• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Long Ride Home From Rolex

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Long Ride Home From Rolex

    I look forward to Rolex every year...the excitement of the event, seeing old friends, shopping the trade fair, etc. However, this year my ride home seemed a bit long. The show IMO did not have the sparkle and excitement as previous Rolex competitions. Only half the horses made it to the final jumps...which concerned me. Were the riders too inexperienced? the horses unfit? the jumps too technical? Then the trade fair....well, I think the vendor's fees charged at WEG must have burned a lot of bridges between the KHP and vendor's. For the past couple years, the shopping at the Rolex trade fair has been in decline; this year was really lack luster. I kept going around thinking, "This is it?" Is it the economy? Online shopping? So many of the vendors were service and product related...a need for sure, but not what I was hoping to see.
    P.S. I thought too that the $6.75 I spent for a Pepsi and bag of chips at the refreshment stand ridiculous...that I know was WEG pricing.

  • #2
    I will condition this by saying that I have been busy with showing this weekend, so most of my Rolex updates have been via Facebook statuses and text messages from friends watching live coverage, so forgive me if I am way off base with what my opinion is going to be....

    From the sounds of it, a lot the rider falls were tip offs. Things a few years ago, people could have gotten back on and finished the course, making it to the final day and at least FINISHING, even if it was with a cricket score. Now a tip off of the shoulder or popping off over a shoulder because of a peck means a long, sad walk home. I think it sucks. (Again, I haven't watched ANY footage, so forgive me if I'm way, way off. This is just the impression I've gotten from the snippets I've picked up over the last two days).

    And it does sound like there were a lot of tired horses. Why? Good for the riders who realized they needed to call it a day. But why were their horses not fit enough? What's missing?

    Sounds like the issues were spread about, so I think that's decent design. And I have ALWAYS been impressed with Derek's course design, so I am loath to think the design is bad (and, since there were very, very few horse falls- one, I think? And wasn't it at the 2nd?- I think that is testament to a good design). Again, haven't looked at the course walks, but I've seen enough of his courses to have an inkling of how it was.

    Maybe the riders weren't prepared. Maybe it was just one of those years. However, it IS a four star. It isn't meant to be easy. Sure, I'd like more than 27 to make it show jumping, but there could be so many factors at play, not just one.

    I can't even begin to answer the question about vendors, etc.
    Amanda

    Comment


    • #3
      They really have to aim the top mounts for the top events - Olympics, World Games. Those come on two year cycles. So the top horses will be seen at the Rolex 2011 for the Olympics in 2012, or Rolex 2013 for the World Games in ? not sure where in 2014.
      So in the years like this you'll see less than the top, somewhat, so you will see some hopefuls. Hopefuls make the leaderboard look like it did after XC yesterday. Nature of the four star competition. I thought that the new to the level horses this year were actually a fairly weak sort of field and a few I thought would be quite good were not and a couple of old timers I thought would be great were not. However that should not take away from the brilliance of the rides of Emily Beshear, Sally Cousins, Kate Hicks, etc.
      In addition, the course design was ramped up a bit I believe for several reasons. Giving American riders a "soft" 4-star does us no favors when it comes time to raise a flag and stand on a podium at the end of international team competitions.
      Third -- I highly recommend flying home! Driving is too long and boring! And at the cost of gas, it's almost as cheap.
      Proud & Permanent Student Of The Long Road
      Read me: EN (http://eventingnation.com/author/annemarch/) and HJU (http://horsejunkiesunited.com/author/holly-covey/)

      Comment


      • #4
        I was just thrilled that no people or horses were killed or seriously injured. I thought a lot of the riders made the course look easy, as well. So I don't have any complaints about the outcomes.

        Comment


        • #5
          I second this! No fatalities, no major injuries and "the pack" was well separated! This goes down in my book as a very. good. year!

          I was thrilled with the Rs and the W's! I truly hope and think it was everyone being smarter about what sort of day their horse is having. AND thinking just as much about the future as they are of one particular day or competition.

          I absolutely LOVED the long slow ride around XC our last place finisher took. It was appropriate to her horse and by golly they are safe and sound and have completed a clear Rolex **** XC course (and Rolex itself).

          Bravo to all our smart safe riders, whether or not they completed!

