• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

2013 FEI Eventing Rules--has anyone seen them?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2013 FEI Eventing Rules--has anyone seen them?

    Speculating here, but from this:
    http://www.fei.org/sites/default/fil...0_%20WEB_4.pdf

    it looks as if there have been some very significant changes.

    Since they are to go into effect in 2013, you'd think they would have been available to the public by now. Per the memo, they are in the hands of the NFs or were.

    One aggravating (to me) change is that a CCI now called "Long Format".
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire

  • #2
    Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
    Speculating here, but from this:
    http://www.fei.org/sites/default/fil...0_%20WEB_4.pdf

    it looks as if there have been some very significant changes.

    Since they are to go into effect in 2013, you'd think they would have been available to the public by now. Per the memo, they are in the hands of the NFs or were.

    One aggravating (to me) change is that a CCI now called "Long Format".

    They locked out all amateurs and shortened XC even more. What a ------- crock of ----. ------- maggots.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Either I'm losing my mind, or there is no longer a requirement for three dressage judges for CCIs. And the second inspection is required for competitions with jumping on the last day for 2013 ONLY. Of course, reading tea leaves from the memo is dangerously speculative.
      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
      Thread killer Extraordinaire

      Comment


      • #4
        The qualifications are a bit upsetting. The CIC 2* now requires you to run a 1*? Money grubbing tactics as before you just had to have your qualifications at Prelim. Ehh, well the FEI was never my favorite organization.
        I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.

        Comment


        • #5
          Wow... are these changes confirmed or just a proposal? I have a problem with most of them, especially the new requirements for qualifications. Definitely a money grabbing tactic - these new rules are going to count a lot of talented young riders out for financial reasons alone. They're really going to snuff out chances for a lot of up and coming riders, especially Canadians. In Ontario, we're already very limited to FEI opportunities - qualifying will be near impossible when you now factor in having to haul to Bromont of the US more often for FEI runs... $$$$$....
          Last edited by *Trinity*; Dec. 3, 2012, 12:06 AM. Reason: still irrate!

          Comment


          • #6
            The new requirements for qualifiers definitely throw a wrench in my plans for 2013 as well as a present a big financial challenge. I almost feel like foregoing the FEI entirely and just staying at Horse Trials.

            Also, I believe that after Jan 1, all newly registered horses have to be microchipped for FEI? Or did I imagine that?

            Comment


            • #7
              Wow, I am really upset about the new qualification requirements. Changes are as follows:

              You must have a CIC* to run a CIC2*. Before, you only needed two Intermediates.

              You now need either a CCI* AND a CIC2* or two CIC2* to run a CCI2*. This throws a wrench into my plans, I've entered three CCI2*'s and yet now I have to go back and get another CIC2* before entering one in 2013. My CCI*'s are long expired. And one of mine will expire after 2013, so if I don't get both my CCI2* and CIC3* this year, I have to get ANOTHER CIC2*. GD it.

              Now you also need two CIC3* to go to a CCI4*. I'm mildly ok with that, but it does make things more difficult for me as an amateur who has trouble hitting up more than 2-3 FEI events a year.

              If they're going to add more qualifications, I really would have preferred they extended the time period before the qualifications expire.
              Comedic Eventing on Facebook

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                The new requirements for qualifiers definitely throw a wrench in my plans for 2013 as well as a present a big financial challenge. I almost feel like foregoing the FEI entirely and just staying at Horse Trials.

                Also, I believe that after Jan 1, all newly registered horses have to be microchipped for FEI? Or did I imagine that?

                No, you did not imagine. Yes, FEI horses must be microchipped.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I will never in this lifetime ride at a high enough level to have personal dealings with the FEI. But it sure seems to me that the FEI has moved into regulating eventing in a big way with these rule changes and the one about restricting participation in a non-FEI competition within 6 months of an FEI competition (yeah, I know: that one has been 'splained).

