Sport Horse Spotlight

Sir Donnerhall_02Beelitz

Real Estate Spotlight

Hart_Barn 1

Sale Spotlight

COTH_without Subscribe
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by HLMom View Post

    Yes, this point was made with respect to the Robert Gage situation as well. It is actually healthy that people are uncomfortable putting blind trust in institutions that conduct most of their work in secret.

    I think if SS said, our investigation disclosed 15 underage victims of GM over a timespan of 20 years, the defenders would shut up fairly quickly.
    No they wouldn’t. They’d say they had an ax to grind or some such nonsense.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by bird4416 View Post
      GM has been quoted as saying he’s had over 10,000 sex partners. If he had sex everyday with a different person, that’s over 27 years of every day a new partner. That’s mind boggling. It’s not hard to believe that some of them weren’t of age or willing. How did he find time for horses?
      Oh,expand your horizons a little. Think of groups. :-)
      *****
      You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Denali6298 View Post

        In some of the social media posts concerning Rob Gage, a woman was stating that’s how it was. She then told a story about how she walked in on JW having sex with a junior rider.

        The horse world is way to small to give out those details because someone some where will know who and bet, that name will be on social media. People still are commenting the SS killed Rob Gage despite HR holding an informal QA about it. Another person has a photo from 2017 that makes you go WTF? I’ve seen it. That person thankfully sent it to the appropriate people.
        Agree with this. The PROCESS (as in, the standard operating procedures, not the process for specific cases) should be completely transparent to the public and stakeholders should maybe even have a say in that process. But after that, we need to trust the process and outcomes as it pertains to evaluating specific cases. Plus...disclosing that there had been more than one victim (as someone else suggested) shouldn't change the way the public forms their opinions about sexual predators! ffs.

        Comment


        • I think it's important to remember the incredible, unequaled power GHM has wielded in the sport over several decades. And not just on some local circuit. On the US Olympic team. In multimillion-dollar deals. Even in other countries and their programs. I read about GHM's ban in the Toronto Star this morning. It's global sports news.

          They say absolute power corrupts absolutely. GHM had the ability to completely destroy, not just *aspirations* but established careers.

          Given that power. Given the absolute tar-and-feather victim shaming job done on AK and HR when it became known that they were among JW and RG's respective victims...

          The person or persons who have come forward against GHM are possibly the bravest in our industry.

          I seriously doubt it was done on a whim, or out of spite. Who would risk everything to accuse the man known as "God H Morris" without having something really solid?

          Likewise, it has been proven time and again that Safesport does not hand down lifetime bans based on rumors, anonymous single-source allegations.

          For those who are, once again, asking to see evidence, to know who the victims are. Think now, about what you are asking for. Think of just how horrific the reaction will be. Think of the abuse those people will have to endure at the hands (and keyboards) of GHM's supporters. It will be worse than JW or RG to the power of 10.

          I think their right to safety trumps your curiosity.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Midge View Post

            Oh,expand your horizons a little. Think of groups. :-)
            Sort of like clinics!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by HLMom View Post

              I'm sorry you're not comfortable with what the science seems to show. Kind of reminds me of the Republicans with global warming. "We don't like it; therefore it can't be true!"

              Here is a 2019 article that reaches the same conclusion: https://www.timescolonist.com/life/h...ght-1.23644975
              So from your Q/A opinion piece you’re telling me male pattern baldness is from the environment? And that’s not a scientific study. Try again.

              Comment


              • Davignport - From Mary Phelps personal FB page

                "Robert Dover speaks. Thank you for standing up and taking a stand. Safe Sport needs an overhaul - period."

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Denali6298 View Post

                  In some of the social media posts concerning Rob Gage, a woman was stating that’s how it was. She then told a story about how she walked in on JW having sex with a junior rider.

                  The horse world is way to small to give out those details because someone some where will know who and bet, that name will be on social media. People still are commenting the SS killed Rob Gage despite HR holding an informal QA about it. Another person has a photo from 2017 that makes you go WTF? I’ve seen it. That person thankfully sent it to the appropriate people.
                  It’s a delicate line for sure. But I also think it could have helped to avoid what happened next: the victims ended up having to waive their anonymity completely and subject themselves to the full backlash of deniers just to correct the misinformation and be believed.

                  A basic summary as I mentioned above would have shielded them much better.
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  "I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of stars makes me dream." --Vincent Van Gogh

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by HLMom View Post

                    I'm sorry you're not comfortable with what the science seems to show. Kind of reminds me of the Republicans with global warming. "We don't like it; therefore it can't be true!"

                    Here is a 2019 article that reaches the same conclusion: https://www.timescolonist.com/life/h...ght-1.23644975
                    Keep in mind what is meant by "environment' in genetic studies. It usually means "anything that is not attributed to DNA sequences". Thus, this includes epigenetic phenomena, uterine environment, anything that affects upregulation or downregulation of genes, nutrition, contaminants, etc., etc., etc. Social environment is a part of overall "environment", but no one knows how much (if at all) it's relevant in sexual orientation. it's not a correct reading of the science to assume that everything not accounted for by "genes" equals "how you were raised".

                    Science does however support @evilc 123's position.

                    Back to the topic of the thread.

                    Comment


                    • At least now they are finally mad at SS and not the USEF LOL
                      Boss Mare Eventing Blog

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by IdahoRider View Post
                        And that guy he asked is really, really good looking! So if GM didn't go after the super good looking dude, he wouldn't have gone after anyone.

