• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

No unrecognized or schooling shows for ULR's ...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
    Yeah but what the hell does that mean---and I am a lawyer!!!!? You go to a local schooling show in my area (dressage or a starter event for example) and you absolutely can easily have 15 riders from 4 different nations. What do they consider an "international event"????
    I did say they had bad communication skills ... Anyway I think what that means is that the big events that try to rival the FEI come into play such as indoor eventing and probably there are some big non-FEI SJ comps that would fall into this category too.

    It likely does not mean schooling shows and unrecognised horse trials. Although, really, they are going to need to clarify this AGAIN with better wording.

    Of course in some jurisdictions that this would still fall foul of anti-trust/competition rules as the FEI would still be using their market position to exclude competitors.

    I vote the FEI needs to learn through Com Sci 101...

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Divine Comedy View Post
      "We've been told that the disallowed 'unsanctioned events' with penalties would be full international events in an FEI discipline with at least 15 international 'riders' from more than 4 nations but not organised by the FEI..."

      So it looks like it does not affect schooling shows. Not exactly sure what it does affect....
      That isn't nearly as broad as you might think. It could possibly effect any schooling show in No.Va/MD, Ocala or Aiken SC!

      Comment


      • #63
        So essentially they are defining a schooling show based on who shows up? How is anyone to know in advance (or even, really, there) whether they are at risk of penalty?

        Comment


        • #64
          Totally agree bf! A lot exclusions & possibilities & inclusions to worry about when you are sending in an entry. Not to mention all the QEs.

          Honestly, let's take this time & have USEA & British Eventing (BE) & Canada come together, ditch the FEI, and let the FEI see wat they have left. Rolex, Burghley, and Badders don't need the FEI. Easy enough to adopt their drug & regulatory standards for hosting events. The big three I listed have pride, tradition, and experience in their favor.

          BTW, glad I'm not the only one noticing the anititrust/competition implications here...

          Comment


          • #65
            To put it simply, it sounds like FEI wants a monopoly on money making venues that may attract international riders...EG: The winter florida circuit.
            And doesn't want anyone else thinking they can plunder the riders into doing shows for bigger prizes, not just scores and placings.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by subk View Post
              That isn't nearly as broad as you might think. It could possibly effect any schooling show in No.Va/MD, Ocala or Aiken SC!
              Probably northern California as well.
              If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

              Comment


              • #67
                would this also apply to unrecognized divisions at recognized hunter/jumper/ eventing shows and events (I thought at least in hunterland there were classes run at recognized shows that are not recognized like super baby green division etc.??)

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by AbbyVD View Post
                  I did say they had bad communication skills ... Anyway I think what that means is that the big events that try to rival the FEI come into play such as indoor eventing and probably there are some big non-FEI SJ comps that would fall into this category too.

                  It likely does not mean schooling shows and unrecognised horse trials. Although, really, they are going to need to clarify this AGAIN with better wording.

                  Of course in some jurisdictions that this would still fall foul of anti-trust/competition rules as the FEI would still be using their market position to exclude competitors.

                  I vote the FEI needs to learn through Com Sci 101...


                  What this rule, I suspect, intended to address is how several Middle Eastern teams made it to the Olympics. They had literally private horse shows which allowed their riders to qualify. Kinda nice to have that kind of money.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                    What this rule, I suspect, intended to address is how several Middle Eastern teams made it to the Olympics. They had literally private horse shows which allowed their riders to qualify. Kinda nice to have that kind of money.
                    But even that doesn't make sense. If that was your target, wouldn't you just tighten up the rule as to what shows count as qualifiers? Not try and scare riders from competing in other competitions?
                    ** Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip. ~Winston Churchill? **

