• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Running Order sold to WFP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by JER View Post
    It sounds to me like Doug tried his damndest and that people stepped up.
    But those people did not step up enough to purchase the horse.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by ahbaumgardner View Post
      But those people did not step up enough to purchase the horse.
      Again, the EN reports intimated that the money was there but that the owner made a decision to go elsewhere.

      And again, there's nothing inherently wrong with an owner choosing to whom to sell. The highest offer might not be the best situation in the owner's eyes, for any number of reasons.

      But in that case, it's not really fair to blame 'americans' or Doug's supporters for not stepping up, because they did.

      Comment


      • #23
        JER, you may be right, but you just as likely may be putting too much faith in the EN report being accurate and unbiased. That has not been my experience with the "news reporting" on that site, thinking of another story involving the threat of another popular rider's horse changing ownership.
        I evented just for the Halibut.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by NeverTime View Post
          JER, you may be right, but you just as likely may be putting too much faith in the EN report being accurate and unbiased.
          I'm not putting any 'faith' in accuracy or inaccuracy. I'm simply stating what EN reported. LesleyGrant is putting forth another version, that Doug Payne and his connections didn't/couldn't come up with the money for the horse. Both things can't be true.

          Again, I'll reiterate my preference for less rumour and more straightforwardness in these matters.

          (Also, I have no idea what other horse/rider/sale hoax you're talking about.)

          Comment


          • #25
            I am now very confused, if they did step up, and they did have the money, then why didn't they buy RO? I think the most straightforward version is that the horse sold to the highest "bidder." It seems like LesleyGrant's version is the easiest for my brain to comprehend.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by NeverTime View Post
              JER, you may be right, but you just as likely may be putting too much faith in the EN report being accurate and unbiased. That has not been my experience with the "news reporting" on that site.
              And full of spin.

              Comment


              • #27
                You know, the only ones who know the entire story are Doug and Patti S. Speculation based on intimations in EN get no one any closer to knowing what really happened. Suffice it to say it was a painful loss to Doug and Running Order, wherever he lands, has room to go higher.

                Comment


                • #28
                  There are economic profits that are beyond the scope of simple accounting profits...

                  The Springsteen's are no longer novice horse owners. Perhaps they were thinking that WFP might be the best rider, and therefore suitor, for the horse. Speculation can be fun Maybe they had a couple riders in mind for the horse here in the US, and who they had in mind was occupied with other mounts, or not interested due to the perceived lack of talent or whatever Doug mentioned about the horse.

                  DP: "Moving forward, I need to be mounted on better quality horses."

                  Hey, if the upcoming coach is agreeing with this, isn't the horse going to face a uphill climb to get on teams here in the USA? Couldn't this sentiment have annoyed the Springsteens enough to favor an overseas purchase? Send it to someone who appreciates it, and will give it the best chance to get to the top.

                  Or none of the above. Maybe one of WFP's children will take over the ride

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by goodmorning View Post

                    DP: "Moving forward, I need to be mounted on better quality horses."
                    I think that many people miss took this statement. I've heard a dozen ULRs come to this conclusion and make similar statements. It likely wasn't a put down of RO but a realization that at this stage of his riding career that if he is aiming for a team spot he has to be smarter about the use of his limited time. He needs a barn full of RO like horses. Not just one RO that he could lose to injury or an owner's choice. So he is realizing that all the horses he puts his time into need to be top quality. Not just having one or two stars in his barn.

