• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

For those of you who like to do conformation critiques

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For those of you who like to do conformation critiques

    I posted pictures of our 2 and 3 year old homebreds to my facebook page. If you want to comment on their conformation, and then guess what you think they move like/what their future most likely career would be, I thought it would be fun. They are all registered TBs, and will all (hopefully) race first. If we still have them when they are done racing, I will school them and send them onto their next careers (unless they do super well and we keep them to breed). Revvie is the only one we are planning in advance to keep after racing. If anyone wants to play, after there's a few responses, I'll post what they move like and what their career type tendencies are.



    PS, I posted here in Eventing, since there seems to be more conformation critiques than any of the other forums, plus eventers have a better grasp, IMO, of suitability for a wide range of disciplines.

  • #2
    Your Facebook page won t open


    • Original Poster


      Hmm. Try this link. Maybe I didn't copy it right the first time.


      • #4
        The link worked fine for me!

        They both have a lot of substance! My three year old (March foal) looks much more lanky teenager right now.


        • #5
          I like the Chestnut 3 year old quite a bit (Gem?). She's a nice type. She looks pretty powerful behind...not sure how she moves but she looks like she should be a decent jumper. I generally like them a bit more rangy but she looks to have a strong back. The Partner's Hero Filly (2 year old) also looks like a nice sport type.
          ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **


          • Original Poster

            Thank you guys. BFNE, the chestnut 3 yr old seems to be nice o/f---I've only lunged her over cavaletti on the high setting as part of starting her under saddle. She's got a very pretty, very round jump even over just the 1' cavaletti and has a lovely, slow moving canter. I'm thinking she'll probably be a show hunter after she's done racing. The 2 yr old by Partner's Hero, is a strong mover, if you know what I mean. She's super powerful off the ground when she bucks and plays and likes jumping the drainage ditches in our field. I think she'll end up as either a jumper or an eventer after racing. She's very, very brave about everything.



            • #7
              What kind of racing are they going to do? Steeples? Flat?

              I love this article on eventing conformation: http://www.jwequine.com/jwequine/pdf...on-Eventer.pdf

              I like all of them below the knees except the last one (second chestnut). Not terrible, but not as nice as the previous three. Could be camera angle too.

              The first bay and the first chestnut have very similar body types. I like the strong back, neck set, loin and the location of loin to POH. Their croups are short-ish however, and I don't like how low their tail sets are. Second chestnut has similar body type, but her tail set isn't as low and her croup isn't as short to my eye.

              The second bay has her LS in front of her POH and while many people find that ideal, I don't prefer it (I prefer it right over the POH). But I prefer her HQ (croup length, stifle location, tail set, POB) to the first two. Her back is longer too, which could create better movement and more scope. My money is that she moves really inverted but if you got her working over her back, she might have the best movement out of all of them.

              The last horse has the nicest body out of all of them and I can see why you would keep her. I'm not the best at identifying confo issue on the legs so can't describe what really bothers me. I say they tie in below the knee slightly. I'm sure it won't cause her any soundness issues, and I'm really just being picky. In my opinion, if she had the legs of the other horses, she'd be much better. I also don't like her hocks. I think they are too low and open, making them prone to stress.

              If I were to pick, I think I'd lean toward the second bay filly.

              Take all of this with a grain of salt! I'm not a horse professional Any one of these horses could be a big winner in racing or eventing. So much of it depends on heart and that can't be seen.

              I'd love to see how they move!


              • Original Poster

                Thank you AzuWish!

                Originally posted by AzuWish View Post
                What kind of racing are they going to do? Steeples? Flat?

