• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

new drugs and meds rule

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    true dat, but there are a lot of people who make bad decisions for their horse every day (and a lot more who try to make the right decision). It's tough to craft a rule entirely around the former's actions...
    Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #22
      Originally posted by RAyers View Post
      From a purely uniformed point of view, please help me understand why stacking NSAIDS is beneficial? Maybe I have missed something in the medical literature. I don't know but I would like to understand the perspective as to why this rule would be detrimental to the sport? How long are these horses on the road to need this many drugs?

      From the medical literature I read, extended use and stacking of NSAIDS lead to renal lesions, potentially ulcerative colitis, while failing to alleviate the condition causing the lameness. While combinations such as bute and ketophen can be used synergistically to help short term in a CLINICAL environment, the above mentioned side effects become prevalent as time is extended beyond a few weeks. To me, the rule makes great sense and can help force horsemanship back onto the trainers and riders.

      Reed
      _----------------------------------
      Not uninformed at all.
      Never said rule would be detrimental to the sport either.
      Agree with the rule 100%
      Think horses will be put out of jobs and some owners who are uninformed will be left with an expensive animal that they do not understand why it can't compete anymore.
      I think you understood my post differently than it was intended or maybe I misread your intentions.
      I am sure you and I are on the same page.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by KC and the Sunshine Band View Post
        Alot of posters on this board get very agressive and defensive about things because they don't like to be told what they do to their horses to get them to the ring may not actually have the horses best interest in mind, irregardless of what their trainers tell them.
        Or, they get defensive because they don't agree with the camp who believe that no horse should be given anything for any reason, all shows are evil, and those who do show are sadists.

        (FWIW, the most any horse of mine has received at a show was Banamine--not a stacker-druggie. )
        "And now . . .off to violin-land, where all is sweetness and delicacy and harmony and there are no red-headed clients to vex us with their conundrums."

        Comment


        • #24
          With regard to the Banamine/colic issue, it seems the easiest way to avoid this problem would be to switch your NSAID of choice to Banamine (i.e. give Banamine instead of Bute as your regular NSAID for comfort, not just colic). Depending on timing and dosage, this would still allow a horse that may have had a minor colic incident to show.

          Also, per the USEF NSAID FAQs posted on the USEF website:

          When does the single NSAID rule go into effect?
          The rule has an effective date of 12/1/2011.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #25
            wow i had the date way wrong! Thanks for that clarification!
            The rule doesnt bother me because I dont need 2.
            I agree with the banamine idea with the colic issue, especially if you have a horse prone to colic episodes like a cribber.
            I did have a lg pony once that was better with Bute than Banamine.
            My exp has been that bony issues benefit more from bute and soft tissue more from banamine.
            You just have to know your horse and know what works the best!
            Dont care what naysayers say.....we take things when we hurt from something or another and our horses have to cart our butts around so they deserve a bit of assistance! I bet if they could they would go to the trunk themselves and grab that tube and dose themselves! Especially after a long day of showing!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by dodedo View Post
              I bet if they could they would go to the trunk themselves and grab that tube and dose themselves! Especially after a long day of showing!
              I bet they would, too, but I also bet they would rather roll over and keep on snoring in the straw the next day!
              Life would be infinitely better if pinatas suddenly appeared throughout the day.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by dodedo View Post
                Will this put alot of really nice horses out of a job?
                For the foreseeable future, unfortunately the answer is yes.

                Originally posted by dodedo View Post
                I agree with the new rule myself. Def didn't want to open a "can o worms" here so sorry if that is the case.
                I did try a search but what I got was that horrible Inj Mag thread.
                I was just wondering about the ones that get the 1 plus maybe Surpass or they have been getting Ketophen 6 hours out. I DO NOT have one that needs anything beyond the Ban, and Legend before shows so that is not why I asked. Just curious. Mainly thinking about the ones that really work hard to get the number of shows per year done that are asked of them.
                And yes for the reasons you mention. Older horses coming back down the ranks will end their show careers sooner than they would have otherwise. I also predict more money spent on joint injections (and more) in an effort to stave off the effects of Osteorthritis just as long as they can.

                Since we are eating popcorn, can I add a rant?

                You don't need to say "Oh and by the way and just to be sure, I have never given My Horse anything more than Blah Blah of Whatever."

                Look, I don't know how you medicate your horse. I don't care.
                Since I don't know....
                and you know I'll never know....
                and you know better than to admit the bad stuff you do do....
                (even though no one on the internet knows..... or cares.....)
                or rather, the internetting public doesn't care because they know they will never know.....

                Can we dispense with the credentialling?

                Did you get the part about "I don't care?" and why?
                Last edited by mvp; Sep. 27, 2010, 06:09 PM. Reason: too many 'knows!'
                The armchair saddler
                Politically Pro-Cat

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by mvp View Post
                  For the foreseeable future, unfortunately the answer is yes.



                  And yes for the reasons you mention. Older horses coming back down the ranks will end their show careers sooner than they would have otherwise. I also predict more money spent on joint injections (and more) in an effort to stave off the effects of Osteorthritis just as long as they can.
                  BUT-

                  ALL the REAL veterinary/medical testing shows that the NSAID stacking ISN'T making the horses any sounder, or in less pain.

                  So when they go back down to ONE NSAID, the horese will NOT be lamer or in more pain.

                  AFAI can see, the only change would be that people who use an NSAIDg other than bute on a regular basis would have to scratch when a horse colics (rather than adding banamine). But the bute-banamine combination is ALREADY banned, so really not a lot of change there.

                  But the non-colic-prone horse isn't going to end its career any sooner.

                  It is the trainers who THINK that NSAID stacking works that will be in distress, not the horses themselves.
                  Last edited by Janet; Sep. 27, 2010, 05:37 PM.
                  Janet

                  chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    But the bute-banamine combination is ALREADY banned, so really not a lot of change there.
                    I agree, not much change on the colic situation front. The greater majority of people, in my experience, use bute as their one NSAID (except for those that use Banamine for this very reason). The bute users have never (well, since the 80's anyway) been able to medicate for colic and show with a med report, since there was some language in the rules about the med report not being a viable option for getting around the Bute-Banamine rule. The colic-prone show on Banamine.

                    I think personally that there are enough options left in the med rules for most cases. I've used two NSAIDs in a couple of instances, mainly because I like Arquel for feet when the going is rough, but have never noticed it to do anything for anything else, and Arquel + Banamine seemed to cover all the bases. But, most likely Arquel + Robaxin or Arquel + Dex would be just as effective in the same situation.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      JANET...very well said.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by dodedo View Post
                        I bet if they could they would go to the trunk themselves and grab that tube and dose themselves! Especially after a long day of showing!
                        Or maybe they'd just tell you to go pound sand while they spent the day resting...
                        "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                        ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X