• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

video: a PointTwo failure to deploy

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by LookmaNohands View Post
    Are these air vest companies trying to do something like that? Obviously they cannot judge an impact by looking at the vest like you can a helmet, but are they even interested in looking at videos of falls to see if the vest deployed as designed?

    ...
    Are they taking any interest at all after the sale of the vest to see if the thing worked properly? Or do they just wash their hands of it once it is sold?
    At the USEA meeting, the Air Vest guy said that they want to check it once a year. IIRC they mostly wanted to check for damage from abrasion.
    Janet

    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

    Comment


    • #82
      There are a few things that I would like to point out here. First of all, Reed, you are a respected poster on this forum. Your opinion is valued. Yet I find it interesting that you would not wear a helmet until your girlfriend threatened to leave you. Is there something we should know about helmets that you aren't sharing with us? I also find it ironic that someone with your level of understanding should choose to wear a very old Tipperary vest. As I am sure you are aware....foam has a lifespan and it rarely exceeds 5 years.

      I couldn't care less what you choose to do/wear or not but it would be fair for those that may be influenced by your very strong opinions to know these things.

      Now for my legitimate question.....are you saying that the types of injuries that you are attributing to the air vests did not occur prior to people wearing air vests? Or that we have a higher occurrence since the advent of air vests? I know we do not collect data well in our sport but everything on this board is opinion anyhow so I would like yours.

      I would also like to know if you have seen the medical reports/data from KOC's fall. I haven't and I wouldn't know what to make of it if I had but I would think it would be silly to make claims either way unless one had studied it.

      I have not seen the air jacket companies actually make any claims that their products will prevent compression fractures. Where would one find these specific claims?

      Comment


      • #83
        Wow, hoisttheflag, interesting that you are willing to create an alter to post what you did above. Feels very much like someone that has in interest in the profit of Air Vests..... hmmmm....

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by SevenDogs View Post
          Wow, hoisttheflag, interesting that you are willing to create an alter to post what you did above. Feels very much like someone that has in interest in the profit of Air Vests..... hmmmm....
          Nonetheless, they are all relevant questions.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post

            I have not seen the air jacket companies actually make any claims that their products will prevent compression fractures. Where would one find these specific claims?
            The problem is that the air vest companies have NO IDEA if their product prevents, causes, or aggravates compression fractures.

            They make general safety claims, accompanied by photos of riders who "swear by " the product.
            They have been reprimanded for misleading advertising twice (in the case of Point2) and have not done sufficient studies to know what safety or risk, their product does or does not provide.

            As for RAyers personal choices. no one's business but his own, and helmets have been required in competition for eons.
            Last edited by skydy; Feb. 4, 2013, 07:08 PM.

            Comment


            • #86
              Just FYI alter-person, KOC posted her xrays online, so yes, the injuries were available for study.
              Life doesn't have perfect footing.

              Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
              We Are Flying Solo

              Comment


              • #87
                I applaud hoisttheflag for standing up and making a cogent challenge and am most disappointed that someone would claim that this means he/she has an ulterior motive. Just because someone is willing to stand up and challenge the dominant and popular view on this forum does NOT mean they are doing so for financial gain.

                I just hope that those who lurk on this list are not turned away from potential safety measures because of the dominant and popular opinion.

                Thank you, Hoisttheflag

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by wildlifer View Post
                  Just FYI alter-person, KOC posted her xrays online, so yes, the injuries were available for study.
                  um... xrays online do not = medical reports. :-)

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    I just hope that those who lurk on this list are not turned away from potential safety measures because of the dominant and popular opinion.
                    A statement that cuts both ways.
                    Click here before you buy.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #90
                      Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                      I applaud hoisttheflag for standing up and making a cogent challenge and am most disappointed that someone would claim that this means he/she has an ulterior motive.
                      I suspect it's the creation of an alter, specifically for this post and purpose, that gives rise to the notion that there's an agenda involved.

                      It's hard for me to applaud someone for posting this under a newly-birthed alter. It's not exactly 'standing up', and the 'challenge' would perhaps be more 'cogent' under the real screen name.