                  Does the FEI mandate similar requirements from the other equestrian disciplines? Is this a matter of bringing eventing into alignment with others or specifically targeting eventing?

                  Last point: much as this may have an impact on the US and Canada, I imagine it will make qualifying an impossibility in many other countries. My initial take is that it will be relatively easy in Britain and the EU. More difficult in Australia/ NZ and the US. Harder in Canada. Next to impossible in South America, Central America, Africa and Asia. But maybe I'm wrong.
                  They don't call me frugal for nothing.
                  Proud and achy member of the Eventing Grannies clique.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There are times when I really would prefer to see eventing
                    out of the Olympics. Then North America (and, perhaps, much of the rest of the English speaking eventing world)
                    could go their own merry way and forget the FEI completely.
                    Robin from Dancing Horse Hill
                    Elmwood, Wisconsin

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Divine Comedy View Post
                      Wow, I am really upset about the new qualification requirements. Changes are as follows:

                      You must have a CIC* to run a CIC2*. Before, you only needed two Intermediates.

                      You now need either a CCI* AND a CIC2* or two CIC2* to run a CCI2*. This throws a wrench into my plans, I've entered three CCI2*'s and yet now I have to go back and get another CIC2* before entering one in 2013. My CCI*'s are long expired. And one of mine will expire after 2013, so if I don't get both my CCI2* and CIC3* this year, I have to get ANOTHER CIC2*. GD it.

                      Now you also need two CIC3* to go to a CCI4*. I'm mildly ok with that, but it does make things more difficult for me as an amateur who has trouble hitting up more than 2-3 FEI events a year.

                      If they're going to add more qualifications, I really would have preferred they extended the time period before the qualifications expire.
                      Well, this is a big deal for me as well. The expense of an FEI event is noticeable, especially now that horse has to be microchipped, along with the vet stuff and now this. I am inclined to just forego FEI events entirely and aim for a series of Intermediates with the goal of going advanced.

                      Wish they would change rules and then institute them one year following, so that we could plan accordingly.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                        Well, this is a big deal for me as well. The expense of an FEI event is noticeable, especially now that horse has to be microchipped, along with the vet stuff and now this. I am inclined to just forego FEI events entirely and aim for a series of Intermediates with the goal of going advanced.

                        Wish they would change rules and then institute them one year following, so that we could plan accordingly.
                        Agreed especially to the part bolded.
                        I am on my phone 90% of the time. Please ignore typos, misplaced lower case letters, and the random word butchered by autocowreck.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Just out of curiosity, could there be a less nefarious reason for increasing the qualifications? I fenced judged a CIC** this year, and for some reason those riders had a lot more trouble with my fence than the intermediate division. 2 rider falls and one horse fall. I was a bit perplexed as to why this was (faster pace maybe?) Regardless, even if too many riders/horses are moving up too fast, they could obviously strengthen the qualifications without requiring additional FEI events.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by kcmel View Post
                            Just out of curiosity, could there be a less nefarious reason for increasing the qualifications? I fenced judged a CIC** this year, and for some reason those riders had a lot more trouble with my fence than the intermediate division. 2 rider falls and one horse fall. I was a bit perplexed as to why this was (faster pace maybe?) Regardless, even if too many riders/horses are moving up too fast, they could obviously strengthen the qualifications without requiring additional FEI events.
                            Nope...no reason to now require a CIC* or , more CIC other than money. Before the rule change, there was no real incentive to do a CIC*....not they are creating one to get more fees. The micro chip I personally do not have any issue with...and it isn't that expensive to do.
                            ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
                              Nope...no reason to now require a CIC* or , more CIC other than money. Before the rule change, there was no real incentive to do a CIC*....not they are creating one to get more fees. The micro chip I personally do not have any issue with...and it isn't that expensive to do.
                              Good to hear the microchip isn't that expensive. I was wondering about that and was considering getting Mick into the vet and rushing through the paperwork for FEI before the end of the year, if that is even possible.

