• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

ONE SHOE FITS ALL

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ONE SHOE FITS ALL

    After viewing this natural balance how to apply the NB shoe that Rick burten kindly posted, i feel its a worthy topic for discussion & hopefully it will be discussed sensible , as a traditionally trained farrier i think the horse industry should know the big differences & concepts between traditional & NB farriers, they are not one & the same, that is of course if the moderator will allow the discussion

    http://www.hopeforsoundness.com/misc...ide-Al-1pg.pdf

  • #2
    a qualified farrier offers a complete service
    and services to what the horse in question -- needs

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jack mac View Post
      as a traditionally trained farrier i think the horse industry should know the big differences & concepts between traditional & NB farriers, they are not one & the same, that is of course if the moderator will allow the discussion
      Well, I am a "traditionally trained farrier" too. But I digress...

      Please expound on these alleged "big differences & concepts" between traditional & NB farriers.

      Comment


      • #4
        Jac Mac,
        Have you ever seen a horse shod by someone who has been trained and approved by Gene Ovnecik? Are there any farriers approved by Gene Ovnecik in your region?

        Yes or no is sufficient.
        Katy
        Are you feeding your horse like a cow? www.safergrass.org

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jack mac View Post
          ...i think the horse industry should know the big differences & concepts between traditional & NB farriers, they are not one & the same, that is of course if the moderator will allow the discussion

          http://www.hopeforsoundness.com/misc...ide-Al-1pg.pdf
          OK, for the non-farrier members of the horse industry (i.e. most of the posters on COTH), will you tell us the hoof preparation and shoe placement guidelines for "traditional farriers"? Otherwise we have nothing to compare the NB method to.
          SportHorseRiders.com
          Taco Blog
          *T3DE 2010 Pact*

          Comment


          • #6
            What's the point of the thread's title, then? Honest to God, this is starting to get so tiresome.

            i think the horse industry should know the big differences & concepts between traditional & NB farriers
            Give us a little credit, will you? Most of us are very well aware of the different theories and concepts of shoeing horses. Most of us learned these things from our farriers with whom, I daresay, most horse people converse on the topic for oh, let's say a couple of hours every 5-7 weeks as their farrier is working and the topic is "at hand". We ask questions, they provide answers. "What's this I hear, Mike, about these Natural Balance shoes?" a horse owner might ask. Or "You know, Lynn, I think this horse's feet could do with XYZ", the farrier might say. INTERCHANGE AND DISCUSSION. It actually happens in real life, without the histrionics and drama-queen antics of the fundamentalists.

            Which is why, although I usually peek in these threads to maybe hear something new or (if I'm in the mood) giggle at the foolishness, I make decisions with MY FARRIER.
            Click here before you buy.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by CookiePony View Post
              OK, for the non-farrier members of the horse industry (i.e. most of the posters on COTH), will you tell us the hoof preparation and shoe placement guidelines for "traditional farriers"? Otherwise we have nothing to compare the NB method to.
              Properly fitted horseshoes should be shaped to fit the foot. All too often the natural bs zealots fit feet to shoes.

              Should be of interest to the barefooters to see horseshoers with such strong factions within themselves.

              Jack has some very enlightening things to say about that style of shoeing. It's my hope that he'll be allowed to talk.
              George

              Comment


              • #8
                I think it would very useful for Jacko to show us the differences with picture aids...
                I dare say that he would be willing to shoe to the NB protocols to offer as a comparision, awful lot of big words in them instructions.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JHUshoer20 View Post
                  Properly fitted horseshoes should be shaped to fit the foot. All too often the natural bs zealots fit feet to shoes.
                  What is a "natural bs zealot"? How about "people who don't know how to properly trim a foot, or fit a shoe, often fit the foot to the shoe.

                  Should be of interest to the barefooters to see horseshoers with such strong factions within themselves.
                  Not of any interest at all, because it was never in any doubt.

