• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What's going on in the IR division at SPHT2?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What's going on in the IR division at SPHT2?

    Crap! I'm at work and watching the live scores. There were more eliminations than completed rounds and just 4 jumped without faults.

    I saw most of the course yesterday. Can anyone shed some light? Was it one particular bogie fence?

    (Hey JenS did you work dressage yesterday? I looked but didn't see you)
    Always be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Then always be Batman.

    The Grove at Five Points

  • #2
    Great, now I'm really annoyed I had to scratch!
    Third Charm Event Team

    Comment


    • #3
      Can't say for sure, but it was a serious course! Very well desgned.
      www.amiddle-agedmadwomantakesthereins.blogspot.com

      www.pegasusridge.com

      Comment


      • #4
        I just got on here to ask the same thing. I know the girl who was in first, if she falls off, something crazy happened! Half the division all out for refusals is weird...
        Life doesn't have perfect footing.

        Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
        We Are Flying Solo

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Lots of 'W' in advanced as well. Was the dressage a prep for something else?
          Always be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Then always be Batman.

          The Grove at Five Points

          Comment


          • #6
            First, take a look at the OI divisions. They did not have the same problems. This is is just an indication that the course was fair and probably the IR riders were not ready for SPII. I also notice that the dressage scores were on the high side which can be another indication of problems to come (although not always).

            One has to keep in mind that many of the people who go to SPII have been riding since January and it is not their first Intermediate HT. My guess is that for some of the IR this may be one of their first rides of the year (although I have no facts to support that). Last year, after a number of people had a problem with SPII at the Intermeidate level I asked the TD and the organizer if they saw this as a first HT of the year (since it is the first Intermediate in Area 2) or one to get ready for FEI level competitions such as the Fork. Their answer was that this was the HT to prepare them for the Fork. I wonder what the goals are of the people in IR at SPII?

            Comment


            • #7
              ACME, my guess was in Advanced they were prepping for The Fork or Rolex, hence the withdrawals. I did notice that the OI did not have the same problem, which made the pattern really stand out. I hope that Sara is not hurt from her fall. I would be curious to know if there was one particular challenging fence (not that challenging is bad) or if the refusals were scattered. I know SPII is always a serious course, not to be taken on by the faint of heart!
              Life doesn't have perfect footing.

              Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
              We Are Flying Solo

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by steves View Post
                I also notice that the dressage scores were on the high side which can be another indication of problems to come (although not always).

                I just want to correct this false assumption. There has never been any indicator that dressage scores correlate to jumping faults or ability.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Acme--I had to cancel earlier in the week because I had someone who wanted to come see my gelding who's for sale/lease. And it was a good thing I cancelled as I came down with norovirus mid-week and I'm still house-bound.
                  Flip a coin. It's not what side lands that matters, but what side you were hoping for when the coin was still in the air.

                  You call it boxed wine. I call it carboardeaux.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                    I just want to correct this false assumption. There has never been any indicator that dressage scores correlate to jumping faults or ability.
                    Then one should inform the entire eventing official community of this study/research conclusion, because every judge I have ever scribed for, or TD / course official/organizer I've sat next to for 30 minutes always has informed one another about seriously crappy horses/riders in dressage to give them a heads up -- to look out for these competitors in jumping phases due to unrideability of the horse or lack of ability of the rider. They do it all the time. I'm talking the worst tests in the division, not just a tense ride.

                    I'd really like to see that indicator in writing someplace. I don't THINK (but don't know for sure) if you're right on that, Reed. (Wish I was independently wealthy, did not have to work, and could spend a week online to develop the parameters, and research the facts...)
                    Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                    Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by retreadeventer View Post
                      Then one should inform the entire eventing official community of this study/research conclusion, because every judge I have ever scribed for, or TD / course official/organizer I've sat next to for 30 minutes always has informed one another about seriously crappy horses/riders in dressage to give them a heads up -- to look out for these competitors in jumping phases due to unrideability of the horse or lack of ability of the rider. They do it all the time. I'm talking the worst tests in the division, not just a tense ride.

                      I'd really like to see that indicator in writing someplace. I don't THINK (but don't know for sure) if you're right on that, Reed. (Wish I was independently wealthy, did not have to work, and could spend a week online to develop the parameters, and research the facts...)
                      Actually, the data is there. The USEF eventing safety committee reviewed this back when there was the consideration to eliminate the bottom 10% of the division after dressage. They found no such connection to justify the decision, especially at upper levels. Bad dressage scores do not correlate to XC faults. There does appear to be the OPPOSITE trend at lower levels that high dressage scores tend to have issues on XC.

                      A judge's opinion is not sufficient. I know plenty of excellent dressage judges (even at the Olympic level) who are not really capable of judging suitability to go XC or to jump in the stadium.

