• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Who pays for the vet check?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Who pays for the vet check?

    A friend of mine is trying to sell a horse and another is trying to buy one and the buyer thinks she shouldnt have to pay for the vet, but I always thought the buyer paid for it... Just wondering. Thanks!
    *Paige*
    ~*It's not about the ribbons, but about the ride behind it"
    R.I.P. Teddy O'Connor

  • #2
    I believe that it is the buyers responsibility.
    Gwen Dean
    Erie Hunt & Saddle Club HT Secretary

    Comment


    • #3
      Buyer pays for the vet check.
      Work - feed - ride - shovel poop - repeat.

      Comment


      • #4
        Buyer always pays for the vet check. I've never once paid for it (or been asked to pay for it) when I was selling. I have been asked to forward the vet history/any xrays I may have of the horse to the practice performing the vet check which I of course have no problem with but that's it.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Thanks! I thought I was on the right page!
          *Paige*
          ~*It's not about the ribbons, but about the ride behind it"
          R.I.P. Teddy O'Connor

          Comment


          • #6
            The purpose of the vet check is to make sure you are making a sound buying decision for you intents and purchases, hence the reason the buyer pays for it if desired.

            Comment


            • #7
              Yes, the buyer should select the vet and pay for the vetting. Worth every penny in the long run in my opinion.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                how much is it? The girl said its like $500
                *Paige*
                ~*It's not about the ribbons, but about the ride behind it"
                R.I.P. Teddy O'Connor

                Comment


                • #9
                  Vet checks can run anywhere from a basic checkup to full blown with xrays. As such, the price is HIGHLY variable.

                  That said, I have had a buyer try to get me to pay for the vet check which I did not.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The buyer should pay because it is the buyer who wants it done for their own protection.

                    And speaking of pricing- I had one vet ask me what the price of the horse was. After I'd told them what I wanted to check.

                    As in "we'll set our price according to what you're paying for the horse" not "basic exam is $100 and each X ray is $50". I did not use that vet.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hilary, I've not heard of that practice. It seems to me to be a way to really sock it to someone buying an expensive horse. Is that a standard or ethical practice?
                      The ants are my friends. And they're blowin' in the wind.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The only time I've heard of a seller paying for anything to do with vetting is if, during a ppe by a potential buyer, "something" turned up, the buyer walked and the seller wanted to investigate further to establish if this was a deal-breaker or a bargaining point, or nothing after all, for future sales potential and disclosure. This might also fit into the "honest sellers" thread.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The buyer should pay. The vet then has an obligation to make the disclosures regarding what is found during the exam to its client - the buyer, as opposed to the seller - and the buyer is in the position to decide how extensive the exam will be.

                          Exams can be very cheap, if limited to flexions, for example; very expensive, if every joint in the horse is xrayed; or something in between. The extent of the exam (and thus the cost) is typically based at least in part upon the buyer's anticipated use of the horse and the horse's history (an exam for a horse that a buyer expects to take Adv. and that has already had an upper level career may differ significantly from one done by a buyer looking for trail riding buddy, for example).
                          Treat Jockey for Spellbound and Smidgeon

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I was horse shopping this summer and had three different vet checks by three different vets on three different horses. One was $900, one was $500, and one was $450. All included the basics, plus x-rays of the front feet and hocks. The cheapest check was by my vet; the others were done out of state by "neutral" vets recommended by my hometown vet.

                            I was surprised by the $900 tab, but have had a bill as high as $1,200 for a horse I bought a few years ago. I think the sky's the limit if you want them to check more than the basic things.

                            And as the buyer, I paid for it all.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I paid over $900 for my last PPE but we did something like 16 x-rays. (Front feet & legs, hind feet, hocks and stifles) Compared to the purchase price of the horse, it was worth it because I wouldn't have wanted to buy her and discover something down the road.

                              I paid $250 for a basic exam on another horse and then another $150 when something came up that I decided needed x-rays. She was not an expensive horse but that $400 dropped on a horse I ultimately did not buy saved me TONS of expense down the road. I'd never even heard of a two-year old with navicular!

                              Buyer pays, chooses the vet and decides how little or much will be done in the PPE.
                              The rebel in the grey shirt

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Person who pays owns the information. If the seller were to pay, the vet would not be obligated to disclose anything to the buyer.

                                FWIW, navicular on a 2yo. WB feet aren't read the same as TB or QH feet, if you were buying a WB, I hope you had a vet who was familiar with reading films of WB feet.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Gry2yng: Thank you for that information on the WB feet!
                                  *Paige*
                                  ~*It's not about the ribbons, but about the ride behind it"
                                  R.I.P. Teddy O'Connor

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    i've had vets ask me how much the horse was, but not to determine how much to charge, but how many protocols to recommend (if I'm paying $1500 for a horse, my vet is not going to suggest going full-bore on the vet check like if I was paying $15K for the horse!)

                                    Jennifer
                                    Third Charm Event Team

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Buyer pays.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Speedy
                                        The buyer should pay. The vet then has an obligation to make the disclosures regarding what is found during the exam to its client - the buyer ...
                                        For this reason I am surprised a buyer would suggest the seller pay. Although I'm sure a good vet would behave ethically, it's rather a conflict of interest to be paid by the seller.

                                        I bought a horse in the barn where I rode. Although the horse's long-time vet was to continue to be his vet, the vet agreed that another vet should do the pre-purchase exam because of his own relationship with the seller (he had been the seller's vet for a long-time, for several horses.) Bottom line, even though I think well of the horse's long-time vet, I wanted a pre-purchase vet that was clearly working for me and me only.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X