                      But really, why the need for an alter on this thread?

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        Perhaps the alter's questions, not his/hers identity or motivation, be the focus of conversation?

                        The world wonders......

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post
                          ... Yet I find it interesting that you would not wear a helmet until your girlfriend threatened to leave you. Is there something we should know about helmets that you aren't sharing with us?
                          Uh, that ASTM/SEI tested helmets did not exist until fairly recently and that growing up we did XC, jumpers, hunters, roped cattle, trail rides, sans helmet etc. Ironically, when I did the h/j, I was wearing harnesses etc. on crap helmets long before anybody else or before they were even required. As for the story, that is now almost 10 years old so I see that it has no bearing on the price of caviar in Chile. Of course my mom, who is in her late 70s still refuses to wear a helmet while jumping.

                          What's the point of your assertion? Do you ask professional cyclists why they don't wear helmets at times? Does that impact the choices you make?

                          Just as I say professional endorsements mean jack when it comes to safety equipment, I suggest you apply the same idea to my postings as well. At least I work to use scientific reasoning combined with studied research to achieve my stated claims. I am not making any claims to efficacy of safety equipment from a personal anecdote or hearsay. If you want a full reference list I can give you one.

                          Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post
                          I also find it ironic that someone with your level of understanding should choose to wear a very old Tipperary vest. As I am sure you are aware....foam has a lifespan and it rarely exceeds 5 years.
                          I have an EXO as well and yet I prefer to wear my Carhartt more than anything, even out trail riding in a high wind yesterday or heading up into the mountains last week.

                          I assume you ask your doctor why they drink or smoke or why they have the diet they do?

                          Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post
                          Now for my legitimate question.....are you saying that the types of injuries that you are attributing to the air vests did not occur prior to people wearing air vests? Or that we have a higher occurrence since the advent of air vests? I know we do not collect data well in our sport but everything on this board is opinion anyhow so I would like yours.
                          Good questions. And we are looking into ways to get the answers. One of the best ways would be to start instrumenting riders the same way MotoGP did when companies started to develop their protective gear - including shoulder air bags. They spent 10 years determining the rates of injuries and accident biomechanics.

                          Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post
                          I would also like to know if you have seen the medical reports/data from KOC's fall.
                          As many doctors here can attest, medical reports have little to no insight into the cause of injury. They are not root cause investigations. The doctors only know what the EMTs convey and EMTS are not trained to conduct root cause investigations.

                          How do I know? From the myriad of root cause investigations I do for medical device failures. I almost always find the medical reports to be inaccurate as to root causes. I usually resort to the actual data, such as x-rays which can be very telling if one knows the various components (see below).

                          So, yes, "I studied it."

                          Originally posted by hoisttheflag View Post
                          I have not seen the air jacket companies actually make any claims that their products will prevent compression fractures. Where would one find these specific claims?
                          Air jacket companies make no claims one way or another other than they "reduce injury." However, since we do not access to full data, their claims can not be verified. Again, something that has been proposed to be rectified.

                          At the same time, the standards they are required to meet are so specious that, as I noted, my Carhartt is considered a valid protective garment. The only testing being done does little to mimic actual events and the data is not reflective of where/how injury can occur. For example, I can make a helmet that would virtually prevent any head injury but it would be so heavy that neck spine injuries would increase.

                          As for the burst fracture, one can utilize the great body of research into injuries sustained in similar accidents where rigid/semi-rigid protective devices are worn (motorcycle, military). Back injuries (fracture predominantly) INCREASE in certain instances such as being thrown from a humvee or tossed through the air as the result of an IED as a result of modified mechanics (force/energy transfer) because the body becomes limited in its ability to flex, and the various safety components do not actually dissipate the energy e.g. you can still break your neck/back in a Zorb, car air bags protect by collapsing, not inflating.

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            Originally posted by JER View Post
                            I suspect it's the creation of an alter, specifically for this post and purpose, that gives rise to the notion that there's an agenda involved.

                            It's hard for me to applaud someone for posting this under a newly-birthed alter. It's not exactly 'standing up', and the 'challenge' would perhaps be more 'cogent' under the real screen name.

