• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Rolex entries are up!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Oops, I misread your title. Thought you meant up, as in numbers.
    "Everyone will start to cheer, when you put on your sailin shoes"-Lowell George

    Comment


    • #22
      And, the Olympics and WEGs are not (most years) held in your backyard, so sadly, in addition to the right type of course, and potentially more/different competition, there is the "trial run" of understanding how your horse travels, what changes you may have to make, dealing with time zones, etc. that could all significantly impact performance at an international venue if you had only prepped in your backyard (for all that I am a huge believer in supporting local events at all levels)
      OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

      Comment


      • #23
        So confused.. everybody bitches when the US doesn't represent well at European events and the Olympics but then wants everybody to stay and play in the same sandbox with the same people every time? And it suddenly becomes more important to support a 4* in the US than to gain more experience as a rider in a challenging environment?

        I would love to see all the top riders at Rolex b/c it is a great event and I love to watch them but I won't begrudge them doing what they/the team feel is the best for their horses and the upcoming championship type events. I feel like the more varied experiences those international caliber riders can get the better off they'll be.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Jealoushe View Post
          Is there a way to do both? IE see where the riders stack up to the Europeans AND support your local 4****?
          Yes. Have multiple UL horses, a big bank account and lots of sponsors!
          One thing you can give and still keep is your word.

          Comment


          • #25
            Not necessarily true. Rolex is early in the eventing season. It would be quite possible to do Rolex and then run in Europe in the late summer and fall. The big bank account is going to be necessary whether you run Rolex or not.

            Saumur is the end of May, so one horse wouldn't do both it and Rolex. Pau is the end of October, isn't it? Pierre Michelet also does Pau and was the consultant for Greenwich and is the course designer for WEG 2014. He's also on the short list for Rio along with D. DiGrazia, CMP, and Rudiger Schwarz, who is Michelet's replacement on the FEI eventing committee. There are more than a few opportunities across a year to run Michelet courses in Europe.

            Originally posted by KateDB View Post
            Yes. Have multiple UL horses, a big bank account and lots of sponsors!
            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
            Thread killer Extraordinaire

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by KateDB View Post
              Yes. Have multiple UL horses, a big bank account and lots of sponsors!
              oh yes of course! How silly of me to overlook that
              Boss Mare Eventing Blog
              https://www.youtube.com/user/jealoushe

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                Not necessarily true. Rolex is early in the eventing season. It would be quite possible to do Rolex and then run in Europe in the late summer and fall. The big bank account is going to be necessary whether you run Rolex or not.

                Saumur is the end of May, so one horse wouldn't do both it and Rolex. Pau is the end of October, isn't it? Pierre Michelet also does Pau and was the consultant for Greenwich and is the course designer for WEG 2014. He's also on the short list for Rio along with D. DiGrazia, CMP, and Rudiger Schwarz, who is Michelet's replacement on the FEI eventing committee. There are more than a few opportunities across a year to run Michelet courses in Europe.
                Its definitely possible to run Pau in addition to a spring run at Rolex. The question, however, is whether that is necessarily the best decision for each individual horse/rider combination. For a horse ready to step up to the 4* level for the first time, Rolex in the spring and Pau in the fall is likely a good plan. But for horses that are established and have the requisite experience, running Rolex might just ultimately chip away at any soundness issues (and they pretty much all have 'stuff' that needs to be monitored').

                Supporting the home 4* event is important, but at what cost? Does the US want a big field at the home 4* instead of wins at the Olympics and WEG? Or does the US want to prioritize big wins? These goals aren't necessarily going to always be incompatible, but there will certainly be times when they are...particularly in a pre-championship year.

                Comment


                • #28
                  To get numbers back up why not run a CCI3* concurrently with the 4* like the old days Lots of national level 3* riders and horses that would benefit from competing amongst the big atmosphere that Rolex creates......

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Of course, the real answer would be for one of the NA 3*s to hire Michelet to design their courses for the next few years. Since he's French, Bromont would seem to be the most copacetic.

                    Speaking of Bromont, any rumors or news on the WEG 2018 front?
                    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                    Thread killer Extraordinaire