                Originally posted by AzuWish View Post
                The first bay and the first chestnut have very similar body types.
                It's funny, because they do have similar body types, but neither are related to each other. The first chestnut is 16+ hands, and the first bay is 15 hands at the moment. The two bays have the same mother, and the two chestnuts have the same mother. In fact, the two chestnuts are FULL sisters and they look less alike body wise, IMO. [/QUOTE]

                Originally posted by AzuWish View Post
                The second bay has her LS in front of her POH ...............................My money is that she moves really inverted but if you got her working over her back, she might have the best movement out of all of them.
                What does LS stand for? I got POH is point of hip. As far as movement, she's the second best mover of the batch, but doesn't really move inverted at all, uses her back a lot. She's a very powerful mover with a lot of thrust. (Probably won't be the easist trot to ride!) She moves very straight and efficient without any wasted motion which is what you want for a racehorse. She's got a bit of suspension in her trot and canter, and her gallop is very efficient. When we picked her sire to breed to her mother, we laughed that he was ugly until he started to move then he was pretty breathtaking. Her mother is a very pretty mare, with hunter type daisy cutter movement.

                Originally posted by AzuWish View Post
                The last horse has the nicest body out of all of them and I can see why you would keep her. ........................ I say they tie in below the knee slightly. ..........................I also don't like her hocks. I think they are too low and open, making them prone to stress.
                This one (the second chestnut) is the nicest mover of the four. I think she has the best sport horse body type, although she is lighter boned than her full sister. I think that is what may make her looked tied in below the knee to you (since she doesn't in real life). She's big bodied over less than ideal bone, IMO. She also isn't great at STANDING for pictures. She'd rather be DOING! lol Her hocks have a LOT of scar tissue in them. She got tangled up in a high tensile wire fence when she was 2months old. The tendons, and joint sheath were exposed. She lived in bandages from the stifle down on both hind legs, often being changed twice a day, until she was 16 months old. That's why we plan on keeping her wether she races or no. I've gotten VERY attached to her after all that intensive rehab care. She knows she's "my" horse too. I don't know if she'll be able to race with all the scar tissue in her hocks, but we'll see. She's the one with dressage movement--lots and lots of suspension and sit behind (despite the injury!).



                • #9
                  And I think I failed to mention, I like all four. I hope you didn't think I was beating up on anyone.

                  That's probably why I thought her hocks looked funky if there's scar tissue.

                  Interesting to note on the second bay's movement. SOLD! lol

                  On ugly and then great movement, I wasn't a fan of the tb I'm buying now (March 1!!!!) until I saw her move and was blown away. I never go off straight conformation. Always watch the horse first. I could never buy sight unseen ... I'd make a huge mistake!


                  • Original Poster

                    LOL--oh no, I didn't think you were beating up on anyone! I thought you were very polite. It's COTH, I was kind of expecting someone to rip them to pieces, but I thought it would be a good learning op for a lot of us. I, for sure, don't know all their is to conformation. I know they all have pros and cons for everything--conformation, movement, temperament, work ethic, etc. Plus, I'm not that sensitive. lol

                    I always think it's funny when people (general observation on the horse world at large, not this particular discussion) say a horse can't do x because of conformation y. Yes, things do incline a horse towards certain movement or abilities, but conformation isn't a be all end all.

                    Like the second bay. She is def sport horse potential, conformation, movement. She loves attention and likes our "work" sessions, BUT she has a VERY high opinion of herself, doesn't suffer fools greatly, is smart as a whip, and has a bit of a stubborn streak. And if she feels you are being unfair to her in anyway she will get nasty (lol, just ask my husband who isn't quite as sensitive about how he asks for things!). She's a lovely, sweet girl until you cross her about anything, so probably won't be suitable for the vast majority of people as a sport horse. LOL--but we hope it stands her in good stead racing!

                    That's exciting about your new girl. Some of them are just like that. Not the prettiest hanging in the field, but then turn around to be poetry in motion! Good luck with her. Do you have pictures?



                    • #11
                      Oh I can't resist a picture request!

                      Most of the pictures I have are carefully taken to make her look her best in an attempt to reflect her true quality:




                      Of course then my dad comes to the barn and posts this pic of us on Facebook: http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphoto...36524503_n.jpg

                      She can look pretty rangy, but I love her!