• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Judging question...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judging question...

    Today I watched a hunter round in Vermont. The girl trotted into the ring then stopped. Apparently her stirrup leather came off the saddle she managed to get it back on then picked up her canter and laid down a really lovely trip. I have no idea how she placed but am wondering how a round like that would be judged. I have never seen it happen before and am wondering if a good round is a good round or would the "tack malfunction" disqualify her. I guess it would be up to the judges discretion but am wondering if any of you had seen it happen and the results or how a judge (if there are any r judges on here (I'm new sorry!)) would score the round.

    Looking forward to hear what others think
    Diane

  • #2
    I'm a judge and can probably answer the question for you. When the class is held in a ring, the performance starts as the competitor enters and ends when he leaves. When the class is held outside, the performance starts at any spot designated by competition management and ends at any spot so designated. If the start and finish are not clearly set forth, it is suggested that a judge consider the start approximately 50' before the first obstacle and the finish approximately 50' after the last. This is Rule HU134.2 in the USEF rulebook.

    For most judges, once a horse is approaching the first fence, all gloves are off and the round is being judged.

    IF her stirrup had come off during the course (meaning, she already started jumping), the competitor may either continue without penalty or stop and correct the problem. If the competitor stops and corrects the problem, they are to be penalized as if they had a refusal.
    www.DaventryEquestrian.com
    Home of Oldenburg, Westphalian & RPSI approved pony stallion Goldhills Brandysnap
    Also home to Daventry Equine Appraisals & Equine Expert Witness www.EquineAppraisers.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Welcome to the BB!

      I haven't seen that exact thing happen, but I guess I would say if the horse came to a full stop, I would probably score it like any other loss of forward motion, as a refusal. If you keep walking as you pull your girth up a hole, you might squeak by with some judges (though you shouldn't make a habit of it), but if the horse actually stops while you make a tack adjustment of any kind, that would count as a refusal to me.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Thanks!
        Well it was interesting it was in her opening circle she trotted in went down to her walk (whether this was planned or because the leather came off the bar I'm not sure.) while she walked you could see her fiddling with it. Her trainer asked her what happened and she laughed and told her her stirrup leather came off but managed to fix it. She then took another circle although small when she picked up her canter and then put in a really nice round. It was just so interesting! I was impressed how she kept her composure! I would have fallen apart!!

        Comment


        • #5
          For sure, making two circles before the first jump would count as a refusal for me.

          The rules clearly state you may circle once before the first jump, and once after the last jump. Any extra circles should be scored as refusals.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MHM View Post
            For sure, making two circles before the first jump would count as a refusal for me.

            The rules clearly state you may circle once before the first jump, and once after the last jump. Any extra circles should be scored as refusals.
            Yeah, I would have to agree with you MHM. It's one thing if she trotted in a few steps and stopped to fix her stirrup...as opposed to already starting on her circle and then having to do another one - it would be marked down as a refusal.
            www.DaventryEquestrian.com
            Home of Oldenburg, Westphalian & RPSI approved pony stallion Goldhills Brandysnap
            Also home to Daventry Equine Appraisals & Equine Expert Witness www.EquineAppraisers.com

            Comment


            • #7
              The two circles issue is obvious, but I don't think that is the real question of interest here. I actually think that you would find most judges to be fairly lenient about a few seconds to correct an obvious equipment issue. Particularly as this could have involved a safety issue. From the description it didn't take long to correct and she had no outside assistance and stayed in the arena. Under that described scenario I doubt that she would have been penalized on most score cards.
              www.midatlanticeq.com
              Mid-Atlantic Equitation Festival,Scholarships and College Fair
              November 11-13, 2016

              Comment


              • #8
                She should not have made the second circle...it should have been considered a refusal.
                "Over the Hill?? What Hill, Where?? I don't remember any hill!!!" Favorite Tee Shirt

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, not counting the extra circle which is indeed a "refusal" I don't think trotting then walking with some quick (under 7 seconds maybe) fiddling with an obvious issue would be counted down. May make the judge watch you more closely, but most judges are human too. Its perfectly acceptable to trot in, walk, and then canter, so minus the circle that is basically what she did.

                  Like said above, if it occurred on course, that is covered directly in the rule book. Once you canter, you need to keep canter until a trot fence or until after being on the correct lead after the last fence.

                  So, yes, once entering the ring you are being judged, but that is not the same as "on course" which is often defined as picking up the canter. If it was, everyone that trotted into the ring would get an automatic 40

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Silly question that may sidetrack the whole thing, but--why would a second circle as directed by the rider, done as a result of fixing what is clearly a safety issue, be penalized in exactly the same way as a horse slamming on the brakes as he's being ridden to a fence? Especially in a class ostensibly being judged on the horse's suitability as a hunter/jumper--he's not being disobedient and she's not sneaking him extra looks at the jumps, he stopped because his rider told him to so she could correct a problem that could have caused a dangerous situation if she tried to ride through it. It wasn't an error or disobedience on the horse's part, it wasn't the rider taking extra time to give herself an advantage. How is an equipment failure the equivalent of disobedience?
                    Author Page
                    Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                    Steampunk Sweethearts

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      [quote=PonyLady29;5018488]...it was in her opening circle she trotted in went down to her walk ...She then took another circle although small when she picked up her canter and then put in a really nice round.
                      [quote]


                      Ummmm as I read this, she walked in, picked up a trot but then came back to a walk and did not get to the courtesy circle??? Like less then 30 seconds from entering the ring??

