• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

study on effects of GM grains on pigs

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Katy Watts View Post

    EPA requires a very extensive program of tests for toxicology and residues for all pesticides to make sure that toxic amounts of pesticides are not possible when labels are followed and post treatment harvest intervals are met. Farmers are very careful to follow labels.
    really.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by LMH View Post
      really.
      Here's some really boring reading material for you.

      http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content...m_guide_pkg-en

      Environmental fate stuff here:
      http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environ...x-oecd-live-02

      Doing field studies on pesticide residues was how I made my living while I was playing around with grass for free. I also acted as Quality Assurance Director for another company doing same kind of studies. Trust me. This is very highly regulated, EPA would spend 3 days at my facility every few years. But since the regulations are really boring, it seems everyone would rather keep reading Silent Spring and get all excited about pesticides that were banned 50 years ago before we had all the science we have know. Drama prevails.
      Are you feeding your horse like a cow? www.safergrass.org

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by deltawave View Post
        Hence the on my part. But I'd wager non-GMO foods are exposed to more herbicides than GMO ones. The study in question was not one of ORGANIC grains vs. GMO ones but rather "conventionally grown" non-GMO ones vs. GMO.
        That's an excellent question. I'm not sure.

        Comment


        • #24
          Why would GMO foods need less herbicides? I thought their main attribute was resistance to Roundup?

          Comment


          • #25
            Fair point! I was thinking about it bass-ackwards.
            Click here before you buy.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Jamie.S View Post
              15% is pretty normal, even lower than a lot of producers experience. They often wean at 2-3 weeks so that they can get litters out of their sows- I guess it must work itself out. But high piglet mortalities are a huge issue in the swine industry with every producer.

              Reason million and one I am a vegetarian. That is heartbreaking and disgusting.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by GraceLikeRain View Post
                Reason million and one I am a vegetarian. That is heartbreaking and disgusting.
                I think if you look into it, you will find that there are quite a lot of animals killed on your behalf so you can be vegetarian.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by hank View Post
                  I think if you look into it, you will find that there are quite a lot of animals killed on your behalf so you can be vegetarian.
                  That means, the more vegetables people eat, the more animals have to be killed to help get those crops to their plates.

                  There is a reason animal products made our diets more efficient and complete AND gave us more with less.

                  As for quality of life of cattle for those few months in a feedlot, well, ask those cattle, that think they are in the Ritz of the cattle world, room and board and congenial friends and nothing to do to earn that = bliss for cattle in that stage of their lives.

                  "Unsanitary conditions"?
                  Ever look where cattle out in pristine pastures chose to drink and lay down?

                  Seriously, there is decades of proper studies on how to insure quality of life for those cattle in pens, all kinds of pen parameters are known for it to be a good place to finish those cattle, for them and for the goals at hand also, of course.

                  One of the surprising results was that less than 35 head pens and the cattle were unsettled and not as happy as with more than that or less than 200 per pen.
                  That is cattle for you.

                  There are many independent university studies and degrees for those that study feedlot management.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Thank goodness there are studies! Because if there are studies then it MUST be true!


                    Phew!

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by hank View Post
                      I think if you look into it, you will find that there are quite a lot of animals killed on your behalf so you can be vegetarian.
                      Are you joking? I'm really dense about this but open to be educated. How many animals are killed so that I can buy veggies and fruits and grains at Whole Foods and from my local co-op?

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                        That means, the more vegetables people eat, the more animals have to be killed to help get those crops to their plates.

                        There is a reason animal products made our diets more efficient and complete AND gave us more with less.

                        As for quality of life of cattle for those few months in a feedlot, well, ask those cattle, that think they are in the Ritz of the cattle world, room and board and congenial friends and nothing to do to earn that = bliss for cattle in that stage of their lives.

                        "Unsanitary conditions"?
                        Ever look where cattle out in pristine pastures chose to drink and lay down?

                        Seriously, there is decades of proper studies on how to insure quality of life for those cattle in pens, all kinds of pen parameters are known for it to be a good place to finish those cattle, for them and for the goals at hand also, of course.

