• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

PD's Comments re: Rolex - Add a CIC***?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PD's Comments re: Rolex - Add a CIC***?

    For those of you following Phillip on Facebook, he posted some interesting takeaways from this year's Rolex. I will transcribe for those of you who have not seen it:

    "I think this year was a very successful Rolex for the sport. There was a great competition and an exciting finish for the crowds. I do feel however that the organizers need to look closely at the schedule on Saturday and how it runs. With only about 40 horses running cross country at five minute intervals there are a lot of breaks with inevitable scratches, and the long lunch break is particularly a problem. I feel this year with the morning horses doing the course so easlier riders in the afternoon were pretty complacent and possibly not riding with enough aggression and respect for the course. I think that a complementary class should be added - perhaps a CIC***? The CIC*** could run in the morning and then the CCI**** could still be the feature class in the afternoon. This would be much more exciting for the spectators and better mentally for the competitors."

    What are your thoughts? My main concern would be time. While entries were considerably down this year, I would think that this would not be the norm as there will still be WEG and Olympic years to keep in mind. So how would a *** run with a full entry list of 80+ horses in the ****? I was actually finding myself thinking similar thoughts regarding running another level in conjunction with the **** but was not sure how the logistics would work out. I honestly think that a lot of the long lunch break is for the spectators to ensure that everyone can get off course for a break and also to bring the trade fair more business. Just my speculation though.

    Thoughts?
    "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

    www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
    www.useaiv.org

  • #2
    It used to run with a CCI***....and before that I think when it was just a 3* ran with a 1* perhaps.

    I have to say I agree with him. It is very rare for the the US to fully subscribe Rolex like Badminton or some of the other 4*. I think it would be a better to have two levels. Either a CIC or CCI (not sure I care). A CIC would be a shorter course so takes up less time. The entries could be limited and a lottery like Badminton done so that really your best qualified go...not just your qualified.

    More entries really brings in more people. Randor used to make a killing when it ran a 1* with the 2* as you got all the friends and family of the 1* riders which in turn supported the 2* more.

    I'd support it and think it would work...but some thought would need to be on what other level. A part of me thinks a 1* or 2* could possibly be better economically....
    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

    Comment


    • #3
      I'd love it. Great idea. And it would get the 3* riders experience in front of ginormous crowds,

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by riderboy View Post
        I'd love it. Great idea. And it would get the 3* riders experience in front of ginormous crowds,
        My thoughts exactly. If it were me, trying to get a 3* qual and experience would be great in front of a Rolex crowd. And Kentucky is more accessible travel wise than a lot of the East coast events for those that live farther West.
        "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

        www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
        www.useaiv.org

        Comment


        • #5
          i think its a fantastic ideal.
          they used to run the horse trials in the morning and the *** in the afternoon. with all the improvment and changed the khp has gone through over the years i think they are more than capable!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            Great idea. Great development opportunity for up and coming horses.

            One of the challenges posed by Rolex and other big events are the crowds and atmosphere. Our young up and coming horses just don't get enough of an opportunity to practice in that environment. Neither do our riders. Adding slightly lower divisions would only increase the allure of Rolex, providing additional spectators, riders and supporters.

            Comment


            • #7
              I think they should run an Advanced Horse Trials again rather than a CIC***. It would be a great thing for up & coming horses before they have to tackle the extra difficulty.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by LAZ View Post
                I think they should run an Advanced Horse Trials again rather than a CIC***. It would be a great thing for up & coming horses before they have to tackle the extra difficulty.
                True but we do need more international events for qualifiers....and with all the FEI stewards there it would have some (maybe not much) cost savings in expenses.

                I also wonder if they could also run some of the YEH classes....or create a new one. The finals in the UK are at Burghley and that was cool to go watch. I think they ran them on dressage days. It is too early in the year for a final but there could be a cool class of 5-6 year olds...
                ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                Comment


                • #9
                  Back in the dark ages Rolex ran a Prelim 3 Day, IIRC, along with the then 3* 3 Day, until sometime in the 1980's. They were both Long format.

                  Again IIRC, the entries have been fairly static at 40-50 for the Advance level.
                  "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                  Courtesy my cousin Tim

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by fooler View Post
                    Back in the dark ages Rolex ran a Prelim 3 Day, IIRC, along with the then 3* 3 Day, until sometime in the 1980's. They were both Long format.

                    Again IIRC, the entries have been fairly static at 40-50 for the Advance level.
                    Prelim 3 day, then Intermediate 3 day, then Intermediate HT, then Advanced HT then the *** when they added the ****.

                    I've wished they'd go back to offering the Horse Trials since they dropped the ***. I understand making the seperate courses is a pain, but it is so much better for the spectators and really gives the horses and riders that aren't ready to do a **** a look at the environment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They need to add something. The timing factor PD mentions... with long breaks... is one of the primary reasons I HAVEN'T gone in a number of years. Just can't justify the drive down and back for that kind of time. (2 hours plus traffic delays each way to watch less than 4 hours of rides) There are ways to schedule around the numbers if they opt to do it. Everything from a lottery for both, to skewing the numbers to give everyone in at the 4* and limit the whatever division to whatever time is left over. WE all knew the entries were going to be light this year based on the first couple weeks of posted entries. Can't tell me that TPTB didn't realize it.

