Stallion Spotlight

Total Hope-11-18-09-3662

Real Estate Spotlight

46thlane19
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Steve Guerdat on the Inevitable "Mess" That Will be Tokyo

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Steve Guerdat on the Inevitable "Mess" That Will be Tokyo

    https://horsesport.com/horse-news/st...le-tokyo-mess/

  • #2
    Oh boy..... That's a lot of big names speaking out

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow! O’Connor is an ass. While what he said about China might be true, there was no reason to say it in such a nasty and disparaging way, especially as the then representative of the jumping committee. Not surprising though, glad he resigned. Rantzau’s comment was pretty harsh too. If you really care about the visibility and the spectators of the sport, instead of insulting these countries with newer programs, you ask the FEI what they plan to do to help get these countries to be competitive at this level. The insults make you sound like a spoiled child who’s mad that new kids get to play in your sandbox.

      Ludgar and Steve brought up good points against this change without resorting to petty jabs.
      Talking to some people is like folding a fitted sheet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Eric isn't happy about it either. I tend to agree with these riders though. It's the world stage. You're right, the FEI should help those riders and countries get to the Olympic level, but that doesn't mean changing the format to let them in if they can't qualify like in the past.
        The comment about equine welfare is important as well.

        https://www.theguardian.pe.ca/sports...hanges-348738/

        Comment


        • #5
          So what happened to the substitution thing? Is that still part of the new scoring they are using at the Olympics?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by GoodTimes View Post
            Eric isn't happy about it either. I tend to agree with these riders though. It's the world stage. You're right, the FEI should help those riders and countries get to the Olympic level, but that doesn't mean changing the format to let them in if they can't qualify like in the past.
            comment about equine welfare is important as well.

            https://www.theguardian.pe.ca/sports...hanges-348738/
            The first article mentions that the IOC requested changes. Equestrian isn’t the only one with a change to their team format. Gymnastics had to drop one team member as well and they are now only at four instead of five. I don’t think the push for more countries to be represented came from the FEI. I’m not a fan of this either, but insulting your fellow competitors is not going to make those on the other side reevaluate their position.

            Interesting that Eric mentions Cool Runnings. From the Wikipedia article about the actual bob sledding team: “In a show of sporting camaraderie across national boundaries, other bobsledders were quick to give them guidance and support.”

            The format cannot be changed this late in the Olympic cycle. Put aside the snarky comments about the newbie countries and use your expertise to provide them support as your fellow competitors at the Games. They’re most likely aware they are not on the same level as the Erics and Ludgars of the sport, but it does not mean they deserve to be publicly ridiculed by their peers.
            Talking to some people is like folding a fitted sheet.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by OverandOnward View Post
              So what happened to the substitution thing? Is that still part of the new scoring they are using at the Olympics?
              The mid event substitution? This article says it’s still in the new format:

              https://horsesport.com/horse-news/er...umping-format/

              and also give give more info on the pressure from the IOC
              Talking to some people is like folding a fitted sheet.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Originally posted by AffirmedHope View Post

                The first article mentions that the IOC requested changes. Equestrian isn’t the only one with a change to their team format. Gymnastics had to drop one team member as well and they are now only at four instead of five. I don’t think the push for more countries to be represented came from the FEI. I’m not a fan of this either, but insulting your fellow competitors is not going to make those on the other side reevaluate their position.

                Interesting that Eric mentions Cool Runnings. From the Wikipedia article about the actual bob sledding team: “In a show of sporting camaraderie across national boundaries, other bobsledders were quick to give them guidance and support.”

                The format cannot be changed this late in the Olympic cycle. Put aside the snarky comments about the newbie countries and use your expertise to provide them support as your fellow competitors at the Games. They’re most likely aware they are not on the same level as the Erics and Ludgars of the sport, but it does not mean they deserve to be publicly ridiculed by their peers.
                Realistically, riders can't be expected to coach other teams at the Olympics. Countries have their coaches, most of whom would not welcome interference even if the language barrier was not a consideration, which it is.