                    It isn't a new realization at all. And every rider who I have known riding at these levels comes to this realization. The ones that find a way to be better mounted in their entire string, are the ones who succeed long term. And there are several different ways they make it happen.
                    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Yup! When a professional rider gets to a certain stage in his/her career, it becomes a false economy to take on the type of horses they used to whilst making a name for themselves on the ladder to the top levels. It will do his career no good to waste his time on horses that do not have "team" ability. I know many riders who would never even dream of sitting on horses that they used to ride. It just is not worth it. RO may have been his ticket to the big time, but he may just find that although RO was good for him "at the time", he may, in fact, be a horse that is a distraction from other horses that will take him to the place he wants to be. It is all a learning curve and he should come away from this experience far better at the business side of the horse business. Doug will land on his feet.
                      Last edited by snoopy; Nov. 23, 2012, 01:44 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Again, the EN reports intimated that the money was there but that the owner made a decision to go elsewhere.
                        Doubt it. The person with the money got the horse, which is how it is supposed to work.
                        Wasn't the horse for sale it's entire career?

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
                          Doubt it. The person with the money got the horse, which is how it is supposed to work.
                          Wasn't the horse for sale it's entire career?

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            If I had a horse sold or nearly so and someone came up at the last minute waving money saying they have it now stop the sale...I would not stop the sale as I had a sale in progress and to stop the sale would be dishonorable if not exactly dishonest. I can envision a lot of scenarios where I would be uninterested in stopping a good sale at the last minute even if the former rider were the person. Selling horses is hard enough and to try to please everyone is impossible. Time to move on for everyone. There are many good horses out there and that is where the energy needs to be. Doesn't seem like anyone did anything wrong.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
                              Doubt it. The person with the money got the horse, which is how it is supposed to work.
                              Are you stating this as fact or opinion?

                              IME, money is one reason but often not the sole reason for a particular sale. Sometimes, there is more than one entity with the money. Many other factors weigh in, including and especially relationships.

                              columbus made some good points on this topic, including that there's nothing wrong with it, except the outcome can result in disappointment -- and occasionally, hurt feelings -- to some prospective buyers.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                But snoops - we haven't done a particularly good job of evaluating horses or late, have we? Perhaps some of the horses we 'used to ride' are the types we should be riding. Maybe they will at least pass the jog.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Both

                                  From my understanding, Doug had ample time to try and buy the horse, and considering the owners had no interest in owning an event horse, he could have pulled together something to buy him in the four years it was with him. It was "cheap" as far as 4* horses go.
                                  Purely speculation on my part, but I am curious who set the price? Was it Doug?

                                  There were several people (Americans) interested in buying the horse. They were all given a shot at buying it before a certain deadline or it was being sold to WFP. I was made aware of the deadline as Im sure many others were as well. I see nothing nefarious about it.
                                  Doug is a phenomenal talent and an enterprising dude, he will have lovely horses to ride.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by FairWeather View Post
                                    Both

                                    From my understanding, Doug had ample time to try and buy the horse, and considering the owners had no interest in owning an event horse, he could have pulled together something to buy him in the four years it was with him. It was "cheap" as far as 4* horses go.
                                    Purely speculation on my part, but I am curious who set the price? Was it Doug?

                                    There were several people (Americans) interested in buying the horse. They were all given a shot at buying it before a certain deadline or it was being sold to WFP. I was made aware of the deadline as Im sure many others were as well. I see nothing nefarious about it.
                                    Doug is a phenomenal talent and an enterprising dude, he will have lovely horses to ride.

                                    Fairweather speaks much sense here. Thank you!

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Looks like an American did buy Running Order...

                                      Eventing Nation

                                      Horse and Hound
                                      You know you're a horse person when your mother, who has no grandchildren, gets cards addressed to Grandma, signed by the horses, cats, and dogs.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by PonyGal08 View Post
                                        Looks like an American did buy Running Order.
                                        Not sure if that makes things better or worse. Interesting that a good American owner has multiple horses with a rider across the pond. Owning a horse that's based in the US, with a US rider, too much of a hassle - ?

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by goodmorning View Post
                                          Not sure if that makes things better or worse. Interesting that a good American owner has multiple horses with a rider across the pond. Owning a horse that's based in the US, with a US rider, too much of a hassle - ?
                                          Ask Jane Clarke!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X