• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

because I was curious...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • because I was curious...

    I recently sent my hay samples for testing. I decided to go hog wild and test everything I feed my horses, and will share in the event it helps anyone else out.

    So, here are the results for Triple Crown's bagged Alfalfa Cubes:
    http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c5...0/EQ030103.jpg

    for some real excitement (lol, I'm such a nerd!) stay tuned for the nail-biting results of the difference between dry-out-o-the-bag plain beet pulp shreds versus the same but soaked for 24 hours and washed 3x... hang onto your hats folks!
    Being terrible at something is the first step to being truly great at it. Struggle is the evidence of progress.

  • #2
    Cool. I just subscribed to this thread. Is your beet pulp the kind with molasses?
    "Rock n' roll's not through, yeah, I'm sewing wings on this thing." --Destroyer
    http://dressagescriblog.wordpress.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      I am interested in the information you receive ~ thanks for posting and sharing ~
      Zu Zu Bailey " IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE ! "

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        and here it is,

        triple crown brand PLAIN beet pulp shreds, dry, right out of the bag:



        and the same exact product, soaked overnight then rinsed 3x


        the test samples are both from the same bag of product, from the same feeding actually. I took a handful of dry right from my feed bin and set it aside in a ziplock. Then rationed out the horses for the next day in their feed pails and filled with water as I normally do. Next day, I washed the soaked bp as normal – 3 times till the rinse water runs clear – took a handful of that and put it in a ziplock bag and send both to be tested.

        Makes sense that the WSC and ESC are both significantly lower, but I find the higher protein a bit strange I asked this question to EA, hopefully they will respond.

        in the meanwhile, hope this is useful to someone.
        Being terrible at something is the first step to being truly great at it. Struggle is the evidence of progress.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think the difference in moisture content and the fact that you've washed out a lot of sugar might account for the difference in protein.
          Click here before you buy.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            #6
            aahh, because its a percentage thing? I get it, thanks dw!

            eta, EA just replied:
            It’s a matter of mathematics – when you reduce the concentration of certain components (e.g. carbs), that which remains (e.g. protein) increases in concentration as a percentage of the whole.
            Last edited by buck22; Sep. 3, 2010, 08:10 AM.
            Being terrible at something is the first step to being truly great at it. Struggle is the evidence of progress.

            Comment


            • #7
              Ummmmm, plain beet pulp, without molasses, has no sugar in it. It is the byproduct of sugar industry processing and is totally digestible fiber. It is more digestible than hay.
              Tranquility Farm - Proud breeder of Born in the USA Sport Horses, and Cob-sized Warmbloods
              Now apparently completely invisible!

              Comment


              • #8
                That's really interesting. As a matter of curiousity, did you compare it to what is listed on the feed tags?

                It's a good model to show how much soaking/rinsing can have an affect on something that hasn't had sugars added to it. I wonder how effectively you can remove the sugars from beet pulp with molasses like this?

                I would have thought that soaking/rinsing would affect the starch level a bit more? (It obviously affected it some or it would have increased even more (% wise).)

                Was it soaked in cold, warm, or hot water?

                Comment


                • #9
                  I saw mention of this thread on another post, and came to look at the reports, but the photobucket links aren't working for me. Has the location changed? I have an IR horse that gets a tiny bit of beet pulp to get his supps/meds in, so I'm really interested in your results.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Links still work for me.

                    The first link (plain) results are... (dry matter basis, sample was 92.5% dry matter)
                    WSC - 12.7%
                    ESC - 8.7%
                    Starch - 2.1%

                    The second link (soaked and rinsed) results are... (dry matter basis, sample was 15.6% dry matter)
                    WSC - 2.6%
                    ESC - 1.4%
                    Starch - 2.4%

                    So sugars were decreased, starch was not (at least not by any appreciable amount).

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Tiki View Post
                      Ummmmm, plain beet pulp, without molasses, has no sugar in it. It is the byproduct of sugar industry processing and is totally digestible fiber. It is more digestible than hay.
                      Uhm, according to the data it apparently does


                      Dawn, the only thing listed on the bag label that I paid attention too was protein and it was within spec iirc.

                      I used ground temp water. Rationed out the dry product, filled bucket with ground temp water, let sit 24 hours (my horses are only fed once per day), strain off water and then rinse shreds 3 times.

                      I guess starch isn't water soluable?? I don't know, I'm just pleased as punch that its gone from an NSC of 14.8 (wsc + starch) to a NSC of 5. Makes me feel quite a bit better that my efforts are not for naught.

                      horsepoor, the links haven't changed, if you're having a hard time seeing them, pm me your email and I'll email you the jpgs if you want.
                      Being terrible at something is the first step to being truly great at it. Struggle is the evidence of progress.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Tiki View Post
                        Ummmmm, plain beet pulp, without molasses, has no sugar in it. It is the byproduct of sugar industry processing and is totally digestible fiber. It is more digestible than hay.
                        That's kind of like saying oranges have no sugar in them. Beet pulp w/o molasses DOES have sugar in it (often called "natural sugar") but no added sugar Beet pulp with molasses has natural plus added sugars. Does that make sense?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by buck22 View Post
                          horsepoor, the links haven't changed, if you're having a hard time seeing them, pm me your email and I'll email you the jpgs if you want.
                          Thanks - I can view the linked files now -- I think photobucket was down earlier as I couldn't get anywhere, but works fine now.

                          Guess I'll be pulling out an old colander and rinsing.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X