                I took the article to be a concern that some teams will not be prepared. We all know what can happen in jumping when people and horses are not ready for the level, and no one wants to witness it, especially on the world stage of the Olympics.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by AffirmedHope View Post

                  Wow! O’Connor is an ass. While what he said about China might be true, there was no reason to say it in such a nasty and disparaging way, especially as the then representative of the jumping committee. Not surprising though, glad he resigned. Rantzau’s comment was pretty harsh too. If you really care about the visibility and the spectators of the sport, instead of insulting these countries with newer programs, you ask the FEI what they plan to do to help get these countries to be competitive at this level. The insults make you sound like a spoiled child who’s mad that new kids get to play in your sandbox.

                  Ludgar and Steve brought up good points against this change without resorting to petty jabs.
                  At least Cian recognizes he’s not suited for a front-and-center committee posting.

                  The IOC is primarily responsible for this farce. It’s a change that needs to be introduced gradually. There’s too much risk involved for both horses and riders. All the sport needs is a death or life-altering injury on international telecasts....just no. The alternative is, as O’Connor indelicately stated, is to dumb the courses way down.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by skydy View Post

                    Realistically, riders can't be expected to coach other teams at the Olympics. Countries have their coaches, most of whom would not welcome interference even if the language barrier was not a consideration, which it is.

                    I took the article to be a concern that some teams will not be prepared. We all know what can happen in jumping when people and horses are not ready for the level, and no one wants to witness it, especially on the world stage of the Olympics.
                    Not coaching, but they can treat them with dignity and give them encouragement, that’s what I meant by support. The current “cool kids” of the sport can be seen congratulating and consoling each other at competitions regardless of which nations they represent. I think equestrian sports are very cool and unique in that way. The competitors all tend to be very friendly with each other even at the competitions where the stakes are high. That same courtesy should be extended to the newbies too.

                    I don’t like this new format either and agree with the points these riders brought up, but the way some expressed their concerns is not a good look for the sport either and gives off a sense of elitism.
                    Talking to some people is like folding a fitted sheet.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by AffirmedHope View Post

                      Not coaching, but they can treat them with dignity and give them encouragement, that’s what I meant by support. The current “cool kids” of the sport can be seen congratulating and consoling each other at competitions regardless of which nations they represent. I think equestrian sports are very cool and unique in that way. The competitors all tend to be very friendly with each other even at the competitions where the stakes are high. That same courtesy should be extended to the newbies too.

                      I don’t like this new format either and agree with the points these riders brought up, but the way some expressed their concerns is not a good look for the sport either and gives off a sense of elitism.
                      Have you seen the "cool kids" treat the "newbies" badly at competitions? I'd be very surprised if that is so.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by AffirmedHope View Post

                        Wow! O’Connor is an ass. While what he said about China might be true, there was no reason to say it in such a nasty and disparaging way, especially as the then representative of the jumping committee. Not surprising though, glad he resigned. Rantzau’s comment was pretty harsh too. If you really care about the visibility and the spectators of the sport, instead of insulting these countries with newer programs, you ask the FEI what they plan to do to help get these countries to be competitive at this level. The insults make you sound like a spoiled child who’s mad that new kids get to play in your sandbox.

                        Ludgar and Steve brought up good points against this change without resorting to petty jabs.
                        I agree with you. While I understand the concern about an injury happening on this world stage, there is never any excuse to be a jerk to people (or countries) who don’t have the same level of competitiveness YET. It is fine to express concerns but this comes off as an entitled bully. In a sport that is perceived my most average Joes to be elitist, with winning being based on how big a trust fund one has, the least the big names in the sport can do is not act like jerks.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by skydy View Post
                          ..........
                          I took the article to be a concern that some teams will not be prepared. We all know what can happen in jumping when people and horses are not ready for the level, and no one wants to witness it, especially on the world stage of the Olympics.
                          As we just saw at Burghley, where it was just very dam lucky that there wasn't a bad outcome from an influx of riders not up to the test. The frangibles saved many from serious injuries and maybe worse. And, quite frankly, from their own bad judgments on course.

