• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Gatehouse HS1 skull cap?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gatehouse HS1 skull cap?

    I am due for a new helmet very soon, so it is going to be a Christmas gift. This is one of only two helmets that has been tested and certified by SNELL, so I am very interested in it. However it is only available in the UK.

    Does anyone have any experience with this helmet? I currently have a CO J3 skull that is very very comfy and fit me nicely, just as a comparison if anyone knows how they tend to fit.

  • #2
    The Gatehouse HS1 is NOT ASTM/SEI certified.

    However, I find it is rounder than the CO's. I don't fit into any of the CO's but my Gatehouse fits nicely. Its also a little heavier.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by lmno View Post
      The Gatehouse HS1 is NOT ASTM/SEI certified.

      However, I find it is rounder than the CO's. I don't fit into any of the CO's but my Gatehouse fits nicely. Its also a little heavier.
      I actually ride dressage, so it doesn't matter about the certification to me. I'm just going for safety. My poor head has taken too many blows already

      Does it fit more like the GPA's then? I have heard they are more round. Or is there anything else that you can compare them to that would be available in the US?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by lmno View Post
        The Gatehouse HS1 is NOT ASTM/SEI certified.

        However, I find it is rounder than the CO's. I don't fit into any of the CO's but my Gatehouse fits nicely. Its also a little heavier.
        I thought the Gatehouse was this uber helmet as far as safety. That is, had every certification availble and then some. Not true?

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by riderboy View Post
          I thought the Gatehouse was this uber helmet as far as safety. That is, had every certification availble and then some. Not true?
          It's only sold in the UK, so they didn't bother getting it certified with the American certifications. It's Kitemarked and SNELL approved. SNELL is the most stringent testing done on helmets.

          Comment


          • #6
            For me it compares to the shape of my Tipperary( the older model). Almost a cross between the Tiperary and a well fitting motorcycle helmet. My troxel can not compare.
            I had tried on all the helmets at the tack shop and ordered the HS1. I bought mine from rideaway.co.uk, they have a 14 day return policy but you lose out on the shipping.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              #7
              Thanks for the info! A friend of mine has an older Tipperary Sportage that I should be able to try on.

              Comment


              • #8
                May I ask where folks think that Snell is the best testing?

                Their impact testing allows for 100 more g of impact force than ASTM standards (from their own website and the ASTM standard for riding helmets). Most likely this is because racing is done at an order of magnitude faster than riding, but at the same time....

                Things such as the face shield penetration, flammability tests etc. have no bearing in riding, obviously.

                ASTM also requires the same retention and stability testing for sporting helmets as Snell does for racing (ASTM F1446).

                So I see no advantage to a Snell approval given they test/establish standards for helmets for racing and not riding horses. The SNELL E2001 standard was biolerplated from the racing helmet standards. Heck the even still include full face protection (chin bar) as part of it.

                Reed

                Comment


                • #9
                  One more time.....

                  If you really want to understand protective helmet issues this article from Motor Cycle Magazine is a good place to start. Just because it's about motorcycle helmets doesn't mean that the same issues don't apply to riding helmets. It's a long article but well worth reading. The SNELL organization was upset over the article's conclusions but couldn't refute them.

                  One advantage of motorcycle helmets is that the National Highway Transport Safety Administration randomly tests helmets for conformance to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 218 (FMVSS 218) and publishes the results on their website. Here are their latest test results. If you examine the results for the Z1R ZRP-2M half helmet, 7th in the list and which could easily pass for a riding helmet, you will see that in the primary impact test, a very similar test to that in ASTM F1163, the Z1R helmet comes in well under the limit set in F1163. (200g versus 300g). One downside of motorcycle helmets is that FMVSS 218 penetration test precludes the provision of large ventilation slots.

                  If you really want a helmet that gives maximum impact protection take a look at the HGU-56/P Aircrew Integrated Helmet System (AIHS) (manufactured by the Gentex Corporation, Carbondale, PA). But then it isn't really suitable for riding. Why US Army helicopter pilots can only take a 150g max clout to the head while little Amy falling off Buttercup can take a hit of 300g I don't know.

                  I think it's about time we saw test results from riding helmet manufacturers published.
                  ------------------------------------------------------------
                  But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                  You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    RAyres, can I ask where you found the actual standard from ASTM? I did a google search but I cannot find it without paying $33 to read it.

                    Greyness, after my fall three years ago, I did wonder why the helmet was so darned hard. I know I hit hard, and I have had several other head injuries over the years, but the helmet did seem to transfer a ton of energy to my poor head.

                    So which helmets would be softer then? The ones that make you look more like a mushroom head? I know may people do care about that, but I am not one of them. I really just want to try to keep my poor head safe. It's been through a lot. Also, I prefer a very stable helmet that covers more of my head. The old-school Troxel helmets don't stay put on me very well at all, so they are horribly uncomfortable and thus I don't like to wear them.

                    For what it's worth, I am doubting this helmet will fit me properly. I have a very oval head, and from what I have read this one is a bit more round than would probably work for me.

                    You two have brought up some interesting points, and I would certainly like to learn more about all this.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am lucky as I am a materials scientist so I have access to the standards at my university library for free.