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I'm wondering if this rule is in any way intended to stave off competition to the newly created Furusiyya Nations Cup series in show jumping. It doesn't seem as if the Great Colonial Powers can butt heads en masse anymore until the final in September. Which is too bad since those Nations Cups were the next best thing to a World War II re-enactment complete with silly costumes. The USA's John Madden heads the FEI show jumping committee-- perhaps he needs to make a statement to his confused subjects to explain the new format and what is now Not Done.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
                        But even that doesn't make sense. If that was your target, wouldn't you just tighten up the rule as to what shows count as qualifiers? Not try and scare riders from competing in other competitions?
                        Since when did anyone include logic and the FEI in the same sentence.
                        "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
                        Courtesy my cousin Tim

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          I think what they are proposing is called "Restraint of Trade". Restraint of trade is a common law doctrine relating to the enforceability of contractual restrictions on freedom to conduct business. I'm sure you could make a case for them falling foul of monopolies laws too. In fact you could probably get your brain really spinning with the number of laws this would contravene.
                          ... _. ._ .._. .._

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by AbbyVD View Post
                            I did say they had bad communication skills ...
                            I vote the FEI needs to learn through Com Sci 101...
                            This from their official publications. And Abby, they communicate pretty well in many other publications so I do not feel they are leaving something like this open to interpretation.

                            Series and events not affiliated to the FEI
                            The number of series per discipline and per category will be limited in order
                            to have a well structured calendar, to avoid date clashes and to manage
                            Page 3 of 11
                            athlete horse power properly to protect the welfare of the horse. As a related
                            point, the number of competitions that count for a series will be limited in
                            order to guarantee an open market and to avoid closed shops. Athletes and
                            officials will no longer be permitted to participate in both sanctioned and
                            unsanctioned events. If an athlete, horse or an FEI official participates in a
                            non-sanctioned event, such person or horse will be prohibited from
                            participating in any sanctioned events, both international and national, for a
                            period of six months thereafter. An unsanctioned event is an event that is not
                            on the FEI calendar and is not authorised by a National Federation.
                            I really don't think that is very ambiguous. I did look through the FEI publications and did not find anything that defined or stated the "we what we really meant to say is..." type of wording. Of course I'm at work and taking too much time, but I do not feel we should be defending FEI on off hand information.

                            The summary is really split into two parts, the first almost makes sense in that they are trying to limit "series" so there is more options to play. Okay, trying to stop monopolies and allow organizers the chance to play in the big ring may be a good thing for those who want to run sanctioned or recognized events.

                            The second part is the one that is creating the drama and they are not ambiguous at all. For Eventers, it means schooling shows are not on the FEI calendar nor are they authorized by the national Federation (re USEF).

                            I could not find the wording in any of their rules documents, but unless they clarify in any of these documents then the meaning is pretty clear. Do not expect to see an FEI Professional or registered horse at a schooling HT.

                            This would/will clearly split the sport into two tiers, one which provides FEI professionals the opportunity to develop/train horses under FEI rules...at a cost, and those who mainly choose not to play and pay as much and take the chance on un-recognized events. If you want to play with the pros you'll have to become a member of something, pay higher fees, and have you and your horse tracked.

                            No, there is no fog in those words and unless someone can google and post official FEI verbiage (not anecdotal commentary) to expand the definition of "non-sanctioned event", FEI is flexing its power to control the equine sport world.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by bornfreenowexpensive View Post
                              But even that doesn't make sense. If that was your target, wouldn't you just tighten up the rule as to what shows count as qualifiers? Not try and scare riders from competing in other competitions?
                              For those unfamiliar with the qualifier shenanigans, see here.

                              There is an ongoing issue -- in many sports, not just equestrian -- of oligarchal money and IOC dreams. Rich people from 'emerging' (I think that means 'corrupt') economies who want to buy their way in to all things sporting, including to the pinnacle of corruption, influence-peddling and palm-greasing, the International Olympic Committee.

                              You'll have an aristocrat from Doha hosting a lavish competition in some minor sport in the hopes of the aristocrat buying his way in to the IGB. Or a non-sanctioned competition in Russia that boasts prize money that's a multiple of the nominal pittance offered by a World Cup event.

