• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

2012 Olympics in London...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2012 Olympics in London...

    Have you read about this yet??
    http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...ape/article.do
    We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
    www.dleestudio.com

  • #2
    I've been following this for awhile and yes many Equestrians are not happy with Greenwich. Mind you it's a beautiful park and location to London to die for. I've been there myself and on paper sounds great but not really pratical in terms of cost and suitable venue for the Equestrian segment plus it leaves no legacy to build where the time and money would be better put to use at other Equestrian venues in place already. The UK has a long history of embracing horse sports and there are so many more suitable venues. The location of where they hold the Barbury HT is a fabulous place and spector friendly as well and Hickstead too.

    http://www.barburyhorsetrials.co.uk/

    http://www.hickstead.co.uk/index.php

    But given the way the IOC runs the Olympics it never makes sense to me so why should it be any different for London.

    Comment


    • #3
      I have seen similar reports in other U.K. newspapers. The London Olympics are already seriously over their proposed budget. The present political regime (New Labour) in power in the U.K., who supported London's bid, is unpopular and getting more so. Not only people local to Greenwich, but many others are uncomfortable with the choice of Greenwich Park as an Olympic Equestrian venue. So I would say that there is a small (at the moment) but definite possibility that eventing could be dropped from the London 2012 Olympics. After all, who would have expected the British to ban fox-hunting?

      Windsor Great Park would be a much better venue. Horse events of all kinds are held there on a regular basis. The Queen could foot the bill!
      ------------------------------------------------------------
      But all the finest horsemen out—the men to Beat the Band—
      You’ll find amongst the crowd that ride their races in the Stand

      Comment


      • #4
        What about Powderham Castle? I was there back in 94 and they just revamped their cross country course this year.

        On another topic. I "heard" I think, it announced that Chicago bid for 2016? Does that mean flutie will be hosting the Equestrian portions? <raising my hand> I'll take vacation and volunteer for the entire event (Eventing and dressage and show jumping)

        Comment


        • #5
          Gatcombe?

          It's hosted European Championships before. And Princess Anne would be a great hostess for the Olympics. Or would that give Zara even more of a home field advantage?
          "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
          Thread killer Extraordinaire

          Comment


          • #6
            Why can't they hold the Equestrian Events at one of the facilities used for Badminton or Burghley or Gatcombe, or Blenheim, or Barbury.....
            "Fifteen minutes of excellent work is better than an hour and a half of wandering aimlessly around." -Col. Bengt Ljundquist

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bludini View Post
              On another topic. I "heard" I think, it announced that Chicago bid for 2016? Does that mean flutie will be hosting the Equestrian portions?
              Yes Chicago is bidding. Equestrian would be a Tempel Farms, not Lamplight.

              http://www.associatedcontent.com/art...se.html?cat=14

              Comment


              • #8
                So kind of off topic, but most people have heard about the end of the world being predicted by the Aztecs or Mayans or someone of the like, in 2012, that was always where my aim was, to go to the 2012 Olympics, I remember hearing this and being devastated until i found out that the world is not supposed to end until Nov/Decish...

                Comment


                • #9
                  I personally am saddened by the idea that they would spend all that money to build a temporary venue, and in England of all places. Wouldn't it be better spent on a permanent location, either one already extant or a new one that would be able to host horse shows indefinitely?
                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Poltroon - I agree completely!

                    Bludini - Yup - Chicago's on the short list, but so are Tokyo, Rio and Madrid. Sofar Tokyo is said to have the advantage.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Sightunseen View Post
                      So kind of off topic, but most people have heard about the end of the world being predicted by the Aztecs or Mayans or someone of the like, in 2012, that was always where my aim was, to go to the 2012 Olympics, I remember hearing this and being devastated until i found out that the world is not supposed to end until Nov/Decish...

                      <snort>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                        I personally am saddened by the idea that they would spend all that money to build a temporary venue, and in England of all places. Wouldn't it be better spent on a permanent location, either one already extant or a new one that would be able to host horse shows indefinitely?
                        Ooooo! Ooooo! I know! Take a clue from the Chinese and use a GOLF COURSE! ALWAys a better use of the space for cross country! Hmmmmm. St. Andrews comes to mind <ducking and running>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Okay, I realize that it sucks that it's going to be a temporary venue and they are spending tons when they have some of the most gorgeous horse venues in the world. BUT, for once the horse sports will be in with all the other sports. For once, our athletes can be included with everyone else. For once, they don't have to travel all over kingdom come to get to the venue. For once, our commentators and Olympic organizers will be close to the heart of the rest of the organizers. For once, other sports enthusiasts will be able to easily get to the equestrian events. And maybe just maybe we will have a small window of opportunity to be a mainline sport.
                          Even duct tape can't fix stupid

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by LisaB View Post
                            Okay, I realize that it sucks that it's going to be a temporary venue and they are spending tons when they have some of the most gorgeous horse venues in the world. BUT, for once the horse sports will be in with all the other sports. For once, our athletes can be included with everyone else. For once, they don't have to travel all over kingdom come to get to the venue. For once, our commentators and Olympic organizers will be close to the heart of the rest of the organizers. For once, other sports enthusiasts will be able to easily get to the equestrian events. And maybe just maybe we will have a small window of opportunity to be a mainline sport.
                            Nice dream, but really, non-riders think our sport is like watching paint dry. Since they don't realize, even at BN, how difficult it is to really make a circle 20M and ROUND, diagonals straight, halts square, free walks free. The only exciting part for them is the hope of seeing one of us eat it jumping (without getting hurt, of course) So being inlcuded with the other vunues won't bring that much bigger of a crowd.

