• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Any of the hoof gurus care to comment on this?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by SCMSL View Post
    Yep, when I bought her she had very contracted feet (she's 17' and wore size 1 shoes). It has been almost a year and we've managed to up her to size 2, but the farrier feels she will only be ok once she's a size 3 or 4.

    I love the idea of these casts but wouldn't even dream of suggesting it to my super farrier unless its actually a viable idea.
    Why can't you talk to your farrier?

    It doesn't sound like you trust your farrier much. Why so?
    If you think he doesn't handle your horse properly, maybe you should seek for another farrier's opinion that would suit your beliefs and your horse's needs better.

    Your horse is quite big, and should have enough feet to support him. What is the reason your farrier gave you as to why your horse needs larger feet?

    Originally posted by Rick Burten View Post
    Yep. And, Thank You!
    As much as I appreciate a skeptic, I appreciate it even more when someone employs critical analysis and thought. Not to mention, reading for content in contest with comprehension. Well done!
    Merci!
    ~ Enjoying some guac and boxed wine at the Blue Saddle inn. ~

    Originally posted by LauraKY
    I'm sorry, but this has "eau de hoarder" smell all over it.
    HORSING mobile training app

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Charlie Piccione View Post
      It allows a good amount of protection to weak/thin/under developed/thrushy frogs so the horse can use his heels properly without the sting of loading the heel, when makeing contact with the ground, which in turn should build a conciderable amount of frog in a short time.
      I again ask, How? For example, how does covering(protecting?) a weak/thin/thrushy frog help it or allow a horse to use its heels properly without the sting of loading the heel.......? Can a horse use its heels properly without loading them? If so, how?

      You also first stated that the product will allow a horse to build frog but later add the qualifier 'should build", so which is it? The difference between your initial and second claim is, significant.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Rick Burten View Post
        I again ask, How? For example, how does covering(protecting?) a weak/thin/thrushy frog help it or allow a horse to use its heels properly without the sting of loading the heel.......? Can a horse use its heels properly without loading them? If so, how?

        No...

        You also first stated that the product will allow a horse to build frog but later add the qualifier 'should build", so which is it? The difference between your initial and second claim is, significant.
        If you want to split hairs or frogs......It should build a conciderable amount of frog material as it will allow a more comfortable (key) use of the heels if the horse is so inclined and or able to physically do so.
        I hope that helps.
        Charlie Piccione
        Natural Performance Hoof Care

        Comment


        • #24
          So it makes the foot numb so the horse is more comfortable? I think metal shoes do a much better job of that.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Charlie Piccione View Post
            It should build a conciderable amount of frog material as it will allow a more comfortable (key) use of the heels if the horse is so inclined and or able to physically do so.
            I hope that helps.
            Sorry, but it doesn't help. How does it allow a more comfortable use of the heels?
            What if the horse is not so inclined and/or able to physically do so> By the way, what does 'physicaly do so' mean? How does creating an artificial anaerobic environment over an area already afflicted by anaerobes, help improve an already "thrushy" frog?

            Can you provide any links, cites, etc. to research that has been done that shows that the application of this material actually builds a considerable amount of frog material.

            Why do you continue to use the qualifier "should"? Either it does or it doesn't, right?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Tom Bloomer View Post
              So it makes the foot numb so the horse is more comfortable? I think metal shoes do a much better job of that.
              Now, Tommy, why are you giving the Fluff Bunnies suffering from TSS more ammunition? You know that its going to bite you/us in the butt. Soon, I expect to read that "Noted East Coast farrier, Tom Bloomer says that metal shoes do an excellent job of numbing the foot......." Then, we'll have to spend an inordinate amount of time explaining the sarcasm that is contained in that reference. Perhaps if you were to edit that post and add a disclaimer to the effect that what you wrote was written both in jest and sarcasm. it would save us from the onslaught of stupidity that is bound to occur. Even if you just added the icon it might forestall the non-intelligentsia from doing what they do best......

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Tom Bloomer View Post
                So it makes the foot numb so the horse is more comfortable? I think metal shoes do a much better job of that.
                Tom Blommer says: "So it makes the foot numb so the horse is more comfortable? I think metal shoes do a much better job of that."

                Eh, I got a kick out of it!!
                "When life gives you scurvy, make lemonade."

