• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Air Vest Saved Karens Life...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Is it even possible to tuck and roll with an inflated air vest? Knowing how to do that and being able to do it consistently would have prevented my compression fracture.
    "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
    Thread killer Extraordinaire

    Comment


    • #62
      Viney,
      I wondered the same thing about tuck and roll. I don't see how one could do a number of forward somersaults on the ground to dissipate the energy of the fall. Or keep rolling away from the horse. I have had the horse fall towards me and roll down a hill. I sped up my roll to keep ahead of him.

      I found the backwards or back and sideways trajectories to be the ones that compression fractured my back.. and I didn't land on my back. I started a spin to avoid the back and landed on a seat bone instead. That drove the force up into the spine at an angle.

      How about a thread or article on defensive falling maneuvers to help us?
      Intermediate Riding Skills

      Comment


      • #63
        Well, that is certainly good to know as I've seen plenty of people stopped on course for a blown vest - and that is simply the only reason they're stopped.

        Perhaps it's a training issue with jump judges. Perhaps it's not clear cut in the rules since there's not a lot of mention about air vests in the rules.

        I've already told you, I'm NOT a rep in any way for either company.



        Originally posted by canterlope View Post
        CC, if officials stop a rider because their vest has blown, most likely it is because those officials have determined that the situation is dangerous and are stopping the rider under the dangerous riding rule. If a rider's vest blows and the officials don't stop him, that rider can stop and remove it or continue on. There is no rule which absolutely forces that rider off the course. To say or imply otherwise is misinformation.

        Comment


        • #64
          I'm curious.....

          To those here more knowledgeable than I (everyone)....if you could ask these vest manufacturers to do some testing that would help convince people either way what would it be?

          Is there an actual test that they could be doing that they aren't? Have they done the test and the results are not in their favor so therefore we don't know about it?

          Some posters on this topic appear to have a personal vendetta with the airvest companies and some appear to have genuine and intelligent questions for them. For the rest of us that are trying to make an informed decision it is difficult to know what to believe.

          I know of a few UL riders that wear them happily and are not sponsored....I asked. But they are horseman not scientists.

          So when I read these threads it becomes more difficult to know what the answer is given what appears to be a large amount of misinformation and personal opinion.

          "look deep into his pedigree. Look for the name of a one-of-a-kind horse who lends to his kin a fierce tenacity, a will of iron, a look of eagles. Look & know that Slew is still very much with us."

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Badger View Post
            considering spending hundreds of dollars on an air vest, to use it in a way that is not the manufacturer's recommended application (i.e. using it alone, without a standard safety vest)
            The air vests aren't to be worn without a traditional body-armor vest? Even for riding casually on the flat?
            I have a Fjord! Life With Oden

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
              The air vests aren't to be worn without a traditional body-armor vest? Even for riding casually on the flat?
              From the ProAir description, the manufacture recommends that the vest be worn with a conventional body protector. They say that some riders tell the manufacturer that they prefer to wear it on their own. But I interpret the following as the manufacturer recommending their vest be worn with a conventional body protector:

              Should it be worn with or without a body protector? The safest way to wear the ProAir is in conjunction with a conventional body protector. Some riders who use the ProAir at home or while hunting tell us they prefer to use it on its own — where they previously would have worn no safety equipment at all. But for UK competition, the ProAir must be used with a BETA-approved Level 3 body protector — such as the Racesafe 2010, on which the P2-RS is built. The Point Two ProAir is fully reusable, and requires servicing annually or after every six falls.
              Hindsight bad, foresight good.

              Comment


              • #67
                As a medic, I can tell you numerous stories of people in car crashes, who have serious bruising from seatbelts
                What is a "medic", and do medics avail themselves of the data that show safety belts reduce FATALITIES? Bruises go away. A head through the windshield is permanent, usually.

                This sort of fallacious argument has a name, and is the same as "my grandmother smoked 2 packs a day for 30 years and lived to be 90" or "my friend's neighbor's cousin's doctor told her that if she HAD been wearing a helmet she would have DIED". Random anecdotes do not negate mountains of evidence.

                Is there an actual test that they could be doing that they aren't? Have they done the test and the results are not in their favor so therefore we don't know about it?
                Probably. Possibly. Doing tests is difficult, expensive, and doesn't always produce the data you're hoping for. There is no requirement to report data that doesn't support your product. And if people will swear by and buy the product anyway, why bother?
                Click here before you buy.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Why is that??

                  Originally posted by Cindyg View Post
                  The air vests aren't to be worn without a traditional body-armor vest? Even for riding casually on the flat?
                  Do that open with so much force that it could cause a rib injury or something??

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                    Actually, I can probably provide a better justfication as to how and why airvests cause spinal injuries than the makers can in defending their products. I have already put together a fundamental outline for a research program that I will submit.

                    And I do research in spinal reconstruction.
                    Please add me to the collection of people with an internet crush. (We're going to get to read this stuff if it ends up being all written up properly, right?)

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by gold2012 View Post
                      As a medic, I can tell you numerous stories of people in car crashes, who have serious bruising from seatbelts. I still wear one. People have a legit argument that seatbelts can cause injury. We still wear them though.
                      My husband was in a car crash and suffered severly bruised ribs from the seat belt. The doctor at the hospital siad they had never seen worse briuses without broken ribs.

