• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

the Moroney Group USHJA is it what you want?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • the Moroney Group USHJA is it what you want?

    In response to Portia I have chosen to separate Bill Moroney from the other thread because it would be a tangent to spoil the good dialog existing about what I think is a much more important topic.

    I think that whether or not we show respect for those convicted of crimes is a personal evalauation as to who we choose to be friends with and with whom we want to be associated.

    This is a letter which I have sent to John Straussburger explaining my position about an affiliate.

    1. I do not believe there is any urgency that there be an affiliate selected right now.
    2. It is not the who but the way I object to as it has been handled.
    3. I am not an Officer or Member of the Board of the NHJA and have become involved only because I think the whole situation was handled badly and they have not yet made their presentation.
    4. I do deeply believe in the right of the membership to have a representative and democratic association in which they can have confidence AND have the right to express and opinion.

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Dear Mr. Straussburger,



    I regret your editorial endorsing the selection of the USHJA as the Official Affiliate for the Hunter Discipline. I would have hoped that with your experience you could see past the packaging of this Association which is nothing but smoke and mirrors and that it would defeat everything we as Members have all worked for during the past few years regarding our rights to know and be heard.

    Do you realize that all 28,000 hunter members of the USEF would be represented on their Board of Directors by one seat? We have 12 Zones with diverse geographical and economic problems and the all are in the hands one person to present or defend. All the other seats are appointments by the President of USHJA.

    I believe that your rush to judgment was premature and you were carried away by a 5 hour glitzy presentation with no substance and a lot of “we will, we plan, we might and we will evolve”. It was a promise of a perfect world that was all things to all people and varied depending on the listeners.

    I have attached for your information suggestions to the USEF Board of Directors regarding what I think would be necessary criteria to make a selection. While these may be altered they do set in place some requirement for accountability by any affiliate to the members they seek to represent.

    I think we need to learn from our mistakes with the NHJC which also made a great many promises and although all the Zones were represented had no accountability to the members or the Federation.

    I believe that Mr.Moroney took advantage of his position and has a serious conflict of interest by making his proposal without any notification to any other Associations that this was even on the Agenda and never mind that it was on a fast track.
    • I believe that Mr. Moroney and the USHJA have taken advantage of his position which is a direct conflict of interest by sending out emails with the effort of the USEF and their undue prejudicial influence.
    • I believe it was a conflict of interest when he was granted at expense to the USEF 5 hours for a presentation with the projectors and rooms.
    • I believe it was a conflict of interest when Sue Pinckney as a director for hunters gave him her expertise and skills while on the payroll of the USEF for the Convention.
    • I believe it was unethical for this whole issue to be raised without proper information to all who want to apply; and then condemn them for not being prepared.

    I believe it was wrong for the whole presentation to have been made until after there were proper criteria accepted by the Board of Directors published and made available for all those interested to apply, proper deadlines and opportunity for each to make an equal presentation.

    We still do not know what the financial responsibilities will be, how the USEF plans to have this Affiliate function and under what terms and conditions they will monitor and supervise their activities and require accountability. Will Membership be mandatory or reciprocal? Will there be Financial accountability and over-sight by USEF? If so how?

    This attachment was sent to the Board of Directors with the sincere hope that they will consider the conditions and terms by which to define a Breed/Discipline Affiliate that will replace the National hunter Committee in management of the whole discipline.

    I hope they will then publish that criterion so that any and all National Associations may have the opportunity to read and comply, or apply for the position. We have had only one Executive Committee Meeting available to the members. Certainly, if they feel it is too expensive to web cast they could still produce an Audio CD of the meetings for the members who wish to hear it in the Media Library.

    If the Federation wishes to assure the members that Mr.Moroney has had no undue influence on his behalf this is the most functional way to divert the antagonism of the members and keep the record open. I, by the way disagree that it was not worth the investment because not enough people listened; the fact is as you know there were several who listened and then gave ongoing reports to the thousands of people on your Forums.

    Anything that builds the confidence of the members who pay the bills, support the shows and donate their money is money well spent.

    Yours truly,

    Vikki Karcher Siegel<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Battle Scarred Veteran
    http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org
  • Original Poster

    #2
    In response to Portia I have chosen to separate Bill Moroney from the other thread because it would be a tangent to spoil the good dialog existing about what I think is a much more important topic.

    I think that whether or not we show respect for those convicted of crimes is a personal evalauation as to who we choose to be friends with and with whom we want to be associated.

    This is a letter which I have sent to John Straussburger explaining my position about an affiliate.

