Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

GM is nothing but a bully.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mroades
    replied
    I am with MOC, "OH PLEASE!" Its like tv, if you dont like it, don't watch it.

    Leave a comment:


  • M. O'Connor
    replied
    Oh please. This thread, again?

    "Accomplished" riders participate in the Horsemastership clinic because it is part of their development track, and someone associated with each of them recognizes the fact that as decorated as they are, the level at which they have been successful is only about a third of the way up the ladder of international success with the top being the Olympic and WEG medal podium, which is the goal for many, if not most of them.

    There is a great deal of difference between teaching and training aimed at imparting genuine knowledge, making a rider's ascent up the development ladder to the upper rungs far more likely and the superficial 'prepping' practiced by a large percentage of trainers whose aim is to 'keep their customers happy' by ensuring they are never exposed to anything beyond the boundaries of their comfort zone, that the the sales/board/training/show bills are paid, and that the tack room banner is covered in ribbons each week.

    One keeps the 'business' end of the industry going for those who participate on a recreational basis, the other is what will keep our body of knowledge about horsemanship and riding intact and improve it over time, allowing us to remain competitive internationally.

    If you don't like GM's style, you are not alone, but at this point, changing it will not likely ever be a serious option. Move along, already.

    Leave a comment:


  • OverandOnward
    replied
    Originally posted by rileyt View Post
    ...
    At what point does USEF say, "Thanks for all you've done George... but its best you ride off into the sunset now. Your mouth and unprofessional behavior no longer outweighs your considerable equestrian knowledge."

    I don't know who he said that to, but he owes the young lady an apology. A SINCERE apology, with a promise to himself that he will never again sink to the level of calling students names that wouldn't be tolerated in Kindergarten. For all he preaches about how Americans have become so soft and undisciplined... you'd think he'd start by having the self-discipline to act in accordance with basic courtesy.
    ...
    I agree.

    There are other people who can teach effectively. This era of verbally abusing people needs to be over.

    This is not the example we should be holding up to our young riders, or to anyone else.

    Just wanted to throw in a vote ... because yes this thread won't really be a discussion to follow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pipkin
    replied
    His methods and riding just don't do it for me, let alone his attitude. I've never quite understood the obsession with him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bigbutt
    replied
    So I've often wondered this. I've ridden with some BNT (not GM - and have no desire to be yelled at by him). Some of these BNT were from the older crowd, so just a bit younger then GM and others are from a new generation. And what I wonder is why the older generation of trainers feel the need to yell, reduce riders to tears, ridicule? I'm not riding with people who have the Olympics in mind, most time they are either young pre-teens or teens who just love horses and competing, or they are adult re-riders.

    Yes the last BNT had many of us in tears at the end, but he did push us past our fears. More because we were more scared of him then the jumps or the height he pushed us to. But the risk behind that is to turn someone off riding, and have them just shut down completely.

    I struggle with a trainer telling you to do something, you may not get it right - but your trying and your ridiculed for not doing it correctly, told your not listening. Well its not that I'm not listening, but you have 20 odd years of bad riding to change, if you think its as easy as oh you said do it that way. Well bam changed it, fixed it.

    I know they are passionate about what they do, and maybe its just set in their ways... but its not a way to mentor the new coaches. Fear based teaching doesn't help anyone. Just kind of curious as to why that method.... maybe thats the only way they knew then?

    Leave a comment:


  • HRF Second Chance
    replied
    I always enjoy these threads.....

    I wouldn't ever ride with him simply because I can't understand what he's saying anymore. So I would likely be called a lot of things but it wouldn't matter because I wouldn't be able to hear it anyway!

    Leave a comment:


  • kmwines01
    replied
    I've watched the horsemanship clinic for several years and have never seen "bullying". Ive seen harsh criticism after a rider makes the same mistake repeatedly because they don't follow directions as to what jump to go to and in what pattern. I've always thought he's been extremely complimentary to those riders in that clinic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brooke
    replied
    I'm not going to comment on GM's style of teaching, but as one who learned to ride during the late 50's and 60's, and showed extensively in the 60's and 70's, I was never bullied or berated. Had I been, and being a sensitive and introverted person, I'd probably be knitting now instead of still riding horses.

    Leave a comment:


  • Angelico
    replied
    Every year I watch the live feed of the Master Horsemanship Clinic, and while I do get valuable info from watching it, I find myself wondering why the accomplished riders participating waste their time with it. The riders already train with the best, they have already accomplished more than many ever will, and they go along with being publicly belittled? It isn't about them, it's about making GM look cool.

    Every year when he singles out a rider and essentially tells him/her that she is stupid and can't ride I can't help but want to be able to say to him: "NO, they don't suck, and they have already proven that."

