Stallion Spotlight

C-Quito1

Real Estate Spotlight

01
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

George Morris on the SS list

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I don't think GM has the ability to harm anyone at this point, at least not physically, and he's not inconspicuous enough to go unnoticed for the purposes of committing sabotage at shows, but I do believe that some of his supporters are mentally ill enough to give their lives or livelihoods or kill horses and burn down barns in retribution for this attack against his legacy, given the halo effect and strong cult of personality surrounding him. At the very most, he's got significant dirt to drop on people and happenings that could give bad headlines or perhaps even undermine the last thirty years of H/J, essentially his legacy, and bring the upper-crust echelons of the sport and it's symbiotic society crashing down. It's certainly in the interest of some wealthy and well-known people to keep such information quiet, so if anything, GM is more a danger to himself than to others at this point, but who knows how this will go over twelve months from now or five years.
    Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

    Comment


    • I recommend that everyone go to NetFlix and watch the movie "The Tale". It is a powerful narrative and is based on a true story.

      Comment


      • [QUOTE=cloudyandcallie;n10455488]
        Originally posted by atl_hunter View Post

        1 to 20 years in prison for oral sex and I blurted out in front of my all male classmates that I thought it was foreplay.

        So so it all depends on how the state and federal judges interpret SS. I clerked for the Chief U.S. District Judge in Savannnah eons ago. A good example is that a person can be acquitted of murder in a state court and then tried and convicted of violating the dead person's civil rights with no double jeopardy. So let GW use the court system and get cross examined on all his claims from "Unrelenting."

        Name those 10,000 sex partners. More than Mick Jagger
        Thank you - this is what I was trying to understand. Who gets to decide the actual age? SS or the State? Hopefully he will utilize the court system and we will all have some clarity as to whether age of consent is a state's right or a federal one, and what the age should actually be. I'm all for one age, 18, for the entire nation. It would definitely make it clear and consistent. It's not like 18 year olds can vote and you need to be 18 to enlist.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by neigh View Post
          I recommend that everyone go to NetFlix and watch the movie "The Tale". It is a powerful narrative and is based on a true story.
          I read the plot summary on Wiki, wow. I'll have to go watch it.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post

            Good post. Also missing is the fact that one party has authority over the other, which in many cases can result in the fear of retaliation if the authoritative party is rejected. The younger party, or the party in the subordinate position may be afraid that rejection will result in a loss of opportunities, maybe even eviction. Young adults, even not-so-young adults, struggle with this, which is why many companies have nonfraternization (is that a word) rules.
            Yes, indeed! I would classify that as examples of coerced consent or consent under duress.

            A canter is a cure for every evil. ~Benjamin Disraeli

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              Neigh..... I just watched the YouTube trailer to the movie, “The Tale”, that you suggested. Wow! It’s even set around competition horses.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by NotaPonyDoc View Post

                Science already knows why.... if he's actually been exposed and isn't infected with HIV, then he's an HIV elite controller. Meaning he can suppress HIV viral loads without antiretroviral therapies.

                And yes, science is already harvesting antibodies from elite controllers to work on vaccines for other HIV patients. There's like a 0.3% chance of being an elite controller or 1 in 300, it's not too special.....
                This is very interesting information. If the innate ability to control the HIV virus is that common, and if the same situation exists with other diseases, it would explain why diseases become so much less virulent with time after they enter a new population, and the immune people's descendants begin to dominate the population because the non-immune people have been killed off by the disease..

                Comment


                • Originally posted by TheMoo View Post

                  That’s all well and good but you are missing the piece of positional authority. So if it was a random person of the legal age at the time, yeah side eye. But students? Working students? That’s what gets conveniently left out of these statements.
                  My specific question was about jurisdiction - who gets to decide what age of consent is - the state or the federal government REGARDLESS of the situation. Does the Federal government have the right to state an age of consent or did they overstep? That is my question, which has already been answered as the courts will need to decide.



                  Comment


                  • LexInVA VA

                    I agree with you, especially about the cra-zee supporters.

                    Also, if I were GM, I might hire a taster for my food at this point. I remember the Chicago era quite well. He's got dirt that goes back well beyond 30 years on just about everyone. I frankly don't believe that Epstein's guards just happened to be asleep when he decided to hang himself, for example. I hope SS is prepared for the tremendous pressure that might come into play.

                    What I'm after is the source of that quote about threatening people, or their families, or bringing others down with him. I can't seem to find an original source.

                    Comment


                    • @ atl_hunter But as far as SS is concerned, the actual age of consent doesn't matter. They get to define a "child" as 18 because that's what the rules say and all they're doing is tossing someone out of a club, remember?

                      If there's a civil or legal suit arising out of something SS turns up, then the legal age of consent will matter. At least that's my understanding.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by dannyboy View Post


                        What I'm after is the source of that quote about threatening people, or their families, or bringing others down with him. I can't seem to find an original source.
                        I believe the quote about threatening family members it was in a Facebook post that someone linked to in this thread. Maybe a post by the woman with several last names, about whom someone here subsequently asked that the names be "unpacked?" Sorry, that's the best I can recall. Maybe that hint will jog someone else's memory as to the name.


