• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What?! No more Nigel at Rolex??!?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    In light of the many recent changes...

    I no longer have any desire to visit Rolex, nor do I any longer dream of riding there. Sad day, but a pretty good indicator of the way the eventing world has started going over the last few years. All these changes under the guise of making the sport better are only making it worse.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Heinz 57 View Post
      In light of the many recent changes...

      I no longer have any desire to visit Rolex, nor do I any longer dream of riding there. Sad day, but a pretty good indicator of the way the eventing world has started going over the last few years. All these changes under the guise of making the sport better are only making it worse.
      In some ways I have to agree. In others, not so much. I don't think some of the changes are making the sport worse... I think it's making it a whole different sport. I want my sport to stay, at its core, the sport it is/was/that I love. And I don't think many of the upper level events are doing that (whether by management or by directive)
      ************
      "Of course it's hard. It's supposed to be hard. It's the Hard that makes it great."

      "Get up... Get out... Get Drunk. Repeat as needed." -- Spike

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by tle View Post
        In some ways I have to agree. In others, not so much. I don't think some of the changes are making the sport worse... I think it's making it a whole different sport. I want my sport to stay, at its core, the sport it is/was/that I love. And I don't think many of the upper level events are doing that (whether by management or by directive)
        My apologies - by "worse", I just meant "different in ways I don't approve of". Not to be a whiner, but that starry-eyed kid inside me that always dreamed of doing a long format (a serious one, not the "novelty division" it's offered as these days) and going to Rolex someday is dead. I don't always agree with Denny, but what we have now is just the abused, bastard child of what was once a great thing.

        Comment


        • #44
          I still love Rolex. But I did write an email and got an answer:
          Thank you for your email. There is no question that Nigel is a wonderful announcer and we are very appreciative of what he has provided our event over the years. The decision to change was not taken without a great deal of consideration, contemplation, and discussion. However, I am very confident that Mike Tucker, the new announcer, will be able help continue to grow our event.
          www.ncsporthorse.com

          Comment


          • #45
            Kentucky without Nigel is like yin without yang. I started attending this event at the 1980 Olympic Selection Trials while it was still a modified horse trials. I remember thinking that someday I wanted to hear Nigel announce one of my rides. I checked that off my bucket list back in the late 80's when he announced a horse trials at St. James Farm in Illinois. But whenever I named a horse, it was Nigel's voice I would hear to see if it sounded right!

            I think to accuse the O'Connors shows a great lack of judgement at best. I have been announced by Brian as well and he is fully capable. HOWEVER, I think to remove Nigel from the announcer's chair is a HUGE mistake. The woman who announces is pleasant, but to me, boring. Wish we could mount a campaign to get him back!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by shea'smom View Post
              The decision to change was not taken without a great deal of consideration, contemplation, and discussion.
              Apparently, these discussions didn't include Nigel. Something about the way this was handled is lacking in class. There's no need for shoddy treatment after 35 years of service.

              Originally posted by shea'smom View Post
              However, I am very confident that Mike Tucker, the new announcer, will be able help continue to grow our event.
              Um, what's this about? How is Mike Tucker going to 'help continue to grow' Rolex via his announcing?

              Does Mike Tucker have a deal with some entity, broadcasting or otherwise, that would give Rolex greater exposure or attract new sponsorship?

              Comment


              • #47
                I'm sorry to see Nigel go, on the otherhand I think some of the heat directed toward the board is a bit unwarrented.

                Originally posted by JER View Post
                Apparently, these discussions didn't include Nigel. Something about the way this was handled is lacking in class. There's no need for shoddy treatment after 35 years of service.
                Normally when an organization decides not to rehire an independent contractor it doesn't necessarily proceed with discussions the contractor is expected to be involved in. Maybe the ones with class here is the Rolex board who aren't publicly airing their grievances with Nigel? I think it would be safe to assume they believe they have reasons and I would bet those reasons--justified or not--are not flattering.

                I bet Michael Tucker will know where to get his hands on a recording of the GB national anthem...

                Comment


                • #48
                  A lot of tacky comments from many folks on this issue.

                  IMO - This is just one more case of an organization deciding to clean out the old and bring in the new. Often the organization has nothing against the "old" except they have been there for a long time. Of course the incoming "new" know how to make everything better and so want to have their own people.
                  Sometimes this works well. . . however, far too often it ends poorly.
                  "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                  Courtesy my cousin Tim

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    To me Nigel was a little breath of England in Kentucky. Moving from the west to Lexington, and FINALLY getting to see Rolex in person, his voice (that I had heard on videotape so many years) was the icing on the cake.
                    I had already thought how sad it would be when he retired, how it would just not be the same. It absolutely never occurred to me that they would dump him.
                    Way to go EE.
                    We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                    www.dleestudio.com

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      This is exactly what i mean by "p*ssing on fence posts."

                      Originally posted by fooler View Post
                      A lot of tacky comments from many folks on this issue.

                      IMO - This is just one more case of an organization deciding to clean out the old and bring in the new. Often the organization has nothing against the "old" except they have been there for a long time. Of course the incoming "new" know how to make everything better and so want to have their own people.
                      Sometimes this works well. . . however, far too often it ends poorly.
                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by JER View Post
                        Apparently, these discussions didn't include Nigel. Something about the way this was handled is lacking in class. There's no need for shoddy treatment after 35 years of service.

                        Um, what's this about? How is Mike Tucker going to 'help continue to grow' Rolex via his announcing?
                        Par for the course for most businesses/corporations in the US.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by JER View Post
                          Apparently, these discussions didn't include Nigel. Something about the way this was handled is lacking in class. There's no need for shoddy treatment after 35 years of service.
                          When I posted that, I was aiming at a neutral position. I supposed I should have said 'There's no need for shoddy treatment on either side after 35 years of service.'

