Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post

    Thanks, yes I think the aiding and abetting with teaching is what makes or breaks the antitrust case. HINT TO USEF, DROP IT.
    That's not in USEF's court; it's SafeSport. And their position is that people are given a lifetime ban because they were found to be abusive and dangerous and cannot be trusted with athletes.
    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

    Comment


      This: "Nobody cares that he is and was gay. Nobody cares about 10,000 partners.

      What matters is whether some of those partners were minors, and, beyond being minors, he used his position of power and trust to coerce them.

      [/QUOTE]

      The "pre-Aids gay culture" defense of sex with a minor is ridiculous. No one would argue that the molestation of children by clergy could be excused by a church culture which allowed and accommodated child abuse. Some of those children also "consented," although consent is highly problematic when the power differential is so vast.

      The situation in HJ with working students is completely unregulated and it needs to be regulated just as any other form of child labor is. Only then will children be safe from a spectrum of exploitation in the industry.

      Comment


        Kate Vosbury wrote a letter to editor of the horse of Delaware Valley.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Peggy View Post
          If you wanted an understanding of how a sexual predator works and avoids getting into trouble, I highly recommend the podcast Believed about Larry Nassar.
          https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510326/believed

          It was recommended upthread, or maybe on the RG thread, and I’ve listened to four episodes. One of his victims was six when it started and I think that was roughly twenty years ago.

          But it I don’t think I’ll ever think about PowerPoint quite the same way ever again.
          Second this. Thank you to whomever first mentioned this upthread. I’m only 4 episodes in as well & it is outstanding. Highly recommend (if you can stomach it- lots of disturbing info).

          Comment


            Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

            This will not be a popular stand here, but I agree with the above post. What we are talking about is equal to sitting in judgment in 1950 (many of you were around in 1950!) on events from 1899. THAT is how far removed we are now from that distant day and its entire social context. If you would like to read, in depth, about the cultural background in which these alleged event(s) took place, please read this article straight through to the end: https://quillette.com/2019/08/10/the...f-gay-culture/ First-hand historical detail about Studio 54 and more with emphasis on how free-wheeling it all was at that time and why that is equally unimaginable today.

            The law may arbitrarily place the age of consent today at 16, 18, 21, the way things are trending it may soon hit 26! That is actually an historical anomaly; in just about all early cultures, women were considered marriageable post-puberty, and the Bar Mitzvah or equivalent for young men happened at 13 for a reason. Sexually mature older teens are not physically or mentally the same as "children," and I think repeatedly branding GHM a "pedophile" right now is out of line; totally different levels of agency there. Rife speculation and gossip aside, until either SafeSport or someone else comes forward with the specifics of this allegation, WE DON'T KNOW what the issue was with GHM or when it took place. "Misconduct" could be an inappropriate relationship because it involved both age difference and power disparity, but that is neither the definition of rape nor pedophilia. And anyone paying attention knows #metoo is very much a moving target that erupted extremely recently. Many things are now considered "abuse," just like in riding itself, that 50 years ago very few even thought about. We also know people can be wrongly accused; that's why "Thou shalt not bear false witness" is one of those Commandments that could use dusting off.

            It's a sad fact of human nature that when dealing with sports legends, music stars, movie luminaries, or the rich and powerful who can make or break others' rarefied dream careers, the "casting couch" is a lure. There are just as many young people (even their parents!) who think the ends justify the means to reach "the top" and bask in the limelight of that fame and fortune as there are "stars" whose human weakness or sense of entitlement takes advantage of it. If we were to memory-hole the work of every actor, model, musician, sportsman or even writer who exchanged sex for preferment, there honestly wouldn't be much left to watch on TV. We seem to be in a strange, post-religious cultural moment where we elevate ordinary, flawed, weak humans as "gods," and anoint them with perfection, then a few years later take great delight in ripping them down like wolves from the very pedestals we put them on to begin with.

            As the participants in this thread have thinned out after 90+ pages, it's quite noticeable that a majority of the remaining claim personal childhood abuse. Without in any way diminishing the experience of ANY victim, it must also be noted that such would be automatically excluded from jury selection in a case like this because any objectivity is impossible.


            I. Can’t. Even. 😂😂😂🤣😅🤪

            Comment


              Originally posted by poltroon View Post

              That's not in USEF's court; it's SafeSport. And their position is that people are given a lifetime ban because they were found to be abusive and dangerous and cannot be trusted with athletes.
              USEF is the one who posted a PSA that holding a clinic is aiding and abetting, so it is possibly with them. It SafeSport is giving them this guidance, same applies.

