• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

No unrecognized or schooling shows for ULR's ...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by EventerAJ View Post
    I think this is the case. They're after elephants, not gnats. I expect the FEI to clarify the issue soon.
    FTFY

    I would hope the FEI clarifies, officially, because any other body is either reading something not available to the common man from the FEI or is attempting to spin it. By official I mean a document (pdf) that defines "non-sanctioned" beyond what was printed.

    Comment


    • It has been clarified by the FEI. EN has the latest.

      http://eventingnation.com/home/appar...ing-shows.html

      It does not apply to schooling shows.

      Comment


      • http://eventingnation.com/home/appar...ing-shows.html

        Beaten to the punch. Again.

        Comment


        • Gotta love EN!
          They don't call me frugal for nothing.
          Proud and achy member of the Eventing Grannies clique.

          Comment


          • What is GR?

            "The FEI GRs have always confirmed that the FEI is the recognised International Federation for International Equestrian events for the disciplines it manages. The GRs confirm that a show with more than 15 international riders from more than 4 Nations must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned".
            Kanoe Godby
            www.dyrkgodby.com
            See, I was raised by wolves and am really behind the 8-ball on diplomatic issue resolution.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by frugalannie View Post
              Gotta love EN!
              Yep, but I'd feel better if they had provided a link to the official release. ""trust, but verify". However, what was posted makes sense. One thing the bugs me, why do people use double negatives

              The new rule does not apply to any competition that could never be considered as ‘International’.

              It would just that little bit clearer written as

              The new rule applies to any competition that could be considered as ‘International’.

              Does schooling show fall under the first or second etc etc Felt like it was the King talking in the King and I

              Comment


              • Ok, clarified. But still not happy. While it does not affect me, it still seems the FEI is doing a monopoly/power grab.
                ************
                "Of course it's hard. It's supposed to be hard. It's the Hard that makes it great."

                "Get up... Get out... Get Drunk. Repeat as needed." -- Spike

                Comment


                • So if you have Nina Ligon and some Canadians at your schooling event, you'd better make sure any South/Central Americans are from the same country, and watch out that you don't accidentally let any Australians ride as well... Forget any Europeans competing who may be prepping for Rolex or something. Those schooling dressage shows the Americans rode in (or planned to until rained out) - nope, probably too many people from too many countries to call it a schooling show. Better be FEI.
                  Originally posted by Silverbridge
                  If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                  Comment


                  • GR = General Regulations.

                    Originally posted by CDE Driver View Post
                    What is GR?

                    "The FEI GRs have always confirmed that the FEI is the recognised International Federation for International Equestrian events for the disciplines it manages. The GRs confirm that a show with more than 15 international riders from more than 4 Nations must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned".
                    Last edited by Janet; Nov. 15, 2012, 11:09 PM. Reason: Changed "rules" to "regulations" to be more correct.
                    Janet

                    chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                    Comment


                    • The GRs confirm that a show with more than 15 international riders from more than 4 Nations must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned.
                      Those criteria aren't difficult to meet.

                      What's an 'international rider'? John Whitaker or anyone who's entered a CCI*?

                      It's not hard to find four nations represented even at a schooling show if the location is either (1) very horsey a la Aiken/FL or (2) geographically convenient like most of western Europe.

                      The FEI says it's not out to get schooling shows but what about charity events or charity rides? If they decide your event meets their criteria, the FEI shows up and demands in.

                      IIRC, this is how the FEI took control of endurance -- riders organized rides and invited their foreign friends, only to have the FEI say 'You can't do this without us.'

                      Comment


                      • Still don't like this rule. How can something never qualify as an international show? Who decides? There's a show facility, nice, and local, non FEI and offers prize money for 3'3 hunters @ 25k, trickling down to many lower-lever 'stake' classes which offer $. Can guarantee you there are 15 riders from 4 nations.

                        Some eventers take their non-UL-potential horses to these shows to sell them To school them.

                        Not to mention what that implies to the H/J world as a whole, and I'm sure many other disciplines could take issue with this revision, with that I am not familiar. Surely the reiners could have an issue - as could AQHA - they offer some serious prize $, in no way FEI related! Still stinking with monopolistic tendencies, and I'm sure they are not done expanding their power...

                        How about an event like Fitch's Corner? Not FEI. Think of the impact on these wonderful events, and how the concerns with the FEI could impact their entries.
                        Buck Davidson
                        Bruce Davidson
                        Mark Weissbecker
                        Ferial Johnson
                        Ashley MacVaugh
                        Adrienne Iorio

                        Sure someone more familiar with names can elaborate on this, just took a quick peak - wasn't Boyd there the year before - a non-Olympic year, FWIW.

                        GMHA 'Festivals of Eventing'?

                        Comment


                        • Just guessing here.

                          I would think that, to even be considered as coming under this rule, a schooling show would have to be offering FEI heights/levels.

                          So Prelim (3'7")and above for Eventing,
                          PSG and above for Dressage
                          Whatever height FEI jumper classes start.

                          I do not think it would apply to hunters at all, as hunters are not an FEI discipline.

                          Yes, there are a few unecognized HT at Prelim and above, but not many. But there are lots of schooling dressage shows with FEI classes. Probably some jumper shows too.

                          I would think they also probably would have to be offering at least as much prize money as the FEI rules for that discipline. That seems to be what they care about.

                          At least, if I were writing the FEI rules, that is probably what I would use.

                          That would cut out most of what we consider "schooling" shows for our disciplines.

