• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

New Fall Rule at BN and N passed

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Fall Rule at BN and N passed

    http://prc.usef.org/reports/USEFSear...EV&compyear=12

    EV141.13 (440-12) 12/1/2013 1/19/2013

    EV141 Cross Country Scoring [CHAPTER EV-3 Rules for Horse Trials] change to read:

    1. b) Falls –
    (1) First fall of competitor in which the competitor lands on his/her feet and remains standing (Beginner Novice and Novice) 65 Penalties
    (2) Second fall of competitor (Beginner Novice and Novice) Elimination (RF)
    (3) First fall of competitor (Training, Preliminary, Intermediate and Advanced) Elimination (RF)
    (4) First fall of horse Mandatory Retirement
    *to facilitate accurate administration of EV105.3 (Loss of Establishment) Competitor Falls
    will be denoted as “RF” on official score sheets and results.
    It goes int effect NEXT year.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

  • #2
    Hmm... I guess now is the time for me to practice falling off and landing on my feet

    Comment


    • #3
      The implication being that a first fall at BN, N in which the rider doesn't land on his/her feet still results in elimination?
      "With mirth and laughter, let old wrinkles come" (Shakespeare).

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        yes, that is the implication.
        Janet

        chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

        Comment


        • #5
          So if I land on my feet then teeter onto my bum, I'm out? Sigh.....
          --Becky in TX
          Clinic Blogs and Rolex Blogs
          She who throws dirt is losing ground.

          Comment


          • #6
            Stick that landing! Even if, ahh, that isn't necessarily the safest thing to aim for.

            Sigh. I certainly believe that automatic elimination for all falls doesn't build a safer sport, so I guess this is sort of a step in the right direction. Drop, tuck, and roll, self-assess, then leap up and get back on is safer than trying to land on ones feet, but situational judgement is so out of style these days.
            http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

            http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jeannette, formerly ponygyrl View Post
              Stick that landing! Even if, ahh, that isn't necessarily the safest thing to aim for.

              Sigh. I certainly believe that automatic elimination for all falls doesn't build a safer sport, so I guess this is sort of a step in the right direction. Drop, tuck, and roll, self-assess, then leap up and get back on is safer than trying to land on ones feet, but situational judgement is so out of style these days.
              Ruined a knee landing on my feet. No offense, but this is STUPID. Tuck and roll makes a for a much safer landing, but now no one will try to do that--or learn to do that.
              "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
              Thread killer Extraordinaire

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                Ruined a knee landing on my feet. No offense, but this is STUPID. Tuck and roll makes a for a much safer landing, but now no one will try to do that--or learn to do that.
                You think? Maybe it's my advancing age, but my propensity toward self-preservation is likely to outweigh the forfeiture of my entry fee. I suppose I can't assume that others are wired the same way.
                "With mirth and laughter, let old wrinkles come" (Shakespeare).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                  Tuck and roll makes a for a much safer landing, but now no one will try to do that--or learn to do that.
                  Some of us of a, shall we say, more advanced age will still try to minimize the pain of falling even if it maximizes the pain in the wallet.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                    Ruined a knee landing on my feet. No offense, but this is STUPID. Tuck and roll makes a for a much safer landing, but now no one will try to do that--or learn to do that.
                    Yep--struggling to stay on my feet and holding the reins so I could get back on cost me one ACL.
                    Click here before you buy.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm pretty neutral on the 1 fall rule generally, but this seems hard to enforce--probably lots of people will hop back on, and time will be wasted debating whether the landing was foot/knee/butt. I feel bad for the officials.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        1. Hang on for dear life.
                        2. If you have to let go, stop the horse first. Then....
                        3. Touch down with both feet in bounds and stick that landing!
                        4. Use the reins for balance and to make sure you stay on your feet! Who cares about your horse's poor mouth!?
                        Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                        Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I actually thought the one fall rule was okay. Mainly because I fell and suffered a severe concussion (six days of blackout), and the people I was riding with didn't notice anything wrong. I thought it was unfair to give laypeople the responsibility of determining whether a rider was okay to remount. However, I've had many falls where I was hanging on for dear life and then had to give up- and just set my feet on the ground. I believe this was proposed due to the general lack of injury in BN and N falls?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I agree that this could potentially cause some serious injuries.
                            The BF was exercising a horse at the track and it jumped over a shadow. He tried to hold onto the horse and land on his feet. Ended up taking a hoof to the helmet, was totally knocked out, took a trip to the hospital where they told him he had a sever concussion. He missed 2 weeks of work because of the headaches, dizziness and nausea. He comes from a racing family and now owns, trains, and exercises his own horses on top of having a full time real world job.
                            At 65 penalties is it even worth trying to stay on your feet anyways?
                            Tuck and roll should be taught as a basic riding skill. I learned the hard way

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                              Ruined a knee landing on my feet. No offense, but this is STUPID. Tuck and roll makes a for a much safer landing, but now no one will try to do that--or learn to do that.
                              And I broke my leg... a paratrooper break... requiring two surgeries and hardware. If I had landed on my fat rear I probably would've been better off. Stupid rule.
                              You know you're a horse person when your mother, who has no grandchildren, gets cards addressed to Grandma, signed by the horses, cats, and dogs.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                This is a bad rule and will put a lot of pressure on the jump judges.

                                So a person lands on their feet and then sits back on their butt. By rule they are eliminated. Of course, what is going to follow is arguing with the JJ and pressuring the JJ to be allowed to continue.

                                Or how about the person that lands on their feet and then puts one hand down to steady themselves. Elimination or not?

                                What do you do if the person pops off on the other side of the horse, lands on their butt and gets up quickly before the judge seems them on the ground? Eliminated or not?

                                Dumb rule and not thought out well. I had no problem with the one fall rule. You fell off your horse and your out. Clear and easy. People that argue against it should practice more at home so they don't fall off their horse. And yes I have come off my horse during competition.
                                A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  4. Use the reins for balance and to make sure you stay on your feet! Who cares about your horse's poor mouth!?
                                  Or your shoulders. I've trashed my delicate, persnickety shoulder a few times holding on for dear life after taking a tumble.

                                  I don't know what to say to this new "rule." I rather they just eliminate the whole thing in general, at least at the lower levels. This just seems....silly.
                                  Amanda

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I'd rather that they addressed the gaping loophole about falling off in warmup or a previous horse than this. Any rule that starts introducing a "ok/not ok" fall distinction seems like trouble.
                                    The big man -- my lost prince

                                    The little brother, now my main man

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      How are the short riders with giraffes for horses going to get back on anyway? The jump judge can't help them. I guess they better teach their horses to let them mount from a xc jump

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I have to say i think this is just silly. It will be difficult to enforce and I could see getting hurt worse bc you are trying to land on your feet. Plus, really I am in favor of you fall and you are out. It is a competition, if you cant stay on ya don't get to play the game. And I understand that at this level it is probably bc people were wanting to be able to continue to 'school' their young horses around a xc course, which i get. but again I think not having a uniform rule is just asking for trouble.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X