              They will be much safer from an antitrust challenge if they lose what they have said about the aiding and abetting aspect of clinics. Given the broad nature of the language used, I would think a trainer arranging GM clinics, not approved by USEF, would be OK but the guidance doesn’t say that. It says clinics in general.

              In this sense, PV and his ilk have more freedom to teach and clinic than GM. That is a vulnerable spot for the case. Affecting competition is important. Affecting a single competitor, no.

              Comment


                Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post

                i do think that if SadeSport runs afoul of the Sherman Act, this aiding and abetting aspect is what is going to do it. It makes it possible to argue a broader affect on competition, as opposed to only an effect on a single competitor. That is key.
                If someone brings a case, would the whole thing get thrown out, or just this part?
                *****
                You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

                  Obviously, and goes without saying. My hope is that when it all comes out in the wash, the finding will be that GHM's relationship was with someone of the age of consent, who consented. I honestly don't think the man is STUPID enough to have raped a 13-year old. Just because someone was a live-in student, it does not automatically follow that he was being predated at age 13 by George. My hope is that he was 16 plus. I make no apologies whatsoever for pedophilia.

                  A reminder: As of now no one but SS knows and they aren't saying.

                  What I DO know is that on FB and IRL an impressive list of horse pros of stature have put their names (and therefore reputations and businesses) on the line coming out in public defense of George. People who've known him personally all their lives and worked alongside him all the way back to that time, vs.concern trolls who have no connection whatsoever.
                  To me, that speaks volumes, and drove my insufficient attempt to provide a more balanced perspective here.
                  It is difficult to believe that it takes 18 months to determine whether the age of the reporter was over or under 16 at the time of the incident.
                  When you’re riding a horse, you don’t pick a fight unless you’re pretty sure you’re going to win the argument. For the usual confidentiality reasons, I don’t know what evidence SsgeSport has. However, this early in their life, when they still need to create a track record of legitimacy, they would need to be absolute morons to pick a fight with GM unless they were 99% sure they could withstand an appeal. They are only required to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence, but I’m guessing that they can clear the preponderance bar like a Grand Prix jumper clearing a cavaletti. I don’t think they’re morons.

                  Re all the well known trainers showing their support for GM publicly: it’s not as public as it could be. ISWG, SafeSport The honest conversations, and SafeSport Overhaul are all closed groups. If you proudly SWG and want to shout it from the rooftops, wouldn’t you make the group public? What is the point of an echo chamber in which a large group of people pre-certified as GM supporters swap posts about what a travesty his ban is? If you truly SWG, wouldn’t you want to attempt to persuade those who don’t SWG, or the undecided, to your side? I think the ISWG group is closed in part because they need to maintain a certain level of willful ignorance in order to support GM and continue to cast SafeSport as the villain, and they don’t want anybody putting a damper on their self-righteous rage by bringing in any nasty facts.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

                    This will not be a popular stand here, but I agree with the above post. What we are talking about is equal to sitting in judgment in 1950 (many of you were around in 1950!) on events from 1899. THAT is how far removed we are now from that distant day and its entire social context. If you would like to read, in depth, about the cultural background in which these alleged event(s) took place, please read this article straight through to the end: https://quillette.com/2019/08/10/the...f-gay-culture/ First-hand historical detail about Studio 54 and more with emphasis on how free-wheeling it all was at that time and why that is equally unimaginable today.
                    Wait, because it was a free wheeling time, it was okay to bang children????



                    As the participants in this thread have thinned out after 90+ pages, it's quite noticeable that a majority of the remaining claim personal childhood abuse. Without in any way diminishing the experience of ANY victim, it must also be noted that such would be automatically excluded from jury selection in a case like this because any objectivity is impossible.
                    I also dodged the child abuse bullet, so no. I keep posting because even after the raft, no Ocean Liner!, of explanation on how Safe Sport works, people like you STILL don't get

                    1. He knew who his accusers were
                    2. He was afforded due process
                    3. You can't bang children. Even 50 years ago.


                    *****
                    You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Midge View Post

                      If someone brings a case, would the whole thing get thrown out, or just this part?
                      A case needs to affect competition to lodge a viable Sherman Act claim. At this point it is premature to make predictions as to whether a party could do so as to pass a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment. Maybe. Maybe not. But if it doesn’t, the whole thing would the thrown out. Keep in mind this is a dynamic area of law and I can’t accurately read the tea leaves. I do think it isn’t a frivolous claim. Beyond that, the facts and procedure of SafeSport and the skill of the attorneys all play a huge part.