                      As I stated in the past, if dressage score was a true indicator of jumping ability and safety, GP dressage horses should be excellent jumpers from the get go. In the end, the only thing the judge can do is note the ability of the rider to function with the horse (but that is a limited score).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well, rarely do I disagree with RAyers, but I do this time.
                        I think, sticking to the horses in the IR division of this event, and leaving out all Grand Prix horses , I would agree that the scores were a sign of, while maybe not lack of basics, a lack of training/experience for this level of test. Having observed all the tests, the scores reflected a lack of correct lateral movement, no transitions in and out of medium and extended gaits, for example.
                        this caused the higher scores and in my opinion did somewhat show on the XC.
                        Maybe they were pairs new to Intermediate. Also, people who don't do horses full time, can't get to the early events and probably do have to start at SPIIfor their seasons.
                        www.ncsporthorse.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by retreadeventer View Post
                          Then one should inform the entire eventing official community of this study/research conclusion, because every judge I have ever scribed for, or TD / course official/organizer I've sat next to for 30 minutes always has informed one another about seriously crappy horses/riders in dressage to give them a heads up -- to look out for these competitors in jumping phases due to unrideability of the horse or lack of ability of the rider. They do it all the time. I'm talking the worst tests in the division, not just a tense ride.

                          I'd really like to see that indicator in writing someplace. I don't THINK (but don't know for sure) if you're right on that, Reed. (Wish I was independently wealthy, did not have to work, and could spend a week online to develop the parameters, and research the facts...)
                          Two very different things.

                          Dressage judges issue "watch out for" notices to the jumping phases for riders that do not seem to be IN CONTROL of their horses, and riders who do notseem to have a good seat/balance.

                          Sure, such people probably get poor dressage scores. But there are plsnty of other people with "bad" scores who do not trigger such warnings, and oftern go on to be clear and safe on the jumping phase.

                          In this case, however, I suspect that BOTH the high dressage scores AND the problems on cross country are correlated with riderd going at this level for the first time.
                          Janet

                          chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Agree with Janet.
                            As someone who works in SJ at our HTs, we do get calls from dressage to "watch out" for a horse -- usually one who was barely under control or otherwise really out of the norm (not just tense, didn't show a movement, etc.).
                            Interestingly enough, these pairs are often JUST FINE in the SJ. If I had to guess it is just a matter of horse is happier jumping.
                            Have never seen any data, just anecdotal.
                            Now, when we send a warning from SJ over to XC, THEN it is often a carryover. Not always, but often.
                            The big man -- my lost prince

                            The little brother, now my main man

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              My take on this as I was jump judging yesterday is the 4b combination caught some folks out early, if not that then the sunken road, or the pond, and then if you got that far, the tough combination 14 finished you off. My friend and I drove over to see the 14 combination, and it was a ready for prime time question. I will try to describe it, it was set up nearly perpendicular line (maybe 70 degree turn) across the steeplechase track such that the horses had to gallop along the outside rail, then turn and in about three power short strides line up and jump a MASSIVE Narrow corner, maintain line three four strides over a big table on the right so that horse could see it was actually going out the gate. The jump judges there were having issues keeping the flag up on the narrow much of the day. The pro riders knew exactly what was required to jump though this. My smurf take on the Pro events is your horse better be ready for the next level up ie if you are planning to go Advanced mid season, you should be able to skip around the Intermediate here. It was not an early season "easy" Intermediate. I know I saw some of the best horseflesh in eventing jump yesterday.
                              Last edited by gardenie; Mar. 24, 2013, 07:06 PM. Reason: correct

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                I drove past that combination several times in the days preceding the show and I was like, say what? They came off two big gallop fences (on a racetrack!) and then had to power down to that combination.
                                Always be yourself. Unless you can be Batman. Then always be Batman.

                                The Grove at Five Points

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Yes, ACME, it was a "say what?!", because we were at the big brush as they galloped over that, and then the next big gallop fence, and then hello wake up...as I say, it was a ready for prime time question any way you cut it.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Thanks for the info, gardenie!
                                    Life doesn't have perfect footing.

                                    Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
                                    We Are Flying Solo

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Just wanted to point out in regards to the dressage scores that the IR division had a different judge from the other two divisions. Sure, some of the tests were probably not great, but there were some horses in that division who usually score VERY well, who did not score where they usually are. The different judges could help explain some (not all) of the difference in scores between divisions.

                                      Also, a friend who was riding in that division retired her horse very early on course due to tack malfunction causing her to have little control. She got the horse pulled up and called it a day!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        The entire course was a ready for prime time deal. One of the best courses (Prelim through Advanced) I have seen at the park in a long time. Excellent use of terrain, great accuracy questions, beautifully and meticulously presented.
                                        4B was difficult if you tried to ride it as a 90 degree turn. If you angled the two fences it rode beautifully. The sunken road was tough, the first water, the corner question, the second water and the tobacco barn all required a high degree of control and accuracy.

                                        Hats off to Hugh Lochore, the new course designer.
                                        www.amiddle-agedmadwomantakesthereins.blogspot.com

                                        www.pegasusridge.com

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X