• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

2013 Winter Training List

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2013 Winter Training List

    Congrats to Sinead for being the only global talent on the list. She deserved to be on the Olympic squad so this is a better late than never way to say "oops we goofed".

    However, I have to say that I really think Allison Springer and Arthur deserve to be in that category too-she and Arthur finished 3rd in the HSBC Classic series last year, second at Rolex and top 10 at Burghley. I firmly believe they're capable of winning a four star. Given that there is a higher classification, it's a little bit disappointing to see them in the category with combinations who have no significant top level success in international competition.
    Last edited by NCRider; Dec. 21, 2012, 12:42 PM. Reason: Fixed Year

  • #2
    2013! Perhaps the Mayan Apocalypse has stalled your brain?

    (off to look at list...)

    Comment


    • #3
      A little strange to see Neville Bardos on the National list, which says he has 'future potential to be competitive anywhere in the world'.

      Neville has had multiple top-ten placings at CCI****, including 10th at WEG and 7th at Burghley. (He's the horse Boyd should have ridden in London.) Future potential, indeed.

      Comment


      • #4
        sad to see some names missing - Mr Mendicott, Otis, Twizzle come to mind. nice to see such a variety of names though!

        Comment


        • #5
          http://eventingnation.com/home/usef-...st-is-out.html

          I wonder if you are allowed to audit the training sessions? probably not... but if So I would be making a trip to Galway Down in March!
          Eventers of the West
          A Facebook group I created for Eventers in the West Region of the U.S.
          Remy - My OTTB Gelding! Love him to pieces!

          Comment


          • #6
            Also, still no Colleen Rutledge.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bastile View Post
              sad to see some names missing - Mr Mendicott, Otis, Twizzle come to mind. nice to see such a variety of names though!
              I noticed this as well. And why isn't Mystery Whisper listed?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by acking01 View Post
                I noticed this as well. And why isn't Mystery Whisper listed?
                Mystery Whisper is no longer being competed by Philip, so I'm not surprised not to see him on the list...

                I'd guess Mr. Medicott is not on the list because Karen will be out of comission for a while with her back...
                ~Drafties Clique~Sprite's Mom~ASB-loving eventer~
                www.gianthorse.photoreflect.com ~ http://photobucket.com/albums/v692/tarheelmd07/

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by tarheelmd07 View Post
                  Mystery Whisper is no longer being competed by Philip, so I'm not surprised not to see him on the list...

                  I'd guess Mr. Medicott is not on the list because Karen will be out of comission for a while with her back...
                  I would assume that Mr. Medicott wouldn't have been on the list even if Karen hadn't hurt her back because during the selection process for the new coach, the O'Connors said that Karen would retire from International competition if DOC were selected. Since DOC was selected, I assume they'll be keeping their word-hence no Mr. Medicott.

                  As for Mystery Whisper, wasn't the plan always that PD would only ride him through London?

                  Surprised not to see Colleen on the National list with her young horse. He's very nice.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bastile View Post
                    sad to see some names missing - Mr Mendicott, Otis, Twizzle come to mind. nice to see such a variety of names though!
                    I am betting Mr. Medicott and Otis are left off the list due to Karen's injury and Otis's injury. They would not probably be ready for the winter training. From what I understood this is just the list for these upcoming sessions. They will re-evaluate after the spring, like how Allison was not on the winter training list last year but obviously made it on to the list for the Olympics.

                    *update* did not read the whole thread before posting this so sorry for redundancy!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It's ridiculous and getting really old that Colleen is repeatedly left off these lists.

                      Happy for Michael Pollard though. I really admire him, especially his attitude in the face of all the tragedy he's faced in the past year.
                      "Last time I picked your feet, you broke my toe!"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Why would Colleen be on the list? She does not fit any of the criteria? yes she is competing at and completing at 4* but is not anywhere near the top 10?

                        I understand she is a crowd favourite and I admire her grit and determination to get out there and do it but on Shiraz she is nowhere near good enough for teams. Also how old is Shiraz now? 14? He has not seen a significant improvement in results and actually I felt at Pau they should have had a really decent shot at a top 10 place even after a distinctly poor dressage as the xc was so hard but they got a heap of time and then a very average Sjing round the next day.

                        I believe Shiraz is giving her unrivalled experience but he will not be the horse that gets her a pink coat.
                        The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Why would Colleen be on the list? She does not fit any of the criteria? yes she is competing at and completing at 4* but is not anywhere near the top 10?

                          I understand she is a crowd favourite and I admire her grit and determination to get out there and do it but on Shiraz she is nowhere near good enough for teams. Also how old is Shiraz now? 14? He has not seen a significant improvement in results and actually I felt at Pau they should have had a really decent shot at a top 10 place even after a distinctly poor dressage as the xc was so hard but they got a heap of time and then a very average Sjing round the next day.

