• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

NBC Olympic video on helmet design

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NBC Olympic video on helmet design

    Here is an interesting NBC video clip about the design and testing of helmets for Olympic athletes, equestrian and otherwise

    http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/201...y-helmets.html

    It's too bad that under the U.S. ASTM/SEI system, helmet testing is Pass/Fail compared to a threshold that is many years old and the buying public is not permitted to access actual, relative test results and performance data. IMHO this removes incentives for companies to introduce new, better technology or to strive to higher safety performance. It also prevents buyers from making a more informed buying decision and make their own judgment on the balance of cost versus safety.

    While the USEF does not directly control this process, I feel they should be the leader in pushing for a change in the system.

  • #2
    Great video!

    However, Your assumption that a graded system of safety ratings would be better for the consumer is invalid.

    Ratings are based on FORCES imparted on the brain. These are determined by hundreds of different factors that all can not be measured. Testing can only measure a certain component of safety based on previous experiences and only in a highly controlled environment. Thus, to say one helmet is safer than another leads to FALSE assumptions on the part of the purchasing public. You could spend $1,000 on the SAFEST helmet, but depending on the actual use/impact, that helmet may by the most UNSAFE helmet and vice versa.

    The more data is smeared the LESS the real useable understanding is given to the layperson.

    The companies themselves do little internal R&D and rely on outside engineers and scientists such as Dr. Gupta to design the next generation of safety gear.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Ray: I don't doubt for a minute that the technical data is hard for the lay person to understand, but I do not feel that makes it better to keep it secret.

      Do you feel that the automotive 3*, 4*, 5* safety rating system has NOT pushed automobile manufacturers to make their cars safer?

      I think that having a single pass/fail standard was probably very wise when they were devising the first ever standards for equestrian helmets in the 1990's or whenever it was. That step brought the industry and the sport a huge step forward. I believe we are now ready (or overdue) for step 2. I feel that if we had a good/better/better still rating system that allowed the buying public to spend their safety helmet dollars based on safety results not on space age looking cosmetics that helmet safety would advance more quickly and riders would be safer.
      I understand that the rating system would have some subjective elements, as I am sure the automotive one does. I accept that. I feel that is far superior to what we have now.
      Last edited by Mudroom; Jul. 15, 2012, 07:49 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mudroom View Post
        Here is an interesting NBC video clip about the design and testing of helmets for Olympic athletes, equestrian and otherwise

        http://www.nbcolympics.com/video/201...y-helmets.html
        an if you're Un American you can watch the video here

        Comment


        • #5
          Agree w/ Reed. There's not need to reinvent the wheel for every little tweak a manufacturer might dream up.
          Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
          Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

          Comment

          Working...
          X