• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What's up with the name calling on COTH?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What's up with the name calling on COTH?

    Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
    wow, kind of a d*ck thing to say, anonymous stranger.

    Originally posted by lstevenson;
    Exactly. This is why I think MAC DEUCE is a delusional troll.

    Originally posted by clm08;
    Is MacDeuce possibly related to the troll who a while ago posted about watching JB grind Cooper down on XC phase? I can't remember the specifics, I only remember the troll saying she had personally watched JB running her exhausted horse during XC earlier this year, an unfounded accusation, of course.
    Isn't there a code of conduct that we agreed to when we joined this blog group? Is this behavior appropriate? Isn't COTH supposed to be a resource for constructive discussion and information, or is it a place for name calling and inappropriate statements?

    Sounds like things that elementary school kids would say. Obviously I was given the wrong impression about what this blog site was about because there is alot more of this kind of "stuff" out there.

  • #2
    That's what you get for stepping in the hornet's nest of rabid fans who believe that people they hold up can do no wrong.
    Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

    Comment


    • #3
      Toughen up, cupcake.

      Comment


      • #4
        *snorts*
        Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

        Comment


        • #5
          LexInVA--your signature line is the best ever.

          Comment


          • #6
            I don't think she is being too sensitive. When someone starts calling you names on a forum, the natural response would be to start issuing some serious insults right back. That's when everything starts to go downhill. That's why moderators usually step in and nip things in the bud.
            Yes, I know how to spell. I'm using freespeling!

            freespeling

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by LexInVA View Post
              That's what you get for stepping in the hornet's nest of rabid fans who believe that people they hold up can do no wrong.
              Well worded.

              Comment


              • #8
                I dislike IMMENSELY the way that some people do not READ posts for the meaning and instead get stuck on whatever they can find to trip someone up on some esoteric fact, or find fault with the messenger when the message they happen to deliver, which is opinion, goes against the tidal wave of popularity.
                I dislike how some posters gang up on newbies and those who take a standback look and say something, which is their opinion, and to which they are entitled, just like the self styled gurus and fashionistas who think they are smarter than everyone else here.
                You know, sometimes my grammar sucks, and I try to spell, but the keyboard gets in the way. I kneejerk post, and sometimes I am called out on my hasty logic. But I have been on the receiving end of the very unfair and steamroll-like name calling and believe very strongly that there are some smarta$$ posters on this forum who are convinced they A) write epistles from on high, B) have the right to harass ANYBODY they want with impunity, and C) think their manure pile doesn't have an odor like everyone else's.
                This is a place for opinion. Not for name calling and personal attacks. I don't like characterization as it has no place here or anywhere - it's especially unfair in print.
                And that is MY opinion! Stink as it may!
                Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                Comment


                • #9
                  Look, Mac, here's the thing.

                  Questions like yours are often asked on the forums. And while they usually spawn great debate, they don't usually spawn name calling.

                  However, when the poster who poses the original question has no or very little history of posting on the message board, the more established posters assume that it's a random person who is just trying to stir up trouble, either just for the hell of it, or because they maybe have a personal vendetta against the person they posed the question about. A person who does this is commonly called a troll, and their sole purpose is generally to just cause trouble and drama. We try not to respond to these people.

                  Since you have very little history of posting on this board, and your first real conversation seems (note I say seems as this is the way it came off, regardless of how you meant it) to accuse Jennie Brannigan of ignoring signs that may have prevented Cooper's injury, many people assumed that you were just interested in causing trouble. Hence, the troll name calling.

                  Just to clarify, since you seem new to the board. I agree, it's not right, but it can be very difficult for us to differentiate between a troll and a newbie with a legitimate question.
                  Comedic Eventing on Facebook

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    It's a bulletin board, not a blog site. Sorry, pet peeve, call me an a-hole.

                    Obviously I missed the latest kerfuffle. Lucky me. I shan't go looking, it's tiresome and will never change the fact that this (being an old and venerable community) is my favorite BB by far. I know the locals. They are imperfect. Sometimes decidedly so. I like it that way, and this glass-house dweller is fresh out of stones to throw anyhow.
                    Click here before you buy.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      What's wrong Mac?

                      Billy Goat got your Gruff?
                      Proud scar wearing member of the Bold, Banned and Bitchen clique

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ah, yes, I remember fondly when I first started posting here. I questioned Laine Ashker's judgment at the time.

