Stallion Spotlight

Sir Donnerhall_02Beelitz

Real Estate Spotlight

_MG_4777-HDR
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Irish Ei's View Post
    I have unfollowed the FB group.
    My stomach is truly reacting badly to the perpetual onslaught of venom
    Someone invited me to join. I see their posts. George must be so proud!

    Edited because I spelled geirge/george

    Comment


    • I wonder if Eric Lamaze still thinks the horse world owes George an apology ?

      George owes the victims & the horse world an apology.

      My heart breaks for all his victims. I hope his name gets removed from trophies, classes, clinics & stadiums.

      Comment


      • Here we go kids, the article we’ve been waiting for, not revelatory but certainly fills in some blanks. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/s...register-email

        Comment


        • Just touching back on the qualifications of the investigators and others who work for Safe Sport.

          https://safesport.bamboohr.com/jobs/

          Here are the job postings. They require experience.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Denali6298 View Post
            Just touching back on the qualifications of the investigators and others who work for Safe Sport.

            https://safesport.bamboohr.com/jobs/

            Here are the job postings. They require experience.
            I’m amazed that you continue to be so obtuse about this aspect of the discussion. The comments about the wording on the issue by SS are valid in that initially a non- qualified( as a reporter I asked all three of my interviewers what their creds were) clearly are not in this designated class. All this Safe Sport is perfect already is as naive as George is completely
            innocent. Let’s recognize and fix the glitches instead of taking an irrational high ground.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Horsegirl's Mom View Post

              Yes, I think we all understand that.

              The question is whether that could be challenged in court. People say, "a private club can do whatever it wants." However, I'm not sure a court would agree that USEF is merely a private club, like Tarrytown Bridge Club or Norwell Elks Club. The reason is that USEF has near-monopoly control over a particular livelihood--i.e., being a hunter/jumper professional. And yes, I know you can still teach riding in your backyard even if you are banned from USEF, but let's all be honest and admit it's not the same, and if you were not already a famous trainer it would pretty much cut off your ability to become one. I think likening it to a state bar association or medical board is somewhat apt.

              A true private club can make whatever rules it wants: "No women" "No Asians" or whatever. I'm not so sure that a group that exercises such powerful control over a particular profession can do so. Does anyone really believe USEF could make a rule barring Asians or women?

              Remember, private universities are "private," but courts have struck down their sexual assault tribunals on the ground they don't provide adequate due process. So clearly there are limits on what some private institutions can do.

              I don't think these issues are simple. I will be very interested to see what legal challenges are raised and how they are decided.

              I support SS's mission, and i don't defend GM, but as an attorney I'm definitely intrigued by how this will go.
              I believe the basis for court rulings wrt private universities is their acceptance of government funds, either grant money or guaranteed loans. So not the same thing at all.
              "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

              ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

              Comment


              • A GM victim should write a book... call it in “Unfathomable”.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jealoushe View Post
                  I love how everyone is a law enforcement expert because of this attempted murder. I’m a total true crime junkie, I listen to podcasts all day long and read true crime forums etc.

                  Charges aren’t made without serious evidence supporting the charge. They don’t throw charges out willy nilly because they only get one chance to do it right and not make mistakes for their case. Obviously we don’t know many details to the story but we have to trust that LE did a thorough investigation today and have used their expertise to lay the appropriate charges.
                  Doesnt it have to go to the Grand Jury to see if it will be tried?
                  Save a life...be an organ donor! Visit www.Transplantbuddies.org

                  Comment


                  • I just took a look at the COTH FB page on Michael Barisone incident. One of the first comments I saw was "something is wrong in the horse world". I couldn't help but laugh.
                    Obvious, much?

                    Then I had to quit reading. The rest of the comments varied between "He should be hung" and "But it was self defense!" Judging from the number of people who "know" what happened there must have been a huge number of witnesses.

                    Now, if only George had kept someone around with a clipboard to tick off the numbers...

                    I'm sorry, I haven't had enough coffee yet and I have to find some humour in all of this or I'll start crying.
                    Edited because I haven't had enough coffee yet and there were misspellings.