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Adelaide has a 2* in conjunction with their 4*, IIRC, as does Pau (?). Luhmuhlen has a whole schedule with theirs, and one is a CIC3*. Burghley and Badminton are always so oversubscribed that just getting all the 4* horses in takes up all three days.
                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by Bikoman View Post
                        To get numbers back up why not run a CCI3* concurrently with the 4* like the old days Lots of national level 3* riders and horses that would benefit from competing amongst the big atmosphere that Rolex creates......
                        Unfortunately, you are then pulling entries from Bromont and Jersey Fresh. If Rolex had a 3*, I suspect that you would ultimately lose one of these events.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Backstage View Post
                          Supporting the home 4* event is important, but at what cost? Does the US want a big field at the home 4* instead of wins at the Olympics and WEG? Or does the US want to prioritize big wins? These goals aren't necessarily going to always be incompatible, but there will certainly be times when they are...particularly in a pre-championship year.
                          I honest to goodness think this nationalism is doing more to negatively impact this sport then even the FEI. 99% of the time this sport about individuals, not teams, not even really country. Do WE, as a country, gain anything if the USA gets gold at the Olympics. Do we run around our local shows going USA USA USA or do we maybe more go "Wow, did you see Mary King's ride at WEG?" (traitor. You are Banished from Eventing.). If we talk, we talk about the best from any country, but we talk about them mainly because we see them.

                          Sinead Halpin is not going to run at Rolex. I read her blog, I understood (in principle) the decision, but that just pissed me off. She got dumped by the Selection Committee, took her horse, trained the dickens out of both and then put her name on the tip of every tongue, both sides of the pond. I respected that, because it was the example of doing what you, the rider wants and can do. Now, as I understand, her horse is not injured, he in no way would be harmed running Rolex, but I now don't get to see one of my favorite combinations, because of some damn potential for a piece of metal that has little impact on this sport, with no guarantee she'll run in the Olympics or WEG. A bird in the hand in this case...

                          We should fill Rolex up to overflowing. We should have it so there is a reason to run a second one. Sinead and others skipping Rolex should tell DOC, thanks, but not again (didn't she get told to not do some events to "save" herself for the Olympics?). Rolex should be our Daytona, our Superbowl, our Wold Series. If what DOC is doing is true, he cheapens Eventing in the US. We should become more vocal in demanding more challenging courses here in the states and just stop trying to compete with Europe. Its like everyone wants to play at the Rich guy's mansion, because ours is not as fancy or nice. Eventing does not need WEG or the Olympics, but US Eventing does need Rolex and more.

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by Backstage View Post
                            Unfortunately, you are then pulling entries from Bromont and Jersey Fresh. If Rolex had a 3*, I suspect that you would ultimately lose one of these events.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by JP60 View Post
                              99% of the time this sport about individuals, not teams, not even really country.
                              <snip>
                              I respected that, because it was the example of doing what you, the rider wants and can do.
                              I haven't read her blog so forgive me if the answer is out there somehwere, but just from reading what you wrote... uh... you're angry because a rider is choosing to do something specific (which you applaude her for doing int he past)? Sounds double-standardy to me. Having injury free is not the only consideration to doing a 4*. And while the medals may not matter to some, you can guarantee that having that credential is definitely worth something to the individual, in terms of sponsorship and paying jobs.
                              ************
                              "Of course it's hard. It's supposed to be hard. It's the Hard that makes it great."

                              "Get up... Get out... Get Drunk. Repeat as needed." -- Spike

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                Originally posted by JP60 View Post
                                I honest to goodness think this nationalism is doing more to negatively impact this sport then even the FEI. 99% of the time this sport about individuals, not teams, not even really country. Do WE, as a country, gain anything if the USA gets gold at the Olympics. Do we run around our local shows going USA USA USA or do we maybe more go "Wow, did you see Mary King's ride at WEG?" (traitor. You are Banished from Eventing.). If we talk, we talk about the best from any country, but we talk about them mainly because we see them.

                                Sinead Halpin is not going to run at Rolex. I read her blog, I understood (in principle) the decision, but that just pissed me off. She got dumped by the Selection Committee, took her horse, trained the dickens out of both and then put her name on the tip of every tongue, both sides of the pond. I respected that, because it was the example of doing what you, the rider wants and can do. Now, as I understand, her horse is not injured, he in no way would be harmed running Rolex, but I now don't get to see one of my favorite combinations, because of some damn potential for a piece of metal that has little impact on this sport, with no guarantee she'll run in the Olympics or WEG. A bird in the hand in this case...

                                We should fill Rolex up to overflowing. We should have it so there is a reason to run a second one. Sinead and others skipping Rolex should tell DOC, thanks, but not again (didn't she get told to not do some events to "save" herself for the Olympics?). Rolex should be our Daytona, our Superbowl, our Wold Series. If what DOC is doing is true, he cheapens Eventing in the US. We should become more vocal in demanding more challenging courses here in the states and just stop trying to compete with Europe. Its like everyone wants to play at the Rich guy's mansion, because ours is not as fancy or nice. Eventing does not need WEG or the Olympics, but US Eventing does need Rolex and more.