                        I was called a troll, told I did not know what I was talking about, etc. I also caused a kerfuffle about a certain item of apparel that shall not be named lest this thread get side-tracked.

                        I think, since then people have at least realized that whether they agree or not, my opinion is my opinion and I am not a troll...

                        No, I don't think it is right for every new person to be called a troll. When I see something that does not look right, I simply do not respond. Certain other people can do the same thing. Also, some people do need to learn to take a step back from their idols, as Lex mentioned. Everyone can make mistakes, not even Jim Wofford is perfect.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Ajierene View Post
                          Everyone can make mistakes, not even Jim Wofford is perfect.
                          Ah hell, lightening is gonna strike now...

                          A good suggestion for anyone's future reference might be to avoid the appearance of impugning someone's judgement without strong supporting evidence while their horse is still in critical care at New Bolton. That tends to bring out the grumpy bears...can't imagine why...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by retreadeventer View Post
                            I dislike IMMENSELY the way that some people do not READ posts for the meaning and instead get stuck on whatever they can find to trip someone up on some esoteric fact, or find fault with the messenger when the message they happen to deliver, which is opinion, goes against the tidal wave of popularity.
                            I dislike how some posters gang up on newbies and those who take a standback look and say something, which is their opinion, and to which they are entitled, just like the self styled gurus and fashionistas who think they are smarter than everyone else here.
                            You know, sometimes my grammar sucks, and I try to spell, but the keyboard gets in the way. I kneejerk post, and sometimes I am called out on my hasty logic. But I have been on the receiving end of the very unfair and steamroll-like name calling and believe very strongly that there are some smarta$$ posters on this forum who are convinced they A) write epistles from on high, B) have the right to harass ANYBODY they want with impunity, and C) think their manure pile doesn't have an odor like everyone else's.
                            This is a place for opinion. Not for name calling and personal attacks. I don't like characterization as it has no place here or anywhere - it's especially unfair in print.
                            And that is MY opinion! Stink as it may!
                            I agree totally with this post, I too sometimes post a reply in haste, particularly when I am being harrassed over something false or insignificant. There are far too many people on this board that think that it is their job to put down, or make assumptions that are totally incorrect. I have REALLY stepped back from many posts here lately after a couple of unreasonable people began their "antics" (particularly on the H/J forum as I do "cross over" into both worlds!)
                            www.shawneeacres.net

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Originally posted by subk View Post
                              Ah hell, lightening is gonna strike now...

                              A good suggestion for anyone's future reference might be to avoid the appearance of impugning someone's judgement without strong supporting evidence while their horse is still in critical care at New Bolton. That tends to bring out the grumpy bears...can't imagine why...
                              SUBK, there is no amount of justification for those who misinterpret a post or who make incorrect assumptions about a post to behave in this manner. And the newbie, troll or whatever thing most certainly resembles grade school antics.

                              Sorry, I don't accept your reason to justify your behavior in this matter.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Good grief. Pot - meet kettle.

                                MAC, your post originally inaccurately stated that Cooper suffered a "demise on Sunday" and queried "If only they had verbal input on their own welfare for when us humans mis-judge the signs. How unfortunate for a wonderful horse." Not only was it an incorrect statement of the facts to use the word "demise", but your statement also assumed that "us humans" "misjudge[d]" the signs of Cooper's welfare, thus implying that you believed that Jennie and her team competed the horse on either Saturday or Sunday without proper regard for his welfare.

                                That's a serious charge (not to mention poor grammar). I don't have a stick in this fight, but honestly, I thought subk's reaction was about right. I read your post and my first thought was that it was a return of someone who had an axe to grind against Jennie about a year ago. Didn't read like a legitimate question - it read like pot-stirring - as does this thread. I'm sure that's not what you intended, but it was a fair reading of the original post.

                                Most folks on here have been here a long time, and alot of us know one another off line as well. It's a pretty good group, but for the occasional hysteria which can infect just about any community, offline or on, and subk has been here for awhile and is someone I, at least, consistently think offers smart and insightful views from someone who has competed at both the upper levels and started out youngsters. Not that it's worth much, but I'd take a breath and take a good look around before you start accusing folks of being bad actors.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by GotSpots View Post
                                  Good grief. Pot - meet kettle.