                          But the Olympic courses have always been notable for the alternate routes that do substantially lower the difficulty. The alternate routes allow mid-level riders to complete, but no way to be in the top 20 over the alternate routes. That's not so hard to do.

                          Rio 2016 was rated the toughest course in the world as of that date. But a large cadre of not-top-ranked riders, possibly the majority of the field, completed without jumping faults over the alternate routes. They were no threat to the medals. Good for them to have prepared well and competed well, making good judgments and being able to say they completed for their country. I'm ok with that.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by OverandOnward View Post

                            As we just saw at Burghley, where it was just very dam lucky that there wasn't a bad outcome from an influx of riders not up to the test. The frangibles saved many from serious injuries and maybe worse. And, quite frankly, from their own bad judgments on course.

                            But the Olympic courses have always been notable for the alternate routes that do substantially lower the difficulty. The alternate routes allow mid-level riders to complete, but no way to be in the top 20 over the alternate routes. That's not so hard to do.

                            Rio 2016 was rated the toughest course in the world as of that date. But a large cadre of not-top-ranked riders, possibly the majority of the field, completed without jumping faults over the alternate routes. They were no threat to the medals. Good for them to have prepared well and competed well, making good judgments and being able to say they completed for their country. I'm ok with that.
                            Guerdat was speaking about Show Jumping I believe, not Eventing. I don't think that China is fielding an Eventing team, though I could be wrong.
                            Last edited by skydy; Sep. 8, 2019, 06:29 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Mara View Post

                              At least Cian recognizes he’s not suited for a front-and-center committee posting.

                              The IOC is primarily responsible for this farce. It’s a change that needs to be introduced gradually. There’s too much risk involved for both horses and riders. All the sport needs is a death or life-altering injury on international telecasts....just no. The alternative is, as O’Connor indelicately stated, is to dumb the courses way down.
                              I personally don't like Cian, as a human, but I totally agree with him in this regard. It will be a farce or someone will die or be seriously injured. Seriously. that's a distinct possibility.

                              Not good for the sport either way, and not good for the horses.

                              I'm also temperamentally unsuited
                              Let me apologize in advance.

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Does anyone else remember how terrifying the first Japanese Show Jumpers were? They had heart and desire but no technique. They subsequently received instruction by coaches from the West ( I can't for the life of me remember who it was, but they were well qualified) and are now riding very well in both Show Jumping and Eventing.

                                I wonder if the Chinese will be afforded the same opportunities for coaching by more experienced professionals. The Chinese government is not big on outside influence.


                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Ludger Beerbaum has been running a rider's academy in China for some time and has spent a lot of time bringing on young Chinese talent:

                                  https://riesenbeck-international.com...eijing-masters

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    The sad part is that is will be the horses that will suffer for it... Bring in more countries, maybe not so experienced, try to show at the Olympic level and tear the heart out of the horse that's out there giving its all. In life, there aren't trophies for everyone.
                                    The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      there's a contingent of Chinese show jumpers at a yard in Holland, but I can't remember whose.
                                      Let me apologize in advance.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by nutmeg View Post
                                        Ludger Beerbaum has been running a rider's academy in China for some time and has spent a lot of time bringing on young Chinese talent:

                                        https://riesenbeck-international.com...eijing-masters
                                        It reads more (to me) that he is developing the show and trying to help the riders by promoting the riding academy, not teaching. "I have been involved in the Chinese Equestrian Sport market since 2006."
                                        His sentence ... (International competition), that is the target of the Academy and what I would like to be acknowledged for in 5,8, or 10 years time gives the impression that they riders have a long way to go before they are ready.

                                        I didn't get the impression that he is teaching there in any consistent manner. Traveling through "Asia" (big area involving many countries) and inviting riders to come train in Germany is nice, but I don't think Chinese riders are being allowed that privilege.

                                        The article seems more of an, how we are doing in our efforts to open the market for horse sports in China, than a claim that he is training Chinese riders. Again, not his fault that China restricts the travel of its sporting citizens.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X