• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Eventers and Horses at the Top - Would the list be the same if we never lost the LF?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eventers and Horses at the Top - Would the list be the same if we never lost the LF?

    I am curious to hear what everyone's opinion is. If we never lost the Long Format, do you think it would be the same horses and riders who are on the short lists, are successful at the 4* level, and make the teams?

    I would love to hear why or why you do not think so.
    Boss Mare Eventing Blog
    https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

  • #2
    Riders I actually think its pretty easy to say yes, mainly because the current team riders are still largely the old team riders lol. That is to say (choosing our last Olympic team), Phillip and Karen certainly proved they were successful LF riders, , Coleman stepped on to the big stage by winning NAYRC when it was a LF, and I believe, though am not certain, that Boyd was successful in LF's in OZ. The one with minimal to no LF experience is Tiana. Draw your own conclusions.

    Horses it's tougher to say. Some of them, absolutely. Others, it's hard to say.
    Phoenix Farm ~ Breeding-Training-Sales
    Eventing, Dressage, Young Horses
    www.phoenixsporthorses.com
    Check out my new blog: http://califcountrymom.blogspot.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Agree with Phoenix Farm. Most of the Top is still the same.

      GBR (WFP, Mary King, etc) would still rule the world, that is no different!
      “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.”
      ? Albert Einstein

      ~AJ~

      Comment


      • #4
        TB blood still rules at the highest level as well, a result that was perhaps not anticipated when the format was shortened.
        "Good young horses are bred, but good advanced horses are trained" Sam Griffiths

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by PhoenixFarm View Post
          Riders I actually think its pretty easy to say yes, mainly because the current team riders are still largely the old team riders lol. That is to say (choosing our last Olympic team), Phillip and Karen certainly proved they were successful LF riders, , Coleman stepped on to the big stage by winning NAYRC when it was a LF, and I believe, though am not certain, that Boyd was successful in LF's in OZ. The one with minimal to no LF experience is Tiana. Draw your own conclusions.

          Horses it's tougher to say. Some of them, absolutely. Others, it's hard to say.
          Do you think the same for those who ride at the ULs that have never done a 3* or 4* Long Format?
          Boss Mare Eventing Blog
          https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jealoushe View Post
            I am curious to hear what everyone's opinion is. .
            Everyone's? Or our ranking old timer experts, young guns need not apply (sorry, still a little stung).

            I think PF makes a good point, but let's look at the time line for a moment...
            The format of the sport underwent major changes in 2004 and 2005, with the creation of the "short" or "modified format", which excluded phases A, B, and C from endurance day. The primary reason for excluding these phases was that the Olympic Committee was considering dropping the sport of eventing from the Olympics because of the cost and large area required for the speed and endurance phase with a steeplechase course and several miles of roads-and-tracks. To prevent the elimination of the sport from the Olympics program, the "short format" was developed by the FEI.
            (from Wiki)
            All blessing to the FEI for "saving" Eventing for the Olympics </sarcasm> Consider that the last LF run in the Olympics was in 2000 (Sydney) and the last Circuit LF was 2005. Lets take the 2000 Olympics since it really set the stage for 2005.

            I can see PF's thought that some of the same "Elder's" would still make the teams, but consider the number of potential young riders just breaking into the top levels at the time...They'd be face with the same choice today, run LF(s) and miss out on all the FEI candy or train for the SF because it is now the only path up. With that, you'd not see any young riders in a LF 4*, because they would have no experience.

            As to horses, I'm no horse person, but I can read, I can listen, and much of what comes out is that a horse of today could not handle a LF at the top level. The horse of today is not the endurance horse, but the show horse to win in dressage and make sure that score carries to the end. It will become more the norm for riders in the top levels to ride horses for a time, then switch out to another as this sport places focus not on the rider horse, but on the rider.

            Comment


            • #7
              On a related note, 1994 World Champion eventer Bounce has died at the age of 30. Vaughn Jefferis and Bounce represented New Zealand in the 1994 WEG, 1996 Olympics, 1998 WEG, and 2000 Olympics. Bounce also had four starts in five years at Badminton, finishing second, third, fifth, and tenth from 1994-98. He ended his career with a CCI*** win at Puhinui in 2000, at age 18.


              But the long format is Bad for Horses.
              “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.”
              ? Albert Einstein

              ~AJ~

              Comment


              • #8
                Riders yes, horses, not necessarily. Isn't it fair to say that the presence of the steeplechase and r&t would require a greater balance between dressage and endurance, and that some horses who can't be be successful in SF would be more so in LF? Not that there wouldn't be some equine athletes currently at the top who would be competitive LF, just that there might be others, too?
                Last edited by lmlacross; Mar. 29, 2013, 09:50 AM.
                "With mirth and laughter, let old wrinkles come" (Shakespeare).

                Comment


                • #9
                  I think the SF actually requires more endurance for horses (more efforts in a shorter distance= no breaks). Sure, there are some that just squeak by, but I bet that was the case back in the day, too. The biggest difference is that the dressage has improved so much that you can't just count on a clear xc with minimal time faults being enough to make up a 30 point deficit. A horse like Parklane Hawk would have no trouble with the LF.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    I find it interesting, to look at the horse rider combos and think how different the fields might be if the format never changed.

                    You need a different type of horse for the LF...I much prefer these types
                    Boss Mare Eventing Blog
                    https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Highflyer View Post
                      I think the SF actually requires more endurance for horses (more efforts in a shorter distance= no breaks). Sure, there are some that just squeak by, but I bet that was the case back in the day, too. The biggest difference is that the dressage has improved so much that you can't just count on a clear xc with minimal time faults being enough to make up a 30 point deficit. A horse like Parklane Hawk would have no trouble with the LF.

                      I disagree. Your analogy is like saying a wrestler has the same endurance as a hurdler. Different physiologies. The studies done at the two star level in the UK bear this out. Short format horse performance collapsed at 7 minutes as compared to the long-format horses who were on XC for up to 12 minutes.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Cites, please. I'd LOVE to read those studies.
                        "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                        Thread killer Extraordinaire

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A comparison of cross-country recovery rates at CCI 2* with and without steeplechase competitions
                          J. K. MURRAY1, J. M. SENIOR, E. R. SINGER
                          Equine Veterinary Journal
                          Special Issue: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Equine Exercise Physiology
                          Volume 38, Issue S36, pages 133–138, August 2006


                          Exercise Physiology of Eventing
                          DJ Marlin - Equine Vet J Suppl, 2007


                          How useful are submaximal exercise tests to forecast performance?
                          RJ Rose, RM Christley - Equine Veterinary Journal, 1995


                          This is the one where they found it is likely we over supplement the horses:

                          Feeding management practices and supplement use in top-level event horses
                          A O Burk and C A Williams
                          Comparative Exercise Physiology / Volume 5 / Issue 02 / May 2008, pp 85-93

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            It seems like the LF horses were around longer than the SF horses too...
                            Boss Mare Eventing Blog
                            https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X