• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

spinoff on 'dangerous riding': is it really like pornography? (video included)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • spinoff on 'dangerous riding': is it really like pornography? (video included)

    In other words (actually, the words of Potter Stewart), do you know it when you see it?

    On the other thread, we discussed a horse with an unorthodox jumping style but a very clean XC record getting E'd at Pau for simply going the way he rolls.

    What about a rider with an unorthodox style?

    So I present to you Exhibit A. No, this isn't XC but close enough -- it's the Hickstead Derby, with massive fences and a famous bank. This combination was very successful in their day and even survived an unforgettable moment the previous year when the horse jumped off the top of the bank.

    As the BBC announcer says at the start of the video, hang on to your hats.

    Annette Lewis & Tutein, Hickstead 1986



  • #2
    Ugh, its too early/late for me to comment. (Spent a long night in the studio and need to go to bed, haha.) But I wanted to include this video as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opMiCyoRzYM

    Enjoy a few laughs, maybe cringe a little (or a lot), and pardon the cheesey music.
    (And if you don't want to watch the whole thing, at least watch 3:15.)
    New Username: tres grey

    Comment


    • #3
      Annette Lewis

      Her jumping style certainly gave us many hours of entertainment here in the UK.

      I always had an urge to tie her stirrups to her girth Symmetry straps would never have stood a chance, they would have pinged off at the first jump.

      She once said in an interview that she rode him in that fashion to keep as much weight as possible off his back. I have to say, on other rides, the style was no where near as flamboyant.

      Paddy
      "Chaos, panic and disorder. My work here is done"

      ~Member of the "Addicted to Lessons" clique~

      Comment


      • #4
        Wouldn't her weight come down on his back harder when she regained her stirrups on the landing side?
        http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Looks pretty ugly to me. I'm not sure she could have made it around XC with that horse/ style-- not knocking her really, but she was fighting him so much! That bothered me far more than her 'jumping' position!

          Comment


          • #6
            No wonder he's so rank.

            Jennifer
            Third Charm Event Team

            Comment


            • #7
              This horse is a saint! Imagine what he could do with someone who could accually ride him! Who needs to ride with their leg if they can rip their horse's face off!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Well to me the horse looked exceptionally difficult. And the rider appeared to be making good decisions about when to be slow and when to tell him to move out. Her equitation left a lot to be desired but so does Richard Spooner's.

                Dangerous? the horse was more dangerous than the rider, I think. She was coping with what was going on underneath her and not everyone gets to create their own "goes in a snaffle quietly at all times" horse. Although she could probably shorten her stirrups a hair.

                Flame away.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, it fits my definition of porn, "offensive". I don't know that it is dangerous in my book.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    OMG - watch 1988 when her REINS BREAK!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Why bother with a horse that is that difficult? I can't imagine enjoying the challenge.

                      What I find porny is not the "offensiveness" of blooper/bad ride videos, but the way they appeal to people's love of staring at pictures/movies and saying "wow, check that out" or "my god, that can't be real!" etc.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I liked Michelle Lewis's 1988 round...sort of relevant since we're often talking about the wisdom or not of getting on and continuing. Pretty funny! (And if we're talking "dangerous riding", I found Michelle's style of loosy-goosy-gunning it between fences more "offensive" than Annette's unusual equitation)

                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCnlKfPgaJk&NR=1

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I just watched the 1988 video and OH MY GOSH
                          Neither video looked at all pleasant or even mildly enjoyable. She must have nerves of steel or be completely mad. Its no wonder her reins broke she was sawing the heck out of her horses mouth.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ohhthatgirl View Post
                            Ugh, its too early/late for me to comment. (Spent a long night in the studio and need to go to bed, haha.) But I wanted to include this video as well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opMiCyoRzYM

                            Enjoy a few laughs, maybe cringe a little (or a lot), and pardon the cheesey music.
                            (And if you don't want to watch the whole thing, at least watch 3:15.)
                            How in the heck is this guy catching so much air? Not to mention staying on. Seriously, why is this guy coming so far out of the saddle?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by twofatponies View Post
                              Why bother with a horse that is that difficult? I can't imagine enjoying the challenge.
                              Well... a difficult horse with talent to compete at a high level!

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Tutein may have been unconventional but he was certainly honest. And he and Annette had a partnership worked out for sure.

                                But what makes this not dangerous?

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by JER View Post
                                  Tutein may have been unconventional but he was certainly honest. And he and Annette had a partnership worked out for sure.

                                  But what makes this not dangerous?

                                  nothing....but then jumping horses, riding horses...hell being around horses is dangerous.

                                  And today...that combination might not have been allowed to continue...and they may not have been competitive either (he didn't look like the most ridable of horses and today's courses require more ridability).

                                  Not saying it is right or wrong...just today, there seems to be a different standard as to what is acceptable.
                                  ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by JER View Post
                                    Tutein may have been unconventional but he was certainly honest. And he and Annette had a partnership worked out for sure.

                                    But what makes this not dangerous?
                                    Cause I know it when I see it, and to me, this pair has worked out a way of getting the job done. Can't be asked to actually define dangerous riding - right!?!?!

                                    Horse is good with both his front end and his back. Rider stays basically in the middle of him, she does have some control, even if he is fighting it, he is on his hocks the whole time. Is it pretty - no, but at no time do I think they are in danger of turning over or running thru the jumps. I also think she could turn away from a fence and stop if she wanted.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      It me that is dangerous riding. Anyone else notice the bit she had on that horse? It was noticable in the 1988 video after her rein broke. Double twisted wire. No wonder the horse jumps like he does, she's constantly sawing on his mouth and she never lets him really use his head and neck to get over a fence. What I really think is dangerous is the way that horse would not stop for her. I can drop the reins on my upper level event mare and stop her just by sitting back and giving a little tug on her breastplate. She's an OTTB, and a very keen jumper. And yet she will stop in a situation like that. That horse was running people over and completely out of control.

                                      Personally I think that's what shows dangerous riding, if the rider has control.
                                      http://xtrapony.blogspot.com <-- X's Blog

                                      http://photobucket.com/xtrapony

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by ValleyMiss View Post

                                        Personally I think that's what shows dangerous riding, if the rider has control.
                                        If that's how you define it, then what about the situations where the rider has control, but is asking the horse to do dangerous things? A stupid rider in control is every bit as dangerous in my book.

                                        Although I agree that this looked fairly dangerous!

                                        And I haven't really seen a lot of Hickstead footage before... is it common to have so many rails? The jumps are huge, so it wouldn't surprise me... but in a typical show, having that many faults would hardly define a successful pair.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X