• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Shannon Peters pulling her horses shoes

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TO AZNATIVE

    I have ridden in Oracle, Catalina, and the Sonoita area. Those are very different elevations from where i live. The soil is completely different,"tighter" and it rains more. I have washes and caliche, very loose rocks on top of pavement hard soil. The rocks vary in size from dust to Mt Lemmon. They fill up the boots. The gravel wears out the boots and the skin under the gaiters.

    You are the one calling the Gloves crappy. I said they wear out too fast on this terrain to be affordable. Renegades wear out too fast, too.

    As far as diet, we all do the best we can and it doesn;t seem to make the hooves grow fast enough to ride on this terrain everyday. They certainly don't need trimming!!!

    As far as trimmers, I find it interesting that you say there aren't any good ones....do you think that could possibly be because horses around here need less trimming than the trimmers are doing?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Rick Burten View Post
      Why are you afraid?

      You are demonstrably incorrect. Question: Where does most of the expansion/contraction of any hoof, shod or barefoot, occur? Regardless, there is not, to my knowledge, even one scintilla of research that supports your preposterous claim. In fact, Dr. Jeff Thomason of Guelph University did a study that showed that a shoe does a better job of dissipating shock/concussion than a bare hoof does.

      It Depends.

      Whatever floats your boat. 'Course, it should be about the horse's needs, not yours, right?

      I'm very interested in the new Norwegian-produced Equine Fusion.......they seem like the absolute very best option on the market these days.
      And you know this because....? Perhaps you would provide us with the extensive market testing of all the products out there that you have done that enables you to make such a bold statement. Absent that, how about providing us with all the product comparison research undertaken by others under the same parameters.[/QUOTE]


      Jesus bloody christ. Abrasive much? If you had any interest in a good debate you'd keep the silly kindergarten style stabs to yourself and concentrate on the issue. "I'm afraid I ..." is a way of being polite. And "for me" doesn't indicate I'M wearing them, but that I've made the personal evaluated choice for my individual horse at the moment. That rather transpires from the sentence - how old are we, fourteen?
      I know this because? Laboratory AND market research is coming up with absolutely glowing results in every aspect of EqFu boots, except two points related to the nature of the sole: the soft soles wear more quickly than hard materials, and they aren't studdable. This research is being done on the Norwegian market, but it is valid research still. Why don't you bother to have a look at it yourself (Google is your friend), instead of indiscriminately attacking everything I say, kindergarten-style? The fact that EqFu hasn't come to the USA yet doesn't mean this part of the world isn't doing research.
      Equine portraits in oil and pencil at www.facebook.com/ecrklaveness

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post
        Perhaps not AS MUCH as barefoot would but isn't all hoof protection a trade off of some kind?
        Hasn't this been what I have been saying all along?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by LMH View Post
          why are accusing me of having attitude?

          I think saying-really you don't have to 'buy' is far from attitude. I mean it. Just sharing and you can have an interest or ignore. Just fact. No attitude.

          I have seen the gloves. Thank you however for the link.

          And I am NOT talking about the closure. The SOLE is the issue. When the horse loads on the ground, his hoof does not receive the same feedback.

          That is the influence that dictates the ability of the bulbs to move independently.

          Heck that lack of feedback is probably why over-trimmed or chronically laminitic horses appear sound in boots! (OK that will get some emails to complain).
          Leah, We truly are talking about two different things then and I did feel like your last sentences on your last post was accusing me of ignoring you which is far from the truth or I'd not be involved in this discussion at all. No I don't agree that the sole of the boots prohibit the hoof from expansion nor distortion...they just aren't that tight to do that IMO...particularly the newer style boots. Of course, they don't receive the same feedback from the ground but that is changed by ANYTHING You put on their hooves. However, myself and another person BOTH feel that the Gloves gave our horses a better sense of the ground than wearing shoes did...as a result we both prefer the boots over shoes.

          What is the alternative that you suggest for protection? Rather nail on a rigid shoe to the hoof for weeks at a time? That would seem more loathsome by your thinking.