    1. I do not believe there is any urgency that there be an affiliate selected right now.
    2. It is not the who but the way I object to as it has been handled.
    3. I am not an Officer or Member of the Board of the NHJA and have become involved only because I think the whole situation was handled badly and they have not yet made their presentation.
    4. I do deeply believe in the right of the membership to have a representative and democratic association in which they can have confidence AND have the right to express and opinion.

    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Dear Mr. Straussburger,



    I regret your editorial endorsing the selection of the USHJA as the Official Affiliate for the Hunter Discipline. I would have hoped that with your experience you could see past the packaging of this Association which is nothing but smoke and mirrors and that it would defeat everything we as Members have all worked for during the past few years regarding our rights to know and be heard.

    Do you realize that all 28,000 hunter members of the USEF would be represented on their Board of Directors by one seat? We have 12 Zones with diverse geographical and economic problems and the all are in the hands one person to present or defend. All the other seats are appointments by the President of USHJA.

    I believe that your rush to judgment was premature and you were carried away by a 5 hour glitzy presentation with no substance and a lot of “we will, we plan, we might and we will evolve”. It was a promise of a perfect world that was all things to all people and varied depending on the listeners.

    I have attached for your information suggestions to the USEF Board of Directors regarding what I think would be necessary criteria to make a selection. While these may be altered they do set in place some requirement for accountability by any affiliate to the members they seek to represent.

    I think we need to learn from our mistakes with the NHJC which also made a great many promises and although all the Zones were represented had no accountability to the members or the Federation.

    I believe that Mr.Moroney took advantage of his position and has a serious conflict of interest by making his proposal without any notification to any other Associations that this was even on the Agenda and never mind that it was on a fast track.
    • I believe that Mr. Moroney and the USHJA have taken advantage of his position which is a direct conflict of interest by sending out emails with the effort of the USEF and their undue prejudicial influence.
    • I believe it was a conflict of interest when he was granted at expense to the USEF 5 hours for a presentation with the projectors and rooms.
    • I believe it was a conflict of interest when Sue Pinckney as a director for hunters gave him her expertise and skills while on the payroll of the USEF for the Convention.
    • I believe it was unethical for this whole issue to be raised without proper information to all who want to apply; and then condemn them for not being prepared.

    I believe it was wrong for the whole presentation to have been made until after there were proper criteria accepted by the Board of Directors published and made available for all those interested to apply, proper deadlines and opportunity for each to make an equal presentation.

    We still do not know what the financial responsibilities will be, how the USEF plans to have this Affiliate function and under what terms and conditions they will monitor and supervise their activities and require accountability. Will Membership be mandatory or reciprocal? Will there be Financial accountability and over-sight by USEF? If so how?

    This attachment was sent to the Board of Directors with the sincere hope that they will consider the conditions and terms by which to define a Breed/Discipline Affiliate that will replace the National hunter Committee in management of the whole discipline.

    I hope they will then publish that criterion so that any and all National Associations may have the opportunity to read and comply, or apply for the position. We have had only one Executive Committee Meeting available to the members. Certainly, if they feel it is too expensive to web cast they could still produce an Audio CD of the meetings for the members who wish to hear it in the Media Library.

    If the Federation wishes to assure the members that Mr.Moroney has had no undue influence on his behalf this is the most functional way to divert the antagonism of the members and keep the record open. I, by the way disagree that it was not worth the investment because not enough people listened; the fact is as you know there were several who listened and then gave ongoing reports to the thousands of people on your Forums.

    Anything that builds the confidence of the members who pay the bills, support the shows and donate their money is money well spent.

    Yours truly,

    Vikki Karcher Siegel<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

    Battle Scarred Veteran
    http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

    Comment


    • #3
      Psst... Snowbird. It's "Strassburger."

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Thank you Ma!

        Battle Scarred Veteran
        http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

        Comment


        • #5
          Snowbird, it seems to have escaped you that my objections to your comments on the other thread have nothing to do with the substance of the USHJA, NHJA, or the selection of an affiliate.

          My objection and statement that you should apologize -- not to me, but to Bill Maroney and the USHJA -- was due to your linking of his name to "horse killers" and "child molesters." You took a low, uncalled-for swipe at an individual, and I called you on it.

          You're perfectly capable and free to make whatever points you want or think you can about the substantive issues. But that's not at all what my objection was about.
          "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

          Comment


          • #6
            Snowbird, I wish I had enough time to go toe to toe with you on the USHJA and NHJA issue, but having a job, horses and a family prevents me from turning the BB into a full time occupation.