    I hope none of them believe those remarks... It'd be a shame. The idol worship is the root of the problem, while I agree with meupatdoes that he does a lot of ridiculous things, he does have just as many good things to offer, however he can't seem to offer them without involving his ego. It does sound like his smaller clinics are much nicer, but when the spotlight is on he definitely shows his true colors.

    Leave a comment:


  • AffirmedHope
    replied
    Originally posted by MIKES MCS View Post
    I have to say most of those who are horrified by GM's teaching methods, would never have survived the 60's , Back then if you were that sensitive you would not have been riding and showing in this sport , but then again back then it was sport and tough was a requirement.
    Perhaps, but at this point I think GM knows he is God, so he likes to toy with us and watch us peons sweat and squirm

    Leave a comment:


  • MIKES MCS
    replied
    I have to say most of those who are horrified by GM's teaching methods, would never have survived the 60's , Back then if you were that sensitive you would not have been riding and showing in this sport , but then again back then it was sport and tough was a requirement.

    Leave a comment:


  • leyla25
    replied
    I have nothing against GM but what I dislike it's his legacy of imitators. Many trainers not as gifted or "charming" copy his style to the detriment of his students and staff.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pennywell Bay
    replied
    Thread was resurrected (now deleted) by the same person so creeped out by a shirtless boarder picking out his horse's pen. Sigh. "Go with your gut, girl" (sarcasm font)

    Leave a comment:


  • Small Change
    replied
    I almost feel I shouldn't add to the old thread, but I read things like the posts above, and can't help feeling as though I must have been tricked when I thought I was riding with GM himself. And shame on me, it happened twice! I took my green, sensitive mare to two clinics with him, and never felt bullied, tricked or sent on a suicide mission. I also didn't feel once that I unfairly got after her on his direction, and that is coming from someone who is far more likely to ignore a mistake than punish the horse for it. Either I ride with GM's doppleganger (based on the descriptions of the absolute ogre he's supposed to be), or maybe he's just gentler with us Canadians???

    Leave a comment:


  • AffirmedHope
    replied
    Old thread but there are plenty of tough trainers out there that can get their point across with out resorting to insults.

    Also I think GM needs to retire. He will tell his riders to do an incredibly difficult exercise and berate them should they make a mistake, instead of providing constructive criticisms to help the rider improve (the entire point of riding in a clinic)

    The man has contributed an enormous amount of knowledge to our sport, but he is clearly burnt out and needs to retire. Maybe keep the Horsemastership clinic.

    Leave a comment:


  • 222orchids
    replied
    Originally posted by meupatdoes View Post

    I have made plenty of progress and developed some really lovely horses with "lesser" trainers without asking my horses trick questions, whacking them randomly, getting sent on a suicide mission, or being called an idiot.
    You are officially my favorite person in the COTH Forum, for this. Even a 3 1/2 year hiatus between posts on this thread was worth waiting for, to hear it articulated in this way.

    Leave a comment:


  • bt
    replied
    Welll ohhhh I hate to jump on this train...consider this more of a general personal preference of mine "i would rather have my feelings hurt than my horse or chances at a ribbon." very rarely can all 3 escape with out at least a minor flesh wound.

    Leave a comment:


  • meupatdoes
    replied
    I wouldn't not ride with GM because of his bullying of the riders.

    I would not ride with GM because I think he asks tricky questions in his clinics (such as halt in a 12' one stride) that are counter productive from a training standpoint and serve only to "prove" his point that people can't ride, at the unnecessary expense of the confidence of both horse and rider when unable to answer a ridiculous question.

    Or he has riders pull up to the base of a Liverpool and halt, then has a chat for 30 seconds with the rider, and then has the rider smack the (now zoned-out, patiently waiting for the humans to be done chit chatting) horse behind the saddle to "teach it to go forward to the Liverpool".

    One of my trainers and his trier of a horse got sent for a flip trying to do what the man said.

    So I'll pass, because I don't like to ask my horses unfair or unnecessary questions, and I don't like being expected to smack them suddenly after thirty seconds of standing obediently in park as I just requested. I also do not trust him not to ask me to do something that could send me and my horse for a crash.

    Bullying me is a lower priority than the first three, but I suppose it is the fourth reason I won't ride with him.

    I have made plenty of progress and developed some really lovely horses with "lesser" trainers without asking my horses trick questions, whacking them randomly, getting sent on a suicide mission, or being called an idiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • doublesstable
    replied
    I noticed how old the thread was too... but since the poster only had 9 posts under her/his belt maybe they should just get reserve

    Leave a comment:


  • Coreene
    replied
    Originally posted by forthehorse View Post
    have to agree with you.
    I don't necessarily like the way he framed the comment (we prefer things that take a little intellect to be insulted by), but I'd rather be told than be let do it the wrong way, in any situation.
    OMGiH, could this be the tri-color for Oldest Bump Ever?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X