          I've said it a lot of times already that I admit that all tools have their advantages and limitations. Boots, shoes, casts, whatever...use what works for your horse.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by LMH View Post
            Hasn't this been what I have been saying all along?
            I think you hardly can take credit for this concept and you know it from my comments in my pm to you about riding barefoot on a good horse over rough ground earlier what my preference is...HOWEVER..being a realist, I know that I have to protect their hooves somehow when I take them from the soft wet sand they live on to a mountain top covered in rocks. I've also hopefully clear that I believe that all forms of hoof protection have advantages, disadvantages and limitations and that all people have the right to choose what works for their horse without being harassed for it.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ecrklaveness View Post
              . . . A shoe contracts the hoof and doesn't allow it to expand upon contact with the ground and do its job as shock absorption. . . .
              If you bothered to keep up with published, peer reviewed mainstream hoof care science instead of parroting the fringe cult suppositions of "believers" you would know that this claim has been refuted by scientific testing and measurement.

              Comment


              • My biggest problem with hoof boots is that they come in sizes that either fit or they do not fit and I seem to only ever own horses that they do not fit. Tried different styles and brands and they just did not work.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by ecrklaveness View Post
                  . . .This research is being done on the Norwegian market, but it is valid research still.
                  If you are into marketing, I agree that market research is valuable. Especially when you have a product to sell that has only supposition and no testable scientific data to support its claims. It is always best to perfect the shuck'n jive before a small audience before venturing into the big leagues.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post
                    I think you hardly can take credit for this concept and you know it from my comments in my pm to you about riding barefoot on a good horse over rough ground earlier what my preference is...HOWEVER..being a realist, I know that I have to protect their hooves somehow when I take them from the soft wet sand they live on to a mountain top covered in rocks. I've also hopefully clear that I believe that all forms of hoof protection have advantages, disadvantages and limitations and that all people have the right to choose what works for their horse without being harassed for it.
                    Sharon, for some reason, you are making assumptions and reading into someone's comments things that are not there.

                    *I* never claimed credit for the concept-I made a statement and you have argued with me only to end up agreeing with what I said and NOW say I should not take credit for the statement when I never made it sound like it was my latest discovery????

                    I don't think anyone said hooves should not be protected. The conflict is because some assume boots are a healthier alternative to a correctly applied shoe.

                    I and hank (and others that don't post) are in disagreement with that 'belief' and have explained why that is.

                    I also don't see where anyone is 'harassing anyone.' This is another example of a statement that sort of leaps down the road from anything that was said.

                    Hopefully that clears it up for you bit.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Daydream Believer View Post
                      Leah, We truly are talking about two different things then and I did feel like your last sentences on your last post was accusing me of ignoring you which is far from the truth or I'd not be involved in this discussion at all. No I don't agree that the sole of the boots prohibit the hoof from expansion nor distortion...they just aren't that tight to do that IMO...particularly the newer style boots. Of course, they don't receive the same feedback from the ground but that is changed by ANYTHING You put on their hooves. However, myself and another person BOTH feel that the Gloves gave our horses a better sense of the ground than wearing shoes did...as a result we both prefer the boots over shoes.

                      What is the alternative that you suggest for protection? Rather nail on a rigid shoe to the hoof for weeks at a time? That would seem more loathsome by your thinking.

                      I've said it a lot of times already that I admit that all tools have their advantages and limitations. Boots, shoes, casts, whatever...use what works for your horse.
                      Geez Louise I have LMH on ignore and she still manages to annoy the hell out of me. Can we break the cycle and not feed the trolls? Or at least not have the pointless circular arguments?

                      What would really be useful is EqTrainer coming back on here and explaining her method for trimming and casting heels.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by grayarabpony View Post
                        Geez Louise I have LMH on ignore and she still manages to annoy the hell out of me.
                        LMH I had no idea you had been promoted. Welcome!!! You do realize that having achieved this exclusive status of being on "the list" is not just a position of privilege and honor, but comes with certain responsibilities and obligations?

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by LMH View Post
                          Sharon, for some reason, you are making assumptions and reading into someone's comments things that are not there.
                          And you aren't making assumptions and reading into what I've written??? Perspective is everything.