                        It disappoints me that Dover would do this.
                        Sheilah
                        Robert D has to say that guy is good looking; “that guy” is his husband. I believe he meant that as tongue in cheek but it was a poorly thought out comment, as was his whole defense of GM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Texarkana View Post
                          What I've learned about the appeal process from the fallout after RG is that SafeSport tends to be pretty quick to back down anymore when someone puts up a good fight.

                          I have no doubt in my mind GM will have this overturned, regardless of the "truth," given his stature and seemingly endless access to the resources of his supporters.

                          I hope I'm wrong, not because I want him to be guilty beyond reasonable doubt, but because overturning it would be about the worst thing that could happen in terms of SafeSport earning respect from the equestrian industry. As I've mentioned in the RG thread, "permanent ineligibility" from SafeSport has done little to slow down business for an alarming number of parties on the list, with many of those banned still actively involved in programs that train children. Overturning GM's suspension would further perpetuate misconceptions that SafeSport operates under false information.
                          I’m wondering, Jonathan has a conviction for child pornography. Most people with convicts are straight up banned. Maybe him being on the suspension list rather than the ban has to do with him singing like a canary about GM? Maybe it won’t be overturned so easily.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by evilc123 View Post

                            Sort of like clinics!
                            Ha! Exactly!!!!
                            *****
                            You will not rise to the occasion, you will default to your level of training.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by caffeinated View Post

                              I think PART (not all) of the backlash here is because people want to believe that they'd be able to spot an abuser. That they'd prevent it, that there's something obvious about them. That it would never happen to them or their family because they're attentive. This is the origin of "stranger danger" and the idea of creeper perverts.

                              {I have cut out the rest of this quote until the following sentence}

                              I also know there is an extremely good chance a person I know who experienced mental/emotional abuse at the hands of GM, is very likely to be reading this thread. If he is, I'm thinking of you right now and hope you're OK. And I really hope all this commentary is not hurting you.

                              I am shaking while I am typing this. Me. Me. I am the adult who has always been so conscientious about anyone around my child. Me. Me. I allowed my child to be emotionally and psychologically abused by someone in the horse industry and got sucked into the abuse as well. It’s a long story. The repercussions are still there for both my child and me and I will never again trust any trainer. I am angry. I was smart, I was knowledgeable, I was aware, I was involved and it STILL HAPPENED. I hate myself and especially this trainer for what happened. I. Hate. Her. No one warned us and after we left, we had so many people approach us and tell us what happened to them. This rabid victim shaming that’s going on right now is one of the reasons we will never report her to Safe Sport. That and the fact that she’s loosing her business and can’t hold on the clients.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Texarkana View Post
                                What I've learned about the appeal process from the fallout after RG is that SafeSport tends to be pretty quick to back down anymore when someone puts up a good fight.

                                I have no doubt in my mind GM will have this overturned, regardless of the "truth," given his stature and seemingly endless access to the resources of his supporters.

                                I hope I'm wrong, not because I want him to be guilty beyond reasonable doubt, but because overturning it would be about the worst thing that could happen in terms of SafeSport earning respect from the equestrian industry. As I've mentioned in the RG thread, "permanent ineligibility" from SafeSport has done little to slow down business for an alarming number of parties on the list, with many of those banned still actively involved in programs that train children. Overturning GM's suspension would further perpetuate misconceptions that SafeSport operates under false information.
                                @Texarkana

                                On what basis did you say that SafeSport has been quick to back down when someone puts up a fight?

                                I’m assuming they anticipate the appeal and don’t hand down a lifetime ban unless they think it will be upheld on appeal.
                                Last edited by YankeeDuchess; Aug. 6, 2019, 04:55 PM.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by DarkBayUnicorn View Post

                                  For those who are, once again, asking to see evidence, to know who the victims are. .
                                  And once again, we have the straw man argument. I've read every post on this thread and I don't see anyone asking to know the names of victims. Do you?

                                  Look, I'm not here to defend GM. In my own mind, given the rumors, the wild tales in his book, and the care USEF would take with someone of his stature, I lean toward suspecting he is guilty. (Not that my own personal hunch should count for much, but there it is).

                                  I would just advocate that people engage in this discussion reasonably, fairly, and accurately, taking care not to misconstrue each other's arguments or bully them for raising questions. Does that seem like a reasonable goal?

                                  Comment


                                  • I don't think they would ban someone of such stature as GM if they didn't feel they had a really, really, solid case. I'm sure whatever the NYT is cooking up won't help his case either.
                                    Last edited by Jealoushe; Aug. 6, 2019, 04:48 PM.
                                    Boss Mare Eventing Blog

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by HLMom View Post

                                      I'm sorry you're not comfortable with what the science seems to show. Kind of reminds me of the Republicans with global warming. "We don't like it; therefore it can't be true!"

                                      Here is a 2019 article that reaches the same conclusion: https://www.timescolonist.com/life/h...ght-1.23644975

                                      And another recent one:
                                      https://www.latimes.com/science/scie...007-story.html

                                      "But experts said the results -- as yet unpublished in a peer-reviewed journal -- offer preliminary new evidence that a man’s genetic inheritance is only one influence on his sexual orientation. Through the epigenome, the results suggest, some facet of life experience likely also primes a man for same-sex attraction.

                                      Over a person’s lifetime, myriad environmental factors -- nutrition, poverty, a mother’s love, education, exposure to toxic chemicals -- all help shape the person he will become."

                                      What experts??

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by seriously? View Post


                                        What experts??
                                        Click link. Read article.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by evilc123 View Post

                                          Click link. Read article.
                                          When it’s peer reviewed I’ll care. The first link is straight opinion with zero science. By their logic either me or my brother should be gay.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X