• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

PSA re Cosequin ASU vs. Cosequin costs

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PSA re Cosequin ASU vs. Cosequin costs

    I can't find the recent thread regarding Cosequin ASU. Anyway, I said on that thread that I thought it wasn't as cost-effective because the scoop was bigger, and another poster asked me to confirm. Tonight I measured by using my pure Cosequin scoop to dump into my Cosequin ASU scoop.

    I was shocked to find that the Cosequin ASU scoop is in fact FOUR TIMES as large as the Cosequin scoop. So even on big horses, the Cosequin ASU is probably significantly more expensive per dose, because the scoop is FOUR TIMES as large as the original.

    Hope that helps someone with their cost-benefit analyses for supps!

  • #2

    This is why you have to cost things on a per-dose basis, not the size of the container.
    The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET


    • #3
      ASU is more expensive than treating with Adequan. i remember when ASU came out (and i was working in vet pharm distribution) and I laughed at the cosequin people when the told me the price. i'm supirsed there are people even buying it.
      chaque pas est fait ensemble


      • #4
        I see what you're trying to say... but to me, it's not such an issue that the scoop for the ASU version is bigger, because only 1scp of that version contains 7200 mg glucosamine, whereas the original Cosequin only contains 1800 mg per scoop (a puny amount to me). If you add up four scoops of the original version... ta da, 7200mg. Apparently the maintenance dose for a 1200lb horse is 3scps/day of the original, so that seems pretty darn close to me. I personally don't give less than 10,000mg of glucosamine per day (but then again, my horse is BIG), so that would require me to give 5.5 scps of the original. Let’s round that up to 6 scps. The resulting price of the original version (at retail) would cost me $72/mo. I pay $90/mo for my horse to get *two* scoops of Cosequin ASU daily (which yields 14,400mg of glucosamine, plus the extra cost of the ASU and MSM). $18 more per month isn't that bad to me for 2100mg of ASU.

        So yes, I agree, people need to analyze the amounts per scoop, but once it's all added up to the ingredient amounts per day that the person wants to feed, and after extra ingredient costs (ASU, etc) are factored in, they're really not too far off in price. Especially since the type of glucosamine and chondroitin used in both versions are identical. I saw someone erroneously mention in the other thread that the original Cosequin contains a more potent version of glucosamine and chondroitin than the ASU version, but that's not true.


        • #5
          Ok, whoops, I went back and looked up the other thread (here), and realized that it was YOU, fordtraktor, who implied that the Cosequin ASU was more diluted.

          The types of glucosamine and chondroitin used in both versions are absolutely identical. I poked around a bit and it seems that on the product pages for both versions at various retailer websites, the original version often lists the fancy-schmancy special patented ingredient names, whereas the ASU version usually just says "glucosamine HCL," yada yada, which may have mistakenly given such an impression. However, from the Nutramax website:

          What is Cosequin® ASU?
          Cosequin ASU from Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. is a superior joint health supplement in a tasty powder for horses that goes beyond standard joint supplements. It contains NMX1000®* avocado/soybean unsaponifiables (ASU), MSM (methylsulfonylmethane), FCHG49®* glucosamine hydrochloride, and TRH122®* low molecular weight chondroitin sulfate.

          What is Cosequin®Equine Powder?
          Cosequin is an exclusive formula of three important ingredients: TRH122®* low molecular weight chondroitin sulfate, FCHG49®* glucosamine hydrochloride, and manganese ascorbate.


          • #6
            Thanks Goo. I've been trying to figure out how to say what you just said so well!
            Y'all ain't right!


            • Original Poster

              Good to know and thanks for the correction.

              Are there studies to show they need that much? My horses have always done fine on the one for small, two for big horses dosage of the original Cosequin. It is my understanding that past a certain point with supps they stop absorbing and pee the rest out, but I don't know what that point is.


              • #8
                Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post
                It is my understanding that past a certain point with supps they stop absorbing and pee the rest out, but I don't know what that point is.
                LOL there's no proof they absorb any oral joint supplement if you want to get technical. granted last time i had my ear to the ground and studies at my fingertips was 3 years ago.
                chaque pas est fait ensemble


                • Original Poster

                  Ugh, sounds about right. Well, for what it is worth I have noticed no difference between feeding one scoop of ASU and two scoops of regular Cosequin, so will continue on the latter at half the cost. I do notice improvement over nothing at all on either regimen. It could be a placebo effect, but so it goes. Plus, the horse will actually eat the regular Cosequin, an added benefit.


                  • #10
                    I don't know the rules for other disciplines, but using MSM is illegal in Endurance so we can't use Cosequin ASU (and a lot of other supplements) anyway...
                    Makes life easier -- regular Cosequin it is


                    • #11
                      What's the rationale behind not allowing MSM to be fed? Isn't it just sulphur? (Which is supposedly available in green grass.)


                      • #12
                        Three year old thread.
                        McDowell Racing Stables

                        Home Away From Home


                        • #13
                          I wish I'd bother to look at dates before I get carried away.


                          • Original Poster

                            Well, for what it is worth, I stopped feeding any Cosequin at all about a year after this thread and haven't missed it. So I think I had a decade's worth of expensive pee, probably.


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post
                              Well, for what it is worth, I stopped feeding any Cosequin at all about a year after this thread and haven't missed it. So I think I had a decade's worth of expensive pee, probably.
                              Most of us have years or decades of such pee