                          Originally posted by LMH View Post
                          I* never claimed credit for the concept-I made a statement and you have argued with me only to end up agreeing with what I said and NOW say I should not take credit for the statement when I never made it sound like it was my latest discovery????
                          Sorry but the way you wrote it made it seem as if YOU had been saying this was so all along and no one else had. If you go back to my first post and last paragraph, I pretty much said the same thing regarding the use of all the tools we use on our horses hooves.

                          Originally posted by LMH View Post
                          don't think anyone said hooves should not be protected. The conflict is because some assume boots are a healthier alternative to a correctly applied shoe.
                          See there you did it again. You said we "assume" it as if we are not using facts and good judgement in making our choices. I happen to KNOW that boots are better choice for my horses and that knowledge is the result of my own experiences and mileage and observing the results on my own horses. I accept that your mileage may vary from mine as does hanks and others but that doesn't mean that I automatically assume that you are wrong and just misguided or not thinking it through...as with everything, IT DEPENDS on many factors. hank has problems with his abrasive footing and debris, you don't like the boots for other reasons...whatever...I accept that we have different situations and what works for me may not work for hank or you. OK?

                          It's that sort of attitude that I find offensive...like anyone who doesn't do as you do is only making an incorrect assumption. I realize horse people are the most opinionated people in the world but to have a productive conversation, we have to try and have some respect for other's choices and experience even if it's in conflict with our own.

                          Originally posted by LMH View Post
                          I and hank (and others that don't post) are in disagreement with that 'belief' and have explained why that is.
                          Well, myself and several others disagree with your "belief" and have explained why also. We just will have to agree to disagree.

                          Originally posted by LMH View Post
                          also don't see where anyone is 'harassing anyone.' This is another example of a statement that sort of leaps down the road from anything that was said.

                          Hopefully that clears it up for you bit.
                          I hope this clears things up for you also. Just don't accuse people of ignoring what you are saying simply because they don't see it your way or agree with you. There's a difference...if I want to ignore you, I just won't post as I don't see the value of a reply....or I won't even read your posts like several folks I have on "ignore" already.

                          Comment


                          • Sharon, I honestly have no idea what you are talking about.

                            Comment


                            • I give up Leah. I'm done. This is pointless.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by ecrklaveness View Post
                                Jesus bloody christ. Abrasive much?
                                Nope, just refreshingly frank and earnest. Probably because I tend not to suffer fools or their foolishness much if at all.

                                If you had any interest in a good debate you'd keep the silly kindergarten style stabs to yourself and concentrate on the issue.
                                Perhaps if your reading comprehension were greater, you would have noted that I did concentrate on the issue. As for my "kindergarten style" if that's what it is, you earned it.

                                "I'm afraid I ..." is a way of being polite. And "for me" doesn't indicate I'M wearing them, but that I've made the personal evaluated choice for my individual horse at the moment.
                                ROTFL. Evaluated as compared to what and how many, and where?

                                That rather transpires from the sentence - how old are we, fourteen?
                                Speak for yourself.
                                I know this because? Laboratory AND market research is coming up with absolutely glowing results in every aspect of EqFu boots, except two points related to the nature of the sole: the soft soles wear more quickly than hard materials, and they aren't studdable. This research is being done on the Norwegian market, but it is valid research still.
                                Please direct me to said research and exactly who is doing it. Market research? You're kidding, right. A wise man once observed that "there's three kinds of lies: Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics...... Or is it that 'market research' is your euphenism for "testimonial(s)"?
                                Why don't you bother to have a look at it yourself (Google is your friend), instead of indiscriminately attacking everything I say, kindergarten-style?
                                Please refer back to my comment on fools and their foolishness....

                                The fact that EqFu hasn't come to the USA yet doesn't mean this part of the world isn't doing research.
                                Nor does it mean that any 'real' research is being conducted.

                                Regardless, I do like the abbreviated word "EqFu" It some how seems quite appropriate.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  ecrklaveness, a wise person once told me not to get in a pi$$ing contest with a skunk.
                                  "The captive bolt is not a proper tool for slaughter of equids they regain consciousness 30 seconds after being struck fully aware they are being vivisected." Dr Friedlander DVM & frmr Chief USDA Insp

                                  Comment


                                  • Goes well with, "Don't bring a knife to a gun fight."

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X