Sport Horse Spotlight

Sandro Hit Standa Eylers

Real Estate Spotlight

Birman1

Sale Spotlight

COTH_without Subscribe
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by pds View Post
    Makes me sad and sick to note the names of riders and trainers I formally respected that have shown they support child sexual abuse by attacking SafeSport and individuals.

    I can only hope that one day their hearts and minds open up to the truth. Just hope it is not too late for them all.
    Totally!!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by poltroon View Post

      USEF has no leeway in this. It is baked into the SafeSport law and code. All the NGBs are obligated.

      Whether or not it holds up in court, it will be SafeSport's to litigate. See Page 15.

      https://uscenterforsafesport.org/wp-...yperlinked.pdf



      (As to who they'd go after, I imagine they'd be starting with letters of reprimand and their actions would probably be contextual. The old friend who goes and rides a horse with a suspended person in the vicinity is probably not going to get the same treatment as someone who hosts an equitation clinic for juniors. They're busy folk, alas. But they might go after an elite figure skating athlete, say, who made known he was training with BNT, and was encouraging others to do so. However, insurance companies may put the kibosh on all of it of their own accord.)

      It is meant, explicitly, to end the influence of big name coaches who are found to have created dangerous conditions for athletes. People like Don Peters, who also helped win a lot of (gymnastics) Olympic medals. BNTs that a lot of people would justify training with. The intent is super clear.

      You can't hire a doctor for your practice or hospital who loses a license, either.

      I enjoy the lawyer talk but I'm a little surprised at this particular line you're taking.
      Thanks, you are right. I hadn’t gone and read those rules. Looks like USEF has nothing to say about it, then, but it does make the antitrust case stronger. Interesting!

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Zirgs View Post
        The fundamental question is how best to deal with sexual abuse and the long needed cultural change. For generations victims were oppressed by both the abuser and society.

        As an engaged parent that raises our kids to be empowered, I am horrified by SafeSports current codes and processes.

        While they have honorable Mission and Values, their authoritarian dictation of whom I can choose to train with, and associate my children and resources, so they can be athletes and participate in the sport they love is going down the path of dictatorship.

        Under the good intention to protect, SafeSpot strips away that which enables all of us to be empowered - Choice.

        Raising awareness is good.

        Stripping away the right to choose who should run a business and associate with harms all of us.

        Those that are at most risk, are those that post negative stories and comments about others in these forum, regardless if you think they are true. That behavior is considered bullying, and becomes grounds for reporting to SafeSport.

        I personally know that one of the banned trainers is innocent, and the key witness 20 yrs ago witheld evidence in the form of video surveillance tapes, which would have exonerated them. Since the staue of limitations is expired, the ability to correct a past ruling will be hard. So instead an innocent person is banned, and this forum is not only bashing them, but hunting to strip them of their business associates.

        We officially live in Orwell's 1984
        you are an unserious person.
        Let me apologize in advance.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post

          No one is stopping you from hiring child molesters to give your kids riding lessons. They’ll just have to stick to the non affiliated local circuits. Have fun!


          Zirgs How exactly do you KNOW a banned trainer is innocent? Did you have surveillance on them 24/7? If not, then you don't know. You choose to not believe the results of the SS investigation. If you choose to send your child to that trainer and they are abused, how are you going to feel? But hey, I guess SS should just butt out and allow parents to make that choice. Just pray your kid isn't a mess in 20 years and finally discloses to you that the shady trainer violated them.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by mvp View Post

            It's pretty easy for me: I don't reward unconscionable behavior. Full stop.

            Look, I haven't been in a spot where I desperately needed the help of Paul Valliere or where George Morris was the only horseman who could help me. But I think it's part of being an adult to take the action I can to defend my values. So there is no weighing the pros and cons in my mind. I am clear about that stopped wildly unethical behavior (or doing my part in that) trumps my wanting to get something related to my sport. I'll find another way or I'll go without. But I won't co-sign killing horses for insurance money or molesting children so that I can have fun. Not a hard decision.
            To be honest, I dont think I could attend a Robert Dover clinic or any of the big name slime balls sucking up to GM after this.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by alibi_18 View Post

              This, as Capall like to say, atrocious petition found its way on my Facebook feed, shared by riders I used to respect.

              It’s a shame.
              Yanno, that's how I know who's who and where the people in my life stand.

              I think it's time to let my FB friends know that they can stand with George or they can stand with me, but not both. They can GTFO of my life if they want. I don't see the pay-off to remaining friends with folks who wish to stand in the way of cleaning up the most horrific and dark back bedroom of our sport and industry.