                        "Facts are meaningless. You can use facts to prove anything
                        that's even remotely true."

                        Homer Simpson

                        Comment


                        • I think then it goes back to issues of power/authority rather than age. Regardless of whether 14 is a minor in state x, teacher is still getting fired for having sexual contact with them. This isn't merely about age, that is just one element.
                          Let me apologize in advance.

                          Comment


                          • [QUOTE=atl_hunter;n10455646]
                            Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                            It's not like 18 year olds can vote and you need to be 18 to enlist.
                            18 yr olds can vote - 26th amendment.

                            Comment


                            • It occurs to me when I read the GHM apologists reactions to his banning :
                              its not that they believe in him,

                              it is all about their own perceptions and preserving their egos.

                              If you had to accept the possibility that he is actually guilty then you'd have to ask yourself why you would even consider supporting him after what you know about his character and his morals (If he had any which it has been proved that he doesn't. )

                              Why would you expose your children to such a person?
                              Why would you let people around you , who trust your judgement, expose their children to such a person?


                              What does it say about your own character that you make excuses for his depravity?

                              1) it was a long time ago, so it doesn't matter.
                              2) Maybe they liked it , so it doesn't matter.
                              3) Well, they got what they wanted., so doesn't matter.
                              4) Well, he didn't go after my kids, so it doesn't matter.
                              5) Well, I didn't see anything, so it doesn't matter.
                              6) Well, I'm sure he didn't do it, cause he smiled at me when I took a picture , he signed his book for me so he must be a nice guy., so it doesn't matter.
                              7) Well, maybe he did do it, but if he says he's sorry then it's all good and it doesn't matter.
                              8) Well, I got to survive and if I say anything, I'll never show again, so sorry, it doesnt matter.

                              They don't care about what he did or didn't do;,

                              They don't want their judgement or their character questioned, and they do not want to admit they averted their eyes when they found out what he was doing. They didn't want to know, because then ya know, they might have had to actually say something.

                              I get there are consequences from saying something, and the price would be very high.
                              Too high for some.

                              But ya know, not showing or gasp, not going to the Olympics ain't the end of the world as we know it.

                              Protecting children from predators: Priceless.

                              Own personal anecdote.

                              I was at a local horse show and helping out at the in gate. A spectator came up to me and a local trainer was standing at the gate watching a student make their round.

                              Spectator to me: "Trainer X is a perv".
                              Me.: "Um, really?"( I have no idea what to say. Never seen her before.)
                              Spec: Yes. He likes teenage girls. And it's a shame. He's married and has a baby."
                              Me: "" (I don't remember what I said.)

                              Now, this was way before Safe Sport.
                              I had no proof. I didn't see anything. I had seen this trainer around and spoke briefly about the weather.
                              I had no idea who the woman was and why she would tell me such a thing.
                              If it was true, then she should be telling the police, not someone like myself who had no authority in the matter.
                              if it was false, then it was wicked of her to try and slander someone who was trying to make a living.

                              I didn't tell anyone what she said to me. It may have been true but I had zero proof. Nothing that ever stand up in a court of law.

                              "They'll be no butter in hell."

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by IdahoRider View Post
                                They most often DON'T start with coercion and shame. That doesn't come until much later. These pedophiles start grooming their victims by making them feel special. It is a fact that many (perhaps even most?) survivors of long term sexual abuse had families that were dysfunctional to varying degrees. That dysfunction opened the child up to responding to being made to feel special in a very particular way. The pedophile can smell the "right" conditions a mile away.

                                That is part of the grooming process. Pedophiles always have feelers out, probing and testing, evaluating. When a child's circumstances tick the boxes, the process becomes more targeted to that particular child. Is the family sufficiently distracted with divorce, illness, substance abuse, whatever? Is the child open to being singled out from their peers? Does the child fit the physical profile the pedophile wants?

                                Believe me, if a pedophile's MO was to drag a child into a dark room and molest them the first time they met? The outcomes would be different. The vast majority don't operate that way. They pick their victims carefully. They carefully construct and guide the situation until eventually they are able to frame the sexual contact as an extension of how important that child is, how loved and protected they are by the abuser.

                                The coercion and shaming doesn't start until the abuser starts to feel control of the situation slipping a little. And most often the "go to" method is shaming the victim. Nobody will believe you. You wanted me to touch you. You will get in trouble. Everyone will know you're a slut, know that you're a fag. You won't be special anymore. Pick your poison. And then they move on. The child has aged out of the pedophile's desired demographic. They get caught just enough for people to know that something "happened", but nobody wants to know what and they just want to bury it and walk away. Whatever. Things shift and another child is targeted and the grooming starts all over again.

                                Keep in mind that the pedophile has hidden in plain sight. Larry Nassar, "I am doing a medical procedure. Only I can fix your child". George Morris, "Your child has talent and I can make it happen for them". My step-father, "God has called me to help this broken family and the daughter needs extra support and caring".