                          But I think the rule is most problematic in the cases they DO intend it to apply for, the "indoor eventing", the non FEI "big deal" jumping and dressage competitions.

                          I think thier lawyers need to start looking at the anti-trust, constraint of trade, rules in variuos countries.
                          Janet

                          chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by goodmorning View Post
                            How about an event like Fitch's Corner?
                            But isn't that USEF/USEA recognized, and hence OK
                            Janet

                            chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                            Comment


                            • Agreed this is unfair, unworkable and all things posters have said. But....I think there is much more to it behind the veil.

                              This is a way for our NF to force all the very useful, inexpensive unrated jumper shows, HT, and every other low key FEI disciplined event to become sanctioned thus making more money for the NF.

                              Yes, it would be very hard to monitor but as folks have pointed out there will be the whistle blowers.

                              And there is a big demographic that this does not effect and that would be the Hunter industry. Those, at least in my area, have the largest attendance. If I were a manager I would simply delete the jumper classes rather than pay for sanctioning.

                              And we haven't even talked about officials.

                              Who said F....European Idiots? You got that right!!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Divine Comedy View Post
                                It has been clarified by the FEI. EN has the latest.

                                http://eventingnation.com/home/appar...ing-shows.html

                                It does not apply to schooling shows.
                                However, FEI needs to do more than issue a press release with an oops, they need to rewrite the language of the rule to be explicit.

                                I think the intent of their new rule is stupid, btw, but for example a possible way to distinguish would be to use prize money.

                                We still have the problem for reining of AQHA/ApHC/APHA recognized shows, which are not under the USEF umbrella and are very decidedly serious affairs.

                                For example: http://aqha.com/Showing/World-Show/C...n/Reining.aspx
                                If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                Comment


                                • Does anyone know what the USEF (and Canada the Western European nations and Australia and New Zealand) positions were on this?

                                  If the USEF voted for it, I agree with Ruby G. Weber that they were looking to force popular unrecognized shows to get recognition in those areas where resident (and visiting) non-US citizens are common in competition.

                                  I think a lot will depend on how resident aliens are treated in current FEI rules.
                                  "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                  Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by Janet View Post
                                    But isn't that USEF/USEA recognized, and hence OK
                                    But it's not FEI - it's USEF/USEA - so, per FEI, "must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned".

                                    Very mucky, as read as a part of this:

                                    However, if an OC organises a full international show in one of the existing FEI disciplines with invited international riders and does so outside the NF and so is not in the FEI calendar and is not supported by the NF the rule will be applied by the FEI and the suspensions could be invoked.

                                    Because in one statement you have 'FEI & NF' - but, being on the calender of the FEI and the NF are two different things here in the US. Who is to decide what could come re:suspensions? Why are we even allowing this muckiness to occur. I hope the cowboys & cowgirls whoop their a$$.

                                    Originally posted by Ruby G. Weber View Post
                                    This is a way for our NF to force all the very useful, inexpensive unrated jumper shows, HT, and every other low key FEI disciplined event to become sanctioned thus making more money for the NF.
                                    What will this cost our NF, USEF/USHJA/USEA? And what costs will they then pass on to venues, officials, trainers, competitors, and members of the aforementioned organizations? I think they could be making a big mistake, financially, if they think everyone can continue, or will continue to absorb increasing fees. WHY, is the good ol' USA, do we want to relinquish power & $ to a European governing body? I do not get it; not at all.
                                    Last edited by goodmorning; Nov. 15, 2012, 12:55 PM.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by goodmorning View Post
                                      But it's not FEI - it's USEF/USEA - so, per FEI, "must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned".

                                      Very mucky, as read as a part of this:

                                      However, if an OC organises a full international show in one of the existing FEI disciplines with invited international riders and does so outside the NF and so is not in the FEI calendar and is not supported by the NF the rule will be applied by the FEI and the suspensions could be invoked.

                                      Because in one statement you have 'FEI & NF' - but, being on the calender of the FEI and the NF are two different things here in the US. Who is to decide what could come re:suspensions? Why are we even allowing this muckiness to occur. I hope the cowboys & cowgirls whoop their a$$.
                                      But
                                      An unsanctioned event is an event that is not
                                      on the FEI calendar and is not authorised by a National Federation.
                                      Fitches Corner is "authorised by a National Federation." so, the way I read it, is OK.

                                      Also, using your wording, it doesn't fit under either "outside the NF " nor " not supported by the NF ". Since the cases are joined by "and" not "or" it dosn't matter if it is on the FEI calendar pr not.

                                      The suspensions will apply to events that are
                                      "outside the NF"
                                      AND
                                      "not in the FEI calendar"
                                      AND
                                      "not supported by the NF"
                                      Janet

                                      chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                                      Comment


                                      • I understand how you interpreted it Janet (I did too), but why conclude the release with:

                                        "The GRs confirm that a show with more than 15 international riders from more than 4 Nations must be run as an FEI event and under the NF concerned."

                                        ?

                                        My thoughts, to make sure they can use the release as they fit. Something offends, sanctions, non-threatening, they'll let it fly.

                                        Comment


                                        • I think the FEI needs to hire a REAL translator and not rely on BableFish or Google Translate when they publish documents! Then maybe we could understand what the heck they are saying!
                                          Kanoe Godby
                                          www.dyrkgodby.com
                                          See, I was raised by wolves and am really behind the 8-ball on diplomatic issue resolution.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X