers. Some give each round an overall score on the card even if the class isn't one that announces open numerical scoring, but not all do.
    There isn't an official breakdown, as hunter scoring is more of a judging of overall appearance than a tallying of points.

    Comment


    • #3
      What CBoylen said. As usual.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, I may not judge, but Dave Kelley taught me how to mark my card, and I haven't forgotten!

        Comment


        • #5
          It's always good to learn from the best.

          Comment


          • #6
            OP... The rules for our Hunter divisions, including a breakdown of major and minor faults to be considered by the judge as he/she forms an opinion of each round, can be found at www.usef.org

            Look for the Rule Book in the side menu.
            Patience pays.

            Comment


            • #7
              If you go to the web site "ask the horse show judge" and pay the fee, you'll hear how judges mark their cards. Very few use a numberical score unless show management asks for it

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by FAW View Post
                If you go to the web site "ask the horse show judge" and pay the fee, you'll hear how judges mark their cards. Very few use a numberical score unless show management asks for it
                I beg to differ.

                Many, if not most judges use numerical scores to keep track of the rounds. The fact that the scores are not announced all the time does not mean the entries are not receiving scores.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MHM View Post
                  I beg to differ.

                  Many, if not most judges use numerical scores to keep track of the rounds. The fact that the scores are not announced all the time does not mean the entries are not receiving scores.
                  These judges on this site stated that many judges do not give a score, but merely list the horses with the best rounds in a ranking that gives them room to add better rounds. This surprised me too.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I do squiggles/letters and other grafitti for each fence and sometimes what occurs between the fences,then a general remark or three and perhaps something to help me recall that horse should I be asked about it later, and finish with a numerical score. I don't mind posting cards, if that is the show routine. People try harder when they see they lost on a place beacuse of 1 or 2 points (or less) so the numbers mean something to them, even if the art work doesn't.
                    Really, most people know what they could have done better... even the winner )
                    "The Desire to Win is worthless without the Desire to Prepare"

                    It's a "KILT". If I wore something underneath, it would be a "SKIRT".

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Lostboy View Post
                      I don't mind posting cards, if that is the show routine.
                      I am guessing you are talking about unrated shows? But IMO it would be great if this happened at rated ones!
                      Please don't sabotash my conchess.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        My old trainer was a judge, and when she talked about judging (this is Canada, mind you) she talked about specific symbols that had fairly equivalent point deductions. These were for things like adding strides, leaving out, lead swap, late change, cut corners, breaking gait (or failing to trot in a class that called for it), wiggly line, crooked approach/take off...she was kind of an analytical personality though, so that might have just been her interpretation of what she was taught. As she progressed through her judging training and certifications, she was required to turn in her cards and have them audited, so it makes sense that there was some kind of system taught.

                        I got the impression that your basic errors had common symbols and generally accepted deduction values, much like in Dressage, and then the judge looked at the overall trip and awarded points accordingly. I know my coach also used symbols to denote "good" things, like a nice tight jump, straight line, etc.

                        It is also uncommon in Canada to even hear scores announced (more common the larger the show) and VERY uncommon that a judge would turn over a card to a competitor. At a schooling or small local show though, a lot of judges would be open to the idea of reviewing a round with you, provided you approached them politely when they were not busy and explained that you wanted to understand the scoring.

                        As others said, the competitor usually knows why they lost the big marks...for me it is ALWAYS that I missed a lead somewhere. I once thought to ask a judge about ways I could improve and she basically said "come talk to me once you sort out your leads" and I was all "yeah, probably shouldn't have asked on that one..."
                        Lifestyle coordinator for Zora, Spooky, Wolfgang and Warrior

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Most judges don't mind discussing your rounds after the show ended for the day as long as a Steward is present and the rider's trainer is present. They will not discuss your rounds against another rider(s)

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            THANK YOU!

                            I like what is described in Canada. I think it would be great if the judges did post a final number score that was consistent from every way a certified judge judged so you can compare how you did from show to show. I love that about dressage and gymnastics - (I have a 6 year old daughter in gymnastics).

                            Wonder why that is not done in judge certification?

                            I guess I am such a control freak - I like to know exactly what to work on! LOL

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Some hunter judges don't even bother judging you once they know you are out of ribbon contention... not like dressage where they have to keep watching/scoring regardless.
                              Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Melissa Hare Jumper:

                                f. In classics and when a class is held on an outside course, brilliance should be
                                emphasized.

                                This was written in the rule book under judging. What does brilliance mean? Do you know?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by Joannie Jumper View Post
                                  Melissa Hare Jumper:

                                  f. In classics and when a class is held on an outside course, brilliance should be
                                  emphasized.