                      A few years ago I posted here a pretty extensive review about the differences between the ASTM and EU standards on helmets. I can't find the posts but like the article in the magazine, helmet success depends all on lots of factors. There is no one all-encompassing wonder standard that answers or addresses all questions/risks.

                      Reed

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Hampton Bay View Post

                        So which helmets would be softer then? The ones that make you look more like a mushroom head?
                        It's a bit of an over simplification but, yes, you are likely to get more protection the more you look like a mushroom.

                        The option I have taken after my fall, which resulted in hospitalization and brain surgery, was to investigate the NHTSA test results published every year and pick out a motorcycle half helmet whose test results exceeded the requirements of ASTM F1163. I had e-mail conversation with members of the ASTM committee after my accident as to why my approved helmet didn't protect me more.
                        ------------------------------------------------------------
                        But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                        You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Originally posted by His Greyness View Post
                          It's a bit of an over simplification but, yes, you are likely to get more protection the more you look like a mushroom.

                          The option I have taken after my fall, which resulted in hospitalization and brain surgery, was to investigate the NHTSA test results published every year and pick out a motorcycle half helmet whose test results exceeded the requirements of ASTM F1163. I had e-mail conversation with members of the ASTM committee after my accident as to why my approved helmet didn't protect me more.
                          Do you still have those emails? I would love to see them if you do and can share. I can PM you my email addy.

                          I have felt that my helmet should have given me more protection when I fell, but I did land directly on my head too. I just remember thinking how hard it was. That's about all I remember from my fall, was that my helmet seemed so hard. That's why I find your comments and the article interesting.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Hampton Bay View Post
                            Do you still have those emails? I would love to see them if you do and can share. I can PM you my email addy.
                            My e-mail exchange with members of the ASTM committe was several years ago so the e-mails are lost in the mists of time. However I can summarize what I learned from that exchange and other research:
                            1. Helmet manufacturers do not guarantee that their helmets will protect you in any particular accident. They only guarantee that their helmets pass the ASTM F1163 test.
                            2. The objective of the ASTM F1163 standard is to prevent death and permanent injury.
                            3. The biggest obstacle to developing more protective helmets are the fashion and appearance conscious riders who "do not want to look like a mushroom". (There's no point in developing a "safe" helmet if nobody will wear it)
                            4. The development of safety equipment is a whole lot more complicated than most people realize. Many of the principles are counter-intuitive.
                            5. The fact that some equipment makes someone feel "safe" and "comfortable" bears no relation to whether that equipment actually provides any worthwhile protection.
                            ------------------------------------------------------------
                            But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                            You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              GPA has a skull cap called the Jock-up.. there are 3 different versions of it. I'm going to ask for one for Xmas as my CO doesn't fit very well.. I have a round head and the CO is just not my friend.. but i've made it work for 2 years.

                              Reed - do you know anything about these and their standards? It seems that they are tested and approved but that's also per the website i found them on.

                              http://www.amirashop.co.uk/acatalog/...or_Adults.html

                              TIA!
                              Proud owner of a Spicy mare!!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                SparklePlenty

                                The SEI maintains a list of products it has certified. Go to the SEI website and search under "Equestrian Helmets" to find the helmets that are currently certified. The helmet you reference is not on this list.

                                As someone who has been involved with conformance testing to international standards, admittedly for computer communications software - not helmets, I recognize marketing weasel wording when I see it. "Complies with" is not the same as "Certified against". Also ASTM F1163-01 is the 2001 standard. The current standard is ASTM F1163-04a, the revised 2004 standard.

                                Helmet testing is an expensive activity (as is obtaining product liability insurance). To be certified against ASTM F1163 helmets have to be submitted to a SEI accredited testing laboratory and pass all the elements of the ASTM standard as well as the SEI inspection procedures. All the international standards for riding helmets are quite similar. So if Heaume Activités, S.A., the maker of GPA helmets in Switzerland, has submitted their helmets to a testing laboratory accredited for the European standards, they could see from the test results whether the helmets could meet (comply with) the ASTM standard. Unless they submit the same helmets to a SEI accredited lab and pass the test they can't claim certification. Heaume Activités, S.A., has only done so with part of their product line.

                                Product liability insurance in the USA is extremely expensive. I know of at least one helmet maker who withdrew from the US market because the volume of business didn't justify the expense of the insurance premiums. Low volume sale forecasts for a particular product would be another reason not to introduce a helmet to the American market.

                                You pay your money and you make your choice.
                                Last edited by His Greyness; Nov. 18, 2009, 10:58 PM. Reason: Corrected ASTM standards identification
                                ------------------------------------------------------------
                                But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
                                You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  thank you for that info! Though i am bummed, better be safe than sorry.
                                  Proud owner of a Spicy mare!!

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    Sparkle, that amira equine site is a royal pain to order from. It takes months to get your item, and you better be positive you are ordering the correct size because it's cost-prohibitive to return anything.

                                    Grey, thanks for that link. I just checked on the helmet I am going to get, and it is listed.

                                    Comment

                                    Working...
                                    X