            I have nothing against the NHJA and certainly nothing against Gary Baker, but the NHJA has had their chance (and a very long one) and I don't get the feeling that most people are very excited by what they have accomplished. Additionally, the NHJA has historically been dominated by horse show managers, and that I do find to be a conflict of interest. I believe our governing body should not be run by the same group that benefits financially from the horse shows. It would be a situation of no checks and balances. I think the USHJA sounds exciting, and I for one would like to see them get a chance, IF they meet the criteria and specs designed by the USEF. I also don't have a problem with a little good natured debate about the two entities, but I have had enough of your bomb throwing. Moroney, as you call him, is not a bad guy (even you have said this a number of times) so why do you persist in starting these threads making it out as if they are doing something truly evil? Please give it a rest!

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Portia, there is really no need for further dialog. I didn't put Moroney in the same scene, it was Lauriep who put him there and I responded in the order of importance to me simply as issues of fair play.


              Scarlett, I too wish you had more time because there is no better way for me to clarify my thinking than to examine an idea from another perspective. I simply steal the time that should be sleeping time for projects of concern. At my age there is no further point in worrying about getting my beauty sleep. The time for doing nothing is too quickly approaching and I don't want to waste time or energy by not being useful with the time I have left.

              As to NHJA it started out as a Show Managers Association and that is true but by the end of it's first year it had altered course into a Members Association since that is what was needed. It has been Affiliated with the AHSA/USAE/USEF for 15 years and simply functioned as a lobbying group for the hunter and jumper people. It continued to do that even after the AHSA opted to try the format which led to the now defunct NHJC.

              I must say that my enthusiasm for NHJA started when I learned that Gary Baker was responsible for the changes to the Election System for the Zones to have dedicated seats as an assurance of equal representation not only geographically but also by competition level. That was when I realized his dedication to the principles that many of us had worked on the past 4 years.

              When NHJC was introduced it sounded wonderful and it's demise resulted from the same concept that somehow the unrecognized and unsanctioned horse shows and the exhibitors who refused to accept the responsibilities of Membership should have an equal place in our Hunter Affiliate. This comes from a long standing dispute as to exactly what are the grass roots?

              My objections have nothing to do with a choice for either side but rather the methods that got us to this place because it is too reminiscent of the formation of the NHJC and the way it sprang full blown onto the scene.

              As you can see in the above letter my criticism has not to do with the USHJA or Bill Moroney personally or Andrew Ellis with whom I've had several lively debates. It has to do with what I have always believed a fair and equal system with rules and specifications that everyone can understand and follow with an honest choice of course.

              I have for four/five years now been for our Right to Know and our Right to Vote. When you read the By-Laws of the NHJA and when you read about their plan of operation and if you still feel that the USHJA is your choice that's fine and maybe they will merge or maybe there can be two associations all those are things still open for resolution. Perhaps, we should not have to choose.

              Perhaps there are many of our hunter people who prefer an autocratic system where everyone is appointed by the President and the other half is willing to gamble on democracy. None of that can be determined until the USEF determines what exactly their responsibility will continue to be and what are the terms and conditions that this new entity must follow.

              Once that is determined and published and adequate time is allowed for development of plans there may be four or even six different associations that would be willing to comply with offers to benefit us all as hunter people.

              Then perhaps we will either vote with our checks or get a chance to vote for which one suits us and each will make a presentation. I think it is illogical when there was only one presentation to say that's the one.

              Battle Scarred Veteran
              http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

              Comment


              • #8
                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snowbird:
                Portia, there is really no need for further dialog. I didn't put Moroney in the same scene, it was Lauriep who put him there and I responded in the order of importance to me simply as issues of fair play.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                No, lauriep mentioned him... to irk you, I would imagine. It was you, however, who took the ball and ran with it. You took the opportunity to sensationalize what you perceive as his wrongdoings by comparing them to the wrongdoings of horse murderers and sexual offenders.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Snowbird, it's Bill Maroney, not Moroney. Or is it a childish insult, designed to prove how much better NHJA is?

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Portrock I wouldn't be that petty, No one ever corrected me and I've been spelling it that way. So thank you very much I appreciate the information and will try not to make the mistake again.

                    But, then at my age I'm entitled to be forgiven for sessions of senility. It isn't nice for you young'uns to pick on us old folks for small errors and then expect us to forgive big errors in you youngsters.

                    In case you didn't understand I don't know if NHJA is better; what I object to is the playing field was not equal and fair. I understand that Tom Struzzeri was interested too, and who knows who else once we find out what the rules are going to be. Do you think its fair for USHJA to have all the benefits of the USEF at our expense and no one else knows about it?

                    Battle Scarred Veteran
                    http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You have been trying to sell this POV for a couple of months now, since the convention. So far, I haven't seen a single person voice agreement with you. Perhaps it is time to move on?

                      Laurie
                      Laurie

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Based on your posts you seem to have a very limited circle of acquaintances in a particular bracket. On the other hand I have found there is a lot of support from people who do believe in democracy and the right to know and the right to vote.