                      I'd call that a do over because she did not even get into a canter let alone complete that opening circle. If she had cantered that first circle, headed to the fence and then stopped? I'd count that as a refusal.
                      When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                      The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                        Silly question that may sidetrack the whole thing, but--why would a second circle as directed by the rider, done as a result of fixing what is clearly a safety issue, be penalized in exactly the same way as a horse slamming on the brakes as he's being ridden to a fence?
                        Because under USEF rules, a rider is only allowed to do ONE circle before starting their course and one circle on completing their course.

                        Originally, the OP was a bit vague on what happened and made it sound like she simply trotted in a few strides, stopped and fixed her stirrup and then started on her course. But one of her posts later on mentioned the rider doing TWO circles.

                        At the end of the day, you likely had to be there and see it and it would be up to the discretion of the judge.
                        www.DaventryEquestrian.com
                        Home of Oldenburg, Westphalian & RPSI approved pony stallion Goldhills Brandysnap
                        Also home to Daventry Equine Appraisals & Equine Expert Witness www.EquineAppraisers.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by flyracing View Post

                          So, yes, once entering the ring you are being judged, but that is not the same as "on course" which is often defined as picking up the canter. If it was, everyone that trotted into the ring would get an automatic 40
                          Well, actually, anyone who trotted *into* the ring should receive an automatic score of 0, since it is against USEF rules to trot or canter into or out of the ring in hunters and equitation.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I would hope the judge would differentiate. Otherwise by that logic, it's better to not stop once you've started circling and hope you don't get hurt if you completely lose the stirrup or whatever's broken.

                            I mean, geez, even at the Olympics most sports don't make stopping because of a hazard the same penalty as making an error. Err on the side of caution, indeed.
                            Author Page
                            Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
                            Steampunk Sweethearts

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                              I would hope the judge would differentiate. Otherwise by that logic, it's better to not stop once you've started circling and hope you don't get hurt if you completely lose the stirrup or whatever's broken.
                              You can stop and regroup anytime you want. You just don't get the same score as somebody who didn't have to stop and regroup. That's why you check your tack before you walk in the ring.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by danceronice View Post
                                I would hope the judge would differentiate. Otherwise by that logic, it's better to not stop once you've started circling and hope you don't get hurt if you completely lose the stirrup or whatever's broken.

                                I mean, geez, even at the Olympics most sports don't make stopping because of a hazard the same penalty as making an error. Err on the side of caution, indeed.
                                Sure it's better to stop, but you know that you're out of the class. Just the way it is...and there's nothing wrong with that.

                                McLain Ward didn't get a do-over when his bit broke in Athens.

                                Was it William Fox-Pitt or Phillip Dutton who broke a stirrup leather on XC and continued? He had no other choice...it was keep going or retire.

                                Equipment failure is not the show's fault. Even if there is something that is the show's fault, there are rules about how it can be rectified. For example: I believe if there is a funky distance on course, it cannot be changed if three riders have already competed. Everyone else needs to compensate.
                                Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by RugBug View Post
                                  Was it William Fox-Pitt or Phillip Dutton who broke a stirrup leather on XC and continued? He had no other choice...it was keep going or retire.
                                  It was Mark Todd at Badminton. Rode the rest of the cross country with only one stirrup.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    But, again, all these examples were mid course, not right after they walked on the course, before any whistle blew or the judge even looked up from marking their card on the previous round.

                                    I still am not sure if this gal ever actually did the first circle and it sure sounds like she never even got into a canter before she pulled up. That would infuence what a judge decides. From the OPs description, I just don't know for sure and it makes a big difference in how to see this.
                                    When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                    The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by BAC View Post
                                      It was Mark Todd at Badminton. Rode the rest of the cross country with only one stirrup.
                                      Holy cow!

                                      How far into the course did that happen??

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by BAC View Post
                                        It was Mark Todd at Badminton. Rode the rest of the cross country with only one stirrup.
                                        I could've sworn it was one of the others I mentioned. Maybe it happened to them too.

                                        Findeight: my examples were addressing danceronice's safety issues/Olympics statement, NOT the situation for the OP. That's kind of why I quoted DOI.

                                        As for the situation in the OP, coming down to a walk, no biggie, happens all the time. Quick and unobtrusive fidding with stirrup, no biggie (to me). Circling twice, biggie.
                                        Keith: "Now...let's do something normal fathers and daughters do."
                                        Veronica: "Buy me a pony?"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X