                          I believe Shiraz is giving her unrivalled experience but he will not be the horse that gets her a pink coat.
                          The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Though I like Colleen and Luke, dont get me wrong, I have to agree a bit with Mugsgame. He is not competitive enough to be on the team. His dressage is not there to win, sorry to say. Though I do like her up and coming horse and hope that they will make the list in the future.
                            I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Completely agree with mugsgame. I have talked to other top riders, some listed for the first time on this round, that often have a forgiving 4* horse for the experience of going 4*. They realistically know this 4* horse isn't the one that will get them onto teams, but they now have the knowledge and experience to properly bring along the fancy young horse left back at the barn.
                              Pacific Coast Eventing
                              Standing Yeager GF

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by mugsgame View Post
                                yes she is competing at and completing at 4* but is not anywhere near the top 10?

                                I believe Shiraz is giving her unrivalled experience but he will not be the horse that gets her a pink coat.
                                There are horses on the list that have not yet gone clean or consistently completed at CCI****. One of these is on the 'World' list, which is interesting because if you can't go clear or complete on XC, you cannot be competitive at all. But the USEF sees future potential in them, and feels the combination can become competitive with top-level training. That is what this list is for.

                                I don't think this is about a 'pink' coat. It's a training list. It means the USEF gives these riders/horses training towards making them more competitive.

                                But if we're talking about teams, every team needs a horse that will get around any CCI****, anywhere in the world, anytime, dressage be damned. This is Over to You, this is Opposition Buzz. Neither of those horses were dressage winners, especially not before they got into team training. Team GB has benefited for many years from their inclusion, particularly in their respective roles as pathfinder.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Though I appreciate its about getting training, from what I understand team training is more about adding polish. Sinead's rapid improvement in dressage did not come from US team training it came from what she did at home?

                                  I also appreciate team GB has had huge success using pathfinder horses but these always go clear inside the time and jump good sjing rounds on the whole. Opp Buzz and Over to You mostly scored in the low 50s which is not enough for individual glory (though Over to You did win a silver at WEG) but with a DC is good enough to be a solid team performance if required.

                                  As for the jumping clear XC - I guess if the horse is young and still showing improvement then you look to see if its a regular occurrence or a one off. Imperial Cavalier has had serious blips in his career and when it counted (fall at euros), so has Miners Frolic (WEG and Badminton) but they are still used because when its good its good. DHI Topper had a very naughty 20 this year at a CIC3* but was still going to the Olympics if he had not gone lame. It appears team GB often bank on the riders over the horses!
                                  The only place where success comes before work is in the dictionary.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by JER View Post
                                    A little strange to see Neville Bardos on the National list, which says he has 'future potential to be competitive anywhere in the world'.

                                    Neville has had multiple top-ten placings at CCI****, including 10th at WEG and 7th at Burghley. (He's the horse Boyd should have ridden in London.) Future potential, indeed.
                                    I thought it was odd to see a horse that competed at the Olympics on the National list, as well as seeing Neville there. So now that RM has been to the Olympics he's only considered a nationally ranked horse? It seems to almost support the conspiracy theory that he was only on the team because he was already there.

                                    I agree with those who question Allison not being considered a world talent as well. I know that they had been inconsistent, but I feel like Allison really has turned the corner with Arthur and had some strong finishes this year. How long do people have to live with the mistakes of their past?

                                    I also have to ask why the heck is MLM on any list? Between unsound horses and having to put stewards on watch for her Dr. Feelgood at major events, I can't see her potential to be anything other an embarrassment to the sport. An embarrassment that US Eventing doesn't need at this point.

                                    And while I'm hanging my arse out, making controversial statements, I also have to wonder about putting R Star on these lists as well. I love the mare and I think Kristi seems like an excellent rider, but let's face it, the mare has had some pretty major falls and I worry about their safety. It's not for lack of skill, but I feel they have been lucky with falls and I worry that their luck may run out eventually.

                                    As for not putting Colleen on the list, I understand what musgame is saying, but these lists are for training sessions. Why not ask Colleen and Shiraz to show up at some of the dressage lessons and see if one of the team coaches can unlock the secret for them? If it seems like a lost cause, then don't invite them back. The horse is crazy talented and it seems like they just need that one puzzle piece to lock into place and they will be on fire.
                                    Rhode Islands are red;
                                    North Hollands are blue.
                                    Sorry my thoroughbreds
                                    Stomped on your roo. Originally Posted by pAin't_Misbehavin' :

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Lists are just someone's fantasy game, I think. Or a way for the coach to be able to get his hooks in somebody's horse that he thinks he can "fix" up for a team slot in the future. It's a way to get them in front of real instruction, see if they can learn and improve. Then watch them compete and see if they know how to keep a top horse sound and listen to instruction. Some pairs don't seem to fit in some lists but I am sure there is a reason they are on them. We just don't know it. Or it isn't obvious to us experts here.
                                      Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
                                      Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        IMO, dressage and SJ can be improved. What can't be improved so well is not having a CC machine. Would like to see Colleen and Shiraz have a chance too.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X