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                        Kate Vosbury wrote a letter to editor of the horse of Delaware Valley.
                        Link - http://thehorseofdelawarevalley.com/...-to-the-editor
                        The Evil Chem Prof

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post

                          USEF is the one who posted a PSA that holding a clinic is aiding and abetting, so it is possibly with them. It SafeSport is giving them this guidance, same applies.
                          Does anyone have a link to this PSA? I somehow missed it.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post


                            The law may arbitrarily place the age of consent today at 16, 18, 21, the way things are trending it may soon hit 26! That is actually an historical anomaly; in just about all early cultures, women were considered marriageable post-puberty, and the Bar Mitzvah or equivalent for young men happened at 13 for a reason. Sexually mature older teens are not physically or mentally the same as "children," and I think repeatedly branding GHM a "pedophile" right now is out of line; totally different levels of agency there. Rife speculation and gossip aside, until either SafeSport or someone else comes forward with the specifics of this allegation, WE DON'T KNOW what the issue was with GHM or when it took place. "Misconduct" could be an inappropriate relationship because it involved both age difference and power disparity, but that is neither the definition of rape nor pedophilia. And anyone paying attention knows #metoo is very much a moving target that erupted extremely recently. Many things are now considered "abuse," just like in riding itself, that 50 years ago very few even thought about. We also know people can be wrongly accused; that's why "Thou shalt not bear false witness" is one of those Commandments that could use dusting off.


                            With the bill passing extending the Statute of Limitations for sexual abuse, it will be interesting to see if any victims file a civil suit against GM. If abused as a minor, the victim now has until their 55th birthday (or seven years from the time they become aware of the injury, whichever is later) to file a civil suit.

                            https://www.njtvonline.org/news/vide...-abuse-claims/

                            And FYI, there is NO statute of limitations for criminal cases of sexual assault in New Jersey

                            Comment


                              And the response by Sara is as unprofessional as the original story. She still does not understand how SafeSport works and continues to state the the accused does not know who reported (wrong), that they are unable to defend themselves (wrong). Some people refuse to believe that GM and the other banned individuals were well aware of the situation long before they are banned for life.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post

                                USEF is the one who posted a PSA that holding a clinic is aiding and abetting, so it is possibly with them. It SafeSport is giving them this guidance, same applies.

                                They will be much safer from an antitrust challenge if they lose what they have said about the aiding and abetting aspect of clinics. Given the broad nature of the language used, I would think a trainer arranging GM clinics, not approved by USEF, would be OK but the guidance doesn’t say that. It says clinics in general.

                                In this sense, PV and his ilk have more freedom to teach and clinic than GM. That is a vulnerable spot for the case. Affecting competition is important. Affecting a single competitor, no.
                                USEF has no leeway in this. It is baked into the SafeSport law and code. All the NGBs are obligated.

                                Whether or not it holds up in court, it will be SafeSport's to litigate. See Page 15.

                                https://uscenterforsafesport.org/wp-...yperlinked.pdf

                                E. Aiding and Abetting
                                Aiding and Abetting is any act taken with the purpose of facilitating, promoting, or encouraging the commission of Prohibited Conduct by a Participant. Aiding and Abetting also includes, without limitation, knowingly:

                                1. Allowing any person who has been identified as suspended or otherwise ineligible by the Center to be in any way associated with or employed by an organization affiliated with or holding itself out as affiliated with an NGB, LAO, the USOC or the Olympic Movements;

                                2. Allowing any person who has been identified as suspended or otherwise ineligible by the Center to coach or instruct Participants;

                                3. Allowing any person who has been identified as ineligible by the Center to have ownership interest in a facility, an organization, or its related entities, if that facility/organization/related entity is affiliated with or holds itself out as affiliated with an NGB, LAO, USOC or the Olympic Movements.

                                4. Providing any coaching-related advice or service to an Athlete who has been identified as suspended or otherwise ineligible by the Center.

