• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Where are the kids?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Where are the kids?

    The USEF Pan Am squad has 4 riders in their mid to late 40s,and the other two in their 30s.
    Where are the up and coming kids that I thought the Pan Ams were meant to "discover" and put into the pipeline?
    Do we have a vital pipeline these days? Not griping, just honestly curious.
    http://www.tamarackhill.com/

  • #2
    unless I get a sugar daddy and a trust fund, there's no pipeline until you are rich enough to get yourself up the levels.

    alas. I'd LOVE to do this fulltime.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ditto Leah. We're all working full time to support our riding habit (this is said very tongue-in-cheek, knowing I don't have the skill to get to that level)

      One possibility is that the short format has contributed to the upper levels being dominated by several very very big names: most of the successful riders get more than one ride on more than one nice horse at the upper levels. The long format was the great equalizer: can you imagine doing phases A, B and C 4 or 5 times the way Phillip and others do XC these days? No! people had one horse they competed at the 4-star level at a time.

      There are lots of outstanding younger riders bringing along wonderful horses, but they don't get the same number of nice horses with whom to compete. The odds are just higher for the folks that have 2 or 3 horses at the 4-star level.
      "Cynicism is a sorry kind of wisdom" Barack Obama

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by HiJumpGrrl View Post
        Ditto Leah. We're all working full time to support our riding habit (this is said very tongue-in-cheek, knowing I don't have the skill to get to that level)
        Tongue in cheek perhaps, but if we'd had the support from our early-20s for lessons multiple times a week and riding 1-2 horses a day? We'd be at those levels. I know you would! I know I would too, assuming we had the ponies (or horses in my case... ) to take us there.


        I do agree that the shorter format HAS allowed more of the bigger trainers/names to show multiple horses -- I suppose the question is why there aren't *younger* versions of those bigger trainers/names? Well, aside from the obvious experience and such. Still, what happens to the YRs after they age out? where are they going?

        Comment


        • #5
          true that many of the up and coming YRs don't have a string of horses yet but the Pan Ams I thought were the venue to give them Red Jacket experience. I expected to see one or two experienced pros on the squad....but not the number that are on the list. I can think of 5-6 YRs or young pros (under the age of 35) and even a few older pros that haven't been given the Red Jacket experience that I would have thought should be on that squad.

          I guess you have to balance spending the money on riders who have demonstrated their commitment to the sport (i.e. the lifers) with getting the new blood out there and giving them experience. But I was surprised by some of the names left off the list....glad I don't have that job of picking!!!!
          ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

          Comment


          • #6
            And though I didn't follow the other thread carefully, it seems there were at least a couple up and comers who got passed over. Perhaps the selection criteria or our national bodies' purposes for this competition have changed.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JAM View Post
              And though I didn't follow the other thread carefully, it seems there were at least a couple up and comers who got passed over. Perhaps the selection criteria or our national bodies' purposes for this competition have changed.

              good point. perhaps you are correct.
              ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

              Comment


              • #8
                While I agree that the Pan Am team seems inexplicably focused on proven riders with unproven horses, that makes me worried about the selectors and the politics potentially influencing them.

                Sitting at Jersey Fresh the other weekend, watching the dressage, I didn't find myself at all worried about the next generation of eventing superstars. I was astounded by the quality of horseflesh, even at the ** level. I felt utterly and completely outclassed with my wonderful but somewhat unflashy OTTB -- and had to remind myself that, yes, some of those big-moving, flashy horses actually ARE OTTBs just like mine, only better produced and better ridden!

                Among the younger generation of strong riders on jaw-droppingly fancy horses: William Coleman, Clark Montgomery, Kristin Bond and Sara Dierks, to name a few. Then there's Laine Ashker, Elisa Wallace, Will Faudree, the list goes on.

                None of them are peaking at quite the right time for the Pan Am squad, but I've got no doubt they'll be in the mix before too long.

                I also wonder how much of the decision is being influenced by who actually WANTS to go to Rio. Some up-and-comers have withdrawn their applications in favor of going to Burghley or Pau, others didn't apply because they have concerns about Rio either from a health standpoint (for their horses) or from a quality standpoint (my understanding is that the course hasn't even been built yet?) so perhaps this team represents the best combination of people both qualified and willing to go?
                I evented just for the Halibut.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Do placings in the PanAm's qualify us for anything?
                  http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

                  http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    What???? I thought late 30's WAS still a kid!! At least, that's how I feel....

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ding Ding Ding!!!

                      Nevertime hits the jackpot! If a young rider has just one horse they would most likely fall on their sword before signing "the waiver".

