• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Would you buy a horse that had failed the vet on flex tests?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I don't think failing a flexion test is a big deal.

    But I do think it is kind of weird that the previous buyers would have stopped there instead of x-raying the joint (since flexions are generally just a guide to what to x-ray). I'm guessing he wasn't an inexpensive horse at that time?

    And weirder still that the owners would just leave it at that non-diagnosis and sell the horse for cheap, instead of paying for an x-ray, diagnosing the issue if any, and pricing accordingly. Maybe he would have x-rayed fine and they could have added "clean films" to the ad.

    I would pursue, but cautiously, as they probably went far enough in their diagnosis to price him where they did.


    • #22
      Without knowing how lame the horse was upon flexion and what the x-rays actually there is no way anyone can make an assesment..also when was the last time horse competied?? Is horse still in daily work?? when was the horse Vetted and after is horse still in work???


      • #23
        Oh the joys of flexions, etc
        I had an old campanger who wouldn't pass ANYBODY'S flexions. And I mean pass. Maybe by the end of the jog line he would have the leg back down after a hock flexion But hey, he was old, had been there done that, etc and was, for the most part, sound enough for our unregonized BN and occasional N CT or HT. Until one day when he suddenly went 3 legged in the middle of a dressage test (yah, that was fun--a race to see if DH got him stopped and signaled the judged he was quitting or if the judge could whistle him out first. It was tie. ANd he walked sound of of the arena. Go figure) We had him looked over--flexed and no surprise there. Radiograph taken of both hocks--BEAUTIFUL!! One tiny little itty bitty spur you really had to look for under a hot light for to find. Hocks looked like a 3 yr olds!! But he was for sure off. They blocked him, just the hock. Re examined him and WOW. Then I rode him there too. OMG. It was like riding a 3-5 y old. We retired him. Would have loved to have MRI back then to see what all was going on in those jts just for grins.

        Story #2: OTTB horse (had been of the track for a while). PPE flexions, etc all 100% clean and perfect. Not a bad step any where. Rads: OMG you should have seen the gravel in the joints. Yes that is jointS. No effusions, no reaction of flexions, was in flat and jumping work already, etc. Vets (yes, more than, in 2 big horse states at 2 big practices!) were amazed!!

        Moral to the story: How bad does the horse respond to the flexions WHEN YOU ARE THERE? What do you intend to do with him in addition to what has been done to him? And what is risk factor comfort zone? Even the prefect ones have things go wrong and there are ones out there ugly as hell the just going cuz ain't nothing else left to break. But would I start with one that is broke all to hell that is a BN horse and barely making it there and buy it with the intention of going advanced? In this day and age? Probably not unless the price was really right and I have economical access to really good soundness support. But if he is broke all to hell, and is a steady eddie at what he is doing and that is what I want to do, ie what he is doing and have him help with it, I would prob consider it if the price was right and could afford the upkeep I knowI am prob looking at later on down the road.

        I hope that made sense.


        • #24
          I am tough when it comes to PPE. I want clean flexions and clean x-rays. I pass on most horses because if this. However, I have never purchased an older, been-there, done-that sort of horse. The ones I've purchased have always been younger and typically have few if any miles under saddle.


          • #25
            I did with a green at the time horse that has now taken me to my first AA jumper show, first recognized HTs, and first fox hunt. Five years later his only lameness was from a stone bruise. My next horse passed his flexions with all 0/5s and he ended up being basically useless because he wasn't sound mentally. Radiographs and nerve blocks are the mostly reliable lameness tools in my book.
            Last edited by ahorwith; Dec. 9, 2012, 04:31 PM.


            • #26
              As most have said, flexion test don't tell you the whole picture.
              Once sold a horse that vet said did not pass flexion test.
              Person decided to buy horse anyway and the horse went on to be a whip horse, whipped off of twice a week for 11 years and was never lame.