                        However, you seem to miss the issue which is not who is the choice but rather, whether or not the playing field is and has been equal and fair.

                        I have always had this weird concept left over I am sure from my youth that rules were rules for everyone and that an Educational Association needed to be very careful not to infringe on the rights of anyone. Even, little people who are just not important enough to worry about.

                        I think you may hear from the silent majority before this is over.

                        Battle Scarred Veteran
                        http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          My friends, debate and difference of opinion is a.) what our country is based on b.) a fun and healthy exercise of our brain power, that in this day and age we find it increasingly difficult to exercise... this is all good.
                          Do not get mental because someone makes a typo, or doesn't agree with you. Don' make petty issues the topic instead of what we really need, enjoy and want to address.
                          Now (dust...dust...) I will get off my soap box and let the games continue. My efforts are as well self centered... I don't have time to read 1000 threads to find out why you are all talking badly about Billy Moroney. I personally just find it interesting that he has become such a player because he happened to have the good fortune to be in the right place/time to get hired to try to keep Paige Johnson on the center of a pony at that time in her career, and now he heads committees and has you all getting crazed about his erudite decision making. PLEASE... let it be said... I have no issue w/ Mr. Maroney (or Mr. Moronoy for that matter...) It sometimes just blows my mind on how people get from place A. to place B.... No offence Billy...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            IMHO I am really tired of the attitude of "just hand over your money and shut up!" that is prevelent in so many organizations, and not just horse-oriented ones. I have put in many volunteer hours in different organizations (non-equestrian)at the national level in the past, and have found that the Movers and Shakers don't listen to "the little people" anywhere you go. It takes open meetings and direct voting by members to give any voice to those who aren't at the top. Unfortunately, we are arm-twisted financially into joining these equestrian organizations if we want to participate, but don't have any say in how our dollars are spent. Is it really such a horrible thought that we might have some influence in the organization? I'm sure I'll just get slapped down for even opening my mouth here - I should know better, but it's all part of the whole "don't buck the Important people in the sport" thing that really ticks me off.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Let's get one simple thing straight. The spelling of the name of the USHJA leader is MORONEY. That's the way it is spelled in the USEF Roster of Officials.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snowbird:
                                I think you may hear from the silent majority before this is over.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                If a silent majority falls in the woods, does anyone hear it?

                                Sometimes I think I understand everything, then I regain consciousness.
                                Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snowbird:
                                  In case you didn't understand I don't know if NHJA is better; what I object to is the playing field was not equal and fair.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
                                  Have you read Linda Allen's article in the Chronicle (2/20/04)?
                                  Quote:"The challenge put to the NHJC's leaders was to take the head start provided by this instant creation and use it to develop a business plan for transformation into an independent affiliate organization that equaled the other affiliates. Seven years, and several million dollars, later, the NHJC was not much closer to meeting that challenge than it had been at the outset.
                                  Wrangling between the NHJC's leaders and their 'parents' was continual, centering around the NHJC's desire for immediate and complete authority over the disciplines while retaining access to funding via the federation for the foreseeable future." End of quote.
                                  You are right, the playing field is not level. One organization obviously had all the benefits at our expense. Like, seven years and several million dollars!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I am a steward and have taken a sit back and wait stance on these issues, however, I am a member of both groups - NHJA and USHJA. I know Billy Moroney personally quite well and find him to be as upstanding a man in the horse world that I know. And, as a steward, I know a lot of people who push the limits of the rules all the time. And, Gary Baker is just as upstanding as is Billy. I have the same feelings for him as I do for Billy. If anyone is attacking these people personally, that is a huge mistake. Of course, both groups have their own agenda, but it is now up to both groups to present their agenda to USEF for them to make their decision as to who will become the H/J affiliate. If you want to support one or the other organization, that's fine. But I chose to wait it out, see just who is picked for that affiliate, then work hard to support the chosen group to attain the goals as they present them. I usually don't speak to these topics, but I am so tired of the constant bickering and the posts that are so negative. Don't you all realize that USEF is working on it and will make a decision in July. Certain of you didn't want USEF to make a decision at the convention, and they didn't. Now you bicker about the fact that, supposedly, one group has more information in front of USEF than the other. Just how do you know that that is true. I think we need to give the powers at USEF some credit for being smart enough to figure out just which group will be the best to be the affiliate and go with that with our support. I know I will certainly give all my efforts to the group chosen, whether it is Gary's or Billy's. I would be proud to work for either one.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Nicely stated, BAB!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Out of ignorance, a question...

                                        Will those who pay H/J discipline fees on their USEF memberships have a right to VOTE for which organization, or if they want either or any, to represent them?

                                        If not...well...doesn't this issue of choice become somewhat moot?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X