              I'm not interested in reputations or statuses of any of the BNTs who have gotten caught with their pants down, so to speak. What does disturb me about the ISWG crowd is the ill-informed conviction that SafeSport isn't worth trusting or defending. While it's fine to critique and improve, I don't see any of these folks 1. offering a better solution; and 2. bothering to educate themselves enough to possibly devise a better process. And that's the height of a form of callousness and elitism that's peculiar to modern Americans. I think these folks have been wrapped in easy privilege for so long (including the scapegoating of victims of sex crimes or taking an uncritical, non-factual view of history), that they can't find a reason to think carefully or empathetically about the problem of reining in the predators amidst our ranks.
              The armchair saddler
              Politically Pro-Cat

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Zirgs View Post
                The fundamental question is how best to deal with sexual abuse and the long needed cultural change. For generations victims were oppressed by both the abuser and society.

                As an engaged parent that raises our kids to be empowered, I am horrified by SafeSports current codes and processes.

                While they have honorable Mission and Values, their authoritarian dictation of whom I can choose to train with, and associate my children and resources, so they can be athletes and participate in the sport they love is going down the path of dictatorship.

                Under the good intention to protect, SafeSpot strips away that which enables all of us to be empowered - Choice.

                Raising awareness is good.

                Stripping away the right to choose who should run a business and associate with harms all of us.

                Those that are at most risk, are those that post negative stories and comments about others in these forum, regardless if you think they are true. That behavior is considered bullying, and becomes grounds for reporting to SafeSport.

                I personally know that one of the banned trainers is innocent, and the key witness 20 yrs ago witheld evidence in the form of video surveillance tapes, which would have exonerated them. Since the staue of limitations is expired, the ability to correct a past ruling will be hard. So instead an innocent person is banned, and this forum is not only bashing them, but hunting to strip them of their business associates.

                We officially live in Orwell's 1984
                The whole point of an independent, unbiased body is to provide checks and balances when otherwise well meaning people lose perspective and overlook the possibility that someone close to children may have motivation for being there that is completely unrelated to your child’s best interests.

                When I shared my story earlier in this thread re: competitive dance, I in no way, shape or form meant to imply I had bad or negligent parents. Quite the opposite actually. But when you’re in an environment that is a direct pipeline for future professionals, where your child has been identified as one of the best of the best and people are constantly reinforcing your child’s potential and clamouring to give him/her opportunities, it’s easy to overlook the red flags or give people the benefit of the doubt that maybe you or your child misunderstood what happened.

                Both of my parents worked full time. In order to give me the opportunities that they did, they couldn’t be there with me every minute of every day. Had SafeSport existed at the time I was a child in that environment, I would like to think that at least one person might have taken a step back, asked WTF??? is going on here and advocated for the kids. What decent, healthy grown man with any sense of appropriateness whatsoever, wants to surround himself with little kids, often wearing the equivalent of underwear, and encourage them to gyrate or touch themselves on stage in front of hundreds of people? Let that sink in for a minute. I wish someone’s dad taking pictures of me was the worst of my problems back then.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by BigMama1 View Post
                  2. They apparently have evidence of misconduct as far back as 50 years and as recently as the 1990s.
                  I hate to bring this up, and this is no defense of George, but the 1990s were still 25-30 years ago, as evidenced by my upcoming high school reunion

                  We don’t mind the Nazi going to trial after so many years because there is no statute of limitations on murder, but sexual crimes do in most states. Not saying it’s right, just stating a fact.
                  https://www.rainn.org/state-state-gu...es-limitations

                  I suspect that there will be increased pressure to change these types of laws now that more egregious behavior is coming to light. Like it or not, society has changed dramatically even in the time that I’ve been alive WRT the acceptability of certain behavior. Doesn’t make it right, not saying that, just saying that there *was* a different standard, even in the 90/s. Watch some 90s commercials where teens as young as 12 were highly sexualized as models. Brooke Shields is an example. https://www.theguardian.com/theguard...ild-photograph

                  Of course, that was just for girls, sexualizing young boys hasn’t been normalized since the Romans.

                  Our society is shifting, and I’m glad of it, but it doesn’t surprise me at all that some would be struggling to adjust, not just because GM is a hero, in their eyes but also because attitudes were different when they grew up. Epstein’s parties that he is being (now posthumously) jailed for? That behavior was so normalized in the modeling world that it was just part and parcel of becoming one.