                                5. Allowing any person to violate the terms of their suspension or any other sanctions imposed by the Center.

                                In addition, a Participant also violates the Code if someone acts on behalf of the Participant to engage in Aiding or Abetting, or if the guardian, family member, or Advisor of a Participant, including Minor Participants, engages in Aiding or Abetting.
                                (As to who they'd go after, I imagine they'd be starting with letters of reprimand and their actions would probably be contextual. The old friend who goes and rides a horse with a suspended person in the vicinity is probably not going to get the same treatment as someone who hosts an equitation clinic for juniors. They're busy folk, alas. But they might go after an elite figure skating athlete, say, who made known he was training with BNT, and was encouraging others to do so. However, insurance companies may put the kibosh on all of it of their own accord.)

                                It is meant, explicitly, to end the influence of big name coaches who are found to have created dangerous conditions for athletes. People like Don Peters, who also helped win a lot of (gymnastics) Olympic medals. BNTs that a lot of people would justify training with. The intent is super clear.

                                You can't hire a doctor for your practice or hospital who loses a license, either.

                                I enjoy the lawyer talk but I'm a little surprised at this particular line you're taking.

                                If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                Comment


                                  Originally posted by HoolieB View Post

                                  Believe me, I am embarrassed about how I let the celebrity of GM affect my perception.
                                  Yes, but you took a good look at the facts and changed your opinion accordingly. That's what reasonable people *do*.
                                  "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                                  ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                                  Comment


                                    Figure Skating is having a tough week too. This is a direct civil suit instead of a SafeSport action. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/09/s...ual-abuse.html

                                    Adam Schmidt, 34, a former skating student of Mr. Callaghan’s, filed a lawsuit in San Diego saying that Mr. Callaghan had repeatedly abused him from 1999 to 2001, beginning when Mr. Schmidt was 14 years old. Mr. Schmidt became the fourth male skater to have publicly accused Mr. Callaghan of improper behavior during a period from the early 1990s to the early 2000s.

                                    Also named as defendants were U.S. Figure Skating, the sport’s national governing body, and a skating facility in suburban Detroit where Mr. Callaghan taught Mr. Schmidt.

                                    ...

                                    Mr. Callaghan, 73, is best known for coaching Tara Lipinski to a gold medal at the 1998 Winter Olympics and coaching Todd Eldredge to a world championship, six United States titles and three Olympic appearances.
                                    The stories are so similar. And you can read about the 1999 allegations that caused Lipinski to move to another coach, linked in that article.
                                    https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/11/s...?module=inline

                                    ''For whatever reasons I don't understand, people love me or hate me,'' Callaghan said. ''I have no clue why. In almost 30 years, I've taught about 500 kids. I don't understand this. The allegations are awful. I can't believe I worked my butt off for kids to be successful in skating to be better people and this stuff happens.''
                                    If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                    Comment


                                      Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

                                      Obviously, and goes without saying. My hope is that when it all comes out in the wash, the finding will be that GHM's relationship was with someone of the age of consent, who consented. I honestly don't think the man is STUPID enough to have raped a 13-year old. Just because someone was a live-in student, it does not automatically follow that he was being predated at age 13 by George. My hope is that he was 16 plus. I make no apologies whatsoever for pedophilia.

                                      A reminder: As of now no one but SS knows and they aren't saying.

                                      What I DO know is that on FB and IRL an impressive list of horse pros of stature have put their names (and therefore reputations and businesses) on the line coming out in public defense of George. People who've known him personally all their lives and worked alongside him all the way back to that time, vs.concern trolls who have no connection whatsoever.
                                      To me, that speaks volumes, and drove my insufficient attempt to provide a more balanced perspective here.
                                      😱😳😂
                                      Not stupid. Narcissistic. Personality. Disorder.
                                      Wait and see. There are many names missing too. Those who stood by RG were wrong.
                                      Actually, there are others who know parts of the truth outside of Safesport. Those who spoke to Safesport. There are a number of us on here with first hand experience with Safesport and who personally know people who were involved in the GM investigation.
                                      Feel free to keep drinking the Kool Aid.

                                      Comment


                                        Can any of you lawyers weigh in on the verbiage of this petition please? Are they essentially asking for Safe Sport to be in civil court as opposed to what it is now? Wasn't the whole point of SS to keep these people from being eligible to compete or coach even if they did were not eligible to be tried for whatever reason?

                                        https://www.change.org/p/donald-j-tr...se_react=false
                                        McDowell Racing Stables

                                        Remarkable Leather Goods
                                        Triple Stitched Halters, Hand Made To Order in US

                                        Comment


                                          In the link to the letter to the editor above, you can see an ad for an upcoming GM clinic. I guess he can keep teaching clinics outside of USEF?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X