                    Comment


                    • per a poster over on the infamous "Diva" (I don't frequent the board because its classless but there are some people with brains there), a friend of the poster was involved in the investigation after the GM Camp threatened her. Apparently the investigation goes much, much farther than a single incident 50 years ago, as GM said. They have evidence that goes all the way up through the 90's and 2000's and its bad. Sufficient information that is bad enough that he is never going to get out of this. Per the poster, another hunterdon affiliate is likely to go down in the near future as well.

                      As another poster mentioned who was close with GM, this investigation has been going on for a long, long time. this is not something that Safesport took on 2 months ago and jumped to conclusions.

                      I found it extremely suspicious that Bernie Traurig relinquished his memberships as a "protest" to what occurred. When you relinquish your memberships, SS can't investigate you.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by ClerkofCourts View Post
                        Here we go kids, the article we’ve been waiting for, not revelatory but certainly fills in some blanks. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/08/s...register-email
                        Just and FYI- a ISWG member posted the link (2ce) and it was taken down (2ce) saying "This is a support page only. Don't name the accuser. It's for GM only" (not a direct quote but you get the gist and it is close).

                        People DON'T WANT TO BE INFORMED.
                        Come to the dark side, we have cookies

                        Comment


                        • @ FairHills123 Thank you for this!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by snaffle1987 View Post
                            per a poster over on the infamous "Diva" (I don't frequent the board because its classless but there are some people with brains there), a friend of the poster was involved in the investigation after the GM Camp threatened her. Apparently the investigation goes much, much farther than a single incident 50 years ago, as GM said. They have evidence that goes all the way up through the 90's and 2000's and its bad. Sufficient information that is bad enough that he is never going to get out of this. Per the poster, another hunterdon affiliate is likely to go down in the near future as well.

                            As another poster mentioned who was close with GM, this investigation has been going on for a long, long time. this is not something that Safesport took on 2 months ago and jumped to conclusions.

                            I found it extremely suspicious that Bernie Traurig relinquished his memberships as a "protest" to what occurred. When you relinquish your memberships, SS can't investigate you.
                            The Bernie info definitely piqued my interest.... But like. If he "goes down" as part of the fallout from someone's investigation.... they can probably still ban him from USEF anyway? Like you don't have to be an active member to be told "actually you can't be a member." Be another interesting question to pose to SS.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by dannyboy View Post
                              @ FairHills123 Thank you for this!
                              agree. I have been on COTH many years and this post stands out a mile for its thoughtful, well considered voice. Please stay a friend and share as a part of our community
                              _\\]
                              -- * > hoopoe
                              Procrastinate NOW
                              Introverted Since 1957

                              Comment


                              • I’ve caught up on this entire thread, and read the NYT report. A few observations...

                                1. The NYT report does seem as though it may have been rushed to print in certain respects. They had to run it as soon as this news broke. It’s understandable.

                                2. The two names in the article are Jonathan Soresi and Michael Hart. Both have long been rumored to be victims. They also are both tragic examples of what folks mean when they say, “There are no perfect victims.” I do not know Mr. Soresi, nor do I condone the possession of child porn for any reason... but I am willing to say I Stand with him. He was once a 13 year old boy who lost his father at the age of 6. According to the NYT article, he was from a modest background. He went to live and train with GHM at Hunterdon. And his life went off the rails for many years as an adult. That is a tragedy. Soresi’s decision to come forward all these years later and see this through? He has given the other victims - whoever they may be - a voice. Including Michael Hart... who has died. There are rumors of one other possible victim... who has also died too young. So incredibly sad.

                                3. I’m taking a break from Facebook... but am curious if there are attacks starting on Soresi. For those of you who are flies on the wall in the “I Stand With George” group... I hope you are willing to report online vitriol directed at him, just as you did when it was directed at AK, and Hilary. There are no perfect victims... they all were vulnerable young teens once though. They all deserve compassion.

