Stallion Spotlight

BushyGeneology copy

Real Estate Spotlight

Spratt_air 1
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A) we've already devoted the entirety of human history to placing the onus on victims not to get victimized...it hasn't worked

    b) I thought trainers absolutely had to be able to text and Facebook message children privately or their business would be in shambles?
    Let me apologize in advance.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ladyj79 View Post
      A) we've already devoted the entirety of human history to placing the onus on victims not to get victimized...it hasn't worked

      b) I thought trainers absolutely had to be able to text and Facebook message children privately or their business would be in shambles?
      Amen to a and LOL at b.

      "Here are solutions specially chosen not because they have ever worked but because they do not inconvenience me in any way."

      It's good to know Facebook is to blame for sexual assaults of teenage boys 50 years ago.
      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

      Comment


      • Originally posted by ladyj79 View Post
        A) we've already devoted the entirety of human history to placing the onus on victims not to get victimized...it hasn't worked

        b) I thought trainers absolutely had to be able to text and Facebook message children privately or their business would be in shambles?
        <<placing the onus on victims not to get victimized>>

        It's less probable you'll be hit by a train if you don't stand in the middle of the tracks, waving a "Vacancy!" flag.

        <<text and Facebook>>

        Never have used FB, and texting is a bane I actively avoid because it's a PITA. Both media invite exactly the type of over-familiarity that has the potential to cause problems. Regular voice phone makes misunderstandings less likely, with e-mail reserved for more serious business matters with clients. Again, I've never had juniors so non-issue, though I well realize for many they must use these platforms, and that's their choice.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by poltroon View Post

          Amen to a and LOL at b.

          "Here are solutions specially chosen not because they have ever worked but because they do not inconvenience me in any way."

          It's good to know Facebook is to blame for sexual assaults of teenage boys 50 years ago.
          Who's "trolling" now?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by poltroon View Post

            It's not that you won't win in court but that the cost to bring the case is significant, possibly as much as you are out or more, and then you still have to collect the judgement. There's also the cost of your time. Even small claims court - you'd probably have to take a couple of days off from work to bring the case.

            With housing, the amounts are larger and there are government agencies that have some nice bitey tools to quickly and easily bring bad actors in line in the most egregious cases. The lesser cases (you put a mark on the wall so I'm docking you $300) less so.




            Well, if you find yourself in this situation I wish you the best. IME everyone is professional when you move in, and about half the time, not so much when you move out. The only time moving out went well was when I was moving 600 miles away - the manager's attitude immediately went from frosty to pleased for me and helpful. Trying to correct the bad actors was too hard a problem for me.
            Well.... I think one month's board that we were bickering over would put us in Small Claims Court, so I'm good with that.

            Also, I read and discuss contracts before I sign them. If the BO and I both didn't trust each other, or agreed that we shared an understanding about how the last 30 days would go, I think I wouldn't move it.

            I have only had a BO start to let care go downhill toward the end of my 30 days' notice in 25 or so years of boarding. In this one case, it was a newbie to boarding with a private farm. She wanted to save on shavings so she let my horse's stall get really bad for the last day or so. And didn't send a bale of hay with him, as the barn he came from had sent a bale of hay for the transition. IMO, the BO was inexperienced and unprofessional. I will never again be anyone's first boarder. But otherwise, I really don't find myself in these situations, perhaps because I choose carefully in the beginning.
            The armchair saddler
            Politically Pro-Cat

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

              <<placing the onus on victims not to get victimized>>

              It's less probable you'll be hit by a train if you don't stand in the middle of the tracks, waving a "Vacancy!" flag.

              <<text and Facebook>>

              Never have used FB, and texting is a bane I actively avoid because it's a PITA. Both media invite exactly the type of over-familiarity that has the potential to cause problems. Regular voice phone makes misunderstandings less likely, with e-mail reserved for more serious business matters with clients. Again, I've never had juniors so non-issue, though I well realize for many they must use these platforms, and that's their choice.
              And when a child, woman, or man is cornered and forcibly sexually assaulted, by an adult male trainer or priest, whatever, is their fault because their parents spoiled them?
              You are SO cavalier in your attitude.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by RainWeasley View Post
                Does anyone else just get a sick feeling now whenever people start going on about "due process"? Like, I'm sick of hearing that argument.
                "Due Process" is the "Benghazi! EMAILS!" of the horse world.

