• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Horse Soring

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Horse Soring

    As a long-time reader but new poster, I certainly hope this doesn't annoy anyone. I understand that the primary purpose of this forum is to be able to exchange advice and facilitate knowledge-sharing amongst fellow horse people, but I still thought this might be something in which others on here besides myself might be interested.
    There is a bill in Congress right now to ban the practice of soring (common in some show circuits).

    From the ASPCA:

    "It’s not legal, but on today’s Tennessee Walking Horse show circuit, trainers still engage in the cruel practice of “soring”—using chemicals and devices to cause extreme pain to horses’ legs and hooves to exaggerate their special gait. Trainers may also file down horses’ hooves to expose the nerves, then insert sharp objects into hooves to cause further suffering.

    Desperate to escape the constant, intense burning and sharp pain, horses who suffer soring unnaturally fling their legs in the high-stepping “big lick” gait—a gait that unfortunately wins prizes at shows.

    It gets even worse: In an effort to evade detection of this illegal cruelty, these trainers often condition horses to remain still during inspections by beating, torturing or burning them beforehand.

    Our majestic Tennessee Walking Horses have long been cherished, both for their unique four-step gait and their willing and gentle dispositions. Unfortunately, these same traits have also made these horses vulnerable to extreme exploitation and abuse at the hands of unscrupulous trainers. This cruelty must end.

    The Prevent All Soring Tactics (PAST) Act, H.R. 1518, has been introduced in the U.S. House and would dramatically increase protections for these horses—we need your help to ensure it passes."

    (I know that there are certainly TONS of Tennessee Walker owners that would never dream of hurting their horses, so by posting this, I am certainly not passing judgment on owners of the breed as a whole!)

    ANYWAY, if you want to help: http://www.capwiz.com/aspca/issues/a...591616&type=TA

  • #2
    Soring is an abhorrent practice but not something congress needs to trouble themselves with in my opinion. We don't do a very good job of enforcing the animal cruelty laws already on the books, seems to me that would be the logical next step.
    McDowell Racing Stables

    Home Away From Home


    • #3
      I have to say that I'm in agreement with Laurie. There are rules re soring already in place and they are NOT enforced. There are many other topics I'd prefer Congress to discuss before this one. We need to regulate our own sport, regardless the discipline, now, while we still have the chance.
      "Absent a correct diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma and alternative therapy is witchcraft" A. Kent Allen


      • #4
        The "government" has been trying to stop soring in the gaited community, specifically TWH's for over 40 years. As usual they went about it the wrong way by going after trainers, owners and riders. The real problem is out there in the middle of the ring - the judge. The judges have perpetuated the big lick by how they place the competitors. Just like the judges who perpetuate problems one can find in all horse competitions of any discipline.
        "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
        Courtesy my cousin Tim


        • #5
          The judge is just an individual and the act of judging is so subjective that "going after the judge" would never work. There is a rulebook for every discipline stating what shall be rewarded in the show ring. When this is changed and when exhibitors take the changes seriously, treatment of the horses will change.
          "Absent a correct diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma and alternative therapy is witchcraft" A. Kent Allen


          • Original Poster

            The funny thing is, I agree with all of you. I think enacting (another) law to address soring would be a pyrrhic victory. It would satisfy some animal rights activists, and keep them quiet for a while, but not do much to actually prevent the practice. However, in the absence of a federal law what is to be done?? Should individual states get more active? Or, how do we, in the sport, do a better job of self-regulating?


            • #7
              In addressing this issue the Sore Lick community loves to note other equine communities' problems (peanut-rolling QHs or rollkured WBs, for example). To an extent the observation is valid because each of these other abuses is driven by what "the mob" thinks is "beautiful." As long as the "beauty" is sought the practices will continue. At its core, however, each practice is driven by the trainer/rider/owner accepting some pretty cruel practices to attain these "beauties."

              The new Federal law is, in fact, a significant improvement over the current HPA in some important ways. There is one major failing, however, and that needs some explanation.

              Under the current HPA it's an offense to exhibit, transport, sell, etc. a "sored horse." There are civil and criminal penalties involved. For the first 40+ years of the HPA there were no successful criminal prosecutions. A few were tried, all failed for one reason or another. The civil penalties were not effective in that it was not all that hard to evade them or their effects. That changed with the first, successful criminal prosecution in the Federal Court in Chattanooga last year. Some undercover video then surfaced and a State prosecution for animal cruelty is being had just outside Memphis. The Grand Jury there has just indicted the defendants. I don't know when the trial is set.

              Enforcement under the current HPA is joint, with the USDA being primarily responsible. USDA vets. attend shows and inspect looking for evidence of soring. If found it goes to a USDA Administrative Law Judge for disposition. An accused is entitled to notice and hearing. Penalties are fines and suspension from showing, transporting, ect. for periods from one year to life.

              There is also a "private" enforcement scheme. where USDA trains and licenses DQP (Designated, Qualified Persons)* to conduct inspections looking for evidence of soring. A DQP does not have to be a vet. An HIO (Horse Industry Organization) petitions to become a sponsor. If accepted, USDA vets train the DQPs. The inspection protocol is set out in Regulations issued by the USDA. If a DQP issues a "ticket" it goes to the HIO for hearing and disposition. Suspension and fines are the penalties.