                                4. I’ve heard some other truly tragic stories recently as well about additional victims. This behavior went past these two. Bottom line... it’s not ok to name names. I hope that the equestrian world can get their $hit together and show more in the way of compassion and be careful with their comments. I can’t imagine the stress some victims who chose NOT to come forward are feeling right now. I hope as the appeal plays out, they find support if they need it privately, or decide to contact Safe Sport if that works for them instead. Or not. They were all just kids once, and deserved a chance to ride and learn and pursue sports without experiencing sexual exploitation. It’s not ok. Not for young girls. Not for young boys who grow up to be gay men. Kids are kids and ALL minors should be off limits. Period.

                                5. I’m going to encourage folks... be kind. compassionate and mindful as this plays out. If people who have connections to GM from any prior time are choosing not to speak... leave them alone. Hopefully they do feel confident enough in the individuals from Safe Sport who have handled the investigation to speak up privately... if they so choose. Regardless, they alone are the ones that get to make that choice.

                                6. We often hear statistics with respect to the low incidence of false reports of sexual abuse/assault. Are there specific statistics on the incidence of false reporting by males? My guess is that number is quite low. Just something to think about.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by specifiedcupcake View Post

                                  The Bernie info definitely piqued my interest.... But like. If he "goes down" as part of the fallout from someone's investigation.... they can probably still ban him from USEF anyway? Like you don't have to be an active member to be told "actually you can't be a member." Be another interesting question to pose to SS.
                                  I believe they can. They listed Jimmy Williams even though he was deceased

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by snaffle1987 View Post

                                    I found it extremely suspicious that Bernie Traurig relinquished his memberships as a "protest" to what occurred. When you relinquish your memberships, SS can't investigate you.
                                    I was wondering about this part. I also had the same suspicion about him relinquishing his membership and whether it was truly in protest or a thinly veiled attempt to protect himself.

                                    But:

                                    1) How exactly does one "relinquish" their membership? For as long as I can remember, you've had the option to join USEF annually or pay for a lifetime membership (I also think there might have been a family membership way back in the day?). I've always paid annually because even at my most active, I only attend a handful of USEF-affiliated shows a year, and many years I attend none. I'm assuming someone like Traurig would have a lifetime membership. I've never seen any verbiage in the rulebook about how one can "cancel" their membership-- can someone point me to it if it exists? An annual membership would just expire, but a lifetime membership? If you tell USEF "cancel my lifetime membership," do they actually do it?

                                    2) SafeSport/USEF still made a point about listing Jimmy Williams as permanently ineligible, whose membership was clearly inactive. I understand USEF was probably holding him up as an example, and it gave credence to their removal of his name from awards. But based on the JW situation alone, it doesn't seem like an active membership is necessary for SS to issue a sanction.

                                    3) You can show at most (all?) USEF shows by paying a non-member fee. So how does that factor in to all of this? Say you are successful in relinquishing your membership to prevent SafeSport investigation-- that doesn't necessarily stop you from showing. If you're attending USEF shows, does that still make you eligible for investigation? Talk about a double edged sword: certainly it would be a big loophole allowing potentially dangerous parties to remain active in USEF. But on the other hand, if anyone who has ever participated in a USEF affiliated show is eligible to investigation, that could create quite the mess of allegations. There is usually verbiage on the entry form that everyone competing must abide by USEF rules, so I would assume that now includes SafeSport and the latter example might be true.

                                    I'm just musing over the situation at this point, not trying to make any argument. I also haven't had any caffeine yet, so my musings might be incoherent.
                                    Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Farhills123 View Post
                                      I stand with the victims. I have known GM since I was 9 years old. He is a brilliant coach, a master. He is also an incredible judge of people and a master manipulator, which is one of the reason why he can get the most out of his students. He is charming, he is funny, he can talk about just about any topic. He loves to travel and meet new and interesting people. I am now 42 years old and I last saw George about 4 years ago, we spent a few nights catching up at a weekend away with some horse friends and he helped me with my horse, got on him and jumped him around. It was wonderful.
                                      Having said all that I must point out something which I am so surprised no one seems to have noticed. In his very own book he talks several times about how he has two sides to his personality. He discusses his wild party days, how he would go off the rails in the 70s and blow off steam after the horse show. There is a professional, very ‘grown up’ side to GM and there is a childish, petulant - what he would call ‘naughty’ side to him as well. He talks about those wild days to his friends often.