              • #27
                I would also have your own vet do a PPE. I also trust my farrier's opinion above most things, and have often brought him along to look at a horse.

                For the record, my 13 year old former chaser passed his PEE with flying colors. God knows what we'd find if we did x-rays. He was in work when I bought him, has been in work since, and has never had a problem.

                I also think a lot depends on what you want to do with him, and if you'd be upping his workload or not.


                • #28
                  As a vet I feel like I need to respond to this thread. Radiographs are by no means the best way to diagnose a lameness. The best was to diagnose a lameness is with a physical exam, and that includes flexion tests. Flexion tests not only "test" the joints but also the associated soft tissue. X-rays very often do not correlate with the clinical degree of lameness that a horse is exhibiting.
                  That being said, sure a horse that fails a flexion could be sound enough for its job. But personally, I would buy a horse with good flexions and bad X-rays over the opposite combination any day.
                  If you like the horse, have your vet examine it. And no, we do not try to make something wrong with a prepurchase just to cover ourselves. That would be dishonest and unethical. We present the results of the exam on the horse as we see it on that day. It is never a guarantee of the future.
                  5, 4, 3, 2, 1, GO - you're on course!


                  • #29
                    HER, I am totally with you! I stop at bad flexions. Period. And my vet has educated me in this regard. But I am always looking for a horse with an eye toward 1-3 years down the road, and poor flexions are, in our opinion, a poor prognosis.

                    And I also totally believe that vets are working with the results of the exam on that day, and ultimately we, as consumers, are provided data and we make the decision to purchase or not to purchase. And I have never felt like my vet was trying to "cover himself," although we know each other well, communicate well, and have a great working relationship.


                    • #30
                      I did, and more than once. What's important is the underlying reason, and whether it's subject to rehabilitation. Admittedly, most of mine are bought and sold as pleasure hacks, not eventers though.


                      • #31
                        I've bought one. But I went a head with my vet (and the owner's permission) to do a full work up with what was wrong. xrayed and ultrasound. It was a very mild soft tissue injury..nothing to worry about long term. Owner treated, I came back and finished the PPE with full xrays.

                        Flexions (depending on who do them) just indicate something. I would want my vet to do them and trust their opinion. But I personally wouldn't move forward unless I had more information....not just xrays but potentially ultrasounds.
                        ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **


                        • #32
                          On second thought, I remember doing this once. Horse had visible scrapes from recent injury. He failed flexion and we came back 6 weeks later and repeated the PPE. We did one ultrasound on one joint, just to make sure. But in this case, there was good reason to believe that there was a temporary injury. I can imagine following up with ultrasound if I was terribly smitten with a prospect.

                          Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
                          I've bought one. But I went a head with my vet (and the owner's permission) to do a full work up with what was wrong. xrayed and ultrasound. It was a very mild soft tissue injury..nothing to worry about long term. Owner treated, I came back and finished the PPE with full xrays.

                          Flexions (depending on who do them) just indicate something. I would want my vet to do them and trust their opinion. But I personally wouldn't move forward unless I had more information....not just xrays but potentially ultrasounds.


                          • Original Poster

                            I found out some more info on this horse and now I can understand the low price. Need to verify it before I post any of it though.

                            He's done 18 events but hasn't evented for a year. Never finished a Novice course. Lots of jumping penalties.

                            Thank you all.
                            Last edited by kookicat; Dec. 9, 2012, 11:11 AM.
                            Horse Show Names Free name website with over 6200 names. Want to add? PM me!


                            • #34
                              I sold a horse 6 years ago that got something like a 3/5 and 4/5 on flexion tests (hind).

                              This horse had no problems for the 3 years (got her as a 3 year old) I had her so I was VERY surprised at the flexion tests...... and worried that potential buyer would say no way...

                              Vet said mare also had bone chip (xrays) in hind ankle....

                              End of the story is that they bought my horse (for a few thousand less) and still years later NO problems at all....

                              In some ways its a toss up..... good luck to you!!!