• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Poplar place XC - why all the XC time penalties?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Poplar place XC - why all the XC time penalties?

    Just took a look at the PPF live results... lots of top notch folks had XC time added to their score...weather was picture perfect. Anyone know why riders went around with time?
    ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

  • #2
    I was wondering the same thing. Especially when I saw that one rider was there with his Olympic mount and had ALOT of time faults.

    I have since heard that it was the courses and the changes made as well.
    Last edited by Cody; Nov. 15, 2009, 10:40 AM.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      have now heard that the 2** course was really long....
      ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

      Comment


      • #4
        mud??
        www.ncsporthorse.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RunForIt View Post
          have now heard that the 2** course was really long....
          I was curious as well. OT looks to be 8:30. Back in the day (with the long format) Bromont was 9:30 and had WAY more terrain than poplar. Are we shortening the ** as well as the **** now?

          Comment


          • #6
            Talked to a friend there - footing was fine - course design was the issue in their opinion. I also understand there were more jumping efforts than normally allowed under FEI rules.
            www.amiddle-agedmadwomantakesthereins.blogspot.com

            www.pegasusridge.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Design

              As I understood, before PPF bid for the CCI2*, making the course LONG enough was going to be a challenge as it was going to involve lots of back and forth type running in order to garner the requisite distance for the CCI level and not just the CIC level that they are accustomed to running. Tremaine had quite the task to make a long enough track for the CCI2* and as I originally understood, there was going to be lots of going to the back, coming back toward the barns, then back to the back, and back again, if you follow. That's about the only way to utilize that property to make it host a LONG enough track for the CCI2*. Even so, it was on the "short" side of that required distance, and potentially ran into some issues with the FEI rules on number of efforts per 100 meters as pegasusmom touched on.

              Comment


              • #8
                Makes sense. Forgot that they usually host a CIC.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Why try to do the CCI2**...????

                  ...under these conditions? Anyone privy to why the change or have a thoughtful hunch? Hope DQ Eventer jumps in here...
                  ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm not 100% sure, but I believe that because the Ocala Horse Trials later this month has had a change of organizers, they cannot under FEI rules run a CCI there (as was originally planned). This left Area III short a planned CCI, and Poplar agreed to step in and run one in its place.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm sure the riders who are worrying about qualifications are happy to have a CCI with time penalties instead of no CCI at all!

                      Jennifer
                      Third Charm Event Team

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The Area III council approached the Stegman's about running the CCI2* when Chattahoochee Hills had to cancel. Chatt Hills had filled the fall Area III CCI2* void when Ocala canceled back in the summer. Although everyone involved knew it would be a stretch to make the track long enough, the Stegmans were kind enough to pull out all of the stops to see that Area III kept the fall CCI2* by altering their current tracks, buidling new fences, altering routes at the more permanent fixture questions in order to accomodate the new longer track, etc. After the conditions at Fair Hill, many entrants decided to run at Poplar in lieu of not running a CCI2* this fall, so hence the significant entry number increase over the last few weeks. As I understand it, the course at Poplar underwent major renovations in a relatively short period of time in order to see that this happened this year. Kudos to all involved for pulling it off in fine style!

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          That all makes sense! Great that the Area III organizers work together so well to do all that they possibly can to make sure horses and riders at every level get what they need!
                          ~ it no longer matters what level I do, as long as I am doing it..~ with many thanks, to Elizabeth Callahan

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            super snaps to the stegmans!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Kudos to Poplar and the Stegmans for stepping in to fill the CCI** breach left by the cancellation of Ocala and Chattahoochee cancelled. From all accounts, they did a great job.To anyone who has been at Poplar, however, the terrain does not lend itself to an open galloping course. It tends to be twisty, turny, with short steep hills. It is a great CIC site, but I think Chattahochee is better suited to a CCI. I hope the USEA and USEF think so as well...

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                First off, MANY kudos to the Stegmans and PPF for having the CCI**. I was one of them at Fairhill that did not run and was excited to have this to still get my qualifications.

                                As far as the course goes, I thought it was a fair course with tougher questions then Fairhill presented. But if anyone has been there before they know the up and down takes a lot of time away from the clock. The beginning of the course had more gallop time then the end, as there were more questions at the end. They did a great job giving you as much galloping room as possible though, and the OT was 8:41.
                                www.MelissaMillerEventing.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Does anyone still have a copy of the coursemap from the CCI divisions? After having seen all of the changes that were made to the course tracks, it'd be very interesteing to actually see it on a coursemap.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    sorry, tossed them out at the car rental return

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      turbo pony

                                      I just accredit it top my super, turbo charged 15 yr old pony who has the biggest heart ever. The first few minutes of the course felt like a roller coaster, it's a good thing we didn't get motion sick, but I never expected to be the only one not to have any time. I knew I was going fast, but thought others would too.... I DEARLY appreciate the Stegmens generosity and time for putting on the show. Hopefully have a couple years left with Tucker, and really needed to get this CCI** done this fall, again, THANK YOU POPLAR!!!!!!

                                      PS, I did have my heart in my throat just coming around the backside turn between fence 3 and 4........ hoping it wasn't a slip-n-slide...... Luv my pony!!!
                                      Last edited by JesslynW; Nov. 18, 2009, 05:26 PM. Reason: adding more
                                      Jess

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        the xc at poplar was extremely twisty/turny. due to a serious lack of space, the course crossed itself a few times. major kudos though to the stegmans and tremaine for volunteering to run the ccis! i believe there was one double clean xc in the **, and that horse already has shown heavily at advanced

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X