                Comment


                • Crashing Boar
                  Not everyone is blessed with perfect parents or role models to help them navigate their childhood. But EVERY child deserves to be protected from abuse by adults in positions of power. That’s why there are laws and regulations in place to protect them.

                  It takes a village, some would say. It’s not a concept unique to modern times.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

                    Good post. I think it's necessary to acknowledge that there are many, many shades of gray here including battleship, flea-bitten and grulla! Here are the biggest problems I have with SS as things now stand:

                    (1) There should be a reasonable statute of limitations, perhaps corresponding to that in the judicial district where the alleged abuse took place. I've heard all the contrary arguments, but if there is no evidence of any improper activity in say the past 20 years, I'm not seeing any point in setting down elderly people for ancient history--all it does is open a window for people to weaponize SS for vindictive purposes. No child is being "protected" from George, or JW who's been dead a quarter century, now. The person way up thread who stated "It should be about moving FORWARD from here" was spot on.


                    Abuse is abuse, whether it happened last week for 50 years ago. People knew it was wrong and accepted it. People can argue age of consent, but not every 13, 14, 15 16 or 17 year old wanted sexual relations. Many resisted. Many said NO. Many went to adults. Many adults if told today would still look the other way.

                    New Jersey defines Consent as: According to New Jersey law, age, physical impairment and mental impairment all contribute to a person's ability to give consent. A person must be 16 years of age to legally consent to sexual activity. A person cannot give consent to sexual activity with someone who has "the duty to care" for them unless they are over the age of 18. Individuals that fall into "the duty to care" category would include parents or guardians, and those in any type of formal supervisory role. If individuals are at least 13 years old, but less than 16 years old they can legally consent to sexual activity with a partner who is not more than 4 years older than themselves.


                    Some of these cases are WITHIN the legal stature of limitations.

                    Hunterdon is in New Jersey. New Jersey has NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS on sexual assault.

                    N.J. Stat. Ann. 2C:1-6 No statute of limitations: murder, manslaughter, sexual assault, terrorism, widespread injury or damage....


                    As of December 1, NJ removed the civil statute of Limitations for civil charges. So regardless of when the Reporting Party said the abuse occurred, GM can still be charged. Barry Lobel is presently involved in a criminal case for sexual assault that occurred in the late 70's, early 80's.

                    Massachusetts Civil Statute of Limitations is 35 years tolled until the victim turns 18; therefore anyone abused by Mitch Steege has until they turn 53 to file a civil case.

                    Abuse in NY - Civil - now 55 years old. For one year, victims of childhood assault can press charges. It doesn't matter if it happened 100 years. ago.

                    So, those people arguing the cases are too far in the past, many are not; they are within the statute of limitations.
                    Last edited by Keep it Simple; Aug. 21, 2019, 09:00 PM. Reason: added paragraph on consent

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by mvp View Post
                      But otherwise, I really don't find myself in these situations, perhaps because I choose carefully in the beginning.
                      Or, with all due respect, maybe you just got lucky.

                      The idea that nothing bad will happen to you if only you're careful and virtuous enough underlies a lot of American culture. Conversely, if something bad did happen to you, you must have been careless or otherwise be culpable. It's sometimes how we keep moving forward when bad things happen to other people and how we rationalize it can't happen to us. Because *we're* careful.

                      What a curiously interesting way these two tangents tied back together into the thread.
                      If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by FlaxenChestnut View Post
                        Crashing Boar
                        Not everyone is blessed with perfect parents or role models to help them navigate their childhood. But EVERY child deserves to be protected from abuse by adults in positions of power. That’s why there are laws and regulations in place to protect them.

                        It takes a village, some would say. It’s not a concept unique to modern times.
                        Even if there were such a thing as perfect parents, their kids get sexually assaulted too.

                        And parents who never let the kids out of their sight? In another thread, those will be "helicopter parents" creating a doomed generation that is allegedly unable to think for themselves.
                        If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by poltroon View Post

                          Or, with all due respect, maybe you just got lucky.

                          The idea that nothing bad will happen to you if only you're careful and virtuous enough underlies a lot of American culture. Conversely, if something bad did happen to you, you must have been careless or otherwise be culpable. It's sometimes how we keep moving forward when bad things happen to other people and how we rationalize it can't happen to us. Because *we're* careful.

