• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

number of jumping efforts on xc course

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • number of jumping efforts on xc course

    For the rules gurus, how is a jumping "effort" defined on a cross country course in a recognized horse trial? Is an effort defined as an individual fence (ie., if a series of fences is labeled 9 a/b, that would be 2 efforts), or are they grouped (ie., if a series of fences is labeled 9 a/b it would be considered 1 effort).

    My question came up when I was reviewing the USEA rule book and it lists Novice as 16-20 jumping efforts cross country. I was at two novice horse trials within the past few weeks. The first only had 15 numbered fences, but there were two combinations, so there were a total of 17 fences on the course. The second horse trial was the other extreme. It had 20 numbered fences, but there was a combination so there were actually 21 fences on the course. Depending on the intention of the rule, it seems like one of the courses was not designed per the USEA rulebook. Either the first course did not have enough efforts or the second course had too many for Novice level. Any thoughts on this?

  • #2
    An effort is jump, so 16 A/B counts as 1 Jump, two efforts, in addition there should be 110 M between efforts (except for A/B combos).

    I'm very surprised a TD would not have had the course altered to the maximum number.

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by LAZ View Post
      An effort is jump, so 16 A/B counts as 1 Jump, two efforts, in addition there should be 110 M between efforts (except for A/B combos).

      I'm very surprised a TD would not have had the course altered to the maximum number.
      Thanks for the explanation. One more question, I'm assuming a water splash-though is considered an effort even though it is not a jump, per se. Is that correct?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Sonoma City View Post
        Thanks for the explanation. One more question, I'm assuming a water splash-though is considered an effort even though it is not a jump, per se. Is that correct?
        If it had a number it is an effort.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by LAZ View Post
          in addition there should be 110 M between efforts (except for A/B combos).

          EV 139.2 : "The number of jumping efforts shall not exceed an average of 1 per every 100m commenced."

          Your statement seems to imply that the distance between each effort is thusly governed, but it is not.

          Comment


          • #6
            I was wondering the same thing this weekend as my Training XC had 25 efforts. Can the course designers get exceptions to the rule?
            www.ashknollfarm.com

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by AshKnoll View Post
              I was wondering the same thing this weekend as my Training XC had 25 efforts. Can the course designers get exceptions to the rule?
              EV140.5a: Within the limits shown in Appendix 2, the total number of jumping efforts shall be related to the length of the course

              EV139.2: The distances and the speeds demanded are determined by the intended difficulty of the whole Test. Within the limits shown in Appendix 2, Course Designers may choose the distances and speeds most suitable to the terrain and to the quality and standard of preparation of the competitors. The number of jumping efforts shall not exceed an average of 1 per every 100m commenced.

              Appendix 2 for Training says 20-24 efforts. So I read both rulles as meaning 24 is the max. Even though the distances listed is 2000-2600 meters meaning one could take it to mean that since you can have UP to 1 jump/100 m you could have up to 26 jumps. The rules still say "within the limits shown in Appendix 2", ie a max of 24 efforts, not to exceed an average of 1 / 100 m.

              I would have gone to the TD/Ground Jury and brought it to their attention. They should have removed a jump.

              At least that is my interpretation. Janet?

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                Originally posted by MeghanDACVA View Post
                EV140.5a: Within the limits shown in Appendix 2, the total number of jumping efforts shall be related to the length of the course

                EV139.2: The distances and the speeds demanded are determined by the intended difficulty of the whole Test. Within the limits shown in Appendix 2, Course Designers may choose the distances and speeds most suitable to the terrain and to the quality and standard of preparation of the competitors. The number of jumping efforts shall not exceed an average of 1 per every 100m commenced.

                Appendix 2 for Training says 20-24 efforts. So I read both rulles as meaning 24 is the max. Even though the distances listed is 2000-2600 meters meaning one could take it to mean that since you can have UP to 1 jump/100 m you could have up to 26 jumps. The rules still say "within the limits shown in Appendix 2", ie a max of 24 efforts, not to exceed an average of 1 / 100 m.
                Interesting. The second course I mentioned which had 21 jumping efforts for Novice was only 1850m, so not only did they exceed the maximum allowable number of efforts, but they also didn't abide by the 1 jump/100m guideline.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by groom View Post
                  EV 139.2 : "The number of jumping efforts shall not exceed an average of 1 per every 100m commenced."