                  I’m still glad they’ve chosen to set down GM and others as it is necessary for things to get better as a society. It’s just a painful change for some people so the outcry is expected. I don’t think it necessarily means that they are awful people, but rather people do adjust slowly to “newer” social ideas.
                  Last edited by OneGrayPony; Aug. 14, 2019, 09:05 AM. Reason: Writing on my phone sucks

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post

                    I hate to bring this up, and this is no defense of George, but the 1990s were still 25-30 years ago, as evidenced by my upcoming high school reunion

                    We don’t mind the Nazi going to trial after so many years because there is no statute of limitations on murder, but sexual crimes do in most states. Not saying it’s right, just stating a fact.
                    I will repeat again..... there is NO statute of limitations for criminal charges of sexual abuse in NJ.
                    As of December 1, the statute of limitations for civil cases is changed to victim turning 55 or 7 years after their knowledge, whichever comes later. Hunterdon was located in NJ. So if these incidents happened at Hunterdon 20 years ago, the victims are not 55 yet. Also other states have or are removing the statute of limitations.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Zirgs View Post
                      The fundamental question is how best to deal with sexual abuse and the long needed cultural change. For generations victims were oppressed by both the abuser and society.

                      As an engaged parent that raises our kids to be empowered, I am horrified by SafeSports current codes and processes.

                      While they have honorable Mission and Values, their authoritarian dictation of whom I can choose to train with, and associate my children and resources, so they can be athletes and participate in the sport they love is going down the path of dictatorship.

                      Under the good intention to protect, SafeSpot strips away that which enables all of us to be empowered - Choice.

                      Raising awareness is good.

                      Stripping away the right to choose who should run a business and associate with harms all of us.

                      Those that are at most risk, are those that post negative stories and comments about others in these forum, regardless if you think they are true. That behavior is considered bullying, and becomes grounds for reporting to SafeSport.

                      I personally know that one of the banned trainers is innocent, and the key witness 20 yrs ago witheld evidence in the form of video surveillance tapes, which would have exonerated them. Since the staue of limitations is expired, the ability to correct a past ruling will be hard. So instead an innocent person is banned, and this forum is not only bashing them, but hunting to strip them of their business associates.

                      We officially live in Orwell's 1984
                      WTF? I didn’t realize that training with sexual predators was a constitutional right lol. If you want to send your kids to train with accused sexual predators, that’s entirely up to you. Those trainers (and you by extension) just can’t compete in USEF shows. Your choice, your right. But honestly, WTF?

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Keep it Simple View Post

                        I will repeat again..... there is NO statute of limitations for criminal charges of sexual abuse in NJ.
                        As of December 1, the statute of limitations for civil cases is changed to victim turning 55 or 7 years after their knowledge, whichever comes later. Hunterdon was located in NJ. So if these incidents happened at Hunterdon 20 years ago, the victims are not 55 yet. Also other states have or are removing the statute of limitations.
                        Read my post again. The whole thing please. That’s exactly what I said, barring your quite incorrect statement that NJ has eliminated the statute of limitations on sexual crimes. Here are the details on that https://apps.rainn.org/policy/policy...650.1565783180 as it depends on the crime.

                        I was not, and am still not, defending GM.

                        I was explaining that I have empathy for people struggling to adjust.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post

                          I hate to bring this up, and this is no defense of George, but the 1990s were still 25-30 years ago, as evidenced by my upcoming high school reunion

                          We don’t mind the Nazi going to trial after so many years because there is no statute of limitations on murder, but sexual crimes do in most states. Not saying it’s right, just stating a fact.
                          https://www.rainn.org/state-state-gu...es-limitations

                          I suspect that there will be increased pressure to change these types of laws now that more egregious behavior is coming to light. Like it or not, society has changed dramatically even in the time that I’ve been alive WRT the acceptability of certain behavior. Doesn’t make it right, not saying that, just saying that there *was* a different standard, even in the 90/s. Watch some 90s commercials where teens as young as 12 were highly sexualized as models. Brooke Shields is an example. https://www.theguardian.com/theguard...ild-photograph

                          Of course, that was just for girls, sexualizing young boys hasn’t been normalized since the Romans.

                          Our society is shifting, and I’m glad of it, but it doesn’t surprise me at all that some would be struggling to adjust, not just because GM is a hero, in their eyes but also because attitudes were different when they grew up. Epstein’s parties that he is being (now posthumously) jailed for? That behavior was so normalized in the modeling world that it was just part and parcel of becoming one.