                              I am just majorly annoyed with the increased qualifications. If we had 10 advanced horse trials, we would still have to go back and do a 1* in order to do a CCI**. That is just plain irksome! Wish we could picket the FEI, HAHA!

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                If anyone knows Robert Rittenhouse (? the event organizer from California), he's a member of the FEI Eventing Committee. Perhaps he could explain all this and the reasoning behind it.
                                "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  And this is why I won't give FEI a penny of my money, even if my current horse does make it to * level or higher. I just refuse. I think there is plenty to keep me busy at the USEA levels, ROFL, since he's only at Novice thus far. And I DO wish eventing would get out of the Olympics and away from this behemoth which I can't say has brought anything but grief.

                                  But Ann, the microchip is the least of your worries -- they are very inexpensive, heck we microchip wildlife all the time and buy bottles full of them, I can do it myself. I guess it depends on whether the rule requires that a vet does it. Or at least your vet signs a paper that they did it.
                                  Life doesn't have perfect footing.

                                  Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
                                  We Are Flying Solo

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                                    If anyone knows Robert Rittenhouse (? the event organizer from California), he's a member of the FEI Eventing Committee. Perhaps he could explain all this and the reasoning behind it.
                                    Robert Kellerhouse

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by wildlifer View Post
                                      And I DO wish eventing would get out of the Olympics and away from this behemoth which I can't say has brought anything but grief.
                                      I certainly agree. The first ruling was the initial test, to see the mettle of NFs, riders, horse owners and organizers. Sure, lots of talk, mostly at the lower levels, but the big Kahunas didn't ever really make a stink, because they see Olympic Gold, WEG Gold, or 4* fever.

                                      Round two, and now the Big kahunas get to feel the bite directly. Pay us to play or take a walk...but walk to where? For Eventers there is nothing past advanced that is now not covered by FEI. You want Rolex, pay the piper to dance. You want WEG, pony up the dough or go home. You want Olympics, the only path is paved with FEI gold.

                                      What we are seeing (or experiencing) then is the beginning of splitting equestrian sports into the haves and have nots. The have nots will muddle around in non-sanctioned shows for either the cost or prize money factor, but really denied access to the "premiere" events. The haves will be more and more limited in show options as the FEI drives name recognition (aka BNx) to their coffer...I mean sanctioned shows. This kills me for I love, I mean I really LOVE to watch Events like 4*s, WEG, and the Olympics, but now I find the thought so distasteful I am less inclined to view them. BNRs will do what they have to, but the more they accept the FEI regime, the less control they will eventually have and the more the sport will diminish.

                                      To those who feel microchipping is no big deal...you are not bothered that a NGO is requiring owners to perform an active act upon their horses, just for the sake of running in an FEI event? It is one thing to make passive rules (no drugs, must be proper age), but now they have established they can dictate what will be done *to* a horse. It is not the issue of cost, but sure, if micro-chipping is such a good thing, why is it not required by all NFs. Imagine USEA stating that any horse entered into a show must be chipped. I could imagine the law suit(s). The only way to picket the FEI is to not attend their shows. The only way to stop this madness is to have big visible people say enough is enough and start something new. Yeah, Sterling and I will run a 4* some day.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
                                        Good to hear the microchip isn't that expensive. I was wondering about that and was considering getting Mick into the vet and rushing through the paperwork for FEI before the end of the year, if that is even possible.
                                        I think it was less than $100. But the cost of registering and your passport...that is a lot more. But the microchip alone doesn't bother me as I would love to see us doing it more---and people tracking horses more with it.

                                        I care about this as a breeder...and stop people from mis-representing a horse by just "changing" his name. Microchipping is similar to branding...it helps us know who a horse is. It has NOTHING to do with competing at the FEI levels.

                                        In Europe...all horses have to be microchipped. It helps track horses travelling between countries. I personally think it is a good idea. I know a few breeders here in the US who already do it for their youngstock. I'm considering doing the same thing for mine.
                                        ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X