• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Speaking of running a horse at two UL competitions back to back...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Also, on a side, note, and while this is terribly sad and I don't understand it.... Some riders, who are at these levels, have access to far more horses then the one they are currently on. The "strings". They maybe not be as worried about it as someone say, who this is THE Onlly chance they have. WEGS are coming, and I think many are trying to be fully qualified, and ready. NO matter what expense there is. Because to ride for the team, the TEAM has to be your top priority.
    May the sun shine on you daily, and your worries be gone with the wind.
    www.mmceventing.com

    Comment


    • #82
      I'll disagree with the comment that just because these are pro's they know what's best. Take a look at the short list for last year's olympics for the US, how many of them are actively competing this year? Those horses ran a ton last spring and now the majority aren't even competing.

      I know some are being targeted for later events but there has been a significant time off.

      Veronica may be sound now but what is she going to be a month or two from now. It's the cumulative effect that gets them.
      A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Debbie View Post
        According to the EN write up, the mare is going to the CCI*** Bromont in 3 weeks.
        May be looking at Burghley. Perhaps there are some grants available.

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by SLR View Post
          May be looking at Burghley. Perhaps there are some grants available.
          I hope so! That would be awesome!

          Comment


          • #85
            Out curiosity, what are the qualifications for a 4 star? I know that they changed the qualifications so that if a rider isn't categorized the pair has to qualify together but are the qualifications that strenuous that this kind of behaviour is necessary? If Veronica is being pointed towards Rolex isn't that almost an entire year away? Or do you think the horse is being used to get the rider categorized?

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Debbie View Post
              I think the "business" of the short format is horrible for riders and horses. The travel, stress, and wear and tear - it's all become a bit like carnies.
              I agree.
              It's a damn shame that eventing has become just another part of the horse "industry".
              "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

              ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                Btw, I'm a huge fan of this mare. I LOVE her and from what I've seen, she is absolutely a 4* talent. Her E at Rolex last year was a RF where the mare kept jumping a very technical element even with Karen totally unseated. That E, in part, showed me that Veronica has what it takes.
                I remember watching that, and being very impressed. What an honest, genuine horse!

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by skydy View Post
                  I remember watching that, and being very impressed. What an honest, genuine horse!
                  So glad someone shared my reaction. That was the moment I really started watching Veronica. And I have been very impressed with Lauren's riding and horsemanship at the events around here. She is always very pleasant and friendly to little old ammies like me, whether I'm competing or volunteering. I hope that this new partnership brings great things to both horse and rider.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by gold2012 View Post
                    Also, on a side, note, and while this is terribly sad and I don't understand it.... Some riders, who are at these levels, have access to far more horses then the one they are currently on. The "strings".
                    ^^^ this is all a matter of perspective. Our American pros are by comparison very horse poor. When foreigners can bring their second string horses over here and beat our pants off, we know that we don't have the wealth of horses that they have. I am amazed at the talented riders we have who simply do not have the horses or the funds to go find the horses. We have a lot to do if we want to truly be competitive. Eventing is not a popular or well-funded sport here, as evidenced by our lack of horses AND the fact that eventing is not nearly as popular as a spectator sport.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      There are worse things than not being able to consistently field gold medal teams. Is it really worth it if we have to ruin the horses to get there?

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        I just don't understand how people think we are ruining our horses any more than we've ruined them in the past. Eventing is very hard on horses and historically, horses have "broken" often. Years ago, I was told that a horse's talent is a small part of the equation, with the largest part being how tough the horse is to be able to stand up to the rigors of this sport. If we don't want them to break, then we shouldn't train and compete them. We do whatever we can to keep them sound. Of course. This entire discussion began with a criticism of Veronica and Lauren doing back to back CIC/CCI events and the reaction has been quite negative. What do we know about the details of this vet/training protocol? I of course wonder why and how they are doing it. But I feel compelled to present the other side only because I find this unfair and demeaning toward a rider who I've seen take outstanding care of her horses (withdrawing after dressage if its very hot or the footing is hard, when some of the people on this forum went ahead and ran their horses).

                        Who are we to make such blanket judgments?

                        Grrrr.....

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                          My vet will disagree wholeheartedly. He tells me that the disappearance of the long format meant far few horses come in to him shortly after an event, broken and done. He's seen a lot of top event horses over the years. I was surprised when he told me this as I went along with the popular opinion you note. Don't get me wrong, I love the long format. But I also believe my vet.
                          NOt to hijack into a LF thread, but the long format HAS to have been harder - I believe your vet. Look only at the number of miles galloped, steps taken, at the event itself - it was harder. Today's courses may require very fit horses, but removing 20 miles, 5 of them at racing speed, made it easier. That said, I was hoping Veronica was going to get a bit of vacation after this month of hard work. But if horses could do a LF, maybe they are also tough enough to take those extra 20 miles and do more SF events.

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                            I hope so! That would be awesome!
                            Let me get this straight.