                  Jack has some very enlightening things to say about that style of shoeing. It's my hope that he'll be allowed to talk.
                  That's fine if he wants to have a real discussion without automatically making widespread conclusions and accusations.
                  ______________________________
                  The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances. - ET

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JHUshoer20 View Post
                    Should be of interest to the barefooters to see horseshoers with such strong factions within themselves.

                    George
                    Newsflash.
                    Visit my barefoot blog:
                    http://barefoothoofcare.wordpress.com/
                    "I don't mean to brag, I don't mean to boast, but I'm intercontinental when I eat French toast" ~ Beastie Boys

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JHUshoer20 View Post
                      Properly fitted horseshoes should be shaped to fit the foot.
                      A too broad generalization that forgets the first tenant of farriery. To wit: "It Depends"
                      All too often the natural bs zealots fit feet to shoes.
                      Again, you tar with too wide a brush. Please offer substantiation for that comment.

                      What I find to be a more common occurence is that those who, for whatever reason(s) do not like, do not understand, are not willing to learn, and are subject to a whole host of personal prejudices when the subject/topic arises, make statements such as that which you just made.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Katy Watts View Post
                        Jac Mac,
                        Have you ever seen a horse shod by someone who has been trained and approved by Gene Ovnecik? Are there any farriers approved by Gene Ovnecik in your region?

                        Yes or no is sufficient.
                        Katy
                        1 yes 2 they abandoned it 5 years back.

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Correct me if I'm wrong, in your NB protocolo how to fit a NB shoe it depicts only one diagram, I'm assuming the procedure applies to all four hooves being fitted the same way?, & if this is the case, doesnt any one who advocates for NB find it a little strange for nature to produce four hoofs that would be identical on all four limbs?, when clearly the knee elbow & shoulder joint work in opposed direction to the hock stifle & hip , we know a horse lands heels first in his front limbs, dose he's hind hooves follow the same action? ,& if not wouldn't this necessitate a different shaped & structured hoof ,& wouldn't this all so mean the hind hooves would display a different wear patten then that of the front hooves ?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I've never seen a horse shod behind with NB shoes, although I'm sure it is done. One of mine wears them in front because it suits her, the other one does not. Whatever.
                            Click here before you buy.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Theses are all the things you are taught not to do when traditional trained as the practice of has been proven for more than a century to lead to crippling lameness in the horse, & if you wish to keep a horse sound for the duration of his nature life.When finishing the foot, only remove the flares that are
                              obvious from the mid portion of the hoof wall down
                              .its called dumping & boxing the foot its been written about for over a hundred years as one of the most destructive things you can do to a hoof capsule performed regular it leads to contraction & eventually side bone (Fig.
                              4-A) Undercut the remaining hoof left over the shoe.dumping the toe another crippling destructive affliction condemned by writings for over a hundred years a (Fig.
                              4-B) This will give you the appearance of the Naturally
                              worn bare foot. This statement is one of the most contemptible as a farrier i have ever read, it imply to purposely set out to not keep the hoof in pristine condition & encourages one to insidiously systematicly & destructively give the hoof a worn out appearance, which in my book is tantamount to abuse

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                                I've never seen a horse shod behind with NB shoes, although I'm sure it is done. One of mine wears them in front because it suits her, the other one does not. Whatever.
                                so then what your saying in you supporting this theory to be correct, that only your front half of your horse needs to be balanced the other half doesnt apply or matter is that what your saying ?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Hey Jack,
                                  Have you noticed as I have that the proponents of this style are also usually people who turn their noses up at forging?
                                  George

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by jack mac View Post
                                    1 yes 2 they abandoned it 5 years back.
                                    That would not be possible because the certification process is only about two years old.