                      But they also said that, without the seat belt, he would have been dead.
                      Janet

                      chief feeder and mucker for Music, Spy, Belle and Tiara. Someone else is now feeding and mucking for Chief and Brain (both foxhunting now).

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        If the air vest companies want to say, "we're offering this product, we think it could help, here's our data, decide for yourselves" I would be much more supportive.

                        But instead, they're being quite aggressive in their marketing about them "saving lives" to the point that there are people who feel almost an obligation to wear one, that of Course There's No Doubt when in fact there is significant concern.

                        I think that for some people they make sense and I don't object to them being sold while honest research is done. I object to them being sold as if that research has been done and has unequivocal findings.

                        Let me put it this way: it's obvious to all of us, right, that a helmet made of metal would protect your head better than one made of styrofoam and a thin plastic shell, right? And yet, the data would show our intuition to be tragically wrong.
                        If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          I've actually talked to a few pro's about them (and why they weren't worn by many teams at the Games this summer) and I was told that they (ULR's that I spoke to) didn't feel they were safe at that level (Advanced on up), and in fact cause issues when you have minor falls which then become worse when a vest blows and scares a horse. The comment was that they were helpful when riding young horses when you have a chance of getting bucked off, but going Advanced when the risk of falls is more of the rotational variety, not so much.
                          Interesting that the majority of points came from a rider sponsored by one of the air jacket companies. Sad

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Let me add another, somewhat more relevant analogy.

                            The better the body armor for soldiers, the more shattering (cominution and amputation) of the bones we see (based on a study in the American Orthopaedic Journal and presented as part of Combat Life Support training). So we lose penetrating and perforating injuries and now get basically internal trauma underneath the armor as a result of impact.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                              Let me add another, somewhat more relevant analogy.

                              The better the body armor for soldiers, the more shattering (cominution and amputation) of the bones we see (based on a study in the American Orthopaedic Journal and presented as part of Combat Life Support training). So we lose penetrating and perforating injuries and now get basically internal trauma underneath the armor as a result of impact.
                              :-o

                              That's really alarming.
                              If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                One thing that makes me worried about air vests is how they interact with the pinneys that many HTs provide.

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  There is a session on air vests at the annual convention. Anyone planning on going?

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                                    Let me add another, somewhat more relevant analogy.

                                    The better the body armor for soldiers, the more shattering (cominution and amputation) of the bones we see (based on a study in the American Orthopaedic Journal and presented as part of Combat Life Support training). So we lose penetrating and perforating injuries and now get basically internal trauma underneath the armor as a result of impact.
                                    Ow. I think I would rather be perforated then amputated. But that's just me.

                                    I'll stick to my RP -- when I was flipped over my horse's head at a gallop and landed on my back on top of a steeplechase coop (this is why we don't jump ahead), I was thinking one thing: "Wow, this vest is awesome, that didn't even hurt." As my horse galloped away while I sat on the ground with his bridle in my hand, I was thinking......well, that's not PG.

                                    It did its job. If one says "my air vest saved my ribs," I'd counter with, "I bet the foam beneath it did." I can't prove it but as a scientist with a (I like to think) consistent working knowledge of physics and critical thinking, well, it just seems obvious.

                                    There's not a thing in the world that's going to save you when a 1400 lb event horse lands on you after a 6 foot fall, if it even inflates, except maybe blind chance. But if you want to throw $800 at a marketing team, that's a personal choice.
                                    Life doesn't have perfect footing.

                                    Bloggily entertain yourself with our adventures (and disasters):
                                    We Are Flying Solo

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Celtic_Cross: Just want to clear something up that you wrote about the Two Point Hybrid (all one piece) vest. Once it has inflated, it then automatically deflates rather quickly. So if you do have a mishap in the warm up as you suggested, you do not have to take it off. It does not stay inflated. I can check the manual to see the actual timing of it but in my experience its only been a few minutes before it fully deflates and can be used as a regular vest without the air function.

                                      Nancy
                                      www.canterusa.org

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        Originally posted by wildlifer View Post
                                        There's not a thing in the world that's going to save you when a 1400 lb event horse lands on you after a 6 foot fall, if it even inflates, except maybe blind chance. But if you want to throw $800 at a marketing team, that's a personal choice.
                                        Actually, the Exo vest was designed to do just this. It is really unfortunate that the Exo did not have the marketing machine behind it that the air vest companies do. I can imagine the Exo v2.0 being quite a good piece of gear.
                                        Blugal

                                        You never know what kind of obsessive compulsive crazy person you are until another person imitates your behaviour at a three-day. --Gry2Yng

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          Originally posted by RAyers View Post
                                          Let me add another, somewhat more relevant analogy.

                                          The better the body armor for soldiers, the more shattering (cominution and amputation) of the bones we see (based on a study in the American Orthopaedic Journal and presented as part of Combat Life Support training). So we lose penetrating and perforating injuries and now get basically internal trauma underneath the armor as a result of impact.
                                          Question... are you seeing a one-for-one replacement of penetrating/perforating with internal trauma/shattering (i.e. a bullet wound that would have killed someone is now hitting the body armor and breaking ribs)... or because there are less penetrating wounds, that secondary category of wound type has now become the most frequent? Or is it some combination of the two?

                                          I ask out of personal curiosity- I just spent the weekend with a bunch of combat medics and military doctors/surgeons all with multiple deployments, and it was interesting to hear about what they saw injury-wise and treatment protocol 5-10 years ago vs. now in military field medicine.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X