• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Dispute over rules

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dispute over rules

    I was recently at a local non-USEA event where there was a dispute regarding my hunt cap and swan neck spurs. The questioning was brought up by a local BO/coach who also runs her own events who was at the show with some students. She kept going to the TD (who apparently didn't know the rules either) about my hunt cap and then approached me and very rudely (and incorrectly) told me that my spurs were illegal.

    I was prepared for this situation and had the necessary information printed off and with me. While the local eventing organization has some of its own rules to cover certain things not in the USEF rulebook, the rest follow the USEF rules. I also double-checked with our organization's president and rule committee about the hunt cap specifically since it's a very safety-oriented org, but they all said my hunt cap was fine for dressage.

    Despite my proof though, the woman still very loudly declared, "THAT GIRL JUST LIKES TO BREAK RULES!!" and complained to everyone about it during the rest of the event and afterward as well.

    So, my question is whether a show organizer or TD would be allowed to disqualify you under such circumstances. This woman runs events of her own and she obviously thought she knew the rules way better than she did. Even with my proof, she was convinced I was in the wrong. I'm worried now I may end up in a situation like this, but with the actual show organizer or TD
    "Last time I picked your feet, you broke my toe!"

  • #2
    What happened--were you DQ'ed or allowed to continue?

    I don't know the event in question, but schooling shows may sometimes have rules that supersede those of the organizations (for example, maybe the farm hosting requires approved helmets whenever mounted, even if your local CTA and USEF do not?)

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      I wasn't DQed, but that's because the show secretary/barn owner said that if the judge/TD didn't question my equipment, I didn't have to worry about it. They did look at my paperwork though and thanked me for it.

      This event did have some different rules, like I had to wear a vest during my stadium, but they were explicitly stated in the omnibus and during the show.
      "Last time I picked your feet, you broke my toe!"

      Comment


      • #4
        I would say that an organizer of a unrecognized H.T. can pretty much do whatever they want. You pay less to show unrecognized and this one of the disadvantages.

        Comment


        • #5
          Swan neck spurs are one of those things that make me scratch my head - the rules specifically say that spurs must point "down". But swan neck spurs, by design, point UP and are legal.

          I realize they are usuall rounded on the ends, and if you just wore your prince of wales spurs upside down they would be kind of pointy (reason for not being allowed to do so) but from afar, SN spurs can look like they are pointing "up", which is not legal.

          This does not help your specific situation, but just something to think about. Were your spurs of legal length? Dressage allows for more spur than eventing.

          If you were allowed to compete, I would simply file this away as "good to know", smile, and say " I have been given the OK from POGJ but I'm glad you are so concerned that we are all on a level playing field" and go ride.

          Your other post indicated you are new to the Area 1 eventing community, so welcome, and please do ask questions.

          Comment


          • #6
            I hate to have to beat this drum again but for the life of me I do not understand wearing a hunt cap. Why is it so difficult to wear an approved helmet with a chin strap. "Just dressage" is BS. At my last show my very fresh TB had a bucking hissy in the warm-up (which is always a dangerous area )before my dressage. I stayed on, but I was damn glad I had a helmet .

            Comment


            • #7
              Yeah, I don't get the hunt cap either - especially since my approved helmet looks like the hunt caps, except approved and with a chin strap. No reason to buy a hunt cap.

              As far as the rules go - well, it is unrecognized so in the end it is all up to the TD. As long as the TD says it is ok, then it is ok. The other person may have been thinking of the rules at her place. She may not allow hunt caps or swan spurs. Either way, not worth spending to much time thinking about, in my opinion. Someone questioned the rules, you were found not in violation, all good.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by riderboy View Post
                I hate to have to beat this drum again but for the life of me I do not understand wearing a hunt cap. Why is it so difficult to wear an approved helmet with a chin strap. "Just dressage" is BS. At my last show my very fresh TB had a bucking hissy in the warm-up (which is always a dangerous area )before my dressage. I stayed on, but I was damn glad I had a helmet .
                Because the freedom to smash our skulls in the dressage phase is one of the few freedoms we have left.

                Comment


                • #9
                  At an unrecognized event, anything can happen.

                  But under the USEF rules, only the GJ (and in some limited circumstances, the TD) can Eliminate or Disqualify someone. Not the organizer, manager or secretary. And certainly not another competitor.

                  It doesn't matter whether you like the rule or not, unless there is an explicit local (state or organizer) rule to the contrary, "article of apparel " hats ARE permitted in dressage.

                  WRT swan neck spurs, the rule says that spurs must be worn "only with the shank directed downwards". In a swan NECK spur, the NECK points upward, but the SHANK still points downward.
                  Janet

                  chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    In your boots, if I went to the complaining lady's unrecognized events I would not wear the swan-neck spurs and hunt cap. I'd wear something she's not going to fuss over. Or ... not go. It's her party. If I choose to go, as a gracious guest I'll make every effort to stay in her good books, and keep quiet about anything I think is incorrect or even silly.

                    Especially if it conforms to the information she published about her unrecognized event. But I'd stay low key about it even if it didn't, and make a decision about attending next time. Might follow up with a quiet word with the local event organization that sanctions the event, if it is sanctioned by them and included in their omnibus. That is, could the lady be more clear and specific about which rules she is going to stick to ... they could bring it up with her.

                    In your boots if I did not know the organizers of an unrecognized event I would check in advance about the spurs and cap. Just to save the disturbance and bother if they decide they aren't going to allow one or both of these things once I was warming up - or worse yet, after having ridden the test.

                    In your boots I'd simply keep in mind that the organizers of unrecognized events and CT's may follow some or all of the recognized rules, but they if they did not commit in full to them in their published material, they can change their minds about some detail at any moment. It's their party. I would ask about sticky items in advance. At the event I'd stay prepared to go with the flow ... and afterwards make a decision about whether to come next time. Just as with the complaining lady.

                    I would not go to any unrecognized event without other spurs and helmet on hand, ready to switch for the swan-necks and hat, just in case.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      OverandOnward, I think the point is that this was NOT the complaining lady's event. That while she runs her own horse trials, this was someone else's where she was making a big deal, despite the fact that the officials at this event said that the rider was not breaking any rules by wearing this helmet and these spurs.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I've had issues with my swan necks at *recognized* events, so I'm not surprised. I used to carry all of my paperwork with me as well, but that didn't always stop them - then they were debating whether or not my spurs were really swan necks! It was extremely frustrating. My solution to the problem was to just stop wearing them and switch to something else. I really wish that USEA/USEF would clarify the rule on this.
                        ~Nancy~

                        Adams Equine Wellness

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X