                                These people, for the most part, aren't hiding their victims in the basement, behind a secret door. They marry our drug addled mothers. They dangle health and continued competition in front of children and parents. They insinuate that with extra "access" and training the Olympics is within reach.

                                These monsters are right here, living in plain sight. They aren't driving up in an unfamiliar car and asking us if we want to help them find their lost puppy. They are the team doctor. They are the t-ball coach. They teach Sunday school. They are a best friend's parent. They are a legend in the sport we love. They eat dinner at our own kitchen table and wait until everyone is asleep. They are a fixture in our lives. They don't have to lure us. They are already in our lives.

                                They minimize. They minimize. Every. Single. Day. They say their medical treatment is misunderstood. They say they were only trying to build on a talented rider. They say they were only checking to make sure a child was covered on a cold night.

                                They groom us. They twist the world to make it look a certain way. Up is down and down is up. And they scare the shit out of us for the rest of our lives.

                                And even though we are scared, and ashamed, we step forward and speak our truth. Some of us can say it and never waver again from those words being heard out loud. Some of us need to speak it and then take it back because the fear in our own minds is so overwhelming it might be another thirty years before we can speak the truth again. Some of us never say anything. Some of us use drugs and drink. Some of us become so anxiety ridden that we push ourselves to never, ever make a mistake about anything. Some of us turn around and abuse others. None of that changes the fact that we were hurt in an irreparable way when we were young and vulnerable.

                                "F" George Morris. At this point the allegations have been investigated. He doesn't deserve to automatically be given the benefit of even more doubt. I am going to stand with the people who were strong enough to insist that they be heard. At last. Those are my people. They are my tribe.
                                Sheilah
                                I'm so sorry you went through that trauma. I applaud you for having the strength to speak up about it. What you've described is exactly the process that every single girl or woman I've dealt with has said happened to her. Whether it was a poor child who was given gifts, clothes, hair and nail treatments "because she was special " then asked to "help her boyfriend " by "being nice" to his friends, or one from a dysfunctional family looking for anyone to give her validation, the M.O. never changed. The threats don't start until the victim tries to leave.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by poltroon View Post

                                  So true. But people like you insisting that the evidence can't possibly exist or even if it does, how can it matter 50 years later, are causing people like me to dig up, recall, and repeat these inconvenient facts that explain in detail that it does matter, that it's unlikely that the SafeSport investigators walked into this buzzsaw on a whim and without solid evidence, and it's making more people speak out about the things they know and put the pieces together.
                                  It matters to survivors. I did not suffer abuse as a child. I was raped by a home intruder as an adult, almost 30 years ago - and it might as well have been yesterday. If you think another 20 years will make any bit of difference - you'd be dead wrong. The lack of compassion for victims/survivors is just astounding to me.

                                  And how anyone can argue that a 13-year-old is old enough to give consent - insert Catholic priest instead of GM - still feel the same way?? Didn't think so . . . .

                                  Comment


                                  • COTH must think I am quite the surgeon! My ads are for replacement mitral valves.

                                    Comment


                                    • I got invited to the ISWG group so while I'm not comfortable joining, I am comfortable spying (shady, I know).

                                      What I find striking is that virtually all of the posts of people talking about his helping them at Hunterdon, as a groom or trainer or rider whatever, they are all women.

                                      There's a lady who says she took lessons from George and never once did he do anything untoward. A (subsequently banned) person politely points out that George didn't swing that way. The next two comments furiously claim that is "UNCALLED FOR" and that her statement "doesn't have any baring on this conversation".

                                      When I read that, I feel like ok, I get why my telling people to read what's in the Safe Sport code isn't working. People are just not in a headspace to accept new information.

                                      My favorite post is a lady who would bring a rider to Hunterdon for lessons and spent lots of time taking notes of his lessons until he finally brought her into the ring to set jumps and learn from him from the ground. Great.

                                      Lots of other women chime in that his teaching at Hunterdon was central to their training and the last comment is "Just like Paul Valliere". ok dokee then.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Tigre Horse View Post

                                        It matters to survivors. I did not suffer abuse as a child. I was raped by a home intruder as an adult, almost 30 years ago - and it might as well have been yesterday. If you think another 20 years will make any bit of difference - you'd be dead wrong. The lack of compassion for victims/survivors is just astounding to me.
                                        .
                                        Jesus, that is terrifying. I can't even imagine.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by RainWeasley View Post

                                          Jesus, that is terrifying. I can't even imagine.
                                          I won't lie - it was. It's the stuff of nightmares. But, I lived and it made me who I am today. I've never told my now adult daughter - I've never, ever wanted her to fear sleeping in her own bed, or traveling by herself. She's never understood why I have to sleep so I can see at least one exit, have a dog (hate being alone at night) and so many other, what she considers weird little "quirks" mom has . . . the attack happened the year before I started dating/married her dad. I was better while he was alive, had to beat back a lot of demons again when I lost him 7 years ago. But, that's life - one day at time, one foot in front of the other . . . and time in the saddle - that's what really saved me that first year, the barn was the only place I felt safe.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X