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        jeanette, my understanding is that we are qualified for the 2008 olympics already.
                        "We don't ride the clock. We ride the horse." Reiner Klimke.
                        http://community.webshots.com/user/arnikaelf

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by tuppysmom View Post
                          Nevertime hits the jackpot! If a young rider has just one horse they would most likely fall on their sword before signing "the waiver".

                          Please explain the waiver.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            arnika - I would think so, but wondered if there were any chance of getting extra individual slots by good performance, or somesuch. just trying to think what might be going through selector/coach minds.

                            or is it a byproduct of lawsuits/objective selection? unless the selection criteria stated that riders chosen must not have red coats already, it could be hard to explain away not taking the old dogs.
                            http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

                            http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The waiver

                              states basicly that the owner accepts the risk of the horse contracting piroplasmosis. If the horse contracts the tick born disease, (which is endemic in Brazil), the horse cannot return to the USA.

                              The option would be to send the horse to a European country that will accept the import of a piro positive horse. The sending to Europe and all the costs would be at the owner's expense.

                              There is no recognized treatment.

                              I suppose that some owners and riders see the risk as small and worth it, others may not feel that way.

                              I know of a dressage horse and a couple of event horses who opted out for this reason.

                              The USEF has a very good tick management protocal set up for Brazil, but each owner had to make the choice that best suited there situation.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                i know quite a few aged out yrs who have simply had difficulty continuing in the real world arena (ie adult world). i'd consider myself one...but probably not one who would be looking at the pan ams as a legit goal. but society has shifted a bit recently, making jobs and time quite valuable...as well as college and such. i think a lot of yrs are opting to go to college which makes riding at a certain level not only difficult, but confusing.

                                i would also chock some of this up to the ebb and flow of eventing. some years we got 'em all, others not so much. there's been a wave of 'issues' floating around eventing, perhaps we are just in a lull. on all sorts of matters.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  The best young rider with a real shot at Pan Am made the unfortunate decision to run her horse cross-country at Woodside two weeks ago (when he had come back sore after falling at Rolex). Now, he's broken.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    That's terrible to hear. I hope he get better.
                                    I evented just for the Halibut.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Ouch, TBC.

                                      One factor that hasn't been mentioned--and it may be more or less minor--is Pony Club's significantly diminished influence.

                                      I love to brag to outsiders how 80% of all riders on all of the teams at the 1984 Olympics had been Pony Clubbers at some point in their lives. (I can't remember where I got that from, but it was a legitimate source back then--I did a class final project TV commercial using the idea. Shipped half a dozen PC'ers to Manhattan to tape it and every one of them had wanted to ride for the team.)

                                      Pony Club used to be the pipeline, with a solid structure for developing both riders and horsemen/women. Now, it's pretty hit-or-miss and THAT, other than the finances, too--is why I think we're a bit thin in youngsters these days. One mistake can torpedo an up-and-comer's "career," especially if they aren't well-connected or well-heeled enough to "recuperate" from their error.
                                      Sportponies Unlimited
                                      Athletic Thoroughbred crosses for the highly motivated, smaller rider.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by denny View Post
                                        The USEF Pan Am squad has 4 riders in their mid to late 40s,and the other two in their 30s.
                                        Where are the up and coming kids that I thought the Pan Ams were meant to "discover" and put into the pipeline?
                                        Do we have a vital pipeline these days? Not griping, just honestly curious.
                                        The only pipelines that exist at the upper levels of equestrian competition are those who are willing to provide money and horses for riders who are genuinely talented but these are few and far between. For example, much of the so called up and coming talent in the hunter/jumper world are hardly talented in terms of horsemanship but because they can afford to compete at that level on horses they generally don't own, they are the standard we use for young athletes in the equestrian world and they get idolized by those who compete at lower levels for doing nothing noteworthy other than trotting on a horse at Devon. Some are genuinely good riders but a lot of them couldn't win on their own abilities with a horse that they are responsible for working.

                                        Most young riders who compete stop competing once the parental money runs out and they get to college, they realize that they won't make it big (which is why many of them got into it in the first place), or they self-destruct due to their own problems like drug abuse (which is something most parents tend to ignore or miss all together and it is a big problem in the equestrian world despite what parents will insist on saying about their child), hyper sexuality (a problem which plagues many of the female riders due to their feelings of isolation during the teenage years that make or break most of them as both riders and a woman), and of course, dysfunctional families. Very few young riders who ride in college or beyond the age of 18 stick with it longer than a few more years because of the expenses unless they get a really good job or they decide to work in the horse industry in a capacity that allows them to ride on a frequent basis. None of the people I personally know who were labeled as up and coming talent have gone on to do anything with their abilities other than to get a low level job working in the local horse industry.
                                        Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X