• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Response to Ltr. to Ed. in Chronicle "Stop Bashing the Saudis" and Alison Paschall

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Response to Ltr. to Ed. in Chronicle "Stop Bashing the Saudis" and Alison Paschall

    I wanted to send this in to the Chronicle but recognize it wouldn't timely make it to print. I hope if others read the Letter to the Editor in the October 22, 2010, they too would have strong feelings about what was written.

    Melanie Smith Taylor was one of my idols in the late 70's and 80's and having seen her teach over the years found her to be a consummate professional and respectful of everyone. It is woefully unfair for Ms. Alison Paschall to try and soil an Amercan gold medalist in the manner in which she did. Given Ms. Paschall was not born when Ms. Taylor represented the United States or still in diapers, she should learn about someone's background before making such ignorant comments!

    In response to Ms. Paschall’s Letter “Stop Bashing the Saudis” I would encourage her to watch a program more than once before making such mis-statements. Perhaps in her excitement of watching the final four she was not truly listening to the commentators. YouTube has “Abdullah Al Sharbatly: WEG Final Four” which excerpts his final four rides. The commentators note during his first ride on his horse that he was “the surprise of the group” a “meterioric rise, starting day one at 61st and gradually working his way up to end 4th”. Noting that he came to train for the London Olympics and “finds his way at the top.” On Hickstead commenting on how well he rode a bold horse to a clear round. On the ride of Vigo d’Arsouilles that he was the “underdog and unknown coming in” but “he rode with such confidence all week to get to the final four”. While he looked very nervous warming up, including circling away from fences, he “handled his nerves”. That the crowd was rooting for the underdog and “recognizing this youngster.” On HH Rebozo noting that Abdullah was the “surprise of the competition” and “impressed everyone with his riding skill”. That he is the “best story of the competition” such that he finds himself top four. Commenting on the last combination on Rebozo “just beautifully ridden”. The commentator, Ms. Taylor noted how impressed she was that he partnered with his new mount after only six weeks together and reached such immediate success. To this observer it was apparent that Commentator Tim Ryan was asked to focus on the biography of the riders and Melanie Smith Taylor on the horses and the skills of the various animals.

    Ms. Paschall’s comments that Ms. Taylor couldn’t say anything good about the Saudi’s and said nothing negative about the Americans, is evidence that Ms. Paschall simply wasn’t listening! Ms. Taylor in fact praised the Saudis and commented on many mistakes of the American’s. Based on the various commentating excerpted above, Mr. Sharbatly was received well and introduced to the world as an excellent rider/competitor by these commentators. Given Ms. Paschall has never ridden a Grand Prix horse nor had to face what these riders faced, she is in no position to determine whether a rider looks nervous. Given Ms. Taylor’s Olympic success she is certainly able to recognize the nervousness of riders and the reaction of the horses to make such observations and comments.

    To make such a comment about these commentators and infer racism just shows the author’s ignorance. The programming appeared well-balanced for all portions of show jumping and I trust we will see Tim Ryan and Melanie Smith Taylor for years to come commentating for NBC. Ms. Paschall owes Ms. Taylor a personal apology for her outrageous comments in the Chronicle.
    Last edited by sunshinestate; Nov. 2, 2010, 11:23 AM. Reason: TY danderonice :)

  • #2
    It's "idols", not "idles". Also, there is no apostrophe in the plural form of "Saudis."
    Author Page
    Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
    Steampunk Sweethearts

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by danceronice View Post
      It's "idols", not "idles". Also, there is no apostrophe in the plural form of "Saudis."
      Really? Was this a worthwhile contribution to this BB?

      I tend to agree with the OP. I didn't think Melanie Taylor was tough on the Saudis. Surprised? Yes, a bit. But critical...no.
      madeline
      * What you release is what you teach * Don't be distracted by unwanted behavior* Whoever waits the longest is the teacher. Van Hargis

      Comment


      • #4
        Regardless of the flag they ride under, when someone comes out of the nowhere (to us) and makes it to the top like that, we are surprised. America loves an underdog and I think we were all thrilled to see his success. I never at anytime felt as though Melanie was being condescending. She was literally speaking what was on our minds: Who is this guy and where did he come from?

        Granted, while he's been riding for quite some time, we've never seen him covered in any media prior to WEG.

        And personally, I appreciated the correction from 'idle' to 'idol'. I haven't proofed my post so hopefully someone will let me know if I missed anything.

        "If you have the time, spend it. If you have a hand, lend it. If you have the money, give it. If you have a heart, share it." by me

        Comment


        • #5
          I have watched my dvr of that broadcast multiple times and never even for a second thought there was any disrespect to any of the riders.

          Comment


          • #6
            The grammer police out in force yet again not adding anything to the conversation but annoyance. I thought Melanie did a superb job commentating and did not for a second think she said anything that could be misconstrued as condescending,racial,or snarky. Some people just need to get a life.

            Comment


            • #7
              Chill, it was one person's opinion... like you know what everyone has one. FWIW I do agree with you
              http://community.webshots.com/user/summitspringsfarm

              Comment


              • #8
                I watched that competition with no knowledge of where he had come from or how, and loved to hear the background from Melanie. I thought she was surprised, as anyone would be given the facts, but could feel her appreciation for his skills shown. I was so moved by it in fact, that at the end, when he rode the 4th horse so well, I teared up about it! I was so proud of that kid for doing what he did! And I would only have known about the value of the effort by Melanie's comments, none of which were ever negative, only pleasantly surprised.