          I'm thinking these are very GOOD OMENS for eventing!

          SCFarm
          The above post is an opinion, just an opinion. If it were a real live fact it would include supporting links to websites full of people who already agreed with me.

          www.southern-cross-farm.com

          Comment


          • #6
            There's already another thread complaining about Rolex this year, maybe you should share your thoughts there.

            My drive home from Indiana was 3 hours, maybe you got lost on the way.
            http://weanieeventer.blogspot.com/

            Comment


            • #7
              I think you have Post Rolex depression. I think Di Grazia's courses are fabulous...very challenging but not dangerous (you know what I mean - obviously it's terrifyingly dangerous- I'm talking relatively!) I like the way he sets up technical lines with lots of run out potential but not horse flip potential. His safety record for the past 2 years attests to the tough but fair design. Thank God Parker is alright but that was not a course design issue.

              I do agree with you about the number of vendors being way down from previous years. Don't get me wrong - I still did plenty of damage but I wished there was more. The one thing I miss most of all is the Area 8 bag check booth - stopped because of high booth fees.

              Comment


              • #8
                I absolutely LOVED the long slow ride around XC our last place finisher took. It was appropriate to her horse and by golly they are safe and sound and have completed a clear Rolex **** XC course (and Rolex itself).
                LLDM, I saw that on the live feed, too - Gina commented on it a few times. I thought it was super - she gave her horse the positive experience of getting around the course, took great care of him, and finished Rolex 2012!
                Only one cat - must not be totally crazy yet!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Having just driven through Indiana from Rolex, I think the OP is depressed because ofthe horrid bumpy highways in Indiana. :-)

                  (that is a JOKE, for those of you lacking the humor gene).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    i went to rolex!!

                    this was my first trip to rolex. i made the final decision to go on friday at 5pm thanxs to my friends and enablers. lauren and i got on the rode at 9. we got to rolex at 745am after driving all night. closed our eyes for 45 minutes and walked in only to discover we weren't dressed warmly enough for the morning freeze. hiked back to parking and added layers only to discover in the afternoon what hyperthermia and exhaustion were all about.

                    i really went to cheer sally cousins on who rode tsunami around a challenging course quietly and beautifully. it was exciting to see all the riders but she is someone i love to ride with. the course was beautiful. i liked that the jumps weren't overdecorated. no bright red cheese wedges with mouse heads popping out of the holes. i did see one very tired horse who was struggling up this hill with the rider spurring it on every stride. we remarked how tired it looked considering it was only fence 15. they were pulled from the course a few jumps later and the reason was "pressing a tired horse". a couple others seemed to struggle also and one was ridden by a very respected upper level rider. perhaps it was the extreme weather changes in temp and what not that mother nature provided.

                    the vendors....well by the time i got there i had been up for 32hrs straight. my dog was overwhelmed as was i. i never made it to the inside vendor area. but i did buy a new bridle and shirt from smart pak who has firmly won a spot in my heart as the best customer service ever. they rock!!!'

                    the food was overly high. i wish there would have been more water for dogs to drink but there wasn't. so i spent a bit on bottled water and let them drink out of my hotdog box. but i expected the price to be high....so i waited to pig out until we left the park. but...the parking was free which surprised me and made me very happy

                    my drive was almost 10hrs. i got home today at 511pm. we were going to stay and go watch sj but i could not find a hotel close enough that welcomed dogs. we did find some but they made you stay in a smoking room. barfffffff and gasp.
                    so finally in barboursville west va we found a comfort inn with a clean room, two fabulous beds with perfect pillows and a hot bath....it was heavenly.

                    i was only disappointed in the less than attractive rolex gear. the material of the teashirts, sweatshirts etc was cheap and the logo this year was very unattractive. the ballcaps were downright ugly. the volunteers had cute ballcaps and if you drove the rangerover and filled out a survey,,,, you got the best ballcap of all with rolex 2012 on the back....i learned this after they left for the day. but i did get two free collapsable dog bowls with gourmet dog bones in each as i entered the park from...rangerover...! priceless for i forgot my dogs bowls in my haste to leave home.

                    it was a super experience and hope to do it right next year...not so hastily. but i had a impulsive blast with lauren and was privleged to watch some incredible horses and riders perform in a beautiful setting.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X