                          What a curiously interesting way these two tangents tied back together into the thread.
                          For 25 years in four different states on both coasts? C'mon.

                          What I did do is always make sure I could afford middle-of-the-market, established barns.

                          And to be clear: I'm first in line to want all parts of our industry to be regulated. Check my posts on this thread and anywhere else on COTH. I think it's a huge mistake for paying customers to roll over and take it in the bum when they are cheated by horse professionals. I mean, if the horsey set can't afford to hold people accountable, then who can?
                          The armchair saddler
                          Politically Pro-Cat

                          Comment


                          • You all do know that Western society keeps extending childhood. The very idea of childhood as we think of it comes to us from the Victorians. The current thoughts are just one point on a very long historical scale which is, in large part, determined by the wealth of a society. We can AFFORD to set an extended childhood apart as a protected stage, but that is something that has come about in the last 150 years, and is pretty much limited to Western ideas. And Western ideas are not necessarily either better than any other ideas.


                            I suggest you all read this article: https://family.jrank.org/pages/232/C...Childhood.html

                            And this one. https://www.open.edu/openlearn/histo...ent-childhoods

                            Comment




                            • And the truth is sometimes kids do offer. They have crushes on their trainers, they idolize them. They compete to be picked out for favours and ride the best horses. With young kids, it's probably not sexual, no matter how it's perceived, but maybe with older teens, it is, maybe even on an overt level. But it's WRONG. And here's the thing - they can't consent. They're too young and 'real men' know that. Someone here is supposed to be a grownup. It's not their payoff. Trainers are getting paid - in money, prestige, pride in a job well done. But please - not in sexual exploitation of children. That's not part of the job description and anyone who thinks so should be in a different profession. [/QUOTE]

                              Tru dat. I had a huge crush on my swim coach. He was in college and I was 14-15. I totally would have given it up to him if he asked, because I was young and stupid and didn't have the capability of rational thought to know that it was wrong. I flirted with him, he shut it down. He was the adult, he knew better, it was the right thing, the only thing.

                              Comment


                              • tweaking up SS:

                                (1) Parents need to teach their children, from the time they're old enough to understand, which actions by adults are normal and safe and which are never to be tolerated (red light!). They need to have an escape plan, and to know they can ALWAYS bring even the slightest suspicion that someone's a "little off" to YOU--and YOU WILL BACK THEM UP. 50 years ago we didn't have that; today, we should. "Teach Your Children Well." Way more effective than having some 4th party adjudicate the thing 51 years after the incident.

                                (2) Do not dump your kids off at the barn at 0800 and expect the management to entertain them for the next 10-12 hours. If your child is old enough and competent enough for a working student arrangement, that should be in writing with SS protocols incorporated so everyone understands the deal. Parents should not otherwise use the stable as an unpaid babysitting service. Idle hands are the devil's workshop, and this eliminates opportunity to be "groomed" by any personnel not under direct supervision of trainer.

                                (3) For the love of God, STOP sexualizing children. The 12-year old daughter of two Yalies, one a clergyman, that I knew actually let their pubescent daughter run around in hot-pink tights with the word "JUICY!" embossed in rhinestones across the butt! A child doesn't know any better, but parents should. Maybe the promotion of 9-year-old "drag queens" and Jon-Benet Ramsey style dress-up/makeup is not a good choice. Let's stop promoting with our fashion dollars the "bimbo" culture and the idea that taking your clothes off for a camera lens, anyone's lens, is EVER a good idea. Steaming manure like the "Good Boys" movie just released is beyond appalling; one more example of Hollywood's race to the bottom of the muck-choked trough of so-called modern "culture." Go read a synopsis if you haven't yet heard of it, and protect your children from ideas like this that can't possibly end well.

                                (4) Get rid of social media for impressionable youth entirely. A flip-phone will do fine for emergencies and calling home.
                                Parents are enabling all the pathologies that accompany unfettered, 24/7 internet access. Most adults can't handle it, let alone youth.