                          Even if this is SOP for businesses and contractors, the world of Rolex Kentucky is a small one. There are no strangers there. Hence the Chronicle article, which is a disappointing read to any Rolex fan.

                          The Chronicle article, if accurate, pointed to some unhappiness and grievances within this small community. I'd like to think there were a number of ways in which this could have been avoided to make a smoother transition. Hurt feelings are just that, but are they really necessary?

                          I am still wondering how it is that Mike Tucker (who, BTW, I very much enjoy) is seen by the organizers as a way to 'grow' Rolex. I thought it was a curious phrasing.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            How is it tacky to point out that yet another aspect of Rolex has become an O'Connor fief/moneymaker? Do we know if the bidding for the sound system came before or after Nigel was not rehired (I was going to say "canned" but that would be tacky) and whether it was an advertised and open process? EEI is a private entity, so one suspects it doesn't have to follow state rules even though KHP is state property. If (say) four entities with experience and hardware were invited to bid, and Brian's was the cheapest and best then all is good business. But there are set up situations in similar circumstances and we all know it.

                            I listened to Mike Tucker as BBC announcer for the Olympics and, IMO, he babbled. Perhaps Rolex is hoping that something comes of his BBC connections. Or that japanese event riders might come.
                            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                            Thread killer Extraordinaire

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              vine, I was okay to say my piece and step back, but your comments (along with JER) percolated my ire back up. Why is the lowest bid the best business? Why is replacing one for another okay to help "grow" the business when there are no real numbers to prove out the ROI. I don't know Nigel (unless he was the announcer that worked a small show where I had my first start and fall)...but both from the comments here and from what I've read he was an icon of the Rolex experience. To dump an Icon that brings in business means either the potential for embarrassment for the business or a better personal deal for the executive management. You don't get rid of Paul Harvey, you don't get rid of Dr Schuller, you don't get rid of Dick Clark until they are either dead, willing to retire, or a liability; they not only define the image, but continue to bring in income.

                              I get where you are coming from, and really, we're not going to change a damn thing, but maybe its about time to speak in the only language executives understand, our dollars. I have no interest to support Rolex and will gladly take my money and support regional events where I can still watch the excitement and hopefully keep the foundation of eventing alive. And for the record, I am not against change, I understand that at times new ideas and new voices can be a positive effect, but nothing in this decision (publicly) indicates good business, just modern business as usual (ego and narcissism).

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                How is it tacky to point out that yet another aspect of Rolex has become an O'Connor fief/moneymaker?
                                Brian started the headset commentary many years ago--before the new stadium, before the new ring, back when there were only a few dozen "members" under the old pavilions at the old ring. It was a concept that he was one of the pioneers of and he worked very hard, and took financial risk to make it successful. Being able to listen to Sally's commentary has been one of the highlights of mine and I'm sure others' Rolex experience for a long, long time.

                                What that means is that the event itself has profited and prospered from his success with very little output of its own. To turn around and act like this has suddenly become an O'Connor fief/moneymaker that he has somehow been magically or unfairly granted because of his last name is patently undeserved--not to mention flat out wrong. (And just when did it become some sort of black mark on someone's character to create an operation that *gasp* makes money?)

                                I hope to hell that they DIDN'T bid it out. When they were forced to use the KHP food vendor that the park put out to bid the food went to crap! Wouldn't that be great if the all the events at the KHP had to bid out all the services they used--NOT! If that were a requirement it would probably become completely impractical as a venue.

                                Personally, if they were going to get rid of Nigel, Brian would have been my number one choice to replace him--not just his equipment, but his voice too!

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by wildlifer View Post
                                  So.....Rolex now has no Nigel and no Rolex (well, at least through the "glorious" FEI). I stopped going when they started assigning seats in SJ and generally made me feel like a 2nd class citizen, around 2006. I think I prefer to remember "my" Rolex, not....whatever this is.

                                  Oh and I agree that the criticism of Brian is completely unwarranted. I have worked with him on multiple occasions - he is a fantastic announcer, very organized, friendly, generous, entertaining, and is very very good at what he does. He has been involved with Rolex plenty of times in the past and he always works hard to do the job well.
                                  I'm with Wildfire, Brian is a super person. Rolex has not been the same for me since 2006. Last time I went was 2008. Nigel was THE voice of Rolex.
                                  I know he has announced Richland park here in Michigan, The first time I went there, I got goose bumps when I heard his voice! You are the best Nigel. Class all the way, much luck with all your endeavors.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Ah, Vineyridge, does it hurt carrying all those chips on your shoulder?

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Mike Tucker is an excellent announcer. My question is why do we have to have a Brit announcer? Rolex is an American competition.
                                      Brian is an American and in my opinion is the best in the country.
                                      Additionally, Brian has served as cross country control for many years. If only for this, I think he deserved a shot.
                                      But these are only opinions. I'm sure Rolex will go on despite some people's disappointment.

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        You are welcome to keep Mike Tucker - if he could preferably be left in USA and miss Badminton,I would for one be very, very happy!

                                        The man drives me crazy with his inane drivel (yes I appreciate you have to fill airtime but please fill it with interesting stuff!) and his constantly getting things wrong.

                                        Anyway here is a post sharing Mike Tucker Gaffs.
                                        http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/forum...d.php?t=553422
                                        The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by FlightCheck View Post
                                          Ah, Vineyridge, does it hurt carrying all those chips on your shoulder?

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X