                            Have you seen much ping pong or badminton at these Olympics? They're contested in the main venue. If it's not mainline American sport (swimming, gymnastics, basketball, volleyball)forget it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Sightunseen View Post
                              So kind of off topic, but most people have heard about the end of the world being predicted by the Aztecs or Mayans or someone of the like, in 2012, that was always where my aim was, to go to the 2012 Olympics, I remember hearing this and being devastated until i found out that the world is not supposed to end until Nov/Decish...
                              Dec 23rd, 2012 - so we get one more Olympics.....

                              The date is from Aztec mythology and was seconded by the McKenna brothers and their interpretation of the Chinese I Ching.

                              I watch a lot of History Channel....

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                I just figured so much for any chance of it being a remotely gallopy course.
                                We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
                                www.dleestudio.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I think at the end of the day that the closeness of the venues isn't all that important for the spectators. (Very possibly for the athletes.) No matter how close they are, you still can't be in 25 places at once. And I've never had the experience at the World Cup or the like of, "Wow, that was great show jumping. You know what I could go for now? A couple of hours of beach volleyball."
                                  If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    there is no way they will dig up greenwich (a world heritage centre) for a temporary equine facility and do you know why that is? One reason is that part of the plan involves using the adjourning blackheath (open common land) for the horsebox park which is fine but the the officials being given the tour of the proposed site are visiting from the greenwich direction with its marbled white buildings, and dont spend much time i expect in the tenement blocks in blackheath town where most of the residents barely see a horse and could care less about them. the security would be massive, you could park you flash truck there but it might not be where you left it when you return......And i believe as blackheath is common land under british law they would need an act of parliament to dig it up and fence it off. Easy i hear you say, the britsh goverment wants the games they will pass one. well they could try but it would only take one resident to trot to the e high court and the goverment would lose because the laws regarding common lands have charters some on which go back several centuries if not more.
                                    i think the whole thing was a PR excercise to get the games myself the whole idea is ridiculous. and as someone above has said eventing might not even be in it. that descision in the IOC's and nothing to do with the organising comittee. i suppose i dont need to tell you lot on your side of the pond how much money reining is prepared to invest in gettingin and how many members of the American Quarter Horse Association that would back it? and then there is endurance. backed by the money of the maktoums. eventing people will smugly tell you neither of these sports currently fulfils olympic criteria (what ever those are) but do they relly think backer such as these havent thought of that and covered it.
                                    i am a born and bred south londoner by the way and both my brothers still live in the very part of london that will be affected if anyone is wondering.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by lucretia View Post
                                      there is no way they will dig up greenwich (a world heritage centre) for a temporary equine facility and do you know why that is? One reason is that part of the plan involves using the adjourning blackheath (open common land) for the horsebox park which is fine but the the officials being given the tour of the proposed site are visiting from the greenwich direction with its marbled white buildings, and dont spend much time i expect in the tenement blocks in blackheath town where most of the residents barely see a horse and could care less about them. the security would be massive, you could park you flash truck there but it might not be where you left it when you return......And i believe as blackheath is common land under british law they would need an act of parliament to dig it up and fence it off. Easy i hear you say, the britsh goverment wants the games they will pass one. well they could try but it would only take one resident to trot to the e high court and the goverment would lose because the laws regarding common lands have charters some on which go back several centuries if not more.
                                      i think the whole thing was a PR excercise to get the games myself the whole idea is ridiculous. and as someone above has said eventing might not even be in it. that descision in the IOC's and nothing to do with the organising comittee. i suppose i dont need to tell you lot on your side of the pond how much money reining is prepared to invest in gettingin and how many members of the American Quarter Horse Association that would back it? and then there is endurance. backed by the money of the maktoums. eventing people will smugly tell you neither of these sports currently fulfils olympic criteria (what ever those are) but do they relly think backer such as these havent thought of that and covered it.
                                      i am a born and bred south londoner by the way and both my brothers still live in the very part of london that will be affected if anyone is wondering.


                                      Great Post but south of the river??? Dear oh dear

                                      (a little light hearted pi$$ take...lucretia will get it)


                                      Lucetia: On a night bus going to a friends flat I sat next to two folks one who said they lived in Claaahm Common and other Ba-ter-sia...I get so annoyed by that, I started laughing and when asked where I lived, I replied Chizwee.
                                      Last edited by snoopy; Aug. 15, 2008, 07:40 PM.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Random question...does Mark Phillips speak in Cockney slang?
                                        Thus do we growl that our big toes have, at this moment, been thrown up from below!

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X