• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Badminton: Rolex Grand Slam Showdown. And Michael Jung

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I didn't walk the WEG, but from what I saw, it looked more difficult than all of the past Rolex courses I've walked.

    In any event, this weekend is going to be VERY exciting start to finish.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
      BFNE, do you really think that the WEG course was that much harder than the usual Rolex course?
      Yes. Hands down. As did several people I spoke with. It was very well designed and took out a lot of riders early on.

      If you took the long options...no--not a super hard 4*, but the long options were very timely and took you way out of contention.

      ETA: The biggest difference I saw at Burghley was really not the jumps and questions--which I think WEG 2010 was harder....but the footing at Burghley is just relentless. It is so undulating the entire time that there is just no let up...whereas KHP has such good nice turf for a great galloping.
      ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

      Comment


      • #23
        I am very excited to watch and see what happens! I think Badminton being particularly difficult will work to Jung and Sam's advantage. Granted, I've never ridden the horse, or seen him in person for that matter, so I don't actually know how he is to ride. But watching Cross Country footage of Sam he appears to be very eager, confident, and clever on course while being extremely rideable at the same time. Sam is the definition of "cross country machine." Michael is such a lucky guy

        But as riderboy put it, this is a sport of heartbreaks. Can't wait for Sunday!

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #24
          All this is also happening at Badminton, which William Fox-Pitt has won "only" once before, and Andrew Nicholson has never won. Fox-Pitt has won Burghley 6 times, and I believe Nicholson has also won it several times. Does anyone remember who the other Grand Slam contenders were (those who won 2 in a row but not the 3rd)? Oliver Townend had won Badminton & Burghley, then fell at the hollow at Rolex. I think someone else lost by a rail in SJ one year? Was it Andrew Hoy? Clayton Fredericks? I can't remember.
          Last edited by vagabondrider; May. 1, 2013, 12:15 AM.

          Comment


          • #25
            I'm very excited to see Clark go!
            We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
            www.dleestudio.com

            Comment


            • #26
              Lest we forget the ONLY person to ever win the grand slam is running this year. Pippa Funnell has rehabbed Redesigned and that horse is so damn nice. I wish her the BEST of luck. Also very excited to see Clark and Tiana go!

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by wcporter View Post
                Can I ask what may be a dumb question? With so few 4*'s why are Rolex and Badminton back to back weekends? I mean clearly that eliminates a lot of riders with limited mounts and/or funds to be able to compete in both, right?
                Realistically, you can only do two 4* in a year, a spring and fall, just because of the effort required from the horse. Thus, spreading the events apart wouldn't actually help.

                You can't run them much earlier, because the horses need to be fit and ready. Summer is too hot for Kentucky.
                If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                Comment


                • #28
                  I just "geeked out" looking at the stats behind these 3 guys and their horses. (Table of stats here: http://outsidethehorsebox.com/the-st...t-competitors/)

                  WFP and AN have yet to announce their final horse selections for their 2 spaces each, but considering the choices I sorta think WFP looks a bit shaky for this year. Obviously he is not to be counted out of course! Out of his 4 choices he has 2 back from a year off (Oslo and Cool Mountain), but both ran well at the CIC3star at Burnham Market in March - he didn't go for time XC - but they still haven't done much after all that time off. And Lionheart and Parklane Hawk aren't super consistent with stadium or XC time (when I say super consistent I mean in comparison to MJ).

                  MJ and Sam look super on paper and haven't come lower than first or second at a FEI comp since 2010 when they were a lowly 3rd . And they have won all 3 of their 4-stars.

                  And then there is Andrew who is on such a winning streak. I think he generally regards Nereo as his strongest (up until last weekend of course ).

                  So exciting! Can't wait to watch.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #29
                    For everyone on twitter, #nicholsonontwitter is the funniest Badminton-related trend out there!

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by vagabondrider View Post
                      For everyone on twitter, #nicholsonontwitter is the funniest Badminton-related trend out there!
                      It often solicits a rather loud guffaw from me!
                      "IT'S NOT THE MOUNTAIN WE CONQUER, BUT OURSELVES." SIR EDMUND HILLARYMember of the "Someone Special To Me Serves In The Military" Clique

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by vagabondrider View Post
                        All this is also happening at Badminton, which William Fox-Pitt has won "only" once before, and Andrew Nicholson has never won. Fox-Pitt has won Burghley 6 times, and I believe Nicholson has also won it several times. Does anyone remember who the other Grand Slam contenders were (those who won 2 in a row but not the 3rd)? Oliver Townend had won Badminton & Burghley, then fell at the hollow at Rolex. I think someone else lost by a rail in SJ one year? Was it Andrew Hoy? Clayton Fredericks? I can't remember.
                        Yep Andrew Hoy. Looks like all horses passed on the first horse inspection today. Woohoo!

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          #32
                          Does anyone know where to find jog/trot-up photos of everyone from today? I've only seen pics of a few horses & riders.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Lets not forget Toddy!
                            Boss Mare Eventing Blog
                            https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              I'm not so sure that Michael Jung is invincible at a 4* like Badminton. Remember the only 4* he's ever run has been at Luhmuhlen (IIRC), and Badminton is a whole order of difficulty different. AN and WFP know that track like the back of their hands.
                              WFP has been riding at Badminton since 1989 and has won once only. Even with three such top riders, don't forget the extraordinary quality of the rest of the field. It is wide open.
                              "Good young horses are bred, but good advanced horses are trained" Sam Griffiths

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by mustangsal85 View Post
                                Ah ok. I was confused about the Rolex 2013 part too - but then when WFP had the stop with Chilli Morning, the announcer said something along the lines of "and William Fox-Pitt's chance is now gone." But that could have just meant his chance to win Rolex? I just thought I'd heard something about him being able to clinch by winning Rolex.
                                Didn't he need to make it consective at Burghley last fall?

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  I believe if WFP had won Rolex this year it would have counted as Grand Slam since Badminton was canceled last year.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by bizbachfan View Post
                                    I believe if WFP had won Rolex this year it would have counted as Grand Slam since Badminton was canceled last year.
                                    No it would not. You have to win them in consecutive order. Starting at any event, but due to Badminton being cancelled last year, He has to win it this year. That DOES make this a VERY special Badminton, but like Williedon said, He has been riding there for a long time, and has only won once!
                                    Another killer of threads

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by bizbachfan View Post
                                      I believe if WFP had won Rolex this year it would have counted as Grand Slam since Badminton was canceled last year.
                                      Nope. Rolex, the Watch, came out after the Badminton cancellation and said it had to be the NEXT unwon event in the rider's cycle. So it has to be the NEXT Badminton for WFP and now AN.

                                      As to the announcer's statement, WFP had an almost insurmountable lead after dressage--7 point ahead of the next horse. Once he'd gotten the 20 PP for the stop, plus the time penalties XC and assuming horse didn't stop again, it still would have taken a miracle for him to win.
                                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        okay thanks for the correction, all rather confusing.

                                        Comment

                                        • Original Poster

                                          #40
                                          After day 1, the top 10 are quite an international group. And Nicholson 3rd, Fox-Pitt in a tie for 4th, Michael Jung right behind in 6th with their more competitive horses going tomorrow!
                                          Last edited by vagabondrider; May. 3, 2013, 08:09 PM.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X