                  Your statement seems to imply that the distance between each effort is thusly governed, but it is not.
                  Sorry--I thought it was 110. I realize it isn't exactly a distance between efforts but a guideline; my thought was that unless you've got close to a maximum length course you likely shouldn't have maximum number of efforts--or over the maximum # of efforts. I should have been clearer in expressing my thoughts.

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by AshKnoll View Post
                    I was wondering the same thing this weekend as my Training XC had 25 efforts. Can the course designers get exceptions to the rule?
                    I think this was the same event as I am talking about too, but I was competing at Novice....Area II?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      How long has the rule about average number of efforts per 100m been in there?

                      I'm wondering a bit if that was put in over the past 10 years in an effort to keep upper level courses from being too technical and show jumpy.

                      While rules can be lovely things, for Novice and Training courses for sure I would first ask, " Was it a good course? Did the horse come off it better educated than he went on it?" If so, but the number of efforts wasn't exactly to spec, why get up in arms??
                      http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

                      http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Jeannette, formerly ponygyrl View Post

                        While rules can be lovely things, for Novice and Training courses for sure I would first ask, " Was it a good course? Did the horse come off it better educated than he went on it?" If so, but the number of efforts wasn't exactly to spec, why get up in arms??
                        Not up in arms, just clarifying the rules. And honestly pretty surprised that the TD or the XC course designer didn't catch it since the rules that the above posters quoted seem pretty cut and dry.

                        And as far as if it was a good course or not, I don't think it was. The jumps were crammed together so that there was very little galloping space. We fared fine, it was just very different from any other course I had ridden which is what prompted me to check the rules in the first place.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Fair enough. Just musing about the boundaries between rules and guidelines and reasonable shared expectations and requirements and, and , and. Probably bedtime.
                          http://wildwoodfarmnc.com

                          http://cantersgutenberg.wordpress.co...g-quiet-goose/

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Think I was there too, at T. The 1st half of the course was very sparse and the 2nd half crammed. It would have probably been that way if they had pulled a jump out, too, but then nobody could have complained about the legality. I think it would have ridden better had the jumps been distributed more evenly, but I guess they were a bit constrained in that their permanent features (bank, water, ditch) were relatively close together.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Number of efforts on cross country

                              No, there are no exemptions, either to the total number of efforts or to the average of 1 effort per 100 meters. Did you ask the TD? If the TD, GJ and the CD permitted it, then they were in violation of the rules.

                              Malcolm

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Originally posted by msghook View Post
                                No, there are no exemptions, either to the total number of efforts or to the average of 1 effort per 100 meters. Did you ask the TD? If the TD, GJ and the CD permitted it, then they were in violation of the rules.

                                Malcolm
                                I did not say anything at the time because I didn't check the rule book until after I got home. If I send a note to the the TD, is there any risk that the event wouldn't count for qualifying results since it wasn't run according to the rules? The reason I ask is because I also run competatively, and once I did a 10 miler which after the fact they realized was measured slightly wrong, and it no longer counted as a qualifying race, so messed up a lot of peoples race schedules (including my own). I would hate for people to have gotten results for AECs or area championships here only to have them taken away because I said something! But I do think it's important for the organizers to know, because if someone noticed it, say the morning of the the event before any horses had gone, they probably would have had to fix it before any horses started on course which would have caused confusion and probably delay the schedule. They run another event in the fall so they probably should be made aware of this prior to that event so the same mistake isn't made.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by msghook View Post
                                  No, there are no exemptions, either to the total number of efforts or to the average of 1 effort per 100 meters. Did you ask the TD? If the TD, GJ and the CD permitted it, then they were in violation of the rules.

                                  Malcolm
                                  Wow, that means my pony's first training level course was "illegal."

                                  She didn't mind a bit, as far as she is concerned more is better!

                                  Bring it on!

                                  Comment

                                  Working...
                                  X