• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Here's your quote of the day

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here's your quote of the day

    and I am paraphrasing someone else.....

    "Do you build courses to standard, and expect riders/horses to meet that standard, or do you build them substandard for the current group of riders?"

    Whether for SJ or XC, I thought this was a wonderful point to ponder.

  • #2
    The question for me to ponder is this. Have the standards changed over the last several years. The riding is still just as good, if not better and just as bad....
    www.trainoreventing.com

    Comment


    • #3
      This confuses me. Is it generally agreed upon that today's top level riders are less capable than the riders of yore? Or that riders of the past would have handled today's courses easily?

      It seems to me that the horses/riders of the past rose to the top of a different sport from today's short format eventing, that asked different questions of horse and rider, so it may be more of an apples/oranges comparison than better/worse.

      "Back in the day" reminiscing aside, it seems like the faster trend has been toward more technical courses, as opposed to worse riding. It isn't as though courses are getting easier.

      Comment


      • #4
        If your standards are so high that you are causing multiple falls and injuries to our best horses and riders, then the standards do need to be lowered.

        Or, if whoever made this statement knows of a way to make our riders capable of meeting those high standards, then he needs to step forward with a plan and do so. JMHO.
        When in Doubt, let your horse do the Thinking!

        Comment


        • #5
          The big question which begs to be answered is are we asking too much of our horses today with the standards we've imposed? Horses can only jump so high, gallop so fast, think so quickly. Have we maxxed them out?
          Last edited by flutie1; Mar. 14, 2010, 11:09 AM. Reason: Typo

          Comment


          • #6
            The standards need to reward a good forward ride. At some events there were so many tight combinations, the effect was rather punishing on the horse no matter how well he met the fences.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by flutie1 View Post
              The big question which begs to be answered is are we asking too much of our horses today with the standards we've imposed? Horses can only jump so high, gallop so fast, think so quickly. Have we maxxed them out?
              Many thanks for putting this idea out here - it's the most important one.

              To add some thought to FC's original question, I'd ask WHO is setting the standard, and what were the critieria, the indicators that these are reasonable, responsible questions to ask of horses? Riders get a choice.
              ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RunForIt View Post
                Many thanks for putting this idea out here - it's the most important one.

                To add some thought to FC's original question, I'd ask WHO is setting the standard, and what were the critieria, the indicators that these are reasonable, responsible questions to ask of horses? Riders get a choice.
                I believe we are ALL guilty in the setting of unreasonable standards - designers, organizers, officials, competitors. It is unfair to blame any one group within the discipline. Designers strive to be original and raise the bar, organizers compete against other organizers and against themselves, officials find acceptable level criteria a bit fuzzy as written, competitors demand more and more. How to stop this is and reverse the trend the question I wish I could answer!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by flutie1 View Post
                  I believe we are ALL guilty in the setting of unreasonable standards - designers, organizers, officials, competitors. It is unfair to blame any one group within the discipline. Designers strive to be original and raise the bar, organizers compete against other organizers and against themselves, officials find acceptable level criteria a bit fuzzy as written, competitors demand more and more. How to stop this is and reverse the trend the question I wish I could answer!
                  true...and the horses keep on jumping and...?
                  ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by grayarabpony View Post
                    The standards need to reward a good forward ride. At some events there were so many tight combinations, the effect was rather punishing on the horse no matter how well he met the fences.
                    I hate the idea that courses can punish good behavior on the part of the horse or the rider. Is there any way to change the way we think about or implement course design?

                    If every fence is indeed a question, would it make sense for the course designers to state ahead of time what each question is supposed to be and how a pair could successfully answer it?

                    In the "old days" we tended to walk the courses as a group, esp. at the lower levels. The course designers would explain the what each fence needed in approach and negotiation. Our coaches would then tell us what we needed to do for our horse to help him through it.

                    Now, we were juniors, mostly in Pony Club. But the higher levels were doing the same thing. They were walking the courses too and having the same discussions. Often we could tag along and listen as long as we did not interfere.

                    Maybe it isn't possible to have those group walks like we used to. But it the CDs wrote them up and they were handed out, along with the course maps, it would really help a lot of people be better prepared.

                    It would also be a great tool to use to compare courses and get a better understanding of the true total level of difficulty. Knowing not just the stats, like how high, how wide, how many efforts in how many meters, but the complexity of each question and how those questions were strung together would paint much more accurate pictures of each XC test.

                    With that information, we, as riders might better prepare for our levels and know more about the holes in our training and preparation after we are done.

                    CD's might also be better able to learn from each others' courses what worked well and rewarded good prep and what turned out to just be hard with no benefit.

                    As officials, organizers, officers and staff, it would offer perspective, trend info., and easier comparisons. I would think the safety folks might benefit as well from such information.

                    Just a random thought.
                    The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

                    www.southern-cross-farm.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think grayarabpony said it spot on.....
                      www.trainoreventing.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've been riding lower level courses mostly for over 25 years on both coasts, two countries, many of the biggest events in the country. Also watched a lot of upper level (international, too) events and walked the courses as well. The trends have always been changing upward; it is just that within the last ten years perhaps they have trended upward, outward, inward, and every other way! And the difficulty trickles down. I warned a friend this summer, "if you haven't competed in a year, don't start out back at Training level. Better get back into it at Novice," and I think especially now, there seems to be sort of a crossroads at course design. If you rode Novice and took a year or two off and are now expecting to just drop back in -- wow -- you will be surprised. Training -- especially surprised! It's wild right now. Flutie, we have only one place to go to fix this or adjudicate it -- that is the USEA, I guess. The course design committee? Organizers committee? And what is it we are fixing? Do we want to make courses easier or fairer? Do we want to make it so the best get around clean, and the rest don't, or is it a different goal? Especially at the lower levels. Don't we want to have fun, test the horses a little, test the riders a little and make sure all get home safe. Is this goal changed or different for upper levels, and if so, how?
                        I think those questions have to be answered before we can get at the reasons for the designs we have today on courses. JMO. I don't think we can any longer just throw big jumps to test scope. It will become a dressage race, then.
                        Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                        Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          To standard or else the standards will keep getting lowered. If you aren't capable to do your level (getting E'd, RF, 40+penalty points, numerous rails) then there is a SIMPLE solution: move down a level

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Shrunk "N" Da Wash,

                            Would you please show me where the "standards" are and how they are applied at different events?

                            Every event has a different course designer. Different course designers ask different questions. How can you standardize those variables?
                            When in Doubt, let your horse do the Thinking!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X