                            But really, why the need for an alter on this thread?
                            JER, whoever you are.
                            Most people on this forum post using a hidden identity, so what is the issue with having an alter? I have no problem whatsoever with anyone wanting to have a pseudonym for a pseudonym... it's just a cloak on top of a cloak

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              [QUOTE=JER;6816579]
                              I suspect it's the creation of an alter, specifically for this post and purpose, that gives rise to the notion that there's an agenda involved.

                              It's also the need for a personal attack. I have no problem with true opposing opinions, but as soon as you create an alter and your opening paragraphs are a personal attack, credibility goes to zero.

                              I will defend opposing opinions every day of the week. I have actually stopped posting on the air vests. It is a risk/benefit calculation that each of us must do. For me, the potential benefit does not outweigh the very real risk of being tethered to a 1200 lb flight animal. Further, I don't think enough analysis has been provided to show that the can't do harm, in certain circumstances. Others, feel differently and wear them. Perhaps I should be happy -- they will flesh out the findings, one way or another.

                              But creating an alter for a personal attack that has no real bearings on the information that he has presented, is ridiculous and makes me wonder exactly has the motivation to do such a thing.

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Most people on this forum post using a hidden identity
                                Most people are using a screen name, and after posters have been around for a little while the "real" identities of people become known, if one has even a shred of interest in finding out. I've been announced as "deltawave" at HORSE SHOWS (by other COTHers) and it is as much a nickname as anything else.

                                Perhaps to a newcomer the screen names might seem like masquerades, but nothing could be further from the truth. Creating an alter to actually remain incognito (which is rarely done unless someone has something to hide, an axe to grind, or an agenda to support) is not the same as using the same nickname one has had all the way back when "COTH" was the old USCTA bulletin board. Yeah, 15 years with the same screen name, and "delta wave" goes back as my on-line persona to 1995. I've got no secrets.

                                DW
                                aka Lynn Cronin, expletives deleted
                                Click here before you buy.

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  Deltawave is Lynn Cronin!!! Had no idea!

                                  I've not been around for long at all and with the exception of a just a few, I have no idea who is who, unless they sign their posts with their actual name.

                                  So creating an alter is something that one does if one wants to grind an axe... maybe I should have an alter and then I won't feel so blasted when I'm called melodramatic or in need of an education.
                                  Last edited by Winding Down; Feb. 4, 2013, 08:20 PM. Reason: shitty grammar

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Nah, that just means you belong here. This is a gritty bunch, but with the exception of a small few, nobody takes the blustering seriously. And although it's an artificial and inhuman means of communication, I know people through COTH who I would absolutely trust like family and many, many good things have happened to me strictly because of COTHers. When I had to put Gwennie down the outpouring of support from people who I barely knew was breathtaking and still makes me weepy when I think about it. I've had a free lease on an awesome horse through COTH, had horse transport arranged, found help getting animals a home, found people to stay with when traveling, had people show up to spend the weekend because I was a COTHer and said I had room . . .

                                    No, it's not the same as and no substitute for sitting around and having a beer with someone (done that, too) but adults with a firm grasp on their own opinions have NO trouble being heard around here, even if they're not universally agreed with. Hell, no group of several hundred opinionated horsepeople are going to agree on EVERYTHING!
                                    Click here before you buy.

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      so why do people not use their real identities?

                                      I apologize... this is off-topic.... I should use PM...

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #99
                                        Originally posted by caballero View Post
                                        Perhaps the alter's questions, not his/hers identity or motivation, be the focus of conversation?

                                        The world wonders......
                                        The world? Perhaps you and your world didn't notice that hoisttheflag's questions were directed specifically to RAyers and not to the general populace.

                                        As for me, I do take exception to unwarranted personal attacks by purpose-bred alters on a thread that I started. That's what I was addressing.

                                        Comment

                                        • Original Poster

                                          Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                                          so why do people not use their real identities?
                                          Because after 15 years of hearty online interaction under the same screen names, this is our 'real' and our 'normal'.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X