                              We have an aristocrat running the FEI but, really guys, we're lucky as at least she does have a background in the sport. Make an anagram of FEI and you'll get an IGB that's headed by an actual criminal. Or investigate the history of the world's most aptly named sporting organizations, the WTF (which allegedly also stands for World Taekwondo Federation), a consortium of crooks that is forever embroiled in charges of corruption, vote-buying and match-fixing. The former head of the WTF, who used his post as a stepping stone to an IOC vice-presidency, had to resign from the IOC in order to serve a stint in prison on corruption and embezzlement charges. He'd embezzled $3.3M from the WTF and then taken another six-figures' worth of bribes at the IOC.

                              Since his release from the pokey, Dr. Kim has set about collecting honours and conveniently omitting the tawdry details from his biography.

                              This is international sport for you. 'Welfare' is only taken seriously when it's about enhancing their own power or lining their own pockets.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Still leaves the issue of the JUDGES who judge both FEI and non FEI

                                Judges would also have to choose whether they want to work at FEI competitions or non-FEI competitions. Now I wonder which would be better for their pocketbook.

                                Are there enough FEI competitions to keep the judges in work? or do they depend on unrated shows to help out.

                                Would they decide it's not worth FEI or not worth helping out the smaller shows many of them now work with also (at least in driving).

                                I think Canada tried this a few years ago with driving judges and it didn't go well. They had to back off on the idea

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Originally posted by deltawave View Post
                                  This rule does not state that a trainer's clients have to also show at recognized events. They are free to go to unrecognized shows. Eventers don't have to have a trainer with them at all times.
                                  Seriously? My point is not about if you are capable to ride without your trainer on hand, it is the fact that a huge percentage of our riders - specifically the lower level base of the sport - don't have trailers and they don't have trucks. They also may not own a horse and might not be allowed to take the schoolie or lease horse off property without the trainer (if they can get a ride). And of course, the large percentage of riders that help fund our professionals without owning a truck/trailer/horse are the people that need the local shows the most. The trickle down affect of this rule will be monumental.

                                  Really hoping this rule isn't what it sounds like.

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Alrighty then

                                    Alrighty then
                                    Proud Member of the League of Weenie Eventers
                                    Proud Member of the Courageous Weenie Eventers Clique

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Originally posted by JP60 View Post

                                      This would/will clearly split the sport into two tiers, one which provides FEI professionals the opportunity to develop/train horses under FEI rules...at a cost, and those who mainly choose not to play and pay as much and take the chance on un-recognized events. If you want to play with the pros you'll have to become a member of something, pay higher fees, and have you and your horse tracked.
                                      I'm joking about the FEI! But anyway, the clarification from the FEI that the British Horse Driving Trials Association have had (see previous post) is exactly the opposite of this. Riders of any level will be able to compete at schooling shows (club=schooling if I interpret British english correctly). My point was if the FEI meant what they said to the BHDTA then that's not what is in the original document and therefore where a clarification would have been useful.

                                      If the BHDTA clarification is correct then the FEI are trying to stamp out are things like the Furusiyya Nations Cup that directly compete with their own events.

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        The driving community is making a big stink about it on FB with all my driving friends.



                                        This is a really stupid idea.


                                        Originally posted by pegasusmom View Post
                                        Amanda - believe it is a rule proposal. It's making waves in driving as well. Most of the Advanced CDEs are run as FEI events in this country.

                                        The Federation of European Idiots (thanks Flutie!) strikes again.
                                        www.facebook.com/doggonegoodgoodies
                                        http://doggonebakedgoods.com/

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          This makes my head hurt.

                                          I think just about every unrecognized show (jumpers and CTs) I rode at this year had MULTIPLE FEI riders (from YRs to 4*)competing...and not just on baby horses, but on FEI horses. So, so, so freaking ridiculous.
                                          Amanda

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X