                            We're talking about a horse that has a spotty record at 3*, that was E'd at its only attempt at a 4*, which was the 'soft' 4* of Rolex. And we're talking about a rider that has ridden exactly once at 4* level, three years ago, also at the 'soft' 4* of Rolex.

                            Yet you think that Burghley, perhaps the toughest of the world's CCI****s, is an 'awesome!' goal at this time for this pair?

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              It is important to remember that Veronica with Lauren aboard is a very diffrent horse than she was with Karen. No disrespect intended. Just observation. Therefore, JER, i am very willing to cut Vronica some slack recordwise.

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Originally posted by JER View Post
                                Let me get this straight.

                                We're talking about a horse that has a spotty record at 3*, that was E'd at its only attempt at a 4*, which was the 'soft' 4* of Rolex. And we're talking about a rider that has ridden exactly once at 4* level, three years ago, also at the 'soft' 4* of Rolex.

                                Yet you think that Burghley, perhaps the toughest of the world's CCI****s, is an 'awesome!' goal at this time for this pair?
                                Record was with a different rider and over a year ago. So.... ?

                                And that E showed an outstanding horse. Watch the video.

                                Are we the experts on what they are now capable of? We have very little information .... In comparison to the trainers, rider, vets.

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  Last year leading up to the Olympic Games, people were questioning the number of times horses were being run at the 3* and then Rolex. Under CMP, they ran the legs off of horses. I would hope people would have learned some lessons.

                                  Evidence?

                                  Twizzel (last comp Olympics 7/28/12) Has W'd from every comp entered this year
                                  Mystery Whisper (Olympics 7/28/12) Some allowance that arden wildasin is injured
                                  Otis Barbotiere (Olympics 7/28/12)
                                  Arthur (Burghley 8/30/12)
                                  Manior de Carneville (Burghley 8/30/12)

                                  Ringwood Magister is still competing but his pre-olympic competition schedule was much lighter than the US based horses.

                                  I'm generally happier that this year horses seem to be running less. At least some are.
                                  A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Originally posted by FitToBeTied View Post
                                    Last year leading up to the Olympic Games, people were questioning the number of times horses were being run at the 3* and then Rolex. Under CMP, they ran the legs off of horses. I would hope people would have learned some lessons.

                                    Evidence?

                                    Twizzel (last comp Olympics 7/28/12) Has W'd from every comp entered this year
                                    Mystery Whisper (Olympics 7/28/12) Some allowance that arden wildasin is injured
                                    Otis Barbotiere (Olympics 7/28/12)
                                    Arthur (Burghley 8/30/12)
                                    Manior de Carneville (Burghley 8/30/12)

                                    Ringwood Magister is still competing but his pre-olympic competition schedule was much lighter than the US based horses.

                                    I'm generally happier that this year horses seem to be running less. At least some are.
                                    The thought has crossed my mind, in fact, that at least some of these horses are probably NOT running, to save for WEG. There are some very very nice horses that have done three stars, but haven't ran all year.....

                                    Perhaps THAT is why some others are running SO hard. Trying to get in the qualifications/and get noticed for WEG.
                                    May the sun shine on you daily, and your worries be gone with the wind.
                                    www.mmceventing.com

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      ^^^ are you attributing these horses not running to having been over competed in the past? Horses retire. They break down. They go on to easier lives. How do we know that this is due to running back to back events and not to simply running so many events?

                                      My own Mick Dreamy will likely be done in a couple of years. We will go on to dressage or maybe driving. He is 12 and he has given me wonderful runs at prelim and interm, but not without costs. He requires maintenance. He has been lame in the past. But we've brought him back and we are hopeful that he can continue. But there will come a time when my vet and I will decide that he is no longer an UL horse.

                                      Does this mean I've competed him too much? I think we all know that event horses often retire when their bodies tell us that they are done. I don't see this as wrong.... It's what happens, across disciplines and especially in ours.

                                      Comment


                                      • #99
                                        Originally posted by FitToBeTied View Post
                                        Last year leading up to the Olympic Games, people were questioning the number of times horses were being run at the 3* and then Rolex. Under CMP, they ran the legs off of horses. I would hope people would have learned some lessons.

                                        Evidence?

                                        Twizzel (last comp Olympics 7/28/12) Has W'd from every comp entered this year
                                        Mystery Whisper (Olympics 7/28/12) Some allowance that arden wildasin is injured
                                        Otis Barbotiere (Olympics 7/28/12)
                                        Arthur (Burghley 8/30/12)
                                        Manior de Carneville (Burghley 8/30/12)

                                        Ringwood Magister is still competing but his pre-olympic competition schedule was much lighter than the US based horses.

                                        I'm generally happier that this year horses seem to be running less. At least some are.

                                        And yet the Olympic gold medal horse placed 2nd at Badminton ahead of multiple other 2012 Olympic horse/rider combos.
                                        "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                                        Courtesy my cousin Tim

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by fooler View Post
                                          And yet the Olympic gold medal horse placed 2nd at Badminton ahead of multiple other 2012 Olympic horse/rider combos.
                                          This.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X