                                    Ar you sure you are not confusing the NB protocols/shoes with the poorly made, unalterable, lousy rip-off copies of NB shoes known as "Cytek shoes"? If so, and that is what has gotten your undies all wadded up, then I can well understand why.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by jack mac View Post
                                      Correct me if I'm wrong, in your NB protocolo how to fit a NB shoe it depicts only one diagram,
                                      Yes, there is only one diagram and that is of a front hoof. Since shoe fit is dependent on correctly trimming and mapping the hoof, the parameters of the fit remain relatively constant. That said, one does not merely pull a shoe out of the box and nail it home, It often requires modifications, especially when dealing with narrow, boxy feet. Also take note that the toe of the NB "Center Fit" shoe is manufactured such that it is not as wide as the toe of the original NB shoe.
                                      I'm assuming the procedure applies to all four hooves being fitted the same way?,
                                      Not quite. Though the concepts involved in the trimming protocol, trimming to the live sole plane, removal of distortions, mapping, remain the same, the fit is somewhat different because the hind foot is shaped differently than the front.
                                      if this is the case, doesnt any one who advocates for NB find it a little strange for nature to produce four hoofs that would be identical on all four limbs?,
                                      Now that you know that your assumstion is incorrect, the answer should be obvious to you.
                                      And, anyone who trims or shoes horses on a regular basis, especially if that someone is a professional, knows that most of the time, nature doesn't even produce a paired(front or hind) pair of feet that are identical.
                                      we know a horse lands heels first in his front limbs, dose he's hind hooves follow the same action?
                                      Generally speaking, yes. But, as always, It Depends.
                                      if not wouldn't this necessitate a different shaped & structured hoof ,& wouldn't this all so mean the hind hooves would display a different wear patten then that of the front hooves ?
                                      It Depends.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by jack mac View Post
                                        Theses are all the things you are taught not to do when traditional trained as the practice of has been proven for more than a century to lead to crippling lameness in the horse, & if you wish to keep a horse sound for the duration of his nature life.
                                        Absolute rubbish.
                                        When finishing the foot, only remove the flares that are
                                        obvious from the mid portion of the hoof wall down
                                        .its called dumping & boxing the foot its been written about for over a hundred years as one of the most destructive things you can do to a hoof capsule performed regular it leads to contraction & eventually side bone
                                        No, it does not and it never has. No properly trained traditional farrier is ever taught to "leave the flares"

                                        Now, I think we can both agree that the American Farrriers Association is a "Tradition based" organization. So, let me quote to you from the AFA's Certification Study Guide which gives the parameters for evaluating the trimming, shoe fabrication, shoe application and finishing the feet for the certification. (the numbers represent the scores that are possible depending on the work)

                                        "Wall Dressing(figures 25 & 26)
                                        10 The hoof wall is straight. All dishes and flares removed smoothly from the coronary
                                        band to the ground or (at least) the bottom two thirds of the hoof.

                                        8,6,4,2 There are varying degrees of error(e.g., dubbing, over or under-dressing of dishes
                                        and/or flares) which could be corrected without harming the horse or endangering
                                        secure nailing."

                                        Now, it would seem that the 'traditiional' way actually involves more and higher wall dressing than do the NB protocols. Hmmmm........
                                        (Figure4-A) Undercut the remaining hoof left over the shoe.dumping the toe another crippling destructive affliction condemned by writings for over a hundred years
                                        This is not dumping the toe. Were you more cognizant about the protocol, you would know that the ?underecut" refers to taking the rasp and from the bottom, creating a slight angle to the portion of the foot that overhangs the shoe. Call it "light rockering" if it suits your understanding better. Surely you are not anti rockered toes are you? After all, that is ever so traditional.
                                        (Figure4-B) This will give you the appearance of the Naturally
                                        worn bare foot. This statement is one of the most contemptible as a farrier i have ever read,

                                        Then I suggest you read more. A lot more.
                                        it imply to purposely set out to not keep the hoof in pristine condition & encourages one to insidiously systematicly & destructively give the hoof a worn out appearance, which in my book is tantamount to abuse
                                        Your book is wrong. This procedure does not give the hoof a "worn out appearance", nore does it change the hoof from a pristine condition. Unless of course, that pristine condition includes flare, dishes and other distortions such as underrun heels and run-out toes.

                                        And let me repeat, yet again, for the record, the NB protocols do not advocate or teach "dumping the toe", "dubbing the toe " or any other such tomfoolery.
                                        Last edited by Rick Burten; Dec. 23, 2007, 09:31 PM.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X