                                  MAC, your post originally inaccurately stated that Cooper suffered a "demise on Sunday" and queried "If only they had verbal input on their own welfare for when us humans mis-judge the signs. How unfortunate for a wonderful horse." Not only was it an incorrect statement of the facts to use the word "demise", but your statement also assumed that "us humans" "misjudge[d]" the signs of Cooper's welfare, thus implying that you believed that Jennie and her team competed the horse on either Saturday or Sunday without proper regard for his welfare.

                                  That's a serious charge (not to mention poor grammar). I don't have a stick in this fight, but honestly, I thought subk's reaction was about right. I read your post and my first thought was that it was a return of someone who had an axe to grind against Jennie about a year ago. Didn't read like a legitimate question - it read like pot-stirring - as does this thread. I'm sure that's not what you intended, but it was a fair reading of the original post.

                                  Most folks on here have been here a long time, and alot of us know one another off line as well. It's a pretty good group, but for the occasional hysteria which can infect just about any community, offline or on, and subk has been here for awhile and is someone I, at least, consistently think offers smart and insightful views from someone who has competed at both the upper levels and started out youngsters. Not that it's worth much, but I'd take a breath and take a good look around before you start accusing folks of being bad actors.
                                  Too funny--this is exactly what I thought when I saw this post!

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by GotSpots View Post
                                    Good grief. Pot - meet kettle.

                                    MAC, your post originally inaccurately stated that Cooper suffered a "demise on Sunday" and queried "If only they had verbal input on their own welfare for when us humans mis-judge the signs. How unfortunate for a wonderful horse." Not only was it an incorrect statement of the facts to use the word "demise", but your statement also assumed that "us humans" "misjudge[d]" the signs of Cooper's welfare, thus implying that you believed that Jennie and her team competed the horse on either Saturday or Sunday without proper regard for his welfare.

                                    That's a serious charge (not to mention poor grammar). I don't have a stick in this fight, but honestly, I thought subk's reaction was about right. I read your post and my first thought was that it was a return of someone who had an axe to grind against Jennie about a year ago. Didn't read like a legitimate question - it read like pot-stirring - as does this thread. I'm sure that's not what you intended, but it was a fair reading of the original post.

                                    Most folks on here have been here a long time, and alot of us know one another off line as well. It's a pretty good group, but for the occasional hysteria which can infect just about any community, offline or on, and subk has been here for awhile and is someone I, at least, consistently think offers smart and insightful views from someone who has competed at both the upper levels and started out youngsters. Not that it's worth much, but I'd take a breath and take a good look around before you start accusing folks of being bad actors.
                                    As a point:

                                    Main Entry: 2; demise
                                    Function: noun
                                    Etymology: Middle English dimise, from Anglo-French demise, feminine of demis, past participle of demettre to dismiss, from Latin demittere to send down, from de- + mittere to send
                                    Date: 15th century

                                    1 : the conveyance of an estate
                                    2 : transfer of the sovereignty to a successor
                                    3 a : death b : a cessation of existence or activity c : a loss of position or status

                                    from: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/demise

                                    In other words, Cooper's demise would have been the ending of his ability to continue in the event. This would fall under definition 3a. Definition 3b also fits, as his place in the standings was ended.

                                    I also ran Mac Deuce's initial post in the other thread through Word's spelling and grammar check. It found as many grammar mistakes in that post as it did in the post above, so I am unsure where the grammar issues are in Mac Deuce's post.

                                    While subk can and does provide thoughtful posts, that does not mean that Mac Deuce's point is invalid or in any way less important or thoughtful than subk's posts.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                                      It's a bulletin board, not a blog site. Sorry, pet peeve, call me an a-hole.

                                      Obviously I missed the latest kerfuffle. Lucky me. I shan't go looking, it's tiresome and will never change the fact that this (being an old and venerable community) is my favorite BB by far. I know the locals. They are imperfect. Sometimes decidedly so. I like it that way, and this glass-house dweller is fresh out of stones to throw anyhow.
                                      Nicely stated, DW!
                                      Fox Haven Farm, Inc.
                                      Home of 2002 JC Registered stallion Artrageous

                                      Artrageous has his own Facebook page!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Sorry, but if one smells like a troll and acts like a troll, one is probably going to be called a troll.

                                        If you want to change your image, change your behavior. Maybe don't go falsely accusing people of things when you don't know the facts??
                                        http://www.MyVirtualEventingCoach.com

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X