                                  This was written in the rule book under judging. What does brilliance mean? Do you know?
                                  For me, Brilliance is a forward pace with an expressive jump and ring presence. The horse that makes you sit up and watch.

                                  OP, you might want to pick up Anna Jane White Mullen's book "Judging Hunters and Hunter Seat Equitation". It's a great resource for what's expected as does give you some common notations judge use. There is also a DVD out called "The Judge's Eye" that goes through different rounds and the judge talks you through how she would judge it.
                                  Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                  Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    What rugbug said about "brilliance". And I second AJWM's book and Linda Andrisani's videos. Great learning tools.

                                    - Melissa Hare Jones (but I like "Jumper", too)
                                    Patience pays.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      As far as I know, the only "set" scores are for a refusal, a break in gait, and a rail. Everything else is judges discretion.

                                      That's why you can't just say, for example, that a chip is worth x number of points off. One judge's chip is another ones "a little tight." Some horses still jump great from a tight distance. Some fall apart and jump like crap. Is that distance a little long, too long, dangerously long, or "brilliant?" Is a little long better than a little tight? Does your horse jump better from a long distance than that other horse did from a "perfect" distance? For lack of a better phrase (and not wanting to start a debate about it), some like a WB kind of look and trip, and some like a TB type.

                                      And every horse isn't stepping in that ring with an equal playing field. My perfect trip may be worse that your perfect trip. Maybe your horse is so much nicer than mine that I can have a perfect trip and you can make a few minor errors and still beat me. That's how it goes!

                                      That's why they say that you're paying for the opinion of one certain person on one certain day. You might have the same trip but tomorrow's judge might like you more. Or less.

                                      And yeah, if the judge has 8 "clean" trips and 8 ribbons and you come in and biff the first fence, it is not unheard of that the judge will stop watching you, unless it is a classic and they have to score you.

                                      Last weekend I had a chip and was beaten by someone who added up in a line. That was that judge's preference. Another judge may have swapped us.

                                      Originally posted by rugbygirl View Post
                                      My old trainer was a judge, and when she talked about judging (this is Canada, mind you) she talked about specific symbols that had fairly equivalent point deductions. These were for things like adding strides, leaving out, lead swap, late change, cut corners, breaking gait (or failing to trot in a class that called for it), wiggly line, crooked approach/take off...she was kind of an analytical personality though, so that might have just been her interpretation of what she was taught. As she progressed through her judging training and certifications, she was required to turn in her cards and have them audited, so it makes sense that there was some kind of system taught.

                                      I got the impression that your basic errors had common symbols and generally accepted deduction values, much like in Dressage, and then the judge looked at the overall trip and awarded points accordingly. I know my coach also used symbols to denote "good" things, like a nice tight jump, straight line, etc.

                                      It is also uncommon in Canada to even hear scores announced (more common the larger the show) and VERY uncommon that a judge would turn over a card to a competitor. At a schooling or small local show though, a lot of judges would be open to the idea of reviewing a round with you, provided you approached them politely when they were not busy and explained that you wanted to understand the scoring.

                                      As others said, the competitor usually knows why they lost the big marks...for me it is ALWAYS that I missed a lead somewhere. I once thought to ask a judge about ways I could improve and she basically said "come talk to me once you sort out your leads" and I was all "yeah, probably shouldn't have asked on that one..."
                                      Originally posted by Joannie Jumper View Post
                                      THANK YOU!

                                      I like what is described in Canada. I think it would be great if the judges did post a final number score that was consistent from every way a certified judge judged so you can compare how you did from show to show. I love that about dressage and gymnastics - (I have a 6 year old daughter in gymnastics).

                                      Wonder why that is not done in judge certification?

                                      I guess I am such a control freak - I like to know exactly what to work on! LOL
                                      Originally posted by tidy rabbit
                                      Oh, well, clearly you're not thoroughly indoctrinated to COTH yet, because finger pointing and drawing conclusions are the cornerstones of this great online community.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by MHM View Post
                                        I beg to differ.

                                        Many, if not most judges use numerical scores to keep track of the rounds. The fact that the scores are not announced all the time does not mean the entries are not receiving scores.
                                        She's right. Most "seasoned" judges do not bother writing a score down for each round...and just do what was described above - simple write down a "ladder" of the competition numbers and leave room for rounds to squeeze in between. As long as you have a good system for marking rounds, scores are not a necessity...unless they are required to be announced.
                                        www.DaventryEquestrian.com
                                        Home of Oldenburg, Westphalian & RPSI approved pony stallion Goldhills Brandysnap
                                        Also home to Daventry Equine Appraisals & Equine Expert Witness www.EquineAppraisers.com

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X