                          I’m still glad they’ve chosen to set down GM and others as it is necessary for things to get better as a society. It’s just a painful change for some people so the outcry is expected. I don’t think it necessarily means that they are awful people, but rather people do adjust slowly to “newer” social ideas.
                          The idea that sexually abusing minors is abhorrent is not a “new” social norm.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Zirgs View Post
                            Under the good intention to protect, SafeSpot strips away that which enables all of us to be empowered - Choice.
                            So when a doctor loses his license to practice, you would prefer to just know, not have him lose his right to practice.
                            *****
                            You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dannyboy View Post
                              check Zirgs join date. Can you say 'troll'?

                              ETA: and Zirgs If you 'know' one of the banned trainers is innocent, it's your duty to go to SafeSport and present your case. Good luck.
                              A different opinion is not a troll.
                              *****
                              You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                              Comment


                              • Nope, not necessarily a troll. But definitely defending a convicted child molester because lying b*tches, ya know.
                                Let me apologize in advance.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by Zirgs View Post

                                  We officially live in Orwell's 1984
                                  It is definitely 1984 if banning pederasts and child molesters from sport is considered infringement on choice.

                                  Normally I love irony, but I have little kids so this isn’t really funny to me.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Midge View Post

                                    So when a doctor loses his license to practice, you would prefer to just know, not have him lose his right to practice.
                                    I assumed he meant we would all be deprived of choosing to use an unlicensed doctor?

                                    Comment


                                    • I'm a couple of pages behind, but I had to say something about the editor's response to the letter to the editor...

                                      The way SafeSport operates, someone could accuse anyone of bullying or having sex with a minor - and they wouldn't even know it until they found out that they were banned for life and their careers destroyed.
                                      This is probably the stupidest statement. If they were banned for life and their careers destroyed, that means that obviously they were found to have been bullying or having sex with minors...in which case, they absolutely should be banned and have their career destroyed, and I don't really care if they knew about it or not (which they did). I don't get why people are clinging on so hard to their false ideas that SS is banning people on simple accusations. I mean, jeez, if that was all they did, the ban list would be like half of the equestrian world, there are a lot of vindictive people out there.

                                      Typical example of people not listening to the explanations of how they are wrong at all or even considering how logistically improbable it is, sticking their fingers in their ears while they continue to spout the same false facts over and over as if that will make them true.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Mia Sorella View Post

                                        The whole point of an independent, unbiased body is to provide checks and balances when otherwise well meaning people lose perspective and overlook the possibility that someone close to children may have motivation for being there that is completely unrelated to your child’s best interests.

                                        When I shared my story earlier in this thread re: competitive dance, I in no way, shape or form meant to imply I had bad or negligent parents. Quite the opposite actually. But when you’re in an environment that is a direct pipeline for future professionals, where your child has been identified as one of the best of the best and people are constantly reinforcing your child’s potential and clamouring to give him/her opportunities, it’s easy to overlook the red flags or give people the benefit of the doubt that maybe you or your child misunderstood what happened.

                                        Both of my parents worked full time. In order to give me the opportunities that they did, they couldn’t be there with me every minute of every day. Had SafeSport existed at the time I was a child in that environment, I would like to think that at least one person might have taken a step back, asked WTF??? is going on here and advocated for the kids. What decent, healthy grown man with any sense of appropriateness whatsoever, wants to surround himself with little kids, often wearing the equivalent of underwear, and encourage them to gyrate or touch themselves on stage in front of hundreds of people? Let that sink in for a minute. I wish someone’s dad taking pictures of me was the worst of my problems back then.
                                        Aug. 14, 2019, 07:33 AM
                                        About George Morris on the SS list Mia Sorella
                                        I am sorry to hear about your abuse. I have a MSW degree and have been the first to tell a young adult and child that their abuse was not their fault. I have had some vomit on me, as they expel the horrors of their abuse. There is no excuse to abuse.

                                        Society has oppressed these conversations, thus children were not empowered to speak. It is the silence that has allowed abuse to fester and not allow closure.

                                        It is good that we speak openly and constructively.

                                        However, to dictate to me whom I am allowed to work with and select for my children is just as abusive.

                                        In healthcare several decades ago maternal and child death rates at birth were very high. Rather than fine hospitals and dictate solutions, hospitals were required to publically post their Birth Vitals and Statistics. As parents were empowered to choose where to deliver their children, hospitals responded to fix problems. The medical specialty of OBGYN, Prenatal Care and NICU spawned from the posting of performance.

                                        Tranaparency and education are constructive mechanisms to make lasting change.

                                        Dictating and stripping parents of their rights to choose harms all of us and violates our freedoms.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by ladyj79 View Post
                                          Nope, not necessarily a troll. But definitely defending a convicted child molester because lying b*tches, ya know.
                                          No doubt!
                                          *****
                                          You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X