                                (5) Raise your children with a sense of personal responsibility, which seems to have been replaced by "self esteem" and "activism." You will be judged by your actions in the world both good and bad, as GHM is being judged now. Use the current news cycle as a teaching moment, and do not make excuses for anyone.
                                Here's an alternative -

                                Teach adults that sex with children and teens is wrong, and within a coaching or mentoring situation, especially wrong.

                                Short, sweet, fits on a bumper sticker.

                                Puts the responsibility on the adult actor, not a minor, not a parent, not bystanders.

                                Just.don't.have.sex.with.minors.
                                Proud member of the Cackling Yentas!

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  I noticed the safe sport overhaul go fund me has seemed to fizzle out at $3.100 of the $25k goal. I guess the 7k ISWG fb people aren’t that supportive of the over haul idea.
                                  I noticed Elizabeth M donated some $.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Crashing Boar View Post

                                    <<placing the onus on victims not to get victimized>>

                                    It's less probable you'll be hit by a train if you don't stand in the middle of the tracks, waving a "Vacancy!" flag.

                                    <<text and Facebook>>

                                    Never have used FB, and texting is a bane I actively avoid because it's a PITA. Both media invite exactly the type of over-familiarity that has the potential to cause problems. Regular voice phone makes misunderstandings less likely, with e-mail reserved for more serious business matters with clients. Again, I've never had juniors so non-issue, though I well realize for many they must use these platforms, and that's their choice.
                                    But no kid taking a riding lesson is "standing in the middle of the tracks" and the "vacancy" flag either makes no sense or is incredibly sexist.

                                    Which part of a kid being an athlete looks to you like signing up to be sexually exploited?
                                    The armchair saddler
                                    Politically Pro-Cat

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by newtopicnewalter View Post

                                      Here's an alternative -

                                      Teach adults that sex with children and teens is wrong, and within a coaching or mentoring situation, especially wrong.

                                      Short, sweet, fits on a bumper sticker.

                                      Puts the responsibility on the adult actor, not a minor, not a parent, not bystanders.

                                      Just.don't.have.sex.with.minors.
                                      Exactly. The responsibility should not be on the minor. Children/minors have spoken up and it was ignored, by adults. The adults that talked about it, knew it happened and did nothing. It is the worst kept secret in the equestrian community.

                                      Adults should not have sex with minors. Trainers should not have sex with their help/employees or their clients. It is unethical for doctors / lawyers/therapist to have sex with their clients, but equestrians do not want to be held to the same standard as other professions in the real world.

                                      Adults should step up and do the right thing. It was known in many barns that trainers were having sex with their students. The wives knew, the clients knew and they did nothing to stop it. These adults were a instrumental in allowing the abuse to continue. Stop blaming the minor or the parent. Blame the person that did the heinous act.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by newtopicnewalter View Post

                                        Here's an alternative -

                                        Teach adults that sex with children and teens is wrong, and within a coaching or mentoring situation, especially wrong.

                                        Short, sweet, fits on a bumper sticker.

                                        Puts the responsibility on the adult actor, not a minor, not a parent, not bystanders.

                                        Just.don't.have.sex.with.minors.
                                        Thank you

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by newtopicnewalter View Post

                                          Here's an alternative -

                                          Teach adults that sex with children and teens is wrong, and within a coaching or mentoring situation, especially wrong.

                                          Short, sweet, fits on a bumper sticker.

                                          Puts the responsibility on the adult actor, not a minor, not a parent, not bystanders.

                                          Just.don't.have.sex.with.minors.
                                          Pedophiles can't simply be taught that sex with children is wrong. Pedophilia is a psychiatric disorder. Even with treatment, chemical castration, and medication, they sometimes can't stop. Some feel so terrible that they can't control themselves that they commit suicide.

                                          Most treatments don't work to stop the pedophile's attraction to children. Even chemically castrated men have been known to be released from prison and go on to rape another child. Social norms don't allow us to simply lock afflicted individuals up, and they only get the limited restrictions of sexual offender status if they are caught and convicted. They are out and about in the world in search of their next victim.

                                          There is definitely merit in teaching children how not to become victims, especially since the general aggressor for a child would be said pedophile. We simply cannot rely on "Just.don't.have.sex.with.minors." when dealing with people with psychiatric disorders who are unable to control themselves. When I see posts like yours, I have to wonder why you and counter the idea of teaching children how to defend themselves when such people exist in this world?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X