              DQPs are hired by show management the way judges, stewards, etc. are hired.

              This "private" scheme was developed for reasons of economy. The HPA has a rather low dollar limit on funds available for enforcement. To broaden the reach of the Act the private scheme was developed. This is actually quite common (and to some, troubling) in Federal practice.

              If a show manager does not engage a DQP and USDA shows up and finds sored horses show management faces significant civil penalties.

              That's the process currently in place.

              The new law would place much more enforcement within the USDA and severely limit, or even end, the DQP program. It also makes the act of soring a Federal crime.

              There are two problems, here. First, by putting all the enforcement authority back into USDA you run square into the problems of funding. For example, the current sequester may or may not influence USDA enforcement actions by limiting the number of shows they can attend. It can impact the litigation of such cases by the Justice Department. Maintaining a more robust private enforcement program would keep the HPA broadly applied.

              Second, to prove a criminal act the Government must prove each and every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Under current law if you can show a horse was sored you can prosecute the rider because they got on the sored horse and rode it. But if you make the act of soring a crime how will you show who put the chemicals/devices on the legs? Unless you've got a confession from a disgruntled employee (or the like) how will you do it? Under Federal law the use undercover surveillance is governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence. They tend to be very strict (in spite of what you see on cop shows). At the end of the day, strengthening the prohibitions on sale, exhibition, etc. are more practical than trying to get into somebody's barn with a hidden camera.

              This is a terribly emotion issue for many and many of those folks allow their emotions to run off with their reason. They become so desperate to "punish" the sorers that they lose sight of the normal restrictions on governmental activities and ignore Constitutional, administrative, and good sense limits on governmental authority. Some of the provision of this new statute do that.

              Sorry for the "novel" but being a 20+ year veteran of the "soring wars" has left some "old wounds"!!!


              *I completed the DQP syllabus in 1998.
              Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão


              • Original Poster

                This video is hard to watch, but glad the horses are being rescued.
                Today on Fran Jurga's Hoof blog:


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Courtney210 View Post
                  This video is hard to watch, but glad the horses are being rescued.
                  Today on Fran Jurga's Hoof blog:
                  Thank you for posting. You are brave, but obviously new here. Steel yourself for the onslaught of pro-soring opinions and defenses of the industry which promotes soring; it's going to get ugly. I can assure you that your thread will not remain on the topic of the cruelty of soring, but will very quickly get waylaid to criticisms of you, of the Fran Jurga Hoof blog, the HSUS, and the ASPCA. You can rest assured that PETA, Obama, the Right to Put Stacks on My Horse, and Yeah But Other People Do Cruel Things Too, will be prominent as well.
                  "Random capitAlization really Makes my day." -- AndNirina


                  • #10
                    I haven't read all of the soring threads that have happened on this board before... but PeteyPie I don't think I recall anyone on this board ever saying they are "pro-soring."
                    http://www.youtube.com/user/NBChoice http://nbchoice.blogspot.com/
                    The New Banner's Choice- 1994 ASB Mare
                    Dennis The Menace Too- 1999 ASB Gelding
                    Dreamacres Sublime- 2008 ASB Gelding


                    • #11
                      Aside from the asshats actually doing the soring and maybe the judges who reward the asshats, I don't know anyone who is pro-soring.
                      McDowell Racing Stables

                      Home Away From Home


                      • #12
                        No "pro soring" but there have been periodic defences of the Big Lick process.

                        Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão


                        • #13
                          I am sure you are right that no one on CoTH has actually come out and said, "I am for Soring." There have been a lot of thoughtful discussions on the topic as well, and I believe most of the horse people who read and comment on this forum find the practice of Soring to be abhorrent. But this is a public and anonymous forum and some posters have given me the conviction that they do support it, and that they may well be part of the "asshats actually doing the soring." Am I the only one who sees this?

                          Yes, there are many facets to the issues, but if those posting
                          -support the status quo in an industry which has perpetuated Soring for decades,
                          -and if they are loudly resistant to any changes in the industry while insisting that the industry can police itself,
                          -and if they decry any interference and blame whichever organization that brings the abuse to light while spinning the whole topic to be a Conspiracy,
                          -and if they are apologists for the guy who gets caught red-handed;
                          -and when they explain that certain practices around Soring, such as mechanical Soring, are really okay if done the way they do it,
                          -and they argue that the caustic substances they use are really not FOR Soring, just for other purposes, benign and caring health purposes -- but they have the side effect of creating big action in the horse --
                          well, in my opinion that is support of soring. If it walks like a duck...

                          Sometimes I avoid these topics because they can get ugly as they go on. I feel like I'm reading a metaphor for past history of Jim Crow laws, which were argued to not be about racism but about States' rights. So I get creeped out reading that it's not about Soring, it's about the TWH organizations' rights.
                          "Random capitAlization really Makes my day." -- AndNirina


                          • #14
                            OP - you may want to check out the following thread -

                            My personal feeling is that Big Lick needs to go.
                            Disclaimer: Just a beginner who knows nothing about nothing