                                Maybe I misread but my impression was while Tate wasn't flat-lame, the diagnostics turned something up that made everyone think a step back in training was appropriate - hence the reason he isn't jumping. Same thing happened with Boyd and Neville last year - they were supposed to run Burghley but Boyd thought something was off. Not to be snarky or mean but it's called good horsemanship - nobody knows these horses like their riders. I'm happy to see them making decisions that put the horse first.
                                Our journey - http://charlieandmeeventing.blogspot.com/

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by tle View Post
                                  I haven't read her blog so forgive me if the answer is out there somehwere, but just from reading what you wrote... uh... you're angry because a rider is choosing to do something specific (which you applaude her for doing int he past)? Sounds double-standardy to me. Having injury free is not the only consideration to doing a 4*. And while the medals may not matter to some, you can guarantee that having that credential is definitely worth something to the individual, in terms of sponsorship and paying jobs.
                                  Not to put words in JP60's mouth. He's perfectly capable of explaining himself, but what I took it to mean is that Sinead was told last year not to run Rolex because she was a shoo in for the team and should save the horse for the Olympics. Well, that didn't happen and now she's being told to not run Rolex again for a chance at Pau. Perhaps she has more faith in DOC, and the selectors this time around.
                                  Hopefully the lack of transparency that surrounded the team in the recent past has changed. Time will tell.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    I'd like to see an Advanced HT added back in to the Rolex weekend. They quit doing that when they added the 4* to the 3*, but it was a great way for the upcoming horses/riders to get exposure to the atmosphere. I think it would be a win for spectators, competitors, and vendors.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      The first apparent change in format is how the vet evaluations at the first training session were conducted. After the third day of sessions, all the horses had a full work up, including flexions, scans and an updated history on paper. The hope is that this way we have a starting point and can get ahead of things instead of playing catch up at major competitions. Tate looked fantastic in his clinical evaluation, showing no sensitivity to flexions and also looking great (and wild) on a circle. During the second part of evaluations, Dr. Revenaugh found a weakened area in one of Tate’s scans. This was very surprising because Tate was as close to perfect as you can get in a clinical exam.

                                      Following the exam, Coach O’Connor, Dr. Revenaugh, Dr. Furlong and I had a good chat about moving forward. With the ultimate goal being the WEG in Normandy in August 2014, we decided that we should spend the next few months strengthening this weakness. Our original plan of Rolex this spring seems an unnecessary risk if it’s going to compromise the horse or the big picture plan with Team USA.

                                      This new veterinary process is already proof that the new team system is working. We hopefully stopped a problem before it happened, as well as established an open level of communication between coach, rider, vet and owner. I am pleased to say that those involved with the Tate and On Cue syndicate have been amazing and fully supportive of putting the horse first.

                                      The support that Tate and I have received over the past year has been incredible. I was really looking forward to competing at Rolex and hopefully allowing some of Tate’s supporters to come out and see him do his thing, but for the moment the timing is not quite right, and, as we have learned in the past year, timing is everything. Some people might ask why I am sharing this information publicly, and, to be honest, I feel like I owe it to all those who have been part of this ongoing journey with us. Tate is completely sound and happy. He is staying in full flatwork — his precious night turnout is not being taken away — and he will still take part in Team USA training sessions.

                                      Thank you for your continued support and Go USA!

                                      Sinead and Team S.H.E
                                      In this case, it is not politics or random decision making. They are putting the horse first, based on a proactive process that I hope they continue to use for all training group horses (and hopefully can expand to all eligible horses)
                                      OTTBs rule, but spots are good too!

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Here's my 2 cents..

                                        I don't care what ULR and ULH compete at Rolex. If you can make it around cross country with no jumping penalties, well then, in my book, you've done something and I'm going to cheer for you like you were KOC when you gallop away from one of the tough combinations (I like the ditch and bank stuff) because you have prepared your horse and yourself well to do it on the day of.

                                        Are the big names fun to watch, I love PD because he makes it look easy and I love Buck because you can tell exactly how hard it is and he does it anyway.

                                        Watching MK last year was special, not because of her credentials, but because they were both homebreds she made up herself. And even if they'd been made superstars, 1-2 is pretty impressive.

                                        I also loved the little girl who kind of just cantered around XC like she was riding a hunter. She finished and there probably aren't 30 people in the audience who could do it on any given Rolex weekend.

                                        So instead of whining about the "who's who" not coming, how about supporting those who have sacrificed time and money to entertain us while seeking a little hometown glory on the last weekend in April?

                                        That's what I'm going to do.

                                        Right after I get a bag of those yummy roasted almonds and buy something at the Stubben tent so I can get a cool bag.

                                        Carry on.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by LAZ View Post
                                          I'd like to see an Advanced HT added back in to the Rolex weekend. They quit doing that when they added the 4* to the 3*, but it was a great way for the upcoming horses/riders to get exposure to the atmosphere. I think it would be a win for spectators, competitors, and vendors.

                                          Didn't they run a prelim 3 day as well way back when?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X