                                      I did not actually train with GM, my mother wouldnt let me. I trained with his assistant coaches and did the equitation, not the jumpers. I did not witness anything but there have ALWAYS been - from the time I was a child until most recently a few years ago - much much younger boys /men around him. As he got older they were more ‘boy toys’ - definitely over the age of 18 but always way way younger than George himself.

                                      His reach into the sport is extraordinary. Go back and read his book. With the exception of Missy and Andre (although Andre’s mentor was Judy Richter who has a long and close relationship with GM) - anyway, his ‘reach’ into the big name trainers and helping put them on the map in some way or other is why he is being defended / protected (call it what you will). He has doled out favours his entire career. He is not Santa and has never professed to be so. He has calmed down in his elderly age but believe me - in the 70s and 80s and most of the early 90s - if you were called on by George to do something, no matter how old you were - you did it.

                                      Imagine having that kind of power and then imagine a teenage boy going to live with him. He had teenage boys living with him all throughout his years at Hunterdon. And whatever happened in that house (and I am not saying this was Jeffrey Epstein, mind you, I am not saying that at all), but can’t we all admit that there is an enormous power dynamic there just waiting to be exploited?
                                      And then look at his protégées - his students, Let’s see. And in no particular order. Bill Cooney. Who had a relationship with Frank Madden who was a junior at the time. Frank who then went on to have a relationship with Stacia Madden who was a junior. And then went on to have another relationship with a junior. All of that is absolutely well known.


                                      And then there are his other protégées which I think are noticeable for their ABSENCE in his book - Conrad. Ray Texel. Where are they in standing up for him? What did they see or experience?

                                      I am a woman. I could very easily write something like Katie did - I never witnessed anything. He has been nothing but wonderful and supportive of my riding. My grandmother, mother and myself have known GM. My grandmother told me stories of GM when he quite riding and worked in NYC as an actor. That is how far back we go. I have never witnessed anything inappropriate myself but there have always been rumours.

                                      Candice King, Molly Ashe, Katie Prudent. They can all stand up for George. But my darlings, you are women and you are not George’s cup of tea.

                                      I stand for the victims.

                                      Safe sport has many flaws but this has been in the works for a couple years. The public may be surprised but EVERYONE who is anyone in the horse community has known about this investigation. The investigation has concluded and he has been found guilty.

                                      It is a sad sad week for our sport.

                                      He is and always will be an amazing teacher, a “teacher’s teacher”. A huge guiding force in our sport for 50 + years. It is upsetting even for me to see him stripped of all that because he is VERY GOOD AT HIS JOB.

                                      But people are complex and they are more than just one thing. And I encourage everyone to re-read his book with new eyes and take a breathe and try and take the great things he has taught us about horses and riding, but please recognise that there are victimS here. I believe the safe sport board would not have found him guilty without real proof. I really do. No one wants this to happen to our sport. It is a sad day for everyone involved.
                                      Thank you for injecting a voice of reason into the hysteria

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by hoopoe View Post

                                        agree. I have been on COTH many years and this post stands out a mile for its thoughtful, well considered voice. Please stay a friend and share as a part of our community
                                        Farhills123 - I think the tag didn’t work earlier.

                                        And I agree - a thoughtful, important post.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Virginia Horse Mom View Post
                                          I do not know Mr. Soresi, nor do I condone the possession of child porn for any reason... but I am willing to say I Stand with him. He was once a 13 year old boy who lost his father at the age of 6.
                                          I’m no psychologist but even I know that people who are sexually abused as children are frequently attracted to child porn as adults. It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to understand why that might be.

                                          We are all responsible for choices we make as adults, but I completely agree that compassion is in order as the story about Soresi becomes clearer.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X