                What a great rider he was that day! Who knows what the future holds in store for him...
                "As a rule we disbelieve all the facts and theories for which we have no use."- William James
                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                Proud member of the Wheat Loss Clique.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Madeline View Post
                  Really? Was this a worthwhile contribution to this BB?

                  I tend to agree with the OP. I didn't think Melanie Taylor was tough on the Saudis. Surprised? Yes, a bit. But critical...no.
                  If the OP remotely considered sending it to a real publication, and wanted to look illiterate in print, I should hope so.
                  Author Page
                  Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                  Steampunk Sweethearts

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think when it comes to sports commentators and their commentating in these types of situations its not about the country per se it's about the athlete and a respect/admiration tney have for them excelling in a sport where a country might not be known for producing athletes that excel in a given sport. Look at the Olympics and the parade of athletes - some countries might have one representative others 600.. Remember that movie Cool Runnings? Who would have thought Jamaica would send a team to the WINTER Olympics - but they did... When you think of show jumping stars a Saudi rider didn't come to mind but mostly US and European riders. Australia has developed superb 3-day riders, not so many dressage or show jumpers...When one thinks of top 3 day riders Croatia doesn't exactly come to mind...so if a young Croatian came to WEG, rode a spectacular dressage test, was a machine cross country and flawless show jumping... the commentary would have been pretty similar... Most of the commentary I heard about Abdullah Al Sharbatly was about this accompllishment at his AGE, not his country. Any commentary I heard about a rider's country was pretty matter of fact and not at all political.. Why do some people insist on trying to make something politically incorrect or racist when it is just not there... One movie critic did the same thing to Secretariat.. it's pathetic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am astonished that this woman, Paschall, would write "I'm disgusted by what I hope was not racism" about commentary by Melanie Smith Taylor. Melanie is not only an icon to the United States Equestrian Team, but a wonderful human being that goes out of her way to help everyone. For this person to make such horrible comments shows her insensitivity, especially in light of the fact that Paschall was WRONG and clearly did not listen to the commentary at all if she made such comments.

                      Knowing Melanie, as I do, I am sure she is hurt and devastated by such comments being made about her. One can only hope she did not read that Letter to the Editor. As to Paschall, shame on you!! I hope to see an apology forthcoming from you.
                      horse show diva dot com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        So if it was so far off base, why did COTH publish it?
                        EHJ | FB | #140 | watch | #insta

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by dags View Post
                          So if it was so far off base, why did COTH publish it?
                          I wondered that, actually.

                          I didn't find the TV commentary to be off-track at all, and certainly not racist in any way.

                          The Saudi rider was a fresh face and complete unknown to most horse people watching the broadcast, especially compared to the other riders in the final round, like Rodrigo Pessoa. How was it remarkable to comment on that fact?

                          I was thinking most of the things that Melanie said, IIRC. Who is this guy, where did he come from? Look how well he's done for himself this week!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The Chronicle letters policy is to publish EVERY letter submitted. Here's our policy...

                            LETTERS TO THE EDITOR - The Chronicle will accept letters that refer to a previously published article, photograph or letter. Letters must include a name, address and signature, and may be edited for publication. Mail to: Editor, PO Box 46, Middleburg, VA 20118 or email to letters@chronofhorse.com.

                            When the Chronicle office received the letter to which the OP is referring, we offered Melanie a chance to reply. She declined, very classily, hoping to avoid a conflict.

                            If anyone would like to submit a letter in reply to the letter already published, they're more than welcome. We are extremely receptive to publishing reader response and generating discussion.

                            Molly Sorge

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Was anyone in the COTH Cover-It-Live room during the final four? Lots of talk in their about "how the Saudis bought all the good horses," so yeah, I have to say that, unfortunately, I think the letter in COTH did touch on a number of feelings that people may have, veiled or otherwise.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by Tha Ridge View Post
                                Was anyone in the COTH Cover-It-Live room during the final four? Lots of talk in their about "how the Saudis bought all the good horses," so yeah, I have to say that, unfortunately, I think the letter in COTH did touch on a number of feelings that people may have, veiled or otherwise.
                                Meh.

                                If they had the money and desire to buy the best horses, and then succeeded with them, that's a statement of fact. Not racism.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Molly, thanks for the clarification.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Tha Ridge, I was involved with the Chronicle Cover It Live discussion during the Final Four at the WEG, and no Chronicle employee made any kind of reference to 'buying a medal' or any such thing.

                                    If there were such comments, they were from readers logged into the blog.

                                    I actually wrote an article, coming out in the Nov. 5 issue of the Chronicle--our WEG Analysis issue--about the globalization of show jumping and the emergence of the Saudi riders as a factor.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      No one should be upset with COTH printing the Letter to the Editor as they should print what is sent under the name of the contributor. It is great they offered Ms. Taylor an opportunity to rebut and because she has class she chose to not respond. The commentary and coverage speaks for itself and everyone who watches it can see the truth. The sad thing is that Chronicles last for years and this girl's comments will too. That is the unfortunate reality here.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by sunshinestate View Post
                                        The sad thing is that Chronicles last for years and this girl's comments will too. That is the unfortunate reality here.
                                        Well, then, that would be an even better reason to submit a different view to the magazine so it's also on the record.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X