                        One of the surprising results was that less than 35 head pens and the cattle were unsettled and not as happy as with more than that or less than 200 per pen.
                        That is cattle for you.

                        There are many independent university studies and degrees for those that study feedlot management.
                        Yeah, the above makes sense. In bizarro world.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by hank View Post
                          I think if you look into it, you will find that there are quite a lot of animals killed on your behalf so you can be vegetarian.
                          Well, yes, if you eat eggs and dairy. However, if one is vegan, no animals are killed for a vegan diet.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                            That means, the more vegetables people eat, the more animals have to be killed to help get those crops to their plates.

                            There is a reason animal products made our diets more efficient and complete AND gave us more with less.

                            As for quality of life of cattle for those few months in a feedlot, well, ask those cattle, that think they are in the Ritz of the cattle world, room and board and congenial friends and nothing to do to earn that = bliss for cattle in that stage of their lives.

                            "Unsanitary conditions"?
                            Ever look where cattle out in pristine pastures chose to drink and lay down?

                            Seriously, there is decades of proper studies on how to insure quality of life for those cattle in pens, all kinds of pen parameters are known for it to be a good place to finish those cattle, for them and for the goals at hand also, of course.

                            One of the surprising results was that less than 35 head pens and the cattle were unsettled and not as happy as with more than that or less than 200 per pen.
                            That is cattle for you.

                            There are many independent university studies and degrees for those that study feedlot management.
                            Bluey has jumped the shark.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Maybe Bluey is referring to this?

                              http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=97836&page=1

                              (no dog in the fight here and I'm not endorsing the article, really--I'm an omnivore and not emotional about it, and the article may be reaching a bit, but . . .)
                              Click here before you buy.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                From University of Chicago:

                                Study: vegan diets healthier for planet, people than meat diets

                                http://www-news.uchicago.edu/release...413.diet.shtml

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                  Well, yes, if you eat eggs and dairy. However, if one is vegan, no animals are killed for a vegan diet.
                                  Guess you never farmed, so you don't know all that has to be done to protect crops so they make it to harvest and put away, without being a pure smorgasbord spread out for all kinds of critters.

                                  Those crops are where our vegetables come from.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                    From University of Chicago:

                                    Study: vegan diets healthier for planet, people than meat diets

                                    http://www-news.uchicago.edu/release...413.diet.shtml
                                    Really?

                                    If you pay attention, that was a study in 2006, long ago debunked.

                                    The original was a study presented to the United Nations right before an important vote, very biased and very poor science, called "livestock's long shadow".

                                    The United Nations itself apologized for having that one "study" brought into consideration.

                                    There was so much wrong, you can google again and find what it all was about.

                                    Next time, do more than google without understanding what you are putting forth as any kind of truth.

                                    Not that we have not discussed this before, but of course "you forgot" by now.

                                    No time, got to run, or I would help you find the relevant studies proving those old ones wrong.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Here are more current statistics on this, first link I found:

                                      http://www.dairyherd.com/dairy-news/...207589951.html

                                      Then, there is this also, that is so new it has not been "digested" yet thru the scientific community, so the jury is still out on this, but is interesting.
                                      May end up being a blind alley for more than the specific situation, then it may, as the fellow there thinks, be applicable to many more places.
                                      That, we do need more to confirm is so:

                                      http://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savor...te_change.html

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Discobold View Post
                                        Are you joking? I'm really dense about this but open to be educated. How many animals are killed so that I can buy veggies and fruits and grains at Whole Foods and from my local co-op?
                                        No I am absolutely NOT joking. Bluey is right. Your fruits and vegetables would never make it to your mouth if someone did not kill insects, small vermin, deer, feral hogs, and that is just in the field. Once you store things you have to keep after the insects and rodents. So, on your behalf, MANY animals are killed so you can eat plant material and feel morally superior.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Unless you grew your own food or purchased your food from a farmer all using environmentally safe farming practices.

                                          You guys are going to run into problems if you try to reverse those broad statistical averages and try to apply them as factors of causality at the individual level.

                                          You can't account for all of the possible individual variations with enough certainty.

                                          It's like saying individual will has no possibility of influencing the greater whole.

                                          History has already proven otherwise.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X