                      Of course the only ones that would object would be the vendors since everyone invades the trade fair during those long breaks. But perhaps it could be adjusted to stay open later (doesn't it close what most would feel is ridiculously early on Saturday?)
                      ************
                      "Of course it's hard. It's supposed to be hard. It's the Hard that makes it great."

                      "Get up... Get out... Get Drunk. Repeat as needed." -- Spike

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by LAZ View Post
                        Prelim 3 day, then Intermediate 3 day, then Intermediate HT, then Advanced HT then the *** when they added the ****.

                        I've wished they'd go back to offering the Horse Trials since they dropped the ***. I understand making the seperate courses is a pain, but it is so much better for the spectators and really gives the horses and riders that aren't ready to do a **** a look at the environment.
                        Thanks for expanding on my post. Agree either a 2* or 3* would be good for the up and comers horse/rider combos plus some of the 4* riders could ride their young horses. One way to limit the number of "lower level" competitors, if necessary, is to set qualifying requirements in order to maintain a sensible schedule.
                        "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                        Courtesy my cousin Tim

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #13
                          Originally posted by tle View Post
                          Of course the only ones that would object would be the vendors since everyone invades the trade fair during those long breaks. But perhaps it could be adjusted to stay open later (doesn't it close what most would feel is ridiculously early on Saturday?)
                          Personally I refuse to shop during the lunch break because it's impossible! I try to get all my shopping done on Friday when there are less people and more stock. I think people would be happier not having the lunch break and having instead longer hours for the trade fair to spread out the crowds. But I can see how the vendors would be upset if the break were shortened because they get a huge amount of revenue in a short amount of time and don't have to worry about staffing longer hours. So I can see both sides of it.
                          "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

                          www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
                          www.useaiv.org

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think it would be just the kind of addition to the schedule that would have a lot of benefit. Someone needs to tell DOC that when Rolex dropped the CCI*** is about the time our international prospects fell. Not that I really believe that's the problem, but giving young horses and riders the opportunity to compete in that atmosphere could only be beneficial to developing them in to world class competitors.

                            On the trade fair issue an additional class would mean more time to shop on Thursday and Friday as the competition would start earlier and end later. As it is now I shop less because I don't want to miss what little dressage there is. Give me 70-80 horses and yeah, I'd get bored enough to leave the arena and go shop! As it is now I don't shop as much as I did when it was both the *** and the ****.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The multitude of long breaks is BORING..just 2 hours for S/J and they whiz thru dressage again with long breaks....More people = more $$$ spent @ vendors... YEH competition would be awesome !!!!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Running a *** in some form might keep some of the inappropriate combinations out of the CCI****. You can still have Rolex as your goal without exceeding your capabilities.

                                While I agree the long breaks don't make for the best day out, I prefer watching nothing to cringing at those who are not up to the level.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I'd be in favor of a CCI 3*, not a CIC. It would be nice to have a maximum length CCI 3*. There are already too many CICs around as it is. If there isn't CCI support, IMO, they are headed for extinction.
                                  "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                  Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    The issue with running a CCI is Jersey is this weekend and has had issues with entries. A CCI would completely wipe them out as everyone would want to run Kentucky. I can understand that KY needs something else, but I am all for supporting the events we already have. We don't have enough horses to have 5 CCI 3* in the US....

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                      I'd be in favor of a CCI 3*, not a CIC. It would be nice to have a maximum length CCI 3*. There are already too many CICs around as it is. If there isn't CCI support, IMO, they are headed for extinction.
                                      I tend to agree with this, why not take advantage of the space and time to run a CCI? If we are to improve American eventing, we need to keep in mind the advantages that the European riders have and this is one of them. And I also agree with the fact that it will keep less prepared combinations out of the 4* but still give them the exposure and visibility afforded by the crowds at Rolex. Also, who wouldn't want to show their stuff in front of the (usually) entire High Performance team as well as the coaching staff? I think it would be a great opportunity.

                                      I also like the idea of a YEH running in conjunction but also am concerned with time if they were to add that and a ***. I think that YEH needs to be a more publicized program in the US as it encourages US breeding, IMO and that is one of the big issues that needs to improve as well.
                                      "Lord if we should fall, my horse and I, please pick my horse up first."

                                      www.thestartbox.wordpress.com
                                      www.useaiv.org

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by rebelrider View Post
                                        The issue with running a CCI is Jersey is this weekend and has had issues with entries. A CCI would completely wipe them out as everyone would want to run Kentucky. I can understand that KY needs something else, but I am all for supporting the events we already have. We don't have enough horses to have 5 CCI 3* in the US....

                                        I agree...and that is why I thought CIC was better but I would prefer CCI*....I think there is more than enough support for those and it will get more competitors. Make it one that you have to qualify to get in more...so that it is really a show case.

                                        As for the YEH...there isn't a time issue. You run them in a different ring and at different times. Burghley did this. Separate ring with a few xc jumps. In my mind...this would replace some of the demonstrations. There is more than enough space at KHP for holding it together even with adding another level to Rolex.
                                        ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X