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #28
                  So, could you please translate the last few posts to "hoof ignorant" people like me?

                  Tom and Rick, do you feel this "bandaging" system would be useful in situations like mine? (Contracted hoof, minor laminae x-ray changes, high demanding sports career, stabled most of the day?)
                  www.facebook.com/lusitanos4sale

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Rick Burten View Post

                    Why do you continue to use the qualifier "should"? Either it does or it doesn't, right?
                    As in all things Equine...and in your own words of wisdom "It Depends"
                    Charlie Piccione
                    Natural Performance Hoof Care

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by SCMSL View Post
                      Tom and Rick, do you feel this "bandaging" system would be useful in situations like mine? (Contracted hoof, minor laminae x-ray changes, high demanding sports career, stabled most of the day?)
                      All disclaimers apply..........

                      That said, No.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by SCMSL View Post
                        So, could you please translate the last few posts to "hoof ignorant" people like me?

                        Tom and Rick, do you feel this "bandaging" system would be useful in situations like mine? (Contracted hoof, minor laminae x-ray changes, high demanding sports career, stabled most of the day?)
                        Can you buy the idea that socks are better support and protection than shoes?

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Tom Bloomer View Post
                          Can you buy the idea that socks are better support and protection than shoes?
                          I'm a bit ashamed to admit this, but that may be one of the most profound and *head desk* provoking statements that I've ever read on COTH. Once again, I'm reminded why I find both TB and RB's COTH posts absolutely spot-on.
                          Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

                          You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by Tom Bloomer View Post
                            Can you buy the idea that socks are better support and protection than shoes?
                            This is something anyone could understand. Thank You!!

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #34
                              Got it, thanks Tom
                              www.facebook.com/lusitanos4sale

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by jen-s View Post
                                I'm a bit ashamed to admit this, but that may be one of the most profound and *head desk* provoking statements that I've ever read on COTH. Once again, I'm reminded why I find both TB and RB's COTH posts absolutely spot-on.
                                Rick and I are TWINS <link

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by Tom Bloomer View Post
                                  Rick and I are TWINS <link
                                  Yeah, I got the good looks and brains, Tom got the height and the webbed feet...........

                                  I'm the one in the middle in the picture..........

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    No dog in this fight… but the socks vs. shoes comment.

                                    What about the movement in humans towards “barefoot” type shoes – and the preference of many runners to use a very minimal, almost sock like shoe as it allows the foot to function properly, while adding a bit of protection / comfort?

                                    Or that many podiatrist say that going barefoot is healthier for the human foot than wearing shoes?

                                    Or is that just a bunch of new age hooey?
                                    APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                                      No dog in this fight… but the socks vs. shoes comment.

                                      What about the movement in humans towards “barefoot” type shoes –
                                      The movement is glacial.
                                      ....and the preference of many runners to use a very minimal, almost sock like shoe as it allows the foot to function properly, while adding a bit of protection / comfort?
                                      How many is "many"? Does the foot really function properly? Every time/every person? Personally, I prefer a lot of protection and wear shoes/boots that provide both protection and comfort.
                                      Or that many podiatrist say that going barefoot is healthier for the human foot than wearing shoes?
                                      What about all the other podiatrists? And, trying to compare the human foot and its bio-mechanics to that of the horse(or other equidae) is a straw man argument.
                                      Or is that just a bunch of new age hooey?
                                      What makes you think its only 'new age hooey'?

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                                        No dog in this fight… but the socks vs. shoes comment.

                                        What about the movement in humans towards “barefoot” type shoes – and the preference of many runners to use a very minimal, almost sock like shoe as it allows the foot to function properly, while adding a bit of protection / comfort?

                                        Or that many podiatrist say that going barefoot is healthier for the human foot than wearing shoes?

                                        Or is that just a bunch of new age hooey?
                                        Sounds like a good marketing campaign. I'm sure this will result in many industrial workplaces, hospitals, factories, etc. change their requirement for employees to wear hard soled shoes in order to promote better foot health for said employees and subsequently save on workers compensation insurance premiums due to lower incidence of orthopedic problems and foot injuries in the work place.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Haven't there been studies done in the military regarding "barefoot" type footwear that have found significant benefits